Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 15, 2025, 04:00 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Poll

  • Question: What's your stance on polygraphing candidates for public office?  (Voting closed: February 15, 2010, 12:31 AM)
  • For - 4 (57.1%)
  • Against - 3 (42.9%)
  • Not sure - 0 (0%)
  • Total Voters: 7

 Topic: Polygraphs for politicians?

 (Read 2530 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Polygraphs for politicians?
     OP - February 08, 2010, 12:31 AM

    Just a wild though I had when I was stoned earlier today.

    There could be a standard test that every politician has to take before running in an election. Well not ever one of them bu you know what I mean. And just for the sake of the discussion let's assume polygraph tests are 100% reliable.

    I'm inclined to be against it but I will wait until I hear your opinions before I cast my vote.

    Feel free to ridicule the idea.
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #1 - February 08, 2010, 12:33 AM

    Against - simply because there's little point as they are unreliable i.e. somebody could be predjudiced from joining office, just because the test got it wrong. Unfair.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #2 - February 08, 2010, 12:44 AM

    And just for the sake of the discussion let's assume polygraph tests are 100% reliable

  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #3 - February 08, 2010, 01:34 AM

    In that case it depends on the question you ask in them, and if the answers would be public knowledge..

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #4 - February 08, 2010, 01:45 AM

    I'd be more inclined to let the ones who aren't good liars pass the test.

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #5 - February 08, 2010, 02:14 AM

    In that case it depends on the question you ask in them, and if the answers would be public knowledge..

    Of course they would be public knowledge
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #6 - February 08, 2010, 02:22 AM

    let's assume polygraph tests are 100% reliable.


    Well in that case, yes - only on questions related to their job and political positions though.

    Iblis has mad debaterin' skillz. Best not step up unless you're prepared to recieve da pain.

  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #7 - February 08, 2010, 02:35 AM




    oops

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #8 - February 08, 2010, 03:17 AM

    oops

     Huh?
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #9 - February 08, 2010, 04:16 AM

    Communists act in mysterious ways. lol

    Iblis has mad debaterin' skillz. Best not step up unless you're prepared to recieve da pain.

  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #10 - February 08, 2010, 04:50 AM

    ><

    Quote from: Iraqi Atheist on Today at 12:31:40 AM
    And just for the sake of the discussion let's assume polygraph tests are 100% reliable

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: Polygraphs for politicians?
     Reply #11 - February 08, 2010, 05:37 AM

    Just for the sake of discussion let's assume we are really talking about polygraphs. Tongue

    Reliability is about equal to random chance. Totally useless.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »