Your conclusion is still grasping, why that conclusion? why not her youth and ignorance in that had she but been older and wiser she may have had the knowledge to save him?
What kind of knowledge Berbs?In their times, as it happened, medical knowledge was limited, yet I suppose that a physician
might have been able to help out, just might.
OMG, I can't believe you are acting as if her thoughts would have been logical at the time, or even that she could have actually gained the knowledge.
I'm talking about what might have motivated her extreme youth and ignorance comment.
In our times, of course, we'd promptly call a Doctor.

But an 18 year old is an adult even in our times, very much an adult-in all probability she would know the same basic medical knowledge that a 23 year old would. We all study some of that in school, by 18 many people might not even study medical knowledge anymore & say switch to art courses.
What knowledge could an 18 year old, who had finished about a third of her life according to those times life expectance lack?
She wasn't even a newlywed, she had been married for 9 whole years, lived in a harem, accompanied Muhammad to battles, been in the midst of a scandal, probably seen many men die in battle, seen her co wife bear a son who died as a child, what knowledge would she gain in the next few years which would add life saving skills which she lacked now?
Did they have life saving classes for 18+ women & men in Arabia?
I would expect an 18 year old then with Ayesha's life experiences to know everything that an avarage 25 year old would know today.
My conclusion maybe grasping, so's yours.As I have said, I'm not sure it happened this way or not in this thread itself.
Do you know actually, I can't be bothered breaking up your post, it's not alot of points, just one point expanded with unecessary red herrings.
The hadiths do not say they had sex on that day, infact you'd have to be pretty desperate to make those hadiths into what you and the author of that article have done.
Maybe I am,but here is what Ayesha had to say explicitly about the death bit:
Ibn Hisham page 682:
".that he heard Aisha say: "The apostle died on my bosom during my turn: . It was due to my ignorance and extreme youth that the apostle died in my arms
What did her extreme youth have to do with his death? She was an 18 year old teen when he died.
This is what Ayesha said, not about the age at which she married, but about the age at which her husband died when she was 18.
What could an 18 year old do wrong to make her husband die in her arms?
Your conclusion is still grasping, why that conclusion? why not her youth and ignorance in that
had she but been older and wiser she may have had the knowledge to save him? Ibn Hisham page 682:
.that he heard Aisha say: ?The apostle died on my bosom during my turn: [of having sex with]. It was due to my ignorance and extreme youth that the apostle died in my arms IF what you said is true then Ibn hisham would have said
"ignorance due to her youth" . Note that it says ignorance and extreme youth. So we see Muhhamad died because of 2 reasons:
1) Ignorance of Aisha
2) Extreme youth
IF it was referring to ignorance due to extreme youth then there was no need to mention the word Ignorance again. Saying he died because of my
"extreme youth" would be sufficient . IT could then be interpreted possibly as ignorance due to extreme youth.
So the way people spoke was the same back then to now? there was no archaic flowery bizzarre ways of saying things?
These days we would say "he died in my arms whilst we shared a kiss" them days it was "his head was on my bosom as his saliva was mixed with mine"....both mean the same thing, both from different time periods.