Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 15, 2025, 04:00 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Abortion is unethical

 (Read 25538 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #30 - April 14, 2009, 02:45 PM

    Having said that, I think it will be a great day when humanity will be able to grow babies "outside" the body of women. Because, then, women will stop being "necessary incubators" for the survival of our species.


    Yeh, and they'll stop being seen as 'reproductive vessels'!

    Although I can see many people having issues with the concept of growing babies outside a woman's womb. They'll argue that it's 'not normal' and 'goes against religion' yadda yadda  Roll Eyes
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #31 - April 14, 2009, 05:42 PM

    That's because you don't have to give birth, sunshine.


    So they are selfish basically and only thinking about themselves. By the way I don't have problem with abortion on medical grounds, but wanting an abortion just because it was un-planned and then you stood around for 30 weeks and then you get an abortion, that is sick. 


    So there is nothing in between an abortion for medical reasons and one at 30 weeks because a woman was standing around waiting?  This reminds me of the Muslim argument that it's either bikini or hijab / niqab. 

    Is there any country that allows abortion at 30 weeks? 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #32 - April 14, 2009, 06:05 PM

    Quote
    The coat hanger issue is part of the pro-choice debate.


    How can you even justify it, how can you even type that. You call it pro-choice? you call abortion of a concious entity choice, where is the choice in that entity living? What a total psychological disconnect, your logic is unfathomable. It is a feeling entity.


    Can you offer scientific evidence that a fetus at 12 weeks is a feeling entity?  Please provide from a neutral, purely scientific source, and not an anti-abortion resource. 


    Quote
    Prior to the legalization of abortion in regulated clinics, a lot of women in the United States (and other countries) were having illegal back alley coat hanger abortions as a last resort.


    Last resort? So they justified killing a living entity by calling it a "last resort" or whatever, when you could easily give birth and put it up for adaptation. It is a living FEELING entity how can you even not have an objection to the thought of killing a living entity in a inhumane way? 


    Would that be the stage or film adaptation of the fetus?  I kid.

    Yes, going to to a back alley doctor and having a coat hanger abortion was the last resort.  Are you even aware of what place in society women occupied in the West prior to the late 1960s and the 1970s?  A woman or girl couldn't be unmarried and give birth to a child and hand it over like she can today and not be disowned or ostracised, kicked out of her home, fired from her job, and so forth.  The methods of abortion that are safe and legal today are much more humane for the woman.  Or do you object to that?  Are we just to be brood mares, required to carry the seed of men whenever, wherever, no matter what we need or (gasp) want?  I hope you are as harsh with men on the issue of birth control as you are being on women here. 

    Quote
    If abortion was made illegal, people would most probably do that again as a last resort which is dangerous! At least now they are in a controlled environment where they can get proper medical care.


    Yes, these fucks need to be locked up, these stupid ass women need to be locked up for crimes against humanity.


    And what 'punishment' do you propose for the men who impregnated them?  By the by, not even the most extreme anti-abortion activists in the United States propose jail crime or criminal prosecution for women who have abortions or who would continue finding a way to have them if it were made illegal again.  So congratulations for standing alone on that one.  I'm not sure I'd want to be to the right of people like Operation Rescue and the Catholic Church. 

    Quote
    I think it's sick in the head that you judge a woman for having an abortion for a reason like possibly not being able to afford a child. Contraception isn't always effective.



    If you were using contraception and you became pregnant you would not wait for over 10 weeks to have an abortion.


    I don't know very much about you, Tut, other than you're from Saudi or somewhere in the Gulf and you used to have quite a few skirmishes with people here.  Have you ever carried a child yourself? Do you have intimate, first hand experience with a menstrual cycle? Believe it or not, there are times when a woman doesn't even know she's pregnant until after 10 weeks, for many reasons ranging from irregular menstrual cycles to still having periods after conception to having no symptoms at all to thinking a skipped period is due to a reason like stress or other illness.  Unfortunately, there may also be the issue in some countries or provinces and states where the woman is not able to obtain an abortion as soon as she discovers the pregnancy because of insurance or money issues.  Odd, isn't it Tut, how all of this falls on the woman as the sole actor, when the conception usually involves another player?

    Quote
    Pregnancy tests ARE readily available in chemists, but if a couple has used the right contraceptive methods then they wouldn't think that the girl is pregnant.


    That is her fault then, there is no reason not to take permanency tests, when a life depends on it damn it! how fucking retarded is your response, its a fucking joke.


    It's all the GIRL's fault then.  Interesting.   wacko


    Quote
    because she realises, for example, that she cannot afford it. What if she has the child because a bunch of uptight, anti-choice arseholes want to tell her what to do, and then the child lives in poverty because of that?


    She cannot afford it? Some family cannot support children who are like 3 - 4 years old, also living entities, would if be justified if the mother decided to kill them? You now because it was too expensive for her broke ass? Fuck this, if someone is going to kill another living entity, other then extreme necessity, I will call them up on that. 


    I know anti-abortion activists - the kind who picket clinics and harass patients - and even none of them are as strident and hateful as you are being here, calling women who choose abortion 'retarded' and the rest of it.  You are making them look tolerant and kind here.  There is a difference between a fetus at 12 weeks and a 3 year old child.  A child out of the womb has legal rights that a fetus in the womb simply does not have.  Again, and again, and again, you single out the woman.  The reality is that there are a lot of men in the West who will not and do not provide adequate financial support for the children they help to conceive.  Women are left holding the bag, time and time again.   I'm just wondering where the disdain and fire and hatefulness is for the men who impregnate women with children they neither planned for nor wanted.  Where is your anger with regards to how easy and common it is for a man to simply walk away from that situation? 


    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #33 - April 14, 2009, 06:07 PM

    Quote
    So your basically judging a woman on a choice she has made about her own body?


    No I am judging her based on her requiring or being happy about killing a living entity, which feels!


    Why are you assuming that women who have abortions are happy about it?  Have you often seen women going to and from clinics skipping with balloons in hand, singing show tunes? 


    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #34 - April 14, 2009, 07:32 PM

    For me, a woman should have the right to deny the "use" of her body to grow a life form.

    That's because the body and mind of a fully formed and functional human is, pragmatically, a priority over the body and mind of a future potentially functional human that, at the moment, depends on her very existence.

    Exactly my stance. +1  Afro

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #35 - April 14, 2009, 08:55 PM

    "the body and mind of a fully formed and functional human is, pragmatically, a priority over the body and mind of a future potentially functional human that, at the moment, depends on her very existence."

    That's not fair. Using that logic, all children would be considered less valuable than adults because they have not yet finished their development.
    And most kids continue to depend on their mothers for their very existance.

    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat your children. Praise be to Allah." -- Mike Tyson
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #36 - April 14, 2009, 09:07 PM

    A child is much closer to a fully formed and functional human being than a foetus. A child can eat, breathe, and walk. A child can be raised by other parents, but a foetus cannot complete its development in another human being, at least not in today's technology. I can accept a time limit to abortion, though... which is really the way things currently are.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #37 - April 14, 2009, 09:26 PM

    "the body and mind of a fully formed and functional human is, pragmatically, a priority over the body and mind of a future potentially functional human that, at the moment, depends on her very existence."

    That's not fair. Using that logic, all children would be considered less valuable than adults because they have not yet finished their development.
    And most kids continue to depend on their mothers for their very existance.

    They do not strictly NEED their mothers: death of the mother does not imply death for an already born and functional baby.
    So at that point, they have equal priority.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #38 - April 14, 2009, 10:43 PM

    Quote
    Can you offer scientific evidence that a fetus at 12 weeks is a feeling entity?  Please provide from a neutral, purely scientific source, and not an anti-abortion resource.

     

    I have a book here let me quote:
    "... On the basis of studies showing that movement takes place as early as six weeks after fertilization, coupled with other studies that have found some brain activity as early as the seventh week, it has been suggested that the foetus could be capable of feeling pain at this early stage of pregnancy..."  - Practical ethics By Peter Singer (p 142) (Edition: 2, revised Published by Cambridge University Press, 1993 - ISBN 052143971X, 9780521439718)

    Moreover this book goes into great detail on the subject, I am just too lazy to bother writing all the arguments out, it is a superb book dealing with ethics it is a must read for any apostate of Islam.

    Quote
    The methods of abortion that are safe and legal today are much more humane for the woman. 


    How has this turned into about the woman this is about the foetus we don't care if things are made more "humane" for women, it is the woman whom is being inhumane when she is justifying killing a feeling life form. The whole point is you can never justify murder by using fancy terms as "humane" murder is never humane, I am opposed to even the death penalty for the most ardent rapist, genocidal criminal.

    Quote
    Are we just to be brood mares, required to carry the seed of men whenever, wherever, no matter what we need or (gasp) want?  I hope you are as harsh with men on the issue of birth control as you are being on women here.


    Until men can give birth and make a concious decision on aborting a feeling life form, the issue of men is a mute point for me until then. Of course, I would be equally hard on them also if it was the case, it is not a male vs female mentality why do you think I would have such backward archaic beliefs? My empathy is formed out of the love of other living entities not out of the hate of the females.

    Quote
    By the by, not even the most extreme anti-abortion activists in the United States propose jail crime or criminal prosecution for women who have abortions or who would continue finding a way to have them if it were made illegal again.  So congratulations for standing alone on that one.


    Thank you for congratulating me, I also hope you can also join humanity too, so I can congratulate you too. In any case, once there is more empirical scientific evidence proving a foetus has conciousness and feels pain, I have no doubt it will be considered murder/killing of living concious entity, and will carry the same penalty as killing a child.

    Quote
    I don't know very much about you, Tut, other than you're from Saudi or somewhere in the Gulf and you used to have quite a few skirmishes with people here.


    I am from the UK, I don't know about skirmishes maybe some slightly disagreements. Mainly due to me defending Islam, I am an atheist ex Muslim and I've stated a few times, that I don't really have a problem with much of Islamic teachings and also that apostates of Islam (mainly women) embellish the treatment they had under Islam, the opinion they express on Islam is seldom objective or free of biasses.

    Quote
    Have you ever carried a child yourself? Do you have intimate, first hand experience with a menstrual cycle?     

     

    Micky mouse logic, I have also not murder someone but I can tell you it is unethical to murder someone, no ones not have to experience someone to hold an opinion of it.
    Quote
    believe it or not, there are times when a woman doesn't even know she's pregnant until after 10 weeks,

       

    BS, only of she is not using pregnancy tests, they even have damn digital pregnancy tests which read it out for you, there is no excuse for you not to notice until after 10 weeks.

    Quote
    Odd, isn't it Tut, how all of this falls on the woman as the sole actor, when the conception usually involves another player?


    What does a man really have a say in weather or not a woman should have an abortion or not, generally it is based solely on her decision, the opinion of a man hardly carries in weight in the context of a woman's abortion.

    Quote
    I know anti-abortion activists - the kind who picket clinics and harass patients - and even none of them are as strident and hateful as you are being here, calling women who choose abortion 'retarded' and the rest of it.


    No I don't recall, calling them retarded, the worst I said was "her broke ass" wow oh look at the big bad stupid paki who hates woman and wants to rape women how bad is he  :roll:

    Quote
    A child out of the womb has legal rights that a fetus in the womb simply does not have.


    Who gives a hell about an arbitrary law system, it was OK for to have sex with 9 years old in the 7th Arabia, just because it was not illegal it did not make it alright! 

    Quote
    Again, and again, and again, you single out the woman. 


    Yes look at the big paki bully who singles out innocent women who are so defenceless, and fragile, this paki bully really needs to learn some respect! 

    Quote
    The reality is that there are a lot of men in the West who will not and do not provide adequate financial support for the children they help to conceive.  Women are left holding the bag, time and time again.   I'm just wondering where the disdain and fire and hatefulness is for the men who impregnate women with children they neither planned for nor wanted.  Where is your anger with regards to how easy and common it is for a man to simply walk away from that situation?


    Until the man says "abortion OK" and goes through with it, I will have the same fire in addressing them too, I am a person who had actively been a veterinarian for almost 3 years, just out of empathy out of animals, we are them! Imagine an alien spy looking at the humans on earth and looking for a reason to just eat and conquer humans, our planet would make a blood good candidate, as we justify the killing and eating of things which are not as superior to us, imagine a superior race of aliens doing the same to us, them saying:  "Fuck it they have small brains lets just eat them" imagine that!   
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #39 - April 14, 2009, 11:18 PM

    Quote
    I have a book here let me quote:
    <snip>


    Yeah, great, thanx for the book recommendation.  Now bring us an online source with a link we can all click on and view in context for ourselves, which shows that foetus' experience pain before 20 weeks.

    Otherwise you have no case.

    Quote
    How has this turned into about the woman this is about the foetus we don't care if things are made more "humane" for women, it is the woman whom is being inhumane when she is justifying killing a feeling life form. The whole point is you can never justify murder by using fancy terms as "humane" murder is never humane, I am opposed to even the death penalty for the most ardent rapist, genocidal criminal.


    Who is this we you are referring to?  Everybody in the thread bar you cares about making things humane for the woman.  And until you produce that online scientific, impartial source, you have no evidence that the woman is doing anything inhumane, nor that her actions equate to murder.

    Quote
    Until men can give birth and make a concious decision on aborting a feeling life form, the issue of men is a mute point for me until then. Of course, I would be equally hard on them also if it was the case, it is not a male vs female mentality why do you think I would have such backward archaic beliefs? My empathy is formed out of the love of other living entities not out of the hate of the females.


    ORLY? 

    Quote
    we don't care if things are made more "humane" for women,


     Roll Eyes  Some empathy.

    Quote
    Thank you for congratulating me, I also hope you can also join humanity too, so I can congratulate you too.


    She's already a member of humanity, don't be so bloody patronising.

    Quote
    In any case, once there is more empirical scientific evidence proving a foetus has conciousness and feels pain, I have no doubt it will be considered murder/killing of living concious entity, and will carry the same penalty as killing a child.


    Where is that evidence, Tut?  We're all waiting for you to produce a source which shows it, so what's keeping you?

    Quote
    Micky mouse logic, I have also not murder someone but I can tell you it is unethical to murder someone, no ones not have to experience someone to hold an opinion of it.


    I was about to agree with you, until you went ahead and showed exactly why your lack of experience in this department is relevant....

    Quote
    BS, only of she is not using pregnancy tests, they even have damn digital pregnancy tests which read it out for you, there is no excuse for you not to notice until after 10 weeks.


    Pure ignorance, which you would know if you'd ever had the experiences fading asked you about.  Its very easy for a woman to be pregnant for 10 weeks or more and not know about it.  All it takes is an irregular menstrual cycle, which is nothing unusual, especially among teenaged girls.

    Quote
    No I don't recall, calling them retarded, the worst I said was "her broke ass" wow oh look at the big bad stupid paki who hates woman and wants to rape women how bad is he


    Who called you a bad stupid paki?  It wouldn't be nobody by any chance, would it?

    Quote
    Who gives a hell about an arbitrary law system, it was OK for to have sex with 9 years old in the 7th Arabia, just because it was not illegal it did not make it alright!


    Until you produce that scientific evidence, you have no case to argue that an early stage foetus should have the same rights as a child.


    Quote
    Yes look at the big paki bully who singles out innocent women who are so defenceless, and fragile, this paki bully really needs to learn some respect!


    Nobody here has ever spoken to you like that.  Don't play the victim.

    Quote
    Until the man says "abortion OK" and goes through with it, I will have the same fire in addressing them too, I am a person who had actively been a veterinarian for almost 3 years, just out of empathy out of animals, we are them! Imagine an alien spy looking at the humans on earth and looking for a reason to just eat and conquer humans, our planet would make a blood good candidate, as we justify the killing and eating of things which are not as superior to us, imagine a superior race of aliens doing the same to us, them saying:  "Fuck it they have small brains lets just eat them" imagine that!   


    Irrelevant ramblings about your vegetarianism aside, where is that evidence you need before you have even half a point?  Either put up or shut up.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #40 - April 15, 2009, 12:53 AM

    I think I did present the evidence, I quoted an opinion of an expert on the subject, now I can't help it if you are going to be selective about the evidence you choose to accept. I will look for a link and see if I can find one maybe in the morning. Again you talk about menstruation cycles, pregnancy tests are available so there is no excuse really. I mean I am pretty sure if I had a life form which is about 3 inches living and breathing inside me I am pretty sure I would notice that shit, even though I am not an expert on being pregnant.

  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #41 - April 15, 2009, 01:15 AM

    Quote
    I think I did present the evidence, I quoted an opinion of an expert on the subject,


    No you didn't, you quoted a passage from a book by Peter Singer, who is a philosopher with no scientific qualifications whatsoever. 

    Quote
    now I can't help it if you are going to be selective about the evidence you choose to accept.


    You need evidence showing at what stage in a foetus' development it becomes capable of feeling pain.  You need an embryologist, not a philosopher.  You also need an online source so we can look for ourselves and confirm your version of what they say.

    Quote
    Again you talk about menstruation cycles, pregnancy tests are available so there is no excuse really.


    This is remarkably ignorant - and you're supposed to be a married man?  Nobody takes a pregnancy test until they've skipped a period, and a woman with an irregular menstrual cycle may well go 10 weeks or even more without one and not suspect that she's skipped anything.

    Quote
    I mean I am pretty sure if I had a life form which is about 3 inches living and breathing inside me I am pretty sure I would notice that shit, even though I am not an expert on being pregnant.


    People don't just "notice" that they're pregnant, that' s why there are pregnancy tests to begin with.  You're displaying such ignorance on the entire subject its hardly any wonder you think a philosopher is an expert on the development of the central nervous system in embryos.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #42 - April 15, 2009, 06:39 AM

    Quote
    The coat hanger issue is part of the pro-choice debate.


    How can you even justify it, how can you even type that. You call it pro-choice? you call abortion of a concious(sic) entity choice, where is the choice in that entity living? What a total psychological disconnect, your logic is unfathomable. It is a feeling entity.

    Reading your post Tut hurt my head right from the first paragrap. To start, the Two bolded parts are contradictory.
    On One side, u state it is a consious entity,
    On the other you ask why it did not make the choice?
    That is a contradiction. It did not make a choice simply because it is not conscience.

    Quote
    Prior to the legalization of abortion in regulated clinics, a lot of women in the United States (and other countries) were having illegal back alley coat hanger abortions as a last resort.


    Last resort? So they justified killing a living entity by calling it a "last resort" or whatever, when you could beasily give birth and put it up for adaptation(sic)

    Did you just say: "easily give birth"? Lookup the definition of oxymoron in the dictionary.

    . It is a living FEELING entity how can you even not have an objection to the thought of killing a living entity in a inhumane way? 

    Of course we have an objection. What makes you think there is no objection. It is a decision that is not taken lightly.

    Quote
    If abortion was made illegal, people would most probably do that again as a last resort which is dangerous! At least now they are in a controlled environment where they can get proper medical care.

    Yes, these fucks need to be locked up, these stupid ass women need to be locked up for crimes against humanity.

    Here we go again, another guy trying to create his Utopia and hitting the wall of reality.

    That is her fault then, there is no reason not to take permanency tests, when a life depends on it damn it! how fucking retarded is your response, its a fucking joke.

    You expect me, to pay 10$ each time I have sex. Take a hike.

    Quote
    I don't think there are reasonable grounds for YOU to judge a woman who makes the decision of having an abortion.


    Yes i did judge her already. I think she is doings us conscious sentient beings a favor.

    So I should not judge those who are killing defenceless living entities, and justifying it by disconnecting from it? 

    There is plenty of defenseless living entities in 1 spoon of sperm. 100 million sperms per tea spoon. Trust me on this one, they do not all make it ok.

    Quote
    because she realises, for example, that she cannot afford it. What if she has the child because a bunch of uptight, anti-choice arseholes want to tell her what to do, and then the child lives in poverty because of that?


    She cannot afford it? Some family cannot support children who are like 3 - 4 years old, also living entities, would if be justified if the mother decided to kill them?

    It is not murder if that is what you are implying. Because according to the bullshit definition you put forward of what a living entity is, I think I killed 200 million living entities last night. And I think I might kill me another 200 million tonight. And so will you, you are going to kill hundreds of millions next time you meet your wife in your utopian bullshit.

    You now because it was too expensive for her broke ass? Fuck this, if someone is going to kill another living entity, other then extreme necessity, I will call them up on that.   
    Quote
    What if she decides between the time of conception and 20 weeks that she has a stable job and can afford a child - even decides to keep it, then there's a sudden redundancy in her job at work and she can't afford anything?


    Hay its ok to kill a living entity on the basis of "can't afford it" yeah justify it as some cheap ass product. 

    Actual, it is a very strong and valid basis.

    Quote
    There are a lot of things to consider, you have merely taken an anti-choice (I chose to term it that because of your choice of words 'pro-abortion') at face value and think it is an easy as piss decision for the mother.


    Lets call a spade, a spade. Its the killing of a living entity! Its KILLING!

    Killing a living entity? what is that? What is killing a living entity? what is the value we want to put on this?

    Quote
    I'm curious to know what your views are when a woman has been raped and is carrying a 'rape-child'?


    If its over 10 weeks she should keep it. Anything lower she can get an abortion. 

    I can accept that, but only as a recommendation. Our pregnancy tests can often miss a pregnancy into 10 weeks.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #43 - April 15, 2009, 08:19 AM

    Cheetah, rejecting Peter Singer singers arguments is like going to your doctor and he telling you have cancer and you turning around and telling him "NO I don't, I feel good" we are talking about a man who has written and debated on ethics, he is also a strong atheist, he is a genius! 
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #44 - April 15, 2009, 08:26 AM

    Baal, I am not one of those psycho who claim even atoms can feel pain and are concious, I am talking about a foetus in the womb which has a repository system which functions with the brain, this is a concious entity it feels pain, it feels pleasure. Now sperm on the other hand do not have a brain and a conciousness, they cannot feel pain or pleasure.   
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #45 - April 15, 2009, 09:39 AM

    Cheetah, rejecting Peter Singer singers arguments is like going to your doctor and he telling you have cancer and you turning around and telling him "NO I don't, I feel good" we are talking about a man who has written and debated on ethics, he is also a strong atheist, he is a genius! 


    No, it isn't.  Its like going to a medical journalist who has written extensively about cancer and being told I have cancer, and me saying, "no thanx, I'll go and ask an oncologist who is qualified to diagnose cancer before I believe it."

    Peter Singer is not qualified to pronounce on foetal development, and even if he was, you quoted from a book written by him in 1979.  Do you think there have been no developments in the field of embryology since 1979?

    So far all you have is an unsupported assertion, until you provide evidence to back it up you have failed utterly to make your case against abortion. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #46 - April 15, 2009, 11:33 PM

    no i ill see yo later yhis is not he time to arguig
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #47 - April 21, 2009, 11:38 AM

    It's been 6 days, is it time for arguing yet, Tut?
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #48 - April 21, 2009, 12:16 PM

    It's been 6 days, is it time for arguing yet, Tut?


    I thought the topic was done.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #49 - April 21, 2009, 01:59 PM

    I was expecting some form of response to Cheetah's valid points.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #50 - April 21, 2009, 01:59 PM

    Baal, I am not one of those psycho who claim even atoms can feel pain and are concious,

    Spare me the Utopian Bullshit.

    I am talking about a foetus in the womb which has a repository system which functions with the brain, this is a concious entity it feels pain, it feels pleasure.

    If I accept what you say, and I am just trying to waddle through your utopian bull,  to be true, you will have to accept that a chicken will feel million(s) times more than a your precious zygote.

    Now sperm on the other hand do not have a brain and a conciousness, they cannot feel pain or pleasure.   

    Because as per your definition, the only brain and the only consciousness, are those of the mother. And that woman, who owns that brain and the consciousness, instructed you to remove the foetus.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #51 - April 21, 2009, 04:00 PM

    I was expecting some form of response to Cheetah's valid points.


    She refuses to accept Peter S take on it who is an expert on ethics and also is a rationalist. In any case I am not a moral absolutist I am a moral relativist.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #52 - April 21, 2009, 04:06 PM

    Baal, I am not one of those psycho who claim even atoms can feel pain and are concious,

    Spare me the Utopian Bullshit.

    I am talking about a foetus in the womb which has a repository system which functions with the brain, this is a concious entity it feels pain, it feels pleasure.

    If I accept what you say, and I am just trying to waddle through your utopian bull,  to be true, you will have to accept that a chicken will feel million(s) times more than a your precious zygote.

    Now sperm on the other hand do not have a brain and a conciousness, they cannot feel pain or pleasure.   

    Because as per your definition, the only brain and the only consciousness, are those of the mother. And that woman, who owns that brain and the consciousness, instructed you to remove the foetus.



    I just find it unfathomable you would no respect for another living species. We should not kill living entities, that is my argument causing pain even to animals is unethical. I am in full support of women having equality but I do no support that they should be given a right to terminate a living entity. We as humans should be taking care of living things we should not harm them or kill them for our needs. I want to live in a society free or pain and hurt. 
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #53 - April 22, 2009, 02:32 AM

    Baal, I am not one of those psycho who claim even atoms can feel pain and are concious,

    Spare me the Utopian Bullshit.

    I am talking about a foetus in the womb which has a repository system which functions with the brain, this is a concious entity it feels pain, it feels pleasure.

    If I accept what you say, and I am just trying to waddle through your utopian bull,  to be true, you will have to accept that a chicken will feel million(s) times more than a your precious zygote.

    Now sperm on the other hand do not have a brain and a conciousness, they cannot feel pain or pleasure.   

    Because as per your definition, the only brain and the only consciousness, are those of the mother. And that woman, who owns that brain and the consciousness, instructed you to remove the foetus.



    I just find it unfathomable you would no respect for another living species.

    Again with the Utopian bullshit. Didn't i tell you already to stop pulling utopian bullshit when you talk to me? wtf is the "respect for another living species". Talk English. Use real words. With meaning.

    We should not kill living entities, that is my argument causing pain even to animals is unethical.

    I noticed you mixed killing living entities and causing pain on One breath.

    Your argument only makes sense if the preferred way of killing rats and spiders in your society, is by dismemberment.

    I am in full support of women having equality but I do no support that they should be given a right to terminate a living entity.

    wtf is a living entity you drama queen. And at what time does a living entity takes precedence over a human right to pursue happiness.

    We as humans should be taking care of living things we should not harm them or kill them for our needs.

    So we live in a society where we do *not* walk around with a green photosynthesizing forehead. Where we have to acquire our nutrients from others. Where we suffer from infestations and infections. And of all those horrible things that we have to do, daily, as part of a normal, healthy, non-utopian, non-bullshit, happy life, of all those things, you prefer to start by stepping over the rights of some humans to decide for themselves how to achieve happiness.

    I want to live in a society free or pain and hurt. 

    Then stop hurting other humans around you and stop trying to control them.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #54 - April 22, 2009, 03:39 AM

    Baal, I am not one of those psycho who claim even atoms can feel pain and are concious,

    Spare me the Utopian Bullshit.

    I am talking about a foetus in the womb which has a repository system which functions with the brain, this is a concious entity it feels pain, it feels pleasure.

    If I accept what you say, and I am just trying to waddle through your utopian bull,  to be true, you will have to accept that a chicken will feel million(s) times more than a your precious zygote.

    Now sperm on the other hand do not have a brain and a conciousness, they cannot feel pain or pleasure.   

    Because as per your definition, the only brain and the only consciousness, are those of the mother. And that woman, who owns that brain and the consciousness, instructed you to remove the foetus.



    I just find it unfathomable you would no respect for another living species. We should not kill living entities, that is my argument causing pain even to animals is unethical. I am in full support of women having equality but I do no support that they should be given a right to terminate a living entity. We as humans should be taking care of living things we should not harm them or kill them for our needs. I want to live in a society free or pain and hurt. 


    Yet you are ok with abortions before 10 weeks.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #55 - April 03, 2010, 03:25 PM

    spiral dive.. IT'S NOT PRO-ABORTION ITS PRO CHOICE.. Afro

    pro choice is not only aborting the foetus it is a variety of things .. including educating yourself to make better choices next time...
    was it her choice to be raped? or her choice that the condem broke.. let's get real.. most women who are considering abortion are under-age minors or women who know they can not take care of the baby... her mind .. her body.. her choice.. at least consider the freedom to give her that.. to underestimate the womens own judgement over her own body is absurd.. if you can't trust her with a choice... HOW ARE YOU GOING TO TRUST HER WITH A BABY!... so no abortion is not unethical when you make your decision an educated one....
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #56 - April 03, 2010, 04:38 PM

    Have you ever noticed that all the people FOR abortion have already been born.....? Tongue

    It's not pro-choice..... it's anti-choice.... the being it affects most has no choice...... while I think there are several situations where an abortion is the right thing to do..... a lot of the time that isn't the case. The 24 week period I think is far too long (except for medical reasons).... we need to draw a line far earlier, and sure whatever limit we put on may seem arbitrary,....but it has to be. There isn't a clear line where it becomes 'human', but I think it's long before 24 weeks.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #57 - April 03, 2010, 05:48 PM

    A woman has the right to govern what goes on inside her own body. I read somewhere that the fetus, when abortion is common (which is in 88% of cases), has the mental capacity of a rat. I'd rather someone abort a child that wasn't planned than that girl being forced to pop out another child (as if the world needs more unwanted children) so that the kid can grow up in an environment in which the mum perhaps can't support the kid, or the dad has run away, or the mum was a victim of rape, or the kid lives in poverty, or the kid is unwanted.

    Quote
    Have you ever noticed that all the people FOR abortion have already been born.....?


    Or that 77% of anti-abortion leaders are men, and that 100% of them will never be pregnant.  Huh?
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #58 - April 03, 2010, 08:49 PM

    The 24 week period I think is far too long (except for medical reasons).... we need to draw a line far earlier, and sure whatever limit we put on may seem arbitrary,....but it has to be. There isn't a clear line where it becomes 'human', but I think it's long before 24 weeks.

    Even if it was a "living being" that's not in itself sufficient to make it wrong to abort it. That being is not rational and self-conscious enough to be considered a human being with the same rights. Therefore imo the preferences of the mother trump all. Even if there was no threat to woman's life and the fetus was 30 weeks, I still think it's not "immoral" of the mother to abort it. Because I think even a fetus 30 weeks of age is not capable of having feeling and experiencing suffering.

    I know my views are extreme, probably owing to my utilitarian streak. But as I said before I totally appreciate why other people might find my views abhorrent.
  • Re: Abortion is unethical
     Reply #59 - April 03, 2010, 08:57 PM

    I disagree IA.  I think from when the baby becomes viable it would be wrong to abort it.  If the baby can survive in an incubator, to go on and be adopted by a family who wants a baby, and the pregnant woman has come that far in her pregnancy, then it's no worse on her if she gives birth and gives the baby away, or delivers a dead baby, which is what would happen if she aborted that late.

    I wish there were a way for babies to be viable even sooner, so that the 24 weeks issue could be scaled back to 12 weeks, which is whan I personally, would not be opting for an abortion if that was me.


    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »