Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 02:51 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 06:45 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 08:08 PM

Gaza assault
November 21, 2024, 07:56 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 05:07 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2024, 05:41 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 20, 2024, 09:02 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]

 (Read 130682 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 9 10 1112 13 ... 28 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #300 - February 20, 2010, 07:26 PM

    Are you flirting with me?


    See how subtle I am.

    Islam is a funny religion which is misunderstood by its scholars and correctly understood by ordinary Muslims.
    Faith is keeping your eyes shut when looking at the world, and/or keeping your eyes open only for the beauty of the world.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #301 - February 20, 2010, 07:38 PM

    I cant speak on behalf of everyone, but I'll do so anyway Wink

    I think the difference lies in these phrases:

    Muslims should be forced to adopt atheism at gunpoint
    Muslims are ignorant & chauvenistic


    I have observed statements like the first 2 going commonly unchallenged at FFI

    M must not have seen the first one. This would be advocating violence and this is not allowed at FFI. Breaks rule #1 of the FFI Dao.

    But, unlike Allah or YHVH M is not allknowing, and so has to rely on what s/he reads or what is reported.

    The second one is true, so why should it be challanged? Fact is, not only most mohammedans, but most theists are ignorant. They do know shit about their own religion.  
    And mohammedans do have a sense of being superior to kafirs. i.e. western females being seen as whores or non-mohammedans being adressed as kafir in the insulting way and other nice insults. In other words seeing down on non-mohammedans, and that is chauvinism.

    My problem with FFI has always been that it attracts some extreme anti-Muslim haters and that this can be linked to Ali's own remarks such as "a good Muslim is not a good human being" - just what some bigots are waiting to hear so they can dehumanize Muslims and justify their hatred and acts of violence against ordinary Muslims - who are of course our families.

    Again, that's just the truth. A good mohammedan is someone like Mohammad himself and he certainly wasn't a good human being. The ordinary mohammedan is not a good one, as most are ignorant of their faith, just like i.e. Christians. And just because some morons have IQ's in double digits doesn't mean one should censor himself and not say the truth, just like you shouldn't stop selling knives, because some jerk might use it to injure someone.

    FFI has always been quite happy to allow the most disgusting displays of bigotry and extreme statements - in the past I have seen calls for Muslims to be rounded up and placed in 're-education' camps while their Sheikhs and Imams made to "disappear".

     
    Actually such a statement would warrant an immidiate ban. Just ask TT (Taqiyyah Tactician) who has made such comments about theists, you might know him as Methaphysical Naturalist here.

    Just now took a quick look at the forum and can still see comments to Muslims like "Are you a raghead or a diaper-head?".

    If you see it, just report it to M and it will be dealth with. I think this would count as racist and be removed. However, FFI does allow some degree of insults or rather M doesn't bother with it, as it is mostly mutual, so when it is acted upon there will be mostly a general reminder or a part will be split off and dumped into the bin.


    And this is the fundamental difference between FFI and CoEM forums.

    FFI's only interest in ex-Muslims is to use them as a blunt instrument to bash Islam with. That is why they attract so many Christian fundamentalists, racists, necons and every other flavour of bigot who hates Muslims and Islam rather than genuine ex-Muslims.

    Racists are banned or driven away by members.
    FFI has many christian fundies? Nope. Anyway, it would't matter if, because even christian fundies are allowed to have an opinion on Islam.
    Neocons? Only few. Fewer than our christian fundies I would say.

    (After all what sort of an ex-Muslim wants to be used by bigoted groups to add to the irrational hatred directed towards their own families?)

    I.e. BerberElla?   Tongue (Who, btw, along with other major players on here was a long time FFI member and when this forum started even promoted it amongst FFI members. Even after the whole UFO affair this was continued. I know that, because I know there were complaint mails sent out of fear this was a scam. So, FFI must have been not that bad.)


    And I am sorry, but I have to laugh about the "irrational hatred towards their own families" thing.  Cheesy We Ex-Christians have absolutely no problem to criticise Christianity viciously (AND the fundies) and most of us have christian families whom we dearly love. I have yet to come across an Ex-C forum where they are as apologetic about Christianity as you are here about Islam. I can understand that someone who is in the deconversion process can tend to go back and forth, but if it has been years after one has left a religion, there is really no excuse for apologetics.


    CoEM has more to it than simply airing our criticisms of Islam - it is about trying to offer support, and understanding and a place to just finally meet others who have gone through - or are going through what they are and get some help and advice. That stuff that FFI so arrogantly dismisses as "chit-chat" is a very important part of helping each other overcome the baggage Islam has left us with.

    Yeah, some "chit-chat" is understandable, but if a mere leisure forum becomes the most frequented forum, there is something wrong imo.

    Take a look at the most frequented forum here:
    http://www.ex-christian.net/index.php?/index

    I do not think that the deconversion process is so much different in other faiths than Christianity.

    FFI often shows support for Israel

    WTF is wrong about supporting Israel?  Huh? Should you not support people who are being attacked by groups who want them exterminated?  Huh?
    I am a left-liberal (in case you didn't know yet) and I am (mostly) pro Israel. Also, I see the "Israel is bad"-crowd as a bunch of hypocrites. Because, if they weren't, they would protest i.e. the polish settlements on my native soil Silesia with the same rigor they do with the israeli ones.  whistling2

    Ali Sina's Obama-birther nonsense really makes me suspicious. Why on earth would any genuine ex-muslim who says he's from Iran become so passionat about an issue that is deeply rooted in white american right-wing culture? The whole Obama/Birther thing is so rooted in american racism that it's hard to believe any actual immigrant from the middle east (with a muslim name I presume) would get so involved in such a topic.

    I have yet to meet in real life or on-line a single person who takes the Obama-birther stuff seriously who isn't a white Republican Christian.

    Actually, the answer is really easy. In Ali's case it's "You can take the muslim out of islam, but not islam out of the muslim." Ali has still/again a lot of views which are identical with those in Islam and the birfer thingy isn't surprising either, mohammedans have a thing for conspiracy crap and Ali has too. Also, there is racism in Islam, blacks are usually seen as inferior. Just ask the black guy who tried to make a docu about his haji, boy, did he experience a surprise there being asked whose slave he was.

    Do you know who Cassie is? She used to be the user Cassandra, she wants us to believe she has a M.A fuck not with a lack of logic like that. 

    For the Lulz:

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=919331&sid=1543f83f553ee76c872415903d041b20

     Cheesy

    FYI, for people who don't know it yet:

    Sona2 = King Tut = megatroll

    Quote from: Sona2
    I multi nicked as:

    1. Muslim4lyfe.
    2. Khalid Shah.
    3. Infinite.
    4. Rizzwan.
    5. Sona.
    6. Delphi.
    7. rizzy.

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=57641
    (Note: the thread linked to is in the member-only forum Talk To The Mods. If you really want to read some nasty stuff, look up the Khalid Shah persona.)

    P.S. Cassie has 2 PhD's iirc and is one of our best debators.  Wink

    FUCK FFI! I speak for myself although many here will have the same sentiments, we do not care about FFI we think it is a shit forum, for bigots and bullies to gather in, using Islam as a pretext to justify the bigotry against Muslims.

    Lets not forget, it is the sensitive herbs from FFI who come here and tell us how to behave... So what if we think FFI is shit? WE don't want you guys to come over FFI and spam this forum trying to defend the obscene. Stop whining, and you are welcome here if you want to criticize Islam.


    Yeah. Luckily you seem to have overcome your obsession with FFI and have focused on trolling here. Can't say I feel sorry for that.  grin12

    It shows how FFI is so quick to believe any nonsense so long as it shows Muslims/Islam in a bad light.

    Nonsense?

    Fact: Islam allows to marry and fuck prepubescent girls.
    Fact: There are still adult men marrying prepubescent girls in islamic countries. Just read the news and find the latest 8 year old muslimah wanting a divorce from some old fuck.

    So, to believe that is not really that far fetched. The only reason I found it fishy, was simply because of the amount of men.

    Just my 2 cents to this thread.

    "Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." - Steven Weinberg
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #302 - February 20, 2010, 07:39 PM

    @SkyN:

    1. Am I proud to have Q-Man here? I can only judge him by what he writes and proud is not the word I would use to describe everything Q-Man writes.  There are times I could say I'm proud of what he says and others not!  I have no problem with him being here if that's what you mean. (That of course does not mean I condone everything he says.)


    This is pretty much the same thing Ali Sina would say about the most provocative and nasty posters at FFI. Well done Hassan!

    2. What am I going to do about some of the things he says? That's not my job - that's the job of the mods and admin here. If he breaks the rules here they will act accordingly.


    Damn! You're right out of Ali Sina's book of excuses again.

    I have no doubt that Ansari's deep hatred towards Q-Man has a great deal to do with politics and in particular Ansaris hatred towards the left. Ansari clearly sympathises with Neocons and the Conservative Right in the US (I realise he is from Canada) while Q-Man clearly sympathises with the left.


    This is bullshit. Anyone who reads even my earliest postings at FFI knows full well that I am not of the Right and indeed pretty much head what can be called the Left Faction at FFI. I am close with Nick Cohen and many other leftists in Europe and elsewheres who have seen the exrtemist authoritarian types within the Left milieu lose any commitment to rational discourse and a sense of human decency. I was active in anarcho-syndicalist organizations for well over a decade and have a bona fide track record of exposing and helping litigate against labour management companies specialzing in strikebreaking and expoliting other human beings for the sake of the bottom line. My work in regards to Islam is mainly aimed at taking on those who espouse the awful ideas and sentiments of those on the extreme left who hide behind a facade of trendy banter, evasions and non-responses. In reality taking on Q-man is pretty much the same as taking on any corporate shill who espouses the virtues of McDonalds, Big Pharma, free trade agreements, etc.

    Also, when someone like Hassan starts off on using the word "hate" to describe those he cannot denate with rationally then you know that he is still enamored of the propaganda devices that Muslims use on a daily basis to brush off criticism. It works well with an audience of teenagers but doesn't hold water with those who understand that this merely reflects an underlying attachment issue that probably will never be dealt with honestly.

    Ansari is not just on the right - but is typical of that delusional, paranoid taqiyya jihadchat mentality that sees plots everywhere he looks.


    This is even more amazing bullshit coming from the Mr Rogers of Islam. He (like Os) have been playin this stupid tune for a while and especially since the "Beauty of Islam" thread didn't turn out the way they wanted it to. Hell, it wasn't even that important of a subject as far as I could tell and several months later I checked it out and read Osmanthus's stupid reply. Which really wasn't a reply but rather a rant. It was a cheap attempt at defamation and I have received pm's from others wondering about Os's mental health. All I can say is that's what happens when someone ingratiates themselves into some sort of "elite group". Certain moral compromises take place that are difficult to live with and tantrums are an inevitable by-product.

    If Q-Man was on the right and was ranting at a Muslim, Ansari wouldn't have such a problem with him.


    Actually I would and I have. The case of Samurai Jack is one huge example. I campaigned to get that guy kicked off of FFI and when he finally was banned plenty of quarreling happened between I and others at FoFFI. I have taken on plenty of those who espouse what can be called "rightwingers" such as Sorge, Humanist and IHSoter. Sometimes for what seemed like an eternity. So there you go Hassan. Face up the fact that you are wrong.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #303 - February 20, 2010, 07:49 PM

     And mohammedans do have a sense of being superior to kafirs.


    Please don't call Muslims Muhammadans. Come on now.

    "The more I study religions the more I am convinced that man never worshiped anything but himself."
    ~Sir Richard Francis Burton

    "I think religion is just like smoking: Both invented by people, addictive, harmful, and kills!"
    ~RIBS
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #304 - February 20, 2010, 07:52 PM

    guys, guys, its the quality not the quantity which counts. You see Ixoilie she only comes when she needs to stir some shit. I guess she is not content with her mediocre life.

    Oh Ixolite can I have a blueprint of your brain? I want to build a fuckwit.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #305 - February 20, 2010, 07:53 PM

    @Ansar,

    Wow! BD was right you do think I'm the Ali Sina of CEMB... cool!  Afro

    I may be wrong about you being on the right - I doubt I'm wrong about much else.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #306 - February 20, 2010, 07:55 PM

    Look at these nasty goons of ffi coming out of the woodwork. I think we need some pest control over here.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #307 - February 20, 2010, 07:56 PM

    mohammedans


    L M A O

    It's like watching the reincarnation of William Muir come to life.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #308 - February 20, 2010, 07:58 PM

    Yeah those are just trollish comments. Comments like "Mohammedan" are just for the purpose to start a flame-war.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #309 - February 20, 2010, 08:01 PM

    This is even more amazing bullshit coming from the Mr Rogers of Islam


    btw does anyone know what this means?
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #310 - February 20, 2010, 08:03 PM

    guys, guys, its the quality not the quantity which counts. You see Ixoilie she only comes when she needs to stir some shit. I guess she is not content with her mediocre life.

    Oh Ixolite can I have a blueprint of your brain? I want to build a fuckwit.


    You haven't changed much, have you?

    Try to say something which refutes her post, please.

    L M A O

    It's like watching the reincarnation of William Muir come to life.


    Please don't call Muslims Muhammadans. Come on now.


    I am at a loss here. Is Muhammadan an offensive word?

    Quote
    Noun 1. Muhammadan - a follower of Mohammed
    Mohammedan, Muhammedan
    follower - a person who accepts the leadership of another
    Adj. 1. Muhammadan - of or relating to the Arabian prophet Muhammad or to the religion he founded
    Mohammedan


    Islam is a funny religion which is misunderstood by its scholars and correctly understood by ordinary Muslims.
    Faith is keeping your eyes shut when looking at the world, and/or keeping your eyes open only for the beauty of the world.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #311 - February 20, 2010, 08:03 PM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCxgmPEt7Y4
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #312 - February 20, 2010, 08:07 PM

    btw does anyone know what this means?


    I think he is comparing you to David Rogers, who was a convert to Islam and later an apologetic from Islam.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #313 - February 20, 2010, 08:08 PM

    I am close with Nick Cohen and many other leftists in Europe and elsewheres who have seen the exrtemist authoritarian types within the Left milieu lose any commitment to rational discourse and a sense of human decency.


    Cohen is arguably a neocon and a right-winger. See below.

    Quote
    I was active in anarcho-syndicalist organizations for well over a decade and have a bona fide track record of exposing and helping litigate against labour management companies specialzing in strikebreaking and expoliting other human beings for the sake of the bottom line.


    Me too, card carrying Wobbly since '99, and member-activist and professional organizer for other unions for over a decade. I've organized workplaces, led strikes and other industrial/direct actions, litigated at the labor board-- so what? Many of the Italian fascists started off as anarcho-syndicalists as well. And the neocons started off as Trots.

    Your ideological or organizational background does not necessarily preclude you from making an ideological shift. I'm not nearly as right-wing as I was when I was a teenager, and not as radically left wing as I was when I was in my 20s. In fact, I recall you said yourself on this forum that you had departed from the left some time ago, in the context of a debate we were having. In fact, you compared it to apostating, and I disagreed with your comparison. I can't be bothered to find it right now, but I'm sure you could find it if you wanted.

    So just because you have experience on the left and can probably lay claim to understanding some left wing ideology more than some other folks do, that doesn't mean that you are left right now. Yes, I understand that many former left-wingers who are apologists for imperialism and neocon ideology (like Cohen and Hitchens and some other folks besides you I've run across on internet forums) like to continue to classify themselves as left-wing, just composing some kind of principled left-wing opposition, and appeal to the legacy of George Orwell. But I don't buy it. I think you guys are just former leftists who don't want to admit that as you got older you turned into the very reactionaries you once despised.

    Quote
    In reality taking on Q-man is pretty much the same as taking on any corporate shill who espouses the virtues of McDonalds, Big Pharma, free trade agreements, etc.




    Ugh. Looks like its time for another break. See you guys in a few days.

    fuck you
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #314 - February 20, 2010, 08:11 PM

    I am at a loss here. Is Muhammadan an offensive word?


    Muslims find it offensive - few can be unaware of that. Most polite and decent people will avoid using and say; "Muslim". It is mostly only those who wish to deliberately offend and wind-up Muslims who use it.

    (Something FFI loves to do - then step back and point saying;"Look at how rude & uncivilised Muslims are!")

    Though of course you knew all that.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #315 - February 20, 2010, 08:12 PM

    You haven't changed much, have you?
    Try to say something which refutes her post, please.


    No, she is right about me mostly. I just don't like her bigotry of Muslims which is disguised as criticism of Islam. Oh and Mohammedan is an uncalled for term. It is unnecessary. 
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #316 - February 20, 2010, 08:20 PM



    I don't get it?

    Why would Ansari call  me the Mr Rogers of Islam Huh?Huh???
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #317 - February 20, 2010, 08:22 PM

    I think he is comparing you to David Rogers, who was a convert to Islam and later an apologetic from Islam.


    Never heard of him. So is this Mr Rogers still a Muslim? Is he suggesting I am still a Muslim?
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #318 - February 20, 2010, 08:25 PM

    Yes, I think he still is a Muslim.

    Rogers in green:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxdvLxUVUKE
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #319 - February 20, 2010, 08:26 PM

    Muslims find it offensive - few can be unaware of that. Most polite and decent people will avoid using and say; "Muslim". It is mostly only those who wish to deliberately offend and wind-up Muslims who use it.

    (Something FFI loves to do - then step back and point saying;"Look at how rude & uncivilised Muslims are!")

    Though of course you knew all that.


    As I said a few minutes earlier, today is a bad day for my blind spots.

    I used to think that Muslim and Muhammadan were synonyms. After reading a few objections here, I even googled the term and clicked on the link to The Free Dictionary which I quoted in my previous post.

    Why do they find it offensive, please?

    Islam is a funny religion which is misunderstood by its scholars and correctly understood by ordinary Muslims.
    Faith is keeping your eyes shut when looking at the world, and/or keeping your eyes open only for the beauty of the world.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #320 - February 20, 2010, 08:30 PM

    Yes, I think he still is a Muslim.

    Rogers in green:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxdvLxUVUKE


    WTF?Huh?  Cheesy

    Surely he can't be comparing me to him?

    This is so weird - I reject Islam openly - campaign against Shari'ah etc... make loads of videos criticising Islam, write a blog about why I left Islam etc...

    ...and I'm like some bearded salafi da'waganda guy defending Islam?

    WTF?Huh??

    No, surely he must mean some other Mr Rogers? Ansari is not that crazy... then again...

  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #321 - February 20, 2010, 08:30 PM

    They don't worship Mohammad. They worship God. They submit to God and not a man. This is Islam 101. It worries me you don't know this.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #322 - February 20, 2010, 08:33 PM

    They don't worship Mohammad. They worship God. They submit to God and not a man. This is Islam 101. It worries me you don't know this.


    Well technically speaking many practically idolise him as if he were some kind of rockstar.  So much for his simply being a prophet....

    "Modern man's great illusion has been to convince himself that of all that has gone before he represents the zenith of human accomplishment, but can't summon the mental powers to read anything more demanding than emoticons. Fascinating. "

    One very horny Turk I met on the net.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #323 - February 20, 2010, 08:34 PM

    As I said a few minutes earlier, today is a bad day for my blind spots.

    I used to think that Muslim and Muhammadan were synonyms. After reading a few objections here, I even googled the term and clicked on the link to The Free Dictionary which I quoted in my previous post.

    Why do they find it offensive, please?



    Because Muslims find the implication that they worship Muhammad offensive. I know many critics argue that Muhammad is indeed raised to the hight of virtual worship by Muslims - and I agree with this to an extent - but nevertheless the word is offensive to Muslims and there is no need to use it other than to wind Muslims up.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #324 - February 20, 2010, 08:36 PM

    actualy the majority, yes the majority, of Muslims DO worship Muhammed.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #325 - February 20, 2010, 08:37 PM

    Well technically speaking many practically idolise him as if he were some kind of rockstar.  So much for his simply being a prophet....


    Its defunct, it is as out of character as calling a black person a Negro.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #326 - February 20, 2010, 08:38 PM

    I know that they submit to no man and worship Allah only. I had the impression that Muhammadan meant a follower of Muhammad exactly like the free dictionary says.

    I probably have never used this word because "Muslim" makes me type fewer letters compared to "Muhammadan".

    But one learns something new almost everyday.

    Islam is a funny religion which is misunderstood by its scholars and correctly understood by ordinary Muslims.
    Faith is keeping your eyes shut when looking at the world, and/or keeping your eyes open only for the beauty of the world.
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #327 - February 20, 2010, 08:39 PM

    actualy the majority, yes the majority, of Muslims DO worship Muhammed.


    I knew you'd say that - and I agree with you!
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #328 - February 20, 2010, 08:41 PM

    They are not supposed to though. It is something that has been created out of Islam from scholars really. A sort of insulation to protect Muslims from knowing about his character or even thinking about him in a negative manner.

    But this is the half truth.

    The truth is that the Man changed in Medina. And became a statesman. I think it was from here, where he seperated himself from Muslims by setting rules of conduct in the Quran. How to treat him, what to call him and how to act around him in his house etc etc
  • Re: FFI vs. COEM [Split: Poster of the month!]
     Reply #329 - February 20, 2010, 08:42 PM

    I agree with you 100%. Those Muslim2Christ videos on youtube are so fake lol. You can obviously tell they are actors which makes me laugh.


    Oh come on CC!

    Most of them have seen Jesus and were either miraculously healed by him or found a fortune after they accepted him... like this woman here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN8vxGe_opU



    Seriously though, the only video of a Muslim convert to Christianity that I saw on youtube and seemed 100% genuine and for no monetary gains is the case of the Hamas kid:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLjwe2b40YA

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Previous page 1 ... 9 10 1112 13 ... 28 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »