Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 05:41 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 15, 2024, 06:36 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 13, 2024, 05:18 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 04, 2024, 03:51 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

New Britain
October 30, 2024, 08:34 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
October 22, 2024, 09:05 PM

Tariq Ramadan Accused of ...
September 11, 2024, 01:37 PM

France Muslims were in d...
September 05, 2024, 03:21 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism

 (Read 3337 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     OP - January 27, 2010, 10:02 PM

    so are you a pantheist then?


    Wow, sabr, please Cheesy Still, I am greatly complemented that you are interested in my opinion! I took the liberty of creating a new thread, even though my answer is pretty short.

    I checked out the previous post where this question arose -- and, yes, it is fair to say that many strains of Sufism could be called pantheist, in the sense that they believe "God is everything". You look at a rose, that's God. You type on your computer: a movement "within" God. It's very close to most forms of Buddhism in that regard. The universe is God.

    There are a number of implications. You could take it in a sort of Hindu direction, and then see the "many" Gods of that great religion as aspects of the One. But in some forms of Sufism, this is taken to be the true meaning of Tawhid. Not only is there no Allah but Allah -- there is nothing else either, ultimately! In Bahai faith -- and in the Sufi doctrine of Mansur Hallaj -- the various prophets and messengers of all the religions were people who actually "dissolved" into this God and, in a particular sense, "became" God. In all cases, it is through meditation, dhkr, entheogens or whatever, our selfhood, "ego" can be disolved and we can be elevated into only God.
     
    There are different moral implications. Awais would understand this theme to be an undercurrent in the 5 percenter branch of the Nation of Islam (hence, in hip-hop, "G" does not stand for Gansta, but for "God" -- the brothers see God in each other). The Hashashin (it is alleged they were similar) and the 5 percenters are interesting, as, once they realise they are divine, they also understand that everything they do is divine, and so they are permitted to be a universe unto themselves, smoking and womanizing etc (as well as laying down some dope rhymes).

    Alternatively, a more traditional Sufi Muslim might behave in the opposite direction: if the selfhood is obliterated, and there is only God, no more you, then there is nothing arrogant in claiming to be God: in fact, it is the height of adab! This becoming God, becoming one with the universe-as-God, stems from denying one's individual being, which means abandoning lots of worldly stuff (including the women and smoking, though the poetry often remains pretty good).

    Anyway, I take a different position that actually sounds more traditional (probably quite close to that of ibn Arabi in Sufism and Issac Luria in Kabbalah). I am not a pantheist.

    For me, God is separate from the universe.

    It is faster to talk now in metaphor, and then you can ask me more if interested.

    The pantheist would say: we are living in the mind of God. Through prayer, dhkir, LSD or whatever, we can obliterate our false ego-centric selfhood and become one with God -- become one with the universe, become God.

    In contrast, I believe: we are living the breath of God. God breathes "Be" and we are (actually, more precisely, God breathed "Be" and Adam was, and we are built from the fallen form of that original Adam -- but perhaps that is unimportant to elaborate on now).

    Breath is different from mind. In my view, we are as close to God as imaginable -- there is not much closer to you, than your own breath -- but ultimately God transcends (rather than being immanent to) all the universes we might inhabit. However, the nature of this breathing is such that it constructs a world for us built of signs that communicate God's love to us (because the breath is nothing other than Love). Our own individual selfhoods are sort of condensations of the "vapour" of that breath.

    The state of oblivion that the other Sufis (and Buddhists, etc) speak about does exist. We can dissolve into the breath through prayer, dhikr, entheogens, etc. I believe this was very much Ali's (and Hallaj's) state -- one of oblivion, annihilated selfhood. He spoke from the nature of a martyr to that breath. In contrast, Prophecy is not in such a state of oblivion, but rather of a victorious reading of the signs: an important (non-pantheistic) separation from God, an individual separated from the Divine permanently, but one that gets as close as humanly possible to comprehending the signs given by the breath, to "reading" the true nature of the words "spoken" in the breathing (a reading of the words that form existence itsel).

    Yup, that's basically it. I also believe that this whole breathing thing happens once, but has a sort of permanent implication, called the next world -- again separate from God, but almost close enough to be confused with pantheism.

    Any questions, happy to answer Smiley I should point out that I am speaking for Tailorite Sufism only here. I sometimes irritate certain Sufi types with this position -- and am regularly accused of being a kind of "lower-level" Salafi-type. But the general characterisation is correct, actually.

    Love and Light,

    The Tailor


    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #1 - January 27, 2010, 10:10 PM

    Quote
    It's very close to most forms of Buddhism in that regard. The universe is God.

     

    Is that what most forms of Buddhism regard? Sounds more Hindu-ish to me.


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #2 - January 27, 2010, 10:17 PM

    Is that what most forms of Buddhism regard? Sounds more Hindu-ish to me.


    You are right: as least the Therevada and Zen schools of Buddhism wouldn't be so keen on using the God idea anyway, not the least because of the personal implications. When I was doing Therevada training, in fact, my teachers preferred to deny the word God as another illusory attachment. But becoming one with the cosmos is very much the Buddhistic nature Smiley

    Anyhow this (admittedly Hindu-ish) reading of Buddhism is quite popular with (usually western, interfaith) Sufi groups, such as the Universal Sufis. They have a point, within their reading, because they have changed the semantics of the term "Allah" so it is no longer personal in that sense.

    L&L,
    TT

    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #3 - January 27, 2010, 10:19 PM

    Breath is different from mind. In my view, we are as close to God as imaginable -- there is not much closer to you, than your own breath -- but ultimately God transcends (rather than being immanent to) all the universes we might inhabit. However, the nature of this breathing is such that it constructs a world for us built of signs that communicate God's love to us (because the breath is nothing other than Love). Our own individual selfhoods are sort of condensations of the "vapour" of that breath.
    Yup, that's basically it. I also believe that this whole breathing thing happens once, but has a sort of permanent implication, called the next world -- again separate from God, but almost close enough to be confused with pantheism.

    So do bad people come from when God eats garlic and his breath pongs? And good people after he gargles with mouthwash?  Anyhow thanks for the explanation, I am beginning to get your stance a bit better now..

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #4 - January 27, 2010, 10:29 PM

    are your parents sufi's - what do they think of your beliefs?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #5 - January 27, 2010, 10:36 PM



    I sometimes irritate certain Sufi types with this position -- and am regularly accused of being a kind of "lower-level" Salafi-type. But the general characterisation is correct, actually.



    Can you help me understand how your views could possibly be confused with Salafi type views?Huh?
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #6 - January 27, 2010, 10:38 PM

    So do bad people come from when God eats garlic and his breath pongs? And good people after he gargles with mouthwash?  Anyhow thanks for the explanation, I am beginning to get your stance a bit better now..


    Cheesy Quite close! Actually the breath of God is always fresh.

    But the image I just conjured up of God breathing is, in fact, ME breathing (my words -- delivered via the internet). So I've constructed an idol, of sorts, from my breathing -- of God breathing. Because I am not a pantheist, we are never able to capture the reality of this in words -- but we can "feel" the reality, "feel" the breath through the "resonance" of our breathing.

    Hence, good and bad people.

    If I were to set up a different idol, say, standing up in a mosque and delivering a horrible hutba in which I say its okay to blow up other people -- then I most definitely would not be "feeling" the Divine breath through resonance of my own breath: I would have bad breath. Hence the hadiths regarding garlic in the masjid -- and the loads of hadith relating to miswak (Why was the prophet obsessed with dental hygiene? This is the reason.)

    In contrast, my breathing here -- has been all about the Divine breath first, and then (self-referentially) our breathing reflecting/resonating with Divine breath -- is, I think you can feel at least, not garlic ridden. Maybe it smells peculiar, maybe it doesn't smell at all, and is so weak as not to be felt, but it is not unpleasant, I think. Not physically repellant like that of our hypothetical sheikh above.

    So even if I am incorrect in everything I've said -- b/c it is all speculation and metaphor ultimately for me -- I've used a miswak at least, before I started. And it is miswak use that determines who is good and who is bad in this world. The miswak is the reason entire worlds can be destroyed.

    Love and Light,

    The Tailor

    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #7 - January 27, 2010, 10:45 PM

    things like circumcision - where do you stand on that then?
    do you ever worry you might have got it wrong, and the quran was meant to be seen as literal, and you will burn in hell as a result?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #8 - January 27, 2010, 10:46 PM

    Brief answer to previous two questions.

    1) My mother was a Sufi who dabbled with Salafism and then returned. My father is just a "folk Sunni" who dabbled with Sufism through my mum Smiley My father actually really likes my stuff, even though he is very much outwardly a straight up "traditional" brother. My mother had/has concerns regarding me being so public about these ideas -- b/c Sufi tariqas as you might know generally prefer to keep all the good stuff to themselves -- mostly, I think, out of an historical fear of being cut into little pieces! But I think Sufism has some problems of its own, and unwillingness  to go public is one of them.

    2) Some Sufis think I am rather Salfi-leaning (or at least not Sufi enough) because of my emphasis on the Salaf and the importance of studying all these dodgy hadiths and verses. They prefer to turn their heads on this stuff -- in particular, portions of the Bukhari is held in high suspicion as fictionalised political propaganda. Whereas I love the nutty stuff!

    L&L,

    TT

    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #9 - January 27, 2010, 11:03 PM

    things like circumcision - where do you stand on that then?


    Some really hard questions.

    If I had a son (which I have not), I would potentially have a problem with "physically" circumcising him. I might not do it. I'd certainly say that it would have very few health benefits in this day and age.

    At the same time, I endeavor to follow the covenant of Abraham: who circumcised himself, and everyone in his house, at the age of 99. I am not at that stage yet, and I don't think I have circumcised myself yet, let alone my house.

    It is worth referring to the Jewish tradition, in regards to circumcision, as they really prescribe it. They call the phallic aspect of our perception -- Yesod -- which can stand for "basis" or "foundation". It is understood (metaphorically) as a conduit for the light of Prophetic revelation to "inseminate" our feminine aspect of Malkuth/Shekhina -- a conduit for Divine information to be fed into our feminine perception/language

    For me, I sort of go along with this (actually in line with Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis): the phallic principle (the fertility symbol we find in the ancient cultures, but also in today's landscape of tower blocks) dominates all reality. The phallus base/foundation through which reality is determined/stabilized. I've said elsewhere here (again, following modern psychoanalysis) that information is sexuality (and vice versa): and information exchange is consequently a function of the inseminating phallus. If you like, every sign that we perceive has a base, has a phallic aspect that can deliver all kinds of inseminating information into us. (Sounding pretty icky, huh? I did not make this up.) Anyway, to circumcise ourselves is to circumcise the phallic function, so we don't just take in "any old" information (which could be, yknow, evil) -- it is to ensure that whatever we perceive is always "righteously" channeled to us, that the information delivery is "filtered" via the circumcised phallus.

    That we follow the straight path, in other words.

    L&L,

    TT

    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #10 - January 27, 2010, 11:17 PM

    Do you ever worry you might have got it wrong, and the quran was meant to be seen as literal, and you will burn in hell as a result?

    I think you are believing in the Islam of the future, but what do you think of atheism - boring & shallow?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #11 - January 28, 2010, 06:45 PM

    Also do you know shaaz mahboob?  he is Vice Chair of a British NGO - British Muslims for Secular Democracy, and  the only other sufi I have come across

    http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=9475&post=61397&uid=90014368932#/shaazmahboob?v=info

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism and Tailorite Sufism
     Reply #12 - January 28, 2010, 06:50 PM


    2) Some Sufis think I am rather Salfi-leaning (or at least not Sufi enough) because of my emphasis on the Salaf and the importance of studying all these dodgy hadiths and verses. They prefer to turn their heads on this stuff -- in particular, portions of the Bukhari is held in high suspicion as fictionalised political propaganda. Whereas I love the nutty stuff!



    I don't think that you are in any danger of being embraced by any salafis Tailor. If anything, they are likely to pronounce takfir upon you....
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »