I totally agree. It would be cruel to burn an innocent person
Then God is cruel, because (as you agreed) belief is subjective, there is no undeniable objective proof that God exists and Islam is true - so those who look at the evidence and come to the conclusion there is no God are innocent of any crime.
Hell is only for those who are at fault.
What are they at fault for?
Hassan Said: "There is no undeniable evidence of God and there is no undeniable evidence Islam is true."
Hassan. Please dont go all over the place. Read the title of your own thread.
Sorry my friend, but you can't avoid this question as it is CENTRAL to the argument over whether Hell can be called in any way Just.
If there is no undeniable evidence for God or Islam then no-one can be blamed for not believing in God or Islam.
Therefore God's punishment is unjust.
Hassan said: "Therefore an unbeliever cannot be blamed for not believing."
Unless he deliberately closed his eyes to the truth.
Are you saying that the unbeliever really knows that Islam is true, but
pretends he doesn't believe it?
And as I asked you before (but you keep avoiding) are you saying that an unbeliever deliberately
chooses to be tortured for eternity in Hell rather than enjoying an eternity of bliss?
Hassan said: "An infinite torture for a finite "crime" is bad enough (even if they were rapists, mass murderers etc...) But infinite torture for not believing in something that is not undeniably clear is excessive."
I agree with you.
A just God would not burn anyone for simply not having believed in their life on Earth.
That's not what the Qur'an says.
The Qur'an clearley says that those who don't believe will be burnt in Hell.
Most intelligent people, including reasonable Atheists, do not say it is excessive. They say its fair for certain nasty people.
LOL... enough with these claims! Even if it was relevant, (which it is NOT, since what
most people say is not proof that it is true.) unless you can show me actual evidence of what most people say then your claims are meaningless.