Response:
How do I respond to your post? Man, we've got our work cut out for us. All these need study and understanding in light of our agreed upon creedal points of faith. As for Hitchens, I also read his book and did not find it at all persuasive. I still think God is great. If you mean by persuasive that he makes a good case for the madness of men, then I agree, but the Qur'an makes a far better one than Hitchens could ever make. By the way, I have a soft spot for Hitchens and have read his book on Paine, Jefferson, and Orwell; I feel sorry for him. His personal life is tragic, and he has become a linguistic Ronin offering his services to the highest bidder. Logical for an idealist who became a cynic. Salaams,
HY
1) He disregarded the entire core of your comment and his way around it made little (if any) sense.
"All these need study and understanding in light of our agreed upon creedal points of faith"Which means what exactly? Does he mean his faith (religion) obligates him to understand the subject? Then why has he still not accomplished it himself after all these years? There doesn't seem to be a statement that he will commit himself to it now either,
Or does he mean 'faith' in a literal sense? If so, is he justifying a 'drowning man fallacy' (where every possible case scenario points to god, regardless of how it turns out) ?
Seeing as you can't both understand something AND have faith in its plausability, it seems to be the only real possibility in this situation.
2) After that, his statements are asserted but not justified at all.
He doesn't go into any sort of detail (or even an example) of Why Hitchens book doesn't stand up to the Quran or how the Quran is actually providing a better position.
Essentially, he's not said anything.
3) The remaining was just an Ad-hom and 'Poisoning the well' logical fallacy.
Conclusion: That was a non-response,
Unfortunately, I rarely come across any better... You would probably be better off talking to some random guy on youtube, you honestly get more out of it. (as sad as that is)