Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 03:34 PM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
Yesterday at 01:05 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 07:37 AM

New Britain
June 20, 2025, 09:26 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
June 18, 2025, 09:24 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
June 17, 2025, 11:23 PM

Is Iran/Persia going to b...
by zeca
June 17, 2025, 10:20 PM

News From Syria
June 17, 2025, 05:58 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
June 17, 2025, 10:47 AM

ماذا يحدث هذه الايام؟؟؟.
by akay
June 02, 2025, 10:25 AM

What happens in these day...
June 02, 2025, 09:27 AM

What's happened to the fo...
June 01, 2025, 10:43 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(

 (Read 9352 times)
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     OP - June 12, 2009, 02:57 PM

    Quote
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17301-male-pond-skaters-forced-to-sing-for-sex.html

    Male pond skaters forced to 'sing' for sex

    By evolving a "shield" for their genitals, female pond skaters can decide for themselves whether to allow males to mate with them.

    They decide whether or not to mate by listening to "songs" made when male suitors use the tips of their long mid-legs to tap out rippling rhythms on the water surface.

    In other pond skater species ? also known as water striders ? males run the show, mating with females almost at will because they have no means to resist. Nor is there usually any form of courtship.

    But the red-backed water strider, found in stationary pools beside mountain streams in Korea, Japan and China, has now proved to be the exception. Detailed experiments and anatomical analyses have now shown that females of Gerris gracilicornis have evolved a protective shield for their genitalia.

    Moreover, they will only lift the shield if males go through an elaborate mating ritual lasting about 15 minutes, in which they use the tips of their mid-legs to tap out the intricate rhythms.

    Sex shield

    The experiments were carried out by Piotr Jablonski of the Center for Ecological Research in Lomianki, Poland, and Chang Han of Seoul National University in South Korea.

    What they found is that the penultimate abdominal segment of the female has grown to cover three quarters of the final segment, which contains the genitalia. In almost all other pond skaters, it covers half the final segment or less, offering zero protection against marauding males.

    "In this species, the female is in control because she normally keeps her genitalia hidden behind a shield of the last abdominal segment," says Han. "Only when the female expands and protrudes her genitalia from behind this shield can the male have access for mating."

    Arms race

    "This is exactly the kind of thing you might expect to evolve in a system where females are vulnerable to forced matings," comments Tim Birkhead of the University of Sheffield, UK, who in 2007 published evidence that female mallard ducks have intricate vaginas allowing them to send unwanted sperm into a cul-de-sac.

    "The authors are aware that there are no winners in such arms races, but at any point in time, one sex may be ahead of the other ? and here, it seems that the female water striders are ahead," says Birkhead.

    To win their prize, courting red-backed strider males must tap out three consecutive songs. Firstly, the males grip the female from behind and manoeuvre her into the mating position with their forelegs. During this ritual, they extend their long mid-legs forwards and begin tapping rhythms ? dubbed "grasping signals" ? on the water.

    Next come the "mounting signals", during which the male engages his own genitalia with the partially exposed genitalia of the female.

    Finally come the most regular bouts of tapping, when the female finally yields and lifts the shield, exposing her ovipositor and allowing full mating to occur.

    Fitness indicator?

    Jablonski and Han demonstrated that the tapping is vital for mating by disrupting the movements with a tiny metal bar fitted to the backs of the females. This was wide enough to prevent the males reaching the water with their mid-legs, putting a stop to their songs.

    The team says that the courtship tapping is almost certainly a male counter-strategy to rediscover lost influence in the mating game.

    One possibility is that the quality of the rhythm reveals the fitness of the male, enabling the female to mate only with the best available. It may be that the female has internal anatomy that enables her to accept or reject the sperm after mating, and the serenading helps her decide which choice to make.


    If we evolved this way then girls wouldn't ever be subject to rape. I always wondered why god made us this vulnerable when I was a theist.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #1 - June 12, 2009, 05:54 PM

    If we evolved this way then girls wouldn't ever be subject to rape. I always wondered why god made us this vulnerable when I was a theist.


    Because that would've looked freaky as hell... xD xD
    But yeah, If God really wanted to protect us (especially with sex related stuff), why didn't he... =/

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/ExMuslims
    Council of Ex-Muslims of the Netherlands will be back!

    Never doubt that a small group of commited people can change te world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -Margaret Mead
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #2 - June 12, 2009, 06:03 PM

    no need to evolve them, we have got them already

    male chastity belt



    female chastity belt


    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #3 - June 12, 2009, 06:06 PM

    Because that would've looked freaky as hell... xD xD
    But yeah, If God really wanted to protect us (especially with sex related stuff), why didn't he... =/


    Not really, it would have been the norm and therefore it would have looked natural to us because that was the way it had always been.  Infact the way it looks now would have been seen as weird by us if we had evolved as the OP.  Wink

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #4 - June 12, 2009, 06:12 PM

    @IsLame
    You'll have a huge problem when you loose your key... xD

    Not really, it would have been the norm and therefore it would have looked natural to us because that was the way it had always been.  Infact the way it looks now would have been seen as weird by us if we had evolved as the OP.  Wink

    True ^^

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/ExMuslims
    Council of Ex-Muslims of the Netherlands will be back!

    Never doubt that a small group of commited people can change te world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -Margaret Mead
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #5 - June 12, 2009, 07:21 PM

    It doesnt look like its hinged?  It must be damn painful with an erection!

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #6 - June 12, 2009, 08:13 PM

    no need to evolve them, we have got them already

    male chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)

    female chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)

    They don't look comfy Tongue
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #7 - June 12, 2009, 08:26 PM

    no need to evolve them, we have got them already

    male chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)

    female chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)


    Imagine losing the key and having to call the locksmith! That would be embaressing!

    Religion - The hot potato that looked delicious but ended up burning your mouth!

    Knock your head on the ground, don't be miserly in your prayers, listen to your Sidi Sheikh, Allahu Akbar! - Lounes Matoub
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #8 - June 12, 2009, 08:33 PM

    Life would be so much easier if we evolved like that.

    Wouldn't have to waste all that time buying them dinners and flowers and pretending to be interested in what they have to say. Just tap out a few catchy tunes and they expose themselves for intercourse.

    Plus, walking on water would be pretty cool!

    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat your children. Praise be to Allah." -- Mike Tyson
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #9 - June 12, 2009, 08:36 PM

    I already think that human mating rituals are unnecessarily complex: they are such a waste of time, energy and effort.
    If it were like those insects it would be even more complex and cumbersome.

    So why not just wish we evolved into asexual reproduction?
    That would be easier for all.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #10 - June 12, 2009, 08:40 PM

    no need to evolve them, we have got them already

    male chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)

    female chastity belt

    (Clicky for piccy!)


    That is pretty scary lookin.
    What if you accidently fall into a lake?
    Your dick would drag you down to the bottom.

    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat your children. Praise be to Allah." -- Mike Tyson
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #11 - June 12, 2009, 08:40 PM

    Or even, sexual reproduction with just one sex instead of two.
    That would bring all the benefits of genetic combination between two specimen, without the hassle of having two different sexes within the same species.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #12 - June 12, 2009, 08:41 PM

    I already think that human mating rituals are unnecessarily complex: they are such a waste of time, energy and effort.
    If it were like those insects it would be even more complex and cumbersome.

    So why not just wish we evolved into asexual reproduction?
    That would be easier for all.

    There would be no dio-diversity, the world would be so boring, much like the world of the potato.  In fact we would have been extinct by now.  I prefer the idea of us all evolving into Beethhovens (although i would die a male spinster as my music teacher said I was musically limited  Cry)

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #13 - June 12, 2009, 08:42 PM

    Imagine losing the key and having to call the locksmith! That would be embaressing!

    Easy.
    Just summon a rust monster! Grin

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #14 - June 12, 2009, 08:43 PM

    There would be no dio-diversity, the world would be so boring, much like the world of the potato.  In fact we would have been extinct by now.  I prefer the idea of us all evolving into Beethhovens (although i would die a male spinster as my music teacher said I was musically limited  Cry)

    yeah i fixed it with my other post.

    Mono-sexual reproduction.
    That would pwn all.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #15 - June 12, 2009, 08:50 PM

    Easy.
    Just summon a rust monster! Grin


    Dungeons and dragons is enough of a sexual impediment on it's own. You wouldn't need the chastity dick thingy to begin with.

    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat your children. Praise be to Allah." -- Mike Tyson
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #16 - June 12, 2009, 08:54 PM

    Dungeons and dragons is enough of a sexual impediment on it's own. You wouldn't need the chastity dick thingy to begin with.

    Ew, you are such a non-nerd. :\

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #17 - June 12, 2009, 09:00 PM

    Dungeons and dragons is enough of a sexual impediment on it's own. You wouldn't need the chastity dick thingy to begin with.


     Cheesy

    Bob wins the thread. Had you got that in before the Jester of the Month voting closed, that coulda put you over the top.

    fuck you
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #18 - June 12, 2009, 09:33 PM

    I'm trying to get a head start on next month.

    BAfroB

    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable and I'm just ferocious. I want your heart. I want to eat your children. Praise be to Allah." -- Mike Tyson
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #19 - June 12, 2009, 11:05 PM

    You have to watch this. This is funny!! Cheesy



    http://www.buzzhumor.com/player/embedflvplayer.swf?autostart=true&file=http://media.buzzhumor.com/36/v_chastity_belt_prankIp3we.flv

    ...
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #20 - June 12, 2009, 11:19 PM

     Cheesy

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #21 - June 12, 2009, 11:20 PM


    she has a nice bum!
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #22 - June 13, 2009, 01:53 AM

    It doesnt look like its hinged?  It must be damn painful with an erection!

    I think that is the general idea.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #23 - June 13, 2009, 10:10 AM

    she has a nice bum!


    Well she has to have a nice behind and front and everything!! Otherwise why a a Chastity belt? men ruled that time and had women as a sexual possession! maybe Muslims still do. The Niqab is a chastity belt to my understanding, although does not require a lock and a key!!

    ...
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #24 - June 13, 2009, 10:36 AM

    Cheesy

    Bob wins the thread. Had you got that in before the Jester of the Month voting closed, that coulda put you over the top.

    I see nerdy humor is not appreciated in here :S

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #25 - June 13, 2009, 10:39 AM

    Course it is, but where there are nerds, there will always be jocks.  Tongue

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #26 - June 13, 2009, 02:21 PM

    Course it is, but where there are nerds, there will always be jocks.  Tongue


    Ouch, Berbs. That stings.

    Tlaloc, don't take it personal. I used to have a very close friend who played D and D and I teased him mercilessly about it, we were still best friends. It's just that I'm an inveterate nut-buster and making D and D references to me is like waving a piece of meat in front of a hungry Rottweiler. I'm sure Submissive Bob was just busting nuts as well.

    Besides, over the last decade or two, geeks and nerds have made great strides in developing a subculture that is arguably "cool", and a few years ago was even trendy for a while. So take pride! Become one of those geeky hipster types and use it to get laid. If you need some inspiration rent "Revenge of the Nerds" and some Kevin Smith movies.

    fuck you
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #27 - June 13, 2009, 02:33 PM

    Not taking it personal.

    The intended irony was in comparing an imaginary RPG creature to something involving sexuality exactly because nerds and sexuality are generally thought as incompatible... in a sort of self-deprecating humor about myself and any fellow nerds.

    But apparently the humor failed, since he pointed out exactly what was humorous about it as if it was not the intended goal of the joke O_o

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #28 - June 13, 2009, 02:33 PM

    Ouch, Berbs. That stings.



    devil girl  Wink

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Why couldn't we evolve this way? :(
     Reply #29 - June 13, 2009, 02:34 PM

    But on a side note, having to explain a joke that was not obviously understood because it got explained is still the lulz, cause it's anti-anti-humor <3

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »