Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 03:29 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
June 25, 2025, 03:06 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
June 23, 2025, 08:28 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
June 22, 2025, 03:34 PM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
June 21, 2025, 01:05 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
June 21, 2025, 07:37 AM

New Britain
June 20, 2025, 09:26 PM

Is Iran/Persia going to b...
by zeca
June 17, 2025, 10:20 PM

News From Syria
June 17, 2025, 05:58 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
June 17, 2025, 10:47 AM

ماذا يحدث هذه الايام؟؟؟.
by akay
June 02, 2025, 10:25 AM

What happens in these day...
June 02, 2025, 09:27 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".

 (Read 3945 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     OP - March 23, 2009, 03:08 PM

    Hello,

    I had a short discussion on YouTube with a user called xingyimaster1987. It's under one of Hassan's videos, which I uploaded with German subtitles:
    http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=U7VjTg3yxj0

    I planned to invite him here, since I'm not in the mood to answer at the moment. So maybe somebody else wants to respond to him.
    Here's a copy of the discussion:

    > xingyimaster1987
    the answer is quite simple. islam is more diverse than 73 sects, madhabs or whatever denominations. their are 1.4 billion muslims which means 1.4 billion islams. everyone moulds islam around themselves and alters it somewhat. everyone has varied opinions. the fact is in Islam actions are based on intentions. Allah (swT) is merciful. if i practice Islam and its completely wrong filled with bidah and even shirk, but my intention was to do what was right and i tried my best, i will have jannah. .
    > AlsanaAziz
    Salam,
    Interesting opinion. What about negative effects? What if a Muslim society thinks that Islam allows child marriages, wife-beating or demands death for apostates or "blasphemy" and stoning for adultery? In fact, these things happen in some Muslim countries. Why are people to suffer because of the Sharia, when it's interpreted in such ways?

    Will Allah still be merciful to these people? They understand the religion like that, can't blame them for that, right?
    > xingyimaster1987
    i see your point, and the fact is a muslims goal is to follow the Quran and sunnah to the best of their ability and understanding. if their intention is pure but they get it wrong they will not be accountable. the same applies to a non-muslims who never recieived the message of islam properly and carried on worshipping an idol with the best of intentions-to please God, they would not be accountable. its only natural variances in practice and belief will arise, so actions are based on intention.
    > AlsanaAziz
    I understand that, however pardoning bad deeds, only because they were done with best intentions, can't be really called justice IMO. Especially not when irreparable damage is done. It's impossible to revive executed people. People's lives are made hellish because they openly say they're gay, they criticize the religion, belong to a different sect or don't want to live a life restricted by "divine rules" etc.

    That is why secular laws are always better, don't you agree?
    > xingyimaster1987
    i would be inclined to say secular laws are better if i had any proof they worked. Islamic shariah is about making an ordered society devoid of as many problems as possible. although the concept of democracy seems nice, does it work in practice. one only has to look at the archetype of democracy, america and see that it has the highest crime rates in the world. saudia arabia, which does not even implement shariah fully (due to bribery and corruption) has significantly less crime.
    > xingyimaster1987
    you clearly do not believe in shariah, i'm assuming because your not a muslim. however for muslims it is from God, who has knowledge of all, therefore it is the best system. my earnest belief is if shariah was implemented fully, their would be no murder, rape, thievery etc. we would live in a safe society. shariah may seem harsh, but its a balance. for me, ordered, safe society is more important than certain freedoms. even the usa does not allow certain freedoms, where do you draw the line?
    > xingyimaster1987
    if a man beats his wife out of anger, knowing that Islam not only forbids anger, but also wife beating can only be done in certain situations and in a certain way then he is accountable before God. if he does not know, their is no blame on him, but he should be advised if possible and if he still rejects the blame is on him. i can't blame a schizophrenic for attacking me (under delusion), that would not be justice. actions should be based on intention and only God knows the intention.

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #1 - March 23, 2009, 03:22 PM

    Shariah creates a safe, ordered society by controlling everyone's lives. It is essentially a totalitarian law. I'd rather have my freedoms personally. I don't need to be subjugated in order to be safe.

    Also Shariah is not perfect, the way it treats women and certain other people is disgraceful. We have fought long and hard in the West to move away from such practices. The people in Islamic countries are fighting back too but this process will take a very long time.

    You can invite him if you like, it'd be interesting.
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #2 - March 23, 2009, 05:40 PM

    As a simple example - women can't attend funerals according to Shariah law. My mother's last living brother died a while back following a family feud and she couldn't even see him go into his grave...

    "At 8:47 I do a grenade jump off a ladder."
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #3 - March 23, 2009, 06:23 PM

    Sorry to hear that Pazuzu, but I'm not sure if Islam teaches any such thing. However, there's a verse in the Qur'an regarding the funerals of certain unbelievers. It urges the believers not to pray for those who rejected Allah and his Messenger. One should certainly read the verse in its (historical) context, but I think it is possible to derive a general rule from this verse, because of the way it is formulated:

    9:84: Nor do thou ever pray for any of them that dies, nor stand at his grave; for they rejected Allah and His Messenger, and died in a state of perverse rebellion. (Yusuf Ali)

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #4 - March 23, 2009, 08:40 PM

    Democracy works... *points toward switzerland*

    You just need direct democracy! The people are the gouverment!

    *waves swiss flag!*

    Dam im patriotic today...

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #5 - March 23, 2009, 09:48 PM

    9:84: Nor do thou ever pray for any of them that dies, nor stand at his grave; for they rejected Allah and His Messenger, and died in a state of perverse rebellion. (Yusuf Ali)


    Interesting one, so mourners are not allowed to pray for our redemption at our funerals!  Not sure if that will wash with my mum, even if it says it in the Quran.  That'll be her first ever definitive rule break if I go before her.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #6 - March 23, 2009, 10:25 PM

    "Crime rate" is such a malleable concept, it can be used to win any argument :S

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #7 - March 23, 2009, 11:04 PM

    "Crime rate" is such a malleable concept, it can be used to win any argument :S

    Its an acceptable argument, but must be done in line with with all other comparable statistics i.e. suicide, education, health etc. 

    It cannot be done in isolation, otherwise to take an extreme example, we could lock every citizen in jail then crime rates would be nil.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #8 - March 24, 2009, 11:13 AM

    Sorry to hear that Pazuzu, but I'm not sure if Islam teaches any such thing. However, there's a verse in the Qur'an regarding the funerals of certain unbelievers. It urges the believers not to pray for those who rejected Allah and his Messenger. One should certainly read the verse in its (historical) context, but I think it is possible to derive a general rule from this verse, because of the way it is formulated:

    9:84: Nor do thou ever pray for any of them that dies, nor stand at his grave; for they rejected Allah and His Messenger, and died in a state of perverse rebellion. (Yusuf Ali)

    There's a hadith where Mo bans women from going to funerals while the person is being buried. Muslims justification for this is that we are too emotional Roll Eyes
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #9 - March 24, 2009, 12:36 PM

    There's a hadith where Mo bans women from going to funerals while the person is being buried. Muslims justification for this is that we are too emotional Roll Eyes

    So what, even if its true, doesn't it help bring closure? 

    P.S  Do you think he was right about women generally being more emotional than men?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #10 - March 24, 2009, 01:01 PM

    There's a hadith where Mo bans women from going to funerals while the person is being buried. Muslims justification for this is that we are too emotional Roll Eyes

    So what, even if its true, doesn't it help bring closure? 

    P.S  Do you think he was right about women generally being more emotional than men?

    What closure? We cant go to a funeral to see someone we care about being buried, that kind of takes away the closure. I disagree that women are more emotional, we are a product of our culture. Men are just as emotional but are discouraged from showing 'weak' emotions but are more encouraged to show 'strong' emotions such as anger, etc.

    It makes no sense to bar women from certain parts of funerals, in the West women are free to go to all funerals processes and it works just fine.
  • Re: Discussion with xingyimaster1987 about "real Islam".
     Reply #11 - March 24, 2009, 01:37 PM

    "Crime rate" is such a malleable concept, it can be used to win any argument :S

    Its an acceptable argument, but must be done in line with with all other comparable statistics i.e. suicide, education, health etc. 

    It cannot be done in isolation, otherwise to take an extreme example, we could lock every citizen in jail then crime rates would be nil.

    Not only that, but it's valid only if you specify how "crime rate" is measured, without leaving room to a subjective cultural interpretation of what crime is.
    Otherwise, as another extreme example, you would have zero crime rate in a society that doesn't consider anything a crime.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »