When I was a Muslim I thought (and a lot of Muslims I spoke to shared my view) that all McDonald's, KFC, Burger King and all the famous takeouts, restaurants, school canteens, infact everywhere where they serve food should serve halaal food. It made common sense to me. After all, it's not part of anyones religion that they can't eat halaal food (didn't know that Sikhs can't eat halaal...) and atheists don't have a religion anyway. I thought it would be a win-win situation to serve halaal food everywhere.
But even if its not against peoples religion, it may be against their principles on a number of fronts. First of all being:
* Society has formed a consensus, about how animals should be slaughtered. It is strictly monitored and audited. Animals should not feel any pain at all - and slaughter methods reflect this. This is what British society agrees upon.
* Why should Islamic norms in regard to meat and food become default in society? This is arrogant to the extreme. Muslims have a responsibility to provide for themselves if they want to observe dietary rules that are apart from the mainstream.
The second point above just further persuades me that Halal is a form of identity politics, to entrench a kind of religious territorialism in society, to push the mainstream to accept Islamic precepts in terms of food as the norm. This is simply not acceptable.