Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 08:11 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 03:50 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an

 (Read 20038 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #30 - April 13, 2009, 07:09 AM

    Then how do you view the following among many Hadith that support the death penalty for adultery?

    The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) further said: ?[Under Islamic laws in an Islamic state] It is not lawful to shed the blood of a Muslim except for one of three sins: a married person committing fornication, and in just retribution for premeditated murder, and [for sin of treason involving] a person renouncing Islam, and thus leaving the community [to join the enemy camp in order to wage war against the faithful].? (Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and An-Nasa?i)

    IslamOnline.net claims that,

    "As for the punishment specified in the Shari`ah for the married adulterer or adulteress, it is stoning to death. In the Kuwaiti Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence, we read the following:

    Ibn Qudamah wrote: ?Muslim jurists are unanimous on the fact stoning to death is a specified punishment for married adulterer and adulteress. The punishment is recorded in number of traditions and the practice of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) stands as an authentic source supporting it. This is the view held by all Companions, Successors and other Muslim scholars...?"

    How do you ignore all the evidences that scholars have unanimously agreed upon for centuries?

    "when you've got thousands of hadith/sunnah and a book like the Qur'an where abrogation is propagated by some; anyone with a grudge and some time on their hands can find something to confirm what ever they wish"- Kaiwai
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #31 - April 13, 2009, 07:31 AM

    @ AlmostAisha,

    BMZ is a hadith denier, he doesn't accept most hadiths, even authentic ones, if they contradict his beliefs about the Quran. So he only accepts the Quran's punishments on adultery.

    He claimed to be horrified by the Swat flogging, he found the video barbaric & said that Allah has shown "mercy" instead of any punishment:

    This is what he wrote about the Swat flogging:

    The bloody half-baked Mullahs of tribal areas have no clue about this verse 4:15, in which Allah has shown mercy instead of any punishment. 

    وَاللاَّتِي يَأْتِينَ الْفَاحِشَةَ مِن نِّسَآئِكُمْ فَاسْتَشْهِدُواْ عَلَيْهِنَّ أَرْبَعةً مِّنكُمْ فَإِن شَهِدُواْ فَأَمْسِكُوهُنَّ فِي الْبُيُوتِ حَتَّىَ يَتَوَفَّاهُنَّ الْمَوْتُ أَوْ يَجْعَلَ اللّهُ لَهُنَّ سَبِيلاً

    My own translation: "4:15 If any of your women have committed any indecency, get four witnesses to testify and if they do, confine them to houses, till they die or Allah makes a way out for them."


    Thus according to him, its "mercy" for a woman to be confined to her house until death- ie the woman receives a "life imprisonment" for any indecency. We know that modern laws prescribe life imprisonment only for murder & similar crimes, & adultery had been decriminalized in most modern laws, although it remains a ground for divorce.

    But who cares? The people who've outlawed "life imprisonment" for adulterous women are dirty kafirs, they have no idea of Allah's prescribed punishments for an adulterous woman,  & Allah says that a woman is to be locked up until she dies!  Afro

    BMZ didn't reply on that thread, he keeps insisting that Jesus brought nothing new, but Muhammad came to remove idolatry & trinity!

    So guess, removing three gods or many gods is more important than prescribing humane punishments for adulteresses or suspected adulteresses!  Roll Eyes

    BMZ doesn't like the fact that Jesus is supposed to have saved a woman from stoning, he keeps insisting that its a later addition.

    Well, later addition or not, the fact  that Jesus is reported to have stopped a stoning was sufficient to stop stonings, floggings & life imprisonment for "indecency" amongst Jesus' followers!  Tongue

    Muhammad's followers smashed idols, stoned, flogged & bombed their way through history & are still at it!

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #32 - April 13, 2009, 07:39 AM

    Quote from: BMZ
    That is exactly my question and my gripe too.

    Apostasy is not a crime, thus one cannot "repent" for doing it. End of story.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #33 - April 13, 2009, 07:44 AM

    Quote from: BMZ
    That is exactly my question and my gripe too.

    Apostasy is not a crime, thus one cannot "repent" for doing it. End of story.

    ?

    It is in Islam. From what I recall, an apostate is given three days to repent and return to Islam. If they refuse,  Headsman

    I shall look for the texts..

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #34 - April 13, 2009, 08:03 AM

    BMZ doesn't like the fact that Jesus is supposed to have saved a woman from stoning, he keeps insisting that its a later addition.

    Well, later addition or not, the fact  that Jesus is reported to have stopped a stoning was sufficient to stop stonings, floggings & life imprisonment for "indecency" amongst Jesus' followers!  Tongue

    BMZ speaks the truth. Though it is great that that verse is in there, it's an addition that wasn't in the earliest manuscripts. See Misquoting Jesus (link goes to relevent excerpt), by Bart Ehrman (who is the shit! worship)

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #35 - April 13, 2009, 08:12 AM

    Quote from: BMZ
    That is exactly my question and my gripe too.

    Apostasy is not a crime, thus one cannot "repent" for doing it. End of story.

    ?

    It is in Islam. From what I recall, an apostate is given three days to repent and return to Islam. If they refuse,  Headsman

    I shall look for the texts..

    Of course "apostasy" is a crime in Islam. BMZ stated that the execution of apostates is wrong only because it takes away the option of repentance. Such a statement includes the hidden clause that apostasy is still some kind of offence. In other words, "apostasy" is not something that is on the same level with petty theft or even non-criminal offences like adultery. It is an inalienable right.

    Thank Goddess Reason that we have the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #36 - April 13, 2009, 08:25 AM

    BMZ doesn't like the fact that Jesus is supposed to have saved a woman from stoning, he keeps insisting that its a later addition.

    Well, later addition or not, the fact  that Jesus is reported to have stopped a stoning was sufficient to stop stonings, floggings & life imprisonment for "indecency" amongst Jesus' followers!  Tongue

    BMZ speaks the truth. Though it is great that that verse is in there, it's an addition that wasn't in the earliest manuscripts. See Misquoting Jesus (link goes to relevent excerpt), by Bart Ehrman (who is the shit! worship)


    Really? That's kind of surprising. I wish the same person that sneaked that into the Bible had also made a revision of the Qur'an  Roll Eyes

    "when you've got thousands of hadith/sunnah and a book like the Qur'an where abrogation is propagated by some; anyone with a grudge and some time on their hands can find something to confirm what ever they wish"- Kaiwai
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #37 - April 13, 2009, 08:33 AM

    You do not agree with them, so they are false. That's nice, but it's not being honest with the texts.


    If she wants to believe those hadith are false, to the end of being a more tolerant, kind and rational Muslim, why would any of us want to contradict her on that?

    That's great, and I'm all for that. But it's just not being honest with the texts.

    I don't think Islam can progress much until muslims admit that "yes, there are some ugly things in the Islamic tradition, they're a part of Islam, but we reject them for what they are." Like my buddy Mike Knight,

    "If a verse of the Qur'an says to beat your wife, I'm not waiting for the liberal mullahs to change what it means... I cross out the verse."

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #38 - April 13, 2009, 08:37 AM

    But if they reject all the ugly stuff what will be left? That's a serious question by the way. I mean there is going to be a lot of stuff to reject on that basis and why should the remainder be considered to have any particular validity? I think this is why Muslims are so reluctant to reject any of it. They can see it's the thin end of the wedge, so they'd rather "reinterpret" then reject.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #39 - April 13, 2009, 08:42 AM

    That's the problem I have trying to figure out Reform Judaism. How can you consider yourself a believer when you reject so much, and admit that the text was touched by human hands? Huh?

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #40 - April 13, 2009, 08:48 AM

    Rashna, thanks for clarifying. Anyways it's hard to argue about Islam being true or false based on its morality... while I agree with you that a great many of its teachings are barbaric, misogynistic, discriminatory and just terribly cruel and unjust... the point remains, that if a Muslim really believes this is the word of God then they should  technically trust in His wisdom to know best what is 'right' and 'wrong'.

    The very fact that the moral zeitgeist keeps rapidly changing is proof that whatever is 'moral' to us today may not be tomorrow. Don't get me wrong, I agree with your views, I just think it's terribly hard for a Muslim to take the morality of fallible human beings over that of an omniscient Allah... no matter how messed up it may seem even to their own conscience. no

    "when you've got thousands of hadith/sunnah and a book like the Qur'an where abrogation is propagated by some; anyone with a grudge and some time on their hands can find something to confirm what ever they wish"- Kaiwai
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #41 - April 13, 2009, 08:55 AM

    Same with a lot of religions. They were created way back when in societies that had pretty barbaric standards in our eyes, so to square them with your conscience these days you have to overlook or reject quite a lot.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #42 - April 13, 2009, 08:56 AM

    That's the problem I have trying to figure out Reform Judaism. How can you consider yourself a believer when you reject so much, and admit that the text was touched by human hands? Huh?


    Well, they remain attached to the Jewish culture, feel themselves part of a long history of people who've been horribly oppressed, but have still managed to remain till modern times!

    But Judaism still has some advantages & redeeming features in their texts & history in "reforming & remaining" which Islam sadly lacks...

    For once, Judaism doesn't have a single founder whom they have to regard as the paragon of virtue, they have loads of Prophets with various frailities, Islam in addition to Allah(who's as bad as Yahweh) also has Muhammad's poor example to deal with-Muslims have to accept both Allah & Muhammad in their Shahada, so the additional burden for Muslims is dealing with Muhamad's supposed perfection & actual imperfections.

    Secondly Judaism isn't & never was a world conquering faith, they weren't told to march far & wide converting, suppressing & oppressing others-Islam in addition to misogyny also has the problems of Allah's instructions of world conquest-the division of the world into "Dar ul Islam" & "Dar ul Harb".

    Last but not the least, perhaps the most important, is the fact that while the Jews have historically been an oppressed people, Muslims have been the oppressing people. Afro

    There might be a bit of local violence instructed by YHWH, but Judaism never went on a global jihadic rampage, Islam did. Thus textual violence nothwithstanding, Jews can take pride in the fact that they've survived in the face of all oppression, while Muslims will have to account for the fact that they oppressed millions far & wide, according to the authentic teachings of their faith & their Prophet's sunnah!

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #43 - April 13, 2009, 09:27 AM

    But Judaism still has some advantages & redeeming features in their texts & history in "reforming & remaining" which Islam sadly lacks...

    Tongue I disagree (that Islam lacks anything of redeeming value)

    Quote
    For one, Judaism doesn't have a single founder whom they have to regard as the paragon of virtue...

    Moshe Rabeinu (Moses, our Teacher/Rabbi), the highest authority after YHWH?

    Quote
    Islam in addition to Allah(who's as bad as Yahweh) also has Muhammad's poor example to deal with-Muslims have to accept both Allah & Muhammad in their Shahada, so the additional burden for Muslims is dealing with Muhamad's supposed perfection & actual imperfections.

    Ever heard of the Khazars? Turkish tribe that converted to Judaism. Minted on their coins "La ilaha IllAllah, Musa Rasool Allah"

    the division of the world into "Dar ul Islam" & "Dar ul Harb".

    Well there is the division between 'Eretz Yisrael' and 'Galut' (the land of Israel and exhile)...

    Quote
    Last but not the least, perhaps the most important, is the fact that while the Jews have historically been an oppressed people, Muslims have been the oppressing people. Afro

    There might be a bit of local violence instructed by YHWH..

    I know you say 'historically' and 'local', but I gotta say 'Palestine' (don't want to argue on this, I'm just sayin..)

    Islam has different problems and history, but I still don't see how one can label themselves as "Believer" after rejecting so much, you get me now?

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #44 - April 13, 2009, 09:32 AM

    Use bigger letters. She's on a roll again.Wink

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #45 - April 13, 2009, 09:37 AM

    Then how do you view the following among many Hadith that support the death penalty for adultery?

    The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) further said: ?[Under Islamic laws in an Islamic state] It is not lawful to shed the blood of a Muslim except for one of three sins: a married person committing fornication, and in just retribution for premeditated murder, and [for sin of treason involving] a person renouncing Islam, and thus leaving the community [to join the enemy camp in order to wage war against the faithful].? (Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and An-Nasa?i)

    IslamOnline.net claims that,

    "As for the punishment specified in the Shari`ah for the married adulterer or adulteress, it is stoning to death. In the Kuwaiti Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence, we read the following:

    Ibn Qudamah wrote: ?Muslim jurists are unanimous on the fact stoning to death is a specified punishment for married adulterer and adulteress. The punishment is recorded in number of traditions and the practice of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) stands as an authentic source supporting it. This is the view held by all Companions, Successors and other Muslim scholars...?"

    How do you ignore all the evidences that scholars have unanimously agreed upon for centuries?


    Good questions.

    Qur'aan stands Supreme, the Hadith does not.

    I check a Hadith under the light and shade of Qur'aan, not the other way round. That hadith does not make sense at all.
    Prophet knew Qur'aan well and he is the one who taught according to Qur'aan. That hadith can be rejected straightaway.

    If the scholars had unanimously agreed upon for centuries, then all the Muslim countries would have been using the death sentence by stoning. Have we seen all of them doing that? The answer is a firm no.

    BMZ

  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #46 - April 13, 2009, 09:41 AM

    Last but not the least, perhaps the most important, is the fact that while the Jews have historically been an oppressed people, Muslims have been the oppressing people. Afro

    Absolutely. +1  Afro

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #47 - April 13, 2009, 09:43 AM

    If the scholars had unanimously agreed upon for centuries, then all the Muslim countries would have been using the death sentence by stoning. Have we seen all of them doing that? The answer is a firm no.

    BMZ

    Many scholars will disagree with you on some points, as well as disagreeing with each other. What does this prove?

    As for "Muslim countries", whenever they do something you don't like you say they aren't following "true Islam" so why should the fact that they don't all use the death sentence by stoning have any bearing on whether or not it is ordained by Allah? You can't have it both ways.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #48 - April 13, 2009, 09:45 AM

    BMZ doesn't like the fact that Jesus is supposed to have saved a woman from stoning, he keeps insisting that its a later addition.

    Well, later addition or not, the fact  that Jesus is reported to have stopped a stoning was sufficient to stop stonings, floggings & life imprisonment for "indecency" amongst Jesus' followers!  Tongue

    BMZ speaks the truth. Though it is great that that verse is in there, it's an addition that wasn't in the earliest manuscripts. See Misquoting Jesus (link goes to relevent excerpt), by Bart Ehrman (who is the shit! worship)


    Really? That's kind of surprising. I wish the same person that sneaked that into the Bible had also made a revision of the Qur'an  Roll Eyes


    You can read it here. This is from John 7 NIV.

    [quote[52They replied, "Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out of Galilee."

    ((The earliest and most reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have John 7:53-8:11.))

    53Then each went to his own home.[/quote]

    BMZ
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #49 - April 13, 2009, 09:48 AM

    BMZ:

    Quote from: Surah an-Nahl, 16: 44
    We have revealed to you (Muhammad) the Reminder (the Qur'an), so that you (Muhammad) may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them.


    Tongue

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #50 - April 13, 2009, 09:58 AM

    But Judaism still has some advantages & redeeming features in their texts & history in "reforming & remaining" which Islam sadly lacks...

    Tongue I disagree (that Islam lacks anything of redeeming value)



    Did I say that Islam lacks anything of redeeming value?All I said was that it lacks certain additional things of redeeming value that Judaism possesses!  Tongue

    Quote
    For one, Judaism doesn't have a single founder whom they have to regard as the paragon of virtue...

    Moshe Rabeinu (Moses, our Teacher/Rabbi), the highest authority after YHWH?


    Well, even Moses isn't their religion's founder out of nothing, Abraham is the founder perhaps, Muhammad built the faith of Islam out of scratch. Even with Moses, he didn't criticise & attack all "unbelievers", there isn't an open ended command given by him to attack, convert or subjugate & tax all unbelievers worldwide.

    Islam in addition to Allah(who's as bad as Yahweh) also has Muhammad's poor example to deal with-Muslims have to accept both Allah & Muhammad in their Shahada, so the additional burden for Muslims is dealing with Muhamad's supposed perfection & actual imperfections.Ever heard of the Khazars? Turkish tribe that converted to Judaism. Minted on their coins "La ilaha IllAllah, Musa Rasool Allah"


    Sure, heard of them, but what does some stray converts prove? Judaism has historically not been a widespread proselytizing faith, there's no dawa & no missionary work amongst Jews, & conversion while allowed isn't very encouraged for everyone either & its been pretty rare historically for Jews to convert others.

    the division of the world into "Dar ul Islam" & "Dar ul Harb".

    Well there is the division between 'Eretz Yisrael' and 'Galut' (the land of Israel and exhile)...


    Well, & I suppose that the land of exile has to be converted, killed & suppressed into becoming the land of Israel, eh awais?  Roll Eyes

    Thats' how it is in Islam, jihad continues till the whole world becomes Muslim or pays jizya.

    Last but not the least, perhaps the most important, is the fact that while the Jews have historically been an oppressed people, Muslims have been the oppressing people. Afro

    There might be a bit of local violence instructed by YHWH..

    I know you say 'historically' and 'local', but I gotta say 'Palestine' (don't want to argue on this, I'm just sayin..)


    Again, since you brought up Palestine, I say Pakistan, created around the same time!  dance Much bigger, more deaths & dislocations!
    And I say Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines, Sudan & verious other parts of the world, apart from global terrorist attacks to resusciate the Caliphate!

    Just compare the two in range & scale, let alone historical atrocities!

    Islam has different problems and history, but I still don't see how one can label themselves as "Believer" after rejecting so much, you get me now?


    Yep I get you, & I'm not an admirer of Jewish Scriptures, but the Jewish history-millennia of oppression & the Holocaust & their ability to survive inspite of it all are perhaps why many atheist\agnostics stick with it.

    Muslims, have a very different history, largely imperialistic & violent. The Jewish texts haven't led Jews to be violent for millennia, & had the palestinian Muslims been like the Pakistani non Muslims, the Palestinian problem would be long dead.

    Muslims will have to atone for past mistakes like the Church apologised to Jews, but while Christians can comfort themselves that they were going against Jesus deeds & his example, Muslims will also have to recognize that they were applying Muhammad's example.

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #51 - April 13, 2009, 10:07 AM

    Quote from: awais
    Moshe Rabeinu (Moses, our Teacher/Rabbi), the highest authority after YHWH?

    Where does Judaism teach that Moses was infallible, as opposed to Islam where Mohammad is to be considered the perfect role model of humanity for all times? The difference is great.

    Quote from: awais
    Ever heard of the Khazars? Turkish tribe that converted to Judaism. Minted on their coins "La ilaha IllAllah, Musa Rasool Allah"

    This is one isolated and undocumented case, but I'll have to ask for proof first, before I provide the counter-argument. Khazars were averse to the Islamic caliphate, and this inscription sounds like a parody of the Islamic creed to me, i.e. an act of defiance.

    Quote from: awais
    Well there is the division between 'Eretz Yisrael' and 'Galut' (the land of Israel and exhile)...

    Very crude and erroneous analogy. The distinction between Israel and the Exile is just that, an emotive and geographical barrier without any theology of war involved. The dichotomy between the House of War and the House of Islam involves a global, violent struggle.

    1. In Judaism, Jews are obliged to obey the laws of the gentile states they are subject to. Islam makes no such distinction.
    2. Muslims have an obligation to wage war against the House of War. In Judaism, Jews have no such global obligation: warfare is obligatory only to defend the Jewish homeland.
    3. Eretz Yishrael is confined to a geographical boundary, which is actually quite small. House of Islam is virtually any living space where Muslims have established an Islamic government. In other words, no corner of Earth is safe from the theology of Jihad.
    4. Judaism, being an ethnocentric religion, has never been completely hostile to peripheral alien cultures. Judaism has always been more cosmopolitan than Islam. For example, the relations between pagan Greeks and monotheist Jews have been bittersweet, and this comes despite the fact that Hellenistic occupiers forced Jews to adopt Greek values. Jews living in Alexandria were fairly Hellenistic, for example.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #52 - April 13, 2009, 10:09 AM

    If the scholars had unanimously agreed upon for centuries, then all the Muslim countries would have been using the death sentence by stoning. Have we seen all of them doing that? The answer is a firm no.


    There is a near unanimous agreement amongst all Islamic scholars for centuries:

    The four major Sunni Madh'hab (schools of Islamic jurisprudence) and the Twelver Shi'a Jafari madhab agree that a sane adult male apostate must be executed.[1] They differ on the punishment for a female apostate - some schools calling for death and others for imprisonment.

    As for all countries doing it, when you encounter something you dislike, you claim, "Its not Islamic"-eg the girl's flogging.  Wink

    but if you like something, whether it comes from Islamic sources or not, it becomes Islamic? Roll Eyes

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #53 - April 13, 2009, 10:16 AM

    Quote from: Rashna
    Sure, heard of them, but what does some stray converts prove? Judaism has historically not been a widespread proselytizing faith, there's no dawa & no missionary work amongst Jews, & conversion while allowed isn't very encouraged for everyone either & its been pretty rare historically for Jews to convert others.

    It is also important to note that the Khazars did not convert by force. Their reasons to convert to Judaism were complex, and encompassed a need to create a neutral buffer zone between the Byzantine Empire and the Caliphate. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Khazars practiced religious toleration in their domain: Muslims, Christians, Jews and pagans lived together in the Khazar Empire in relative harmony.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #54 - April 13, 2009, 10:36 AM

    You do not agree with them, so they are false. That's nice, but it's not being honest with the texts.


    If she wants to believe those hadith are false, to the end of being a more tolerant, kind and rational Muslim, why would any of us want to contradict her on that?

    That's great, and I'm all for that. But it's just not being honest with the texts.

    I don't think Islam can progress much until muslims admit that "yes, there are some ugly things in the Islamic tradition, they're a part of Islam, but we reject them for what they are." Like my buddy Mike Knight,

    "If a verse of the Qur'an says to beat your wife, I'm not waiting for the liberal mullahs to change what it means... I cross out the verse."



    Being honest to the text Awais?Which texts.The man maid laws written down several hundred years after the Prophet died,is that the text you are talking about?

    The verse you are talking about,the word that the mullahs have translated into meaning beat,darabe,is used several times in the Quran,but does not mean to beat.Why did the mullahs say that in this verse,the word means to hit,but not in the others vers.
    God never gave the husband any right to beat a "disobedient" wife,he should leave her.

    sura14.24"See you not how Allah sets forth(darabe) a parable?A godly word as a goodly tree,whose roots is firmly fixed,and its branches to the sky" Here is the word darabe used,and here it means set forth.

    2.273:"Charity is for the poor,they cannot go forth(darabe)in the land....

    God does not use the word as to beat,no,but to go forth.

    It is in the hand of the translater,and they have put their bad side in,when it comes to women and their rights.There is no sensible reason,for why this word,is translated into beat,in that vers agbout husbands and wifes.And it goes against common sence.

  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #55 - April 13, 2009, 10:46 AM

    No it does not go against common sense. Historically wife-beating has been common. In fact it goes against common sense to insist that the verse could not possibly mean "beat". The people who say it does mean "beat" know the Arabic language better than you do.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #56 - April 13, 2009, 10:54 AM

    You do not agree with them, so they are false. That's nice, but it's not being honest with the texts.


    If she wants to believe those hadith are false, to the end of being a more tolerant, kind and rational Muslim, why would any of us want to contradict her on that?

    That's great, and I'm all for that. But it's just not being honest with the texts.

    I don't think Islam can progress much until muslims admit that "yes, there are some ugly things in the Islamic tradition, they're a part of Islam, but we reject them for what they are." Like my buddy Mike Knight,

    "If a verse of the Qur'an says to beat your wife, I'm not waiting for the liberal mullahs to change what it means... I cross out the verse."



    Being honest to the text Awais?Which texts.The man maid laws written down several hundred years after the Prophet died,is that the text you are talking about?

    The verse you are talking about,the word that the mullahs have translated into meaning beat,darabe,is used several times in the Quran,but does not mean to beat.Why did the mullahs say that in this verse,the word means to hit,but not in the others vers.
    God never gave the husband any right to beat a "disobedient" wife,he should leave her.

    sura14.24"See you not how Allah sets forth(darabe) a parable?A godly word as a goodly tree,whose roots is firmly fixed,and its branches to the sky" Here is the word darabe used,and here it means set forth.

    2.273:"Charity is for the poor,they cannot go forth(darabe)in the land....

    God does not use the word as to beat,no,but to go forth.

    It is in the hand of the translater,and they have put their bad side in,when it comes to women and their rights.There is no sensible reason,for why this word,is translated into beat,in that vers agbout husbands and wifes.And it goes against common sence.




    But Allah does endorse woman's subservient status to her husband, doesn't he marleya?

    Allah in that verse says that men are the protectors of women because Allah has made one excel the other, & good women should be obedient, & men can talk, separate or beat(maybe as you say leave) their disobedient wives alone.

    Why should women be obedient to their husbands marleya? Why did Allah say that man excels his wife?

    Can't the wife be right & the husband wrong?  Huh?

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #57 - April 13, 2009, 10:58 AM

    You do not agree with them, so they are false. That's nice, but it's not being honest with the texts.


    If she wants to believe those hadith are false, to the end of being a more tolerant, kind and rational Muslim, why would any of us want to contradict her on that?

    That's great, and I'm all for that. But it's just not being honest with the texts.

    I don't think Islam can progress much until muslims admit that "yes, there are some ugly things in the Islamic tradition, they're a part of Islam, but we reject them for what they are." Like my buddy Mike Knight,

    "If a verse of the Qur'an says to beat your wife, I'm not waiting for the liberal mullahs to change what it means... I cross out the verse."



    Being honest to the text Awais?Which texts.The man maid laws written down several hundred years after the Prophet died,is that the text you are talking about?

    The verse you are talking about,the word that the mullahs have translated into meaning beat,darabe,is used several times in the Quran,but does not mean to beat.Why did the mullahs say that in this verse,the word means to hit,but not in the others vers.
    God never gave the husband any right to beat a "disobedient" wife,he should leave her.

    sura14.24"See you not how Allah sets forth(darabe) a parable?A godly word as a goodly tree,whose roots is firmly fixed,and its branches to the sky" Here is the word darabe used,and here it means set forth.

    2.273:"Charity is for the poor,they cannot go forth(darabe)in the land....

    God does not use the word as to beat,no,but to go forth.

    It is in the hand of the translater,and they have put their bad side in,when it comes to women and their rights.There is no sensible reason,for why this word,is translated into beat,in that vers agbout husbands and wifes.And it goes against common sence.


    Another excellent response, marleya and thanks.  Afro

    We have no record from the man-made Hadith that Prophet, his Sahaba (companions), Caliphs and followers used to beat their wives. Cheesy May be the Hadith collectors did not want to be called wife-beaters.

    BMZ

  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #58 - April 13, 2009, 11:03 AM

    We have no record from the man-made Hadith that Prophet, his Sahaba (companions), Caliphs and followers used to beat their wives. Cheesy May be the Hadith collectors did not want to be called wife-beaters.

    BMZ




    Muhammad hit his favorite child bride Ayesha on the chest which hurt her.Here is the Hadith:

    Sahih Muslim
    Book 004, Number 2127..."He hit me on the chest which hurt me."

    Its a Hadith from Sahih Muslim, an authentic collection! Wink

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Time for Muslims to stop reading the Qur'an
     Reply #59 - April 13, 2009, 11:09 AM

    We have no record from the man-made Hadith that Prophet, his Sahaba (companions), Caliphs and followers used to beat their wives. Cheesy May be the Hadith collectors did not want to be called wife-beaters.

    BMZ




    Muhammad hit his favorite child bride Ayesha on the chest which hurt her.Here is the Hadith:

    Sahih Muslim
    Book 004, Number 2127..."He hit me on the chest which hurt me."

    Its a Hadith from Sahih Muslim, an authentic collection! Wink


    Cute and ever ready with hadith material.

     Cheesy

    That is another BS Hadith, Rashna.

    BMZ

    ps: The smiley is to show how much did I enjoy that. It is not directed at you.  Smiley
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »