Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 09:20 PM

افضل الايام
by akay
Yesterday at 01:15 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 10:35 AM

News From Syria
March 08, 2025, 02:50 AM

Ramadan
by akay
March 07, 2025, 02:30 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
March 06, 2025, 10:16 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
March 04, 2025, 09:03 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
March 04, 2025, 06:42 PM

Gaza assault
February 26, 2025, 09:25 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Eating Babies

 (Read 3454 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Eating Babies
     OP - September 18, 2009, 05:55 PM

    Fellow atheists, how do you cook yours?   Cheesy

    Quote
    Let's just say, you know for a fact that eating children is wrong. A great number of people believe as you do and we all acknowledge it in unity. Then there is a website that says that eating babies is fine that you don't need to "buy into it" and believe that eating babies is wrong. There is a couple of blogs that talk all day how liberating and fantastic eating children are. Now whoever listens to them think they are crazy and very wrong but a few listen to the intellect behind the reasoning, they listen to the argument. Let's say the argument says it's natural for many animals eat their young in nature, and people are just a part of the natural process or something like that. Some people buy into it and start doing it.

    You struggle everyday as to why people think like that, they all must be crazy, what do they know that you don't? This goes on and on but after a while you get curious. You then start to go around thinking why you don't get to eat babies as others do and how some people demand that you don't, like your parents. Then one day you get an opportunity to do it but everything in your soul KNOWS it is wrong. You shake at the thought of eating that very young child. It's agonizing to you for quite a while, you cuss at yourself for having such insane thoughts!

    One day you see a little 5 year old at some playground and you convince yourself that you have to know what it's like. You seize the moment and kidnap the child. You keep that child tied up for days agonizing whether you should do it or not. You almost feel yourself slipping away into insanity to the point you can't take it. So you get the nerve somehow, and do it. Then afterwords you say to yourself that it was too quick that you need to try it again to see if the feelings you had during were genuine. So flash ahead a month and you have done it many times and you now frequent places that do it and go online to websites that also do it and you feel a sense of a warm community. You struggle with the nightmares until they pass and you feel OK. You embrace the fact that you are now a baby eater and you and your new friends are OK with it. The struggle get's a little easier to accept the notion that eating babies is fine for the natural process. You teach you own kids that it is perfectly natural to eat babies. You start your own website that is called "Eat babies!" and you showcase your work.

    Is this what an atheist goes through when they start to not believe in God? The stories of struggles, that I have heard, turning away from God are similar to this scenario. Many authors talk about the struggle they go through from belief to non belief. The agonizing pain it causes themselves as well as their families. Could atheists talk themselves into anything? The methodical erosion of ones values and morals can be so damaging, to the point that it's acceptable that"Atheists eat babies."

    An atheist may still be moral and say murder and rape are wrong: but when asked why, they will not have a final reason or authority to which they can appeal.


    http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/07/atheists-eat-babies.html

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #1 - September 18, 2009, 06:11 PM

    Oh Christ!

    Well, I took a page out of our Jewish friends' book and grind them up into Matzo balls and unleavened bread for the anti-Sabbath.

    "I am ready to make my confession. I ask for no forgiveness father, for I have not sinned. I have only done what I needed to do to survive. I did not ask for the life that I was given, but it was given nonetheless-and with it, I did my best"
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #2 - September 18, 2009, 06:46 PM

    Stupidity, thy name is fanatical preachers.

    I'll have mine to go, please. Preacher, not baby.

    /Stefan
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #3 - September 18, 2009, 07:55 PM

    Genes are our final authority...
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #4 - September 18, 2009, 08:43 PM

    OMG I have heard some sad desperate arguments in my time but that is the worst. What a thick shithead.

    Take the Pakman challenge and convince me there is a God and Mo was not a murdering, power hungry sex maniac.
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #5 - September 18, 2009, 11:31 PM

    What a total tosser. Of course I didn't go through silly struggles over this. I just went ahead and did it after reading Nietzsche. They taste scrummy.  thnkyu

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #6 - September 18, 2009, 11:38 PM

    you eat them with or without the diaper Huh??

    ...
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #7 - September 18, 2009, 11:41 PM

    Without, obviously. Diapers aren't very tasty.  Roll Eyes

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #8 - September 19, 2009, 12:02 AM

    Actually the point that what happens to people converting into 'baby-eating' is similar to converting into atheism/agnosticism is partially true. But not having morals? Gimme a break, it's religious people who lack them.

    "In every time and culture there are pressures to conform to the prevailing prejudices. But there are also, in every place and epoch, those who value the truth; who record the evidence faithfully. Future generations are in their debt." -Carl Sagan

  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #9 - September 19, 2009, 12:18 AM

    Without, obviously. Diapers aren't very tasty.  Roll Eyes


    what about the stuff inside their tummies that did not arrive into the diaper yet?

    ...
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #10 - September 19, 2009, 12:30 AM

    They're like any other animal: you gut them before cooking them.  Afro

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #11 - September 19, 2009, 04:41 AM

    Funny, it's always religious folks who want to kill babies and animals to appease their violent and insatiable gods.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #12 - September 19, 2009, 05:02 AM

    This is a dirty trick of an argument to use against atheism, because beyond all the ridiculous 'baby-eating' comparisons it is pointing to the fact that leaving your faith FEELS very wrong *initially* as some kind of proof to the fact that it's the "true" faith. This is obviously no proof at all, but for someone who is struggling with leaving their religion such an argument can make the struggle that much more difficult.

    Personally, when I apostasized and was quite depressed as a result, I shared my doubts and concerns with a Muslim friend. "Why does your hand feel cold?" she asked me, then answered herself "Because it's an indication your body sends to your brain to cover it, to prevent harm to the skin on cold weather..." She used this argument on me, saying that there was a reason I felt unhappy, that my soul was trying to cling to this because it needed it. Even though I knew as she said it that the argument had no logical validity, it was still months before I was able to take it out of my mind.

    So while this article sounds rather silly and would be insulting to me as an atheist if the writer wasn't so clearly on another planet... I imagine it could strike a nerve with someone trying to leave their religion. Which I guess is the author's intention.

    Anyways, I'm sorry for going so off track, I really just wanted to say that I prefer my babies as side dishes to crazy preachers.  Yum Yum

    "when you've got thousands of hadith/sunnah and a book like the Qur'an where abrogation is propagated by some; anyone with a grudge and some time on their hands can find something to confirm what ever they wish"- Kaiwai
  • Re: Eating Babies
     Reply #13 - September 19, 2009, 05:05 AM

    We all know there's only one reason to eat babies


    "In a child's power to master the multiplication table, there is more sanctity than in all your shouted "amens" and "holy holies" and "hosannas." An idea is a greater monument than a cathedral. And the advance of man's knowledge is a greater miracle than all the sticks" - Henry Drummond
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »