Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 12:20 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 15, 2024, 06:36 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 13, 2024, 05:18 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 04, 2024, 03:51 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

New Britain
October 30, 2024, 08:34 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
October 22, 2024, 09:05 PM

Tariq Ramadan Accused of ...
September 11, 2024, 01:37 PM

France Muslims were in d...
September 05, 2024, 03:21 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Hello people

 (Read 114135 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 34 5 ... 22 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #60 - January 09, 2010, 06:40 AM

    The Quran may be inhuamne according to your reasoning. But it's not to mine or a billion other Muslims who you will claim are barbaric or delusional.


    Argument by popularity
    is a sign of no viable argument left. There was a time a billion people believed the Earth was flat. Didn't matter, it was incorrect. Now, some Muslims and others who are Creationists believe "God" handmade human beings and we're "Above" other animals. Also, incorrect.

    There was a time when a billion people believed slavery was the normal, natural thing that especially black people were made for. Didn't matter. Inhumane beliefs and practices are inhumane beliefs and practices.

    I never said Muslims are barbaric or delusional. I can agree with delusional, they have that in common with other religionists. But I do not use or think in words like "barbaric". There's a difference between criticizing, examing, reforming and discarding a belief system, and calling its followers "barbaric". Deluded, yes.

    Since the hadiths often contradict the word of God I can not really trust any of them - I find the reasoning pretty simple - there are no mind games involved


    Again, how do you even know what is the word of God? Seriously, how do you actually know that?

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #61 - January 09, 2010, 06:41 AM

    allat, no probs - I appreciate and understand where all your questions are coming from. I do however feel a lot of people have a perception of Islam that is not at all accurate - in my opinion of course.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #62 - January 09, 2010, 06:41 AM

    Angel54, the only thing I can say here is that all scholars on Islam agree that any hitting should be light and should not leave a bruise or mark. We also know the prophet never hit any of his wives and should try to follow his example. Not the answer you were looking for but you backed me into a corner.


    OK, just asking since people tend to read lightly into the quran when it doesn't exist. If Allah wanted it, he should've put it in himself. What scholars say and what the quran says are two different things. Also how do you know the prophet didn't hit his wives?

    "We were married by a Reform rabbi in Long Island. A very Reform rabbi. A Nazi."-- Woody Allen
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #63 - January 09, 2010, 06:52 AM

    ''Argument by popularity is a sign of no viable argument left.''

    I of course didn't say that because a billion people beleive in Islam that it is correct.  My argument was that what people consider 'inhumane' or 'humane' depends on a persons own reasoning - therefore I can't simply accept things are inhumane just because you and others say so. Indeed there are many Muslims like myself as well as non Muslims who consider the teachings of Islam to be good and righteous.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #64 - January 09, 2010, 06:53 AM

    ''I've been dying to ask a Quran-only Muslim, since you don't follow Hadiths, how do you how to pray, how do you know the details of Mohammed's life, and therefore how do you know what is Sunnah?''


    I already stated that there are certain hadiths that extend on prayer, charity and other rulings on the Quran - I accept these hadiths although I know there may be minor differences in the way I pray etc. compared to other Muslims - I don't see this as a big problem.
    To be honest I don't know what is correct Sunnah - I believe it is up to us as indivduals to use our logic and intellect to decide which Sunnah are correct.


    If something was said, then it was said. Your belief, logic, and intelligence do not make a dime's worth of difference as to whether or not the prophet said or did something. To reject a hadith because it doesn't gel with the quran or your way of thinking is fallacious. Sahih hadiths that say wife-beating is OK or that you have to wear half-mast pants aren't false because you dont like wife beating or half-mast pants.

    "We were married by a Reform rabbi in Long Island. A very Reform rabbi. A Nazi."-- Woody Allen
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #65 - January 09, 2010, 07:04 AM

    Angel54, I feel I have every right to reject a hadith if I think it is contradictory to the Quran. Since there is obviously corruption in the hadith and the 'sahih' hadith are only labelled 'sahih' by men I have every right to disregard them given my God-given logic and reason as long as I sincerely beleive they are contradictory to the teachings of Islam.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #66 - January 09, 2010, 08:53 AM

    ras111, Since the Quran says Jinns exist then........they exist. In fact I have a theory: Jinns are made up of antimatter - the matter we know must exist but have no idea where it went or where it is - maybe it went into a dimension of space we cannot see or detect (a la string/M-theory). I can't gurantee I'll be able to prove my theory though.  Wink


    But the quran also clearly states they are made of smokeless fire

    "Modern man's great illusion has been to convince himself that of all that has gone before he represents the zenith of human accomplishment, but can't summon the mental powers to read anything more demanding than emoticons. Fascinating. "

    One very horny Turk I met on the net.
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #67 - January 09, 2010, 10:37 AM

    I don't have proof the Quran is the word of God but it's something I strongly beleive.


    On what basis?  How do you know if there are so many different religions around the world, from sun worship  to Ganesh the milk drinking elephant God? 

    I am sure I could also make all these religions make some sort of sense if I was willing to perform  intellectual summersaults. 

    How do you know this is different from that order, that muhammed was simple a man of humble origins, either with schizotypal tendencies or an inflated agenda, who made up commands from God as he went along?  Some of the flaws that we or others like Hassan have pointed out, or those that you 'dont know', could be explained by this? 

    You certainly need to rule this out as an option before you make assumptions that this religion only came into existence 1400 years ago, when man has been around for 250,000 years, and all these religions seem to have been only delivered to one very small part of the world?

    You are asking me to provide proof for the Quran whereas you have no proof for the Uthman caliphate story.

    Of course there's proof, its accepted in Islam. 

    I am actually disappointed you did not already know about how this book came together according to muslims scholars, yet you are prepared to believe in it and perform genital mutilation, eat halal products only,  reject eating one animal entirely, pray, devote time towards it, all for something that you have no proof and some would consider pie-in-the-sky. 

    You already know that humans have a tendency not only to create false religions, but also to follow them.  You then need to ask youself how you really know, what separates Islam & the rest of religions from the crowd.  I came to the conclusion that it did not, and in anything it was more likely to be false that others, such as buddhism.  Although I am agnostic, as I believe this is the only honest stance anyone can take.  Dont you?  Also do polytheist & atheist have their eyes repeatedly fried in your hell, be bitten by 7-headed snakes whose poison is enough to melt the earth and hit repeated on the forehead with metal hammers?

    Angel54, the only thing I can say here is that all scholars on Islam agree that any hitting should be light and should not leave a bruise or mark.

    That's what the scholars say after allowing the modern societal values to dictate their understandings, a pattern I note is being repeated.  You must understand the book of Allah is 'mubeen' i.e. clear.  It should be, as Allah would not want differing messages to be inferred unwittingly

    Please explain the purpose of this hitting?

    Quote
    We also know the prophet never hit any of his wives and should try to follow his example. Not the answer you were looking for but you backed me into a corner.

    No, we dont know that - in fact how are you going to know if only the literature you are willing to accept is that which Allah dictated, and are not willing to accept any sahih literature on his life & times?  In fact in the sahih literature, it does in fact claim he hits Aisha..

    When sleeping with Aisha, Muhammad surreptitiously left his bed and went to the graveyard at Baqi. 

    Aisha followed and watched what the prophet doing; when the prophet found out, according to Sahih Muslim Book 4:2127, 'He struck me on the chest which caused me pain'

    ''I've been dying to ask a Quran-only Muslim, since you don't follow Hadiths, how do you how to pray, how do you know the details of Mohammed's life, and therefore how do you know what is Sunnah?''


    I already stated that there are certain hadiths that extend on prayer, charity and other rulings on the Quran - I accept these hadiths although I know there may be minor differences in the way I pray etc. compared to other Muslims - I don't see this as a big problem.
    To be honest I don't know what is correct Sunnah - I believe it is up to us as indivduals to use our logic and intellect to decide which Sunnah are correct.

    Can you see how this suggestion is widely open to confirmation bias and incorrect interpretation & understanding?  Couldnt Allah have told you how to pray in at least the Quran?

    Islame, well I think it's quite likely he created living beings from more than just one ingredient don't you? Also as far as I am aware the 'water' is the only one mentioned for 'all living beings' all the rest are specific for humans thus perhaps suggesting water is of fundamental importance?

    I cant imagine you really believe God made each of us from all those ingredients listed, including dead people.  Try imagining one your professors at Cambridge telling you that, and let me know how seriously you would take them!

    allat, no probs - I appreciate and understand where all your questions are coming from. I do however feel a lot of people have a perception of Islam that is not at all accurate - in my opinion of course.

    I understand that, its how I felt as a Muslim too!  With hindsight, my impression is that you have not studied Islam as thoroughly & objectively as you might have and assume you want it to be true to give you hope, purpose & direction.


    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #68 - January 09, 2010, 10:38 AM

    Hello, welcome lol I see you hit the arena already.  Tongue

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #69 - January 09, 2010, 10:42 AM

    Yep, we're already at it


    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #70 - January 09, 2010, 11:21 AM

    No. You are wrong.

    Circumcision is an ancient, barbaric practice with no benefits on its own: Brian Morris, the man behind the site you posted is a hack.


    This line makes me want to give you big huggies.   far away hug

    I've no problem with adult men who decide they want to get a snip-snip, for sex, for hygeine, for their invisible sky friend, whatever reason. I am sorry to say I had this done to my sons, out of extreme religious & cultural pressure and I was looking for proper 'daleel' not to do it up until the day it was done.  I learned later that even if I had managed to prevail at those moments that it would have been done later behind my back anyway. finmad

    It was not our decision to make about their bodies.  We don't like it when it is done to girls.  If Big Al can't be clear about why it should be done, then it's pretty lame for us to all slavishly follow along and do it -- oh wait, it's not even from the quran, it is from the hadith, so Big Al can't even be bothered.  It is all on the other dude.

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #71 - January 09, 2010, 11:23 AM

    ras111, Since the Quran says Jinns exist then........they exist. In fact I have a theory: Jinns are made up of antimatter

    Most antimatter was annihilated at the start of the universe - by coming in contact with matter.  The matter we see is left over, as matter and antimatter were not created in equal amounts.  This is the most common theory anyway.

    Perhaps you mean dark matter.
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #72 - January 09, 2010, 11:26 AM

    Actually God consistently encourages freeing of slaves in the Quran. Maybe he wanted to leave it to the human race to abolish slavery - and you know what we did. When slaves were kept in Muhammads day the Quran orders the followers of Islam to deal kindly and justly with them.


    You know, I don't normally bother to take the time to respond to the threads of Muslim visitors, because it's usually a short while until they can't take the whole "challenge, question, mock" thing, and take off and no doubt run off to tell people how terrible we all are, but this is so condescending.  Most of us were Muslims, you know.  I don't need you to tell me what the quran "actually" says because I read it and studied it.  Give us just a wee bit of the credit you're being given by the members here. 

    Quote
    Regarding Muhammad, it's probably true that Maria was given to him as a slave. But most Muslims beleive that he soon after married her.


    Based on what? Wishful thinking or hadiths?  Based on your posts thus far, I'd think you're not going to claim being a big fan of either.

    Quote
    Regarding the circumcision issue, we could be here for next week digging out various opinions.


    Since you claim not to follow the hadiths and you claim not to be sunni or shia, I'm wondering why you think it is that Big Al requires it of you. 



    [/quote]

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #73 - January 09, 2010, 11:28 AM

    Angel54, the only thing I can say here is that all scholars on Islam agree that any hitting should be light and should not leave a bruise or mark. We also know the prophet never hit any of his wives and should try to follow his example. Not the answer you were looking for but you backed me into a corner.

    All the scholars of Islam agree that Muhammad did hit Aisha - only you guys who say that hadith are nonsense dispute this:

    Sahih Muslim, Book 004, Number 2127:
    Why is it, O 'A'isha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?

    Good for you though.

    A question:
    If you believe that your prophet did not hit his wife and you now discover that someone wrote that your prophet did this (and much worse) - are you angry with that person for lying about your prophet and making him seem like a bad person?  
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #74 - January 09, 2010, 11:33 AM

    Actually,Islam brought a great deal of good to the region, for example preventing the burial of female children alive which was a practice of Pagan Arabs.


    What is the daleel for this, please?  The quran is not a history book, so don't even bother. 

    Quote
    It also undeniably gave a woman many rights which she didnt have befor i.e. for divorce, right to education etc.


    What is the daleel for this, please?  The quran is not a history book, so don't even bother. 

    Quote
    ''Yeah, same like Saffiyah. Killed her tribe, then took her as a wife, but I'm sure she asked for it, yep.''

    You keep asking me to provide proof the Quran is true. Where's your proof that these stories are true?


    As ironic as it may be to you, most of the people here tend to accept some of the hadith on some level as a historical record.  Certainly more of one to point to Mo's existence and behavior than the alleged accounts of a man they call Jesus.  

    I find your version of Islam - the one you are claiming- infinitely preferable to the dominant versions.   It is funny that most all of the Muslims who appear here, hoping to "dialog" with us claim to follow this version of Islam - at least in the start.  I champion it when and where I can.  In your claimed version of Islam, there really aren't any rules.  No hadiths, no ulemaa and ayatollahs, no authorities other than the uncommunicative invisible slave master.  I prefer this - I think it would be much easier on all the women and children and infidels - and men too.  It's certainly  more anarchic and liberal - except for the parts about slaves and women's inheritance and "beat them" (lightly does not appear in the text -- that comes from interpretations of some of these ulemaa that you apparently reject when it is convenient for whatever reason).  Perhaps it makes you more open minded, hence the reason why those who would be deemed heretics in most every mosque come here to chat us up.  

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #75 - January 09, 2010, 11:37 AM

    Angel54, the only thing I can say here is that all scholars on Islam agree that any hitting should be light and should not leave a bruise or mark. We also know the prophet never hit any of his wives and should try to follow his example. Not the answer you were looking for but you backed me into a corner.


    So you are not sunni or shia, and you do not follow hadiths, but you follow the scholars? That's quite... odd.  Why listen to the scholars, then?  The quran does not say "hit lightly" but it says "hit them".  So in some instances, you do let others interpret the deen for you? How do you decide when you will follow the mainstream and when you will not?

    The story about Mo not hitting a wife is false - if you accept the hadiths.  Conveniently for you, you do not, therefore he never hit a woman. 

    This is what I find strange. Don't accept the hadith, but use the words of some of the scholars to make dawah support your personal interpretation. 

    As for the corner, your invisible slave master backed you into it when he used the words "hit them," not anyone here.

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #76 - January 09, 2010, 11:38 AM

    if you read this blog from the start, you will see that I reject most hadith even the so called 'sahih' hadith since they are wirtten by men and therefore can't be trusted. Indeed these hadiths often contradict each other as well as the Quran


    And yet, at least when it comes to the matter of toning down Big Al's words about knocking the missus around, you use the authority of men to try and pretty up "and hit them." 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #77 - January 09, 2010, 11:42 AM

    I already stated that there are certain hadiths that extend on prayer, charity and other rulings on the Quran - I accept these hadiths although I know there may be minor differences in the way I pray etc. compared to other Muslims - I don't see this as a big problem.


    You are cherry picking the deen.  That's good - I encourage that to some extent and to each his own.  But if you want to cast a skeptical view on the hadiths in other posts - as you do about Aisha being a wee girl when the prophet put his dick in her, or how he married Safiya after he killed her kinfolk and enslaved her - then there must be some logical reason why, suddenly, the men who put together these hadith collections and the narrators and such got it right on where to put your arms in sujood or how to wash your feet in wudu. 

    Quote
    To be honest I don't know what is correct Sunnah - I believe it is up to us as indivduals to use our logic and intellect to decide which Sunnah are correct.


    Anarchist.  I like this.  Well up until the time when someone decides to use his logic and intellect to interpret the sunnah to mean he should put a bomb in his underwear or chop someone's head off. 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #78 - January 09, 2010, 11:46 AM

    The Quran may be inhuamne according to your reasoning. But it's not to mine or a billion other Muslims who you will claim are barbaric or delusional.


    Is your reason in coming here to get emboldened in your faith by running the gauntlet of meanie kafirs?  Because more than one of your responses thus far are full of the poor martyr me language that my friends  - and I - so often used as Muslims 'trying' to engage in dialog with non-Muslims. I mean of this claimed one billion, anyway, I wonder what percentage even know what the book says or have bothered with it.  And a billion people believing in something means shit all, really, I mean.  Tons of people believe in ghosts or alternative medicine or that a Jewish zombie in Palestine is really god, and that doesn't mean shit to me either. 

    Quote
    Since the hadiths often contradict the word of God I can not really trust any of them


    Except the ones that tell you how to pray and fast?

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #79 - January 09, 2010, 11:48 AM

    RIBS, actually the burial of female children alive by the pagan Arabs is mentioned in the Quran and many beleive therefore it was a common practice - female children were viewed as a financial burden - but obviously not all of them engaged in such a practice


    The quran is not a history book.  I, for one, would like some historical evidence other than the claims of the quran and of course those untrustworthy hadiths that the Pagans were burying their daughters alive.  Otherwise, it's just religious propaganda, and can be consigned to that bin. 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #80 - January 09, 2010, 11:50 AM

    allat, no probs - I appreciate and understand where all your questions are coming from. I do however feel a lot of people have a perception of Islam that is not at all accurate - in my opinion of course.


    You do know that this is not the Council of Never Been Muslims At All In Their Entire Lives forum? 

    I'm now waiting for ye olde "You were not a true Muslim" stuff to come about, as it usually does.  Odd how these conversations always seem to follow the same path. 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #81 - January 09, 2010, 02:24 PM

    '' Lucky for Muslims, God takes it upon himself to preserve and protect the Quran from such corruption. Indeed the Quran has stood the test of time with no two recogniosed Arabic texts differing by a single word.


    As the two quotes below show, this is not true



    Quote
    During a restoration of the Great Mosque of Sanan'a in Yemen, laborers discovered a graveyard of Qur'anic text. It contained tens of thousands of fragments from close to a thousand different parchment codices of the Qur'an dating back to the seventh and eighth centuries A.D.(29)

    The first person to spend a considerable amount of time with the fragments was Gerd-R. Puin, a specialist in Arabic calligraphy and Qur'anic paleography based at Saarland University, in Saarbrucken, Germany.(30) He discovered that the fragments "revealed unconventional verse orderings, minor textual variations, and rare styles of orthography and artistic embellishment."(31) In the estimation of Puin, this evidence suggests "an evolving text rather than simply the Word of God as revealed in its entirety to the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century A.D."(32) This conflicts with Von Denffer's position stated earlier that Muhammad "determined the order and arrangement" of the text and that "This order and arrangement was well known to the Muslims and strictly observed by them."

     




    Quote
    We find further evidence of an evolving Qur'an when we look outside the Qur'an to references to the Qur'an. We now have coins with supposed Qur'anic writing dating to 685 A.D. We also have the Qur'anic quotations on the Dome of the Rock sanctuary built by Abd al-Malik in 691 A.D. The quotations from both the coins and the Dome of Rock differ from the Qur'anic text today.(40) Two etymologists, Van Berchem and Grohmann have done extensive research on the Dome of the Rock inscriptions write "the earliest inscriptions contain 'variant verbal forms, extensive deviances, as well as omissions from the text which we have today.'"(41) This simply does not make sense if the Qur'an developed the way Von Denffer maintains. If these inscriptions had been derived from the Qur'an with these variants, then how could the Qur'an been canonized prior to this time?

     


    More here http://www.givingananswer.org/articles/koran.html

    How du you explain these differences ?

    Like a compass needle that points north, a man?s accusing finger always finds a woman. Always.

    Khaled Hosseini - A thousand splendid suns.
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #82 - January 09, 2010, 02:35 PM

    Quote from: Manat
    It was not our decision to make about their bodies.  We don't like it when it is done to girls.  If Big Al can't be clear about why it should be done, then it's pretty lame for us to all slavishly follow along and do it -- oh wait, it's not even from the quran, it is from the hadith, so Big Al can't even be bothered.  It is all on the other dude.


    Now I am in love with Manat Afro

    ...
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #83 - January 09, 2010, 04:24 PM

    ''On what basis?  How do you know if there are so many different religions around the world, from sun worship  to Ganesh the milk drinking elephant God?  

    I am sure I could also make all these religions make some sort of sense if I was willing to perform  intellectual summersaults.''  

    I beleive we all posess the logic and reason to know that there is only one God - and that if this God exists that he is the Creator of the uinverse and everything in it i.e. essentially the Muslim God. If you think you can make some sort of sense out of sun or elephant worship please go ahead. As a Muslim I beleive that all monotheists can be considered 'Muslims' i.e. submitters to God's will

    ''How do you know this is different from that order, that muhammed was simple a man of humble origins, either with schizotypal tendencies or an inflated agenda, who made up commands from God as he went along?  Some of the flaws that we or others like Hassan have pointed out, or those that you 'dont know', could be explained by this? ''

    I have faith that Muhammad, Moses, and Jesus were not liars and they taught us a great deal of good.



    ''You certainly need to rule this out as an option before you make assumptions that this religion only came into existence 1400 years ago, when man has been around for 250,000 years, and all these religions seem to have been only delivered to one very small part of the world?
    Of course there's proof, its accepted in Islam.  ''

    Theres no proof that all prophets were sent to the middle east. As Muslims we beleive that God has been sending prophets and messengers ever since Adam - some put the figure over a hundered thousand. Where exactly they were sent no-one knows.

    ''I am actually disappointed you did not already know about how this book came together according to muslims scholars, yet you are prepared to believe in it and perform genital mutilation, eat halal products only,  reject eating one animal entirely, pray, devote time towards it, all for something that you have no proof and some would consider pie-in-the-sky. ''

    Actually I am aware of the story. You can not prove the story is true as much as I can not prove the Quran is true. However my point actually was that I don't accpet that all the details of the story are true i.e. the fact that non-one knew which Quran copies were authentic. I beleive the non-authentic copies were destroyed since they were easily recognised as corruptions but that it was fully known which copies were authentic and thus these were preserved. Furthermore although I do accept the Quran may have been compiled as a single book after the Prophets death but I still beleive the scripture was in its original form.

    ''You already know that humans have a tendency not only to create false religions, but also to follow them.  You then need to ask youself how you really know, what separates Islam & the rest of religions from the crowd.  I came to the conclusion that it did not, and in anything it was more likely to be false that others, such as buddhism.  Although I am agnostic, as I believe this is the only honest stance anyone can take.  Dont you?  Also do polytheist & atheist have their eyes repeatedly fried in your hell, be bitten by 7-headed snakes whose poison is enough to melt the earth and hit repeated on the forehead with metal hammers?''

    For my views on hell and other religions please visit my 'Hell, Eternity, and reason'  section of my blog.

    ''That's what the scholars say after allowing the modern societal values to dictate their understandings, a pattern I note is being repeated.  You must understand the book of Allah is 'mubeen' i.e. clear.  It should be, as Allah would not want differing messages to be inferred unwittingly

    Please explain the purpose of this hitting?
    No, we dont know that - in fact how are you going to know if only the literature you are willing to accept is that which Allah dictated, and are not willing to accept any sahih literature on his life & times?  In fact in the sahih literature, it does in fact claim he hits Aisha..

    When sleeping with Aisha, Muhammad surreptitiously left his bed and went to the graveyard at Baqi.  

    Aisha followed and watched what the prophet doing; when the prophet found out, according to Sahih Muslim Book 4:2127, 'He struck me on the chest which caused me pain'
    Can you see how this suggestion is widely open to confirmation bias and incorrect interpretation & understanding?  Couldnt Allah have told you how to pray in at least the Quran?''

    I don't understand the wisdom behind including the 'hitting verse'in the Quran but this alone is not enough for me to conclude Islam is false.

    ''I cant imagine you really believe God made each of us from all those ingredients listed, including dead people. ''

    Some of the ingredients you list such as 'nothing' and 'dead people' are likely figuritive and not actual physical ingredients. Besides as far as I am aware we were not created from 'dead people' but we will be resurrected after we die hence the relevant verse. I will point out once again that the only ingredient that God tells us he used to make all living beings was water giving this particular ingredient special importnace

    ''Try imagining one your professors at Cambridge telling you that, and let me know how seriously you would take them!

    I understand that, its how I felt as a Muslim too!  With hindsight, my impression is that you have not studied Islam as thoroughly & objectively as you might have and assume you want it to be true to give you hope, purpose & direction.''

    Thanks for letting me know what my assumptions are and how well I have/have not studied Islam - very insightful  Wink




    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #84 - January 09, 2010, 04:38 PM

    Manat and RIBS. I am against female circumcision and certainly view these as mutilation. Most male muslims I know had there circumcissions done when they were infants - none of us feel we were 'mutilated'. But as I have stressed a couple of times before I can not be certain that it is a necessary Islamic requirement. Therefore it goes without saying that if a Muslim couple decided not too circumcise their boys I'd have no qualms with that whatsoever.

    Manat thanks for your other insightful comments

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #85 - January 09, 2010, 04:44 PM

    I have read the thread(mostly) and have nothing to add except to point out how wrong your claim about the Quran surviving the test of time and not having any 2 Arabic texts differ in even one word. I assume you know Arabic after making such claim, and will ask you have you heard about the Seven Readings and their respective Mushafs القراءات السبع ومصاحفها?
    What would the possible explanation for some difference in some words (some of them differ in meaning and are not mere synonyms)?


    "In every time and culture there are pressures to conform to the prevailing prejudices. But there are also, in every place and epoch, those who value the truth; who record the evidence faithfully. Future generations are in their debt." -Carl Sagan

  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #86 - January 09, 2010, 05:01 PM

    Allat
    Actually,Islam brought a great deal of good to the region, for example preventing the burial of female children alive which was a practice of Pagan Arabs. It also undeniably gave a woman many rights which she didnt have befor i.e. for divorce, right to education etc.

    What absolute bull. Khadija was an educated women, she received inheritance from her father even though she had brothers, she ran her fathers business, and she chose who she got married to!

    Different tribes had different rules. There were even warrior women from other tribes who challenged Mo (in the hadith).

    And what divorce rights? If a woman wants to divorce she has to go to a court and prove her case, and as we all know some things can be very difficult to prove! As for the man, he just has to say 'I divorce you 3' times, sounds fair Roll Eyes And of course if the woman initiates the divorce she has to give the dowry back! So much for a wedding gift! What if she cant afford to pay it back? And if it turns out she's pregnant during the 3 month waiting period the husband has every right to take her back against her will, this is stated in the Quran. So much for divorce rights.

    Khadija alone proves all this crap that women had no rights before Islam is false! It's just false propaganda to help spread Islam. Islam on it's own isn't enough, lies have to be created to give it a positive image Roll Eyes

    So, if a hadith "contradicts" the Quran it is false. And if a Quranic verse is factually incorrect or inhumane, it is okay, am I getting that right?

    What is your criteria for which Hadiths are "true" and which are "false", among the widely accepted Sahih hadiths?

    Besides, you claimed Aisha was older, where is your proof of that? Several recognized hadiths state that Aisha was 6 when married, 9 when Mo had sex with her. If you don't accept those Hadiths, why not? Just because it makes your conscience uncomfortable?

    It doesn't matter what age he claims Aisha is. Verse 65:4 allows men to marry a girl of any age, even if she hasn't hit puberty and divorce them too (and waiting periods only count when the marriage has been consummated).
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #87 - January 09, 2010, 05:10 PM

    ''It doesn't matter what age he claims Aisha is. Verse 65:4 allows men to marry a girl of any age, even if she hasn't hit puberty and divorce them too (and waiting periods only count when the marriage has been consummated).''

    If this is your honest interpretation of this verse then I don't find it difficult to undertsand in general why you think Islam is ridiculous.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #88 - January 09, 2010, 05:19 PM

    Quote
    If this is your honest interpretation of this verse then I don't find it difficult to undertsand in general why you think Islam is ridiculous.

    It's not my interpretation. I got the interpretation from tafsirs (including Ibn Kathir). Tbh the verse itself is clear anyway.
  • Re: Hello people
     Reply #89 - January 09, 2010, 05:20 PM

    I agree with peru, that verse is pretty darn clear about being able to marry underage girls.  What is your interpretation of it, and how did you come to it?

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Previous page 1 2 34 5 ... 22 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »