Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 12:39 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 01:20 AM

ركن المتحدثين هايد بارك ل...
by akay
Yesterday at 03:12 PM

What music are you listen...
November 27, 2025, 11:05 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 23, 2025, 04:57 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2025, 05:47 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 05, 2025, 11:34 PM

Ex-Muslims on Mythvision ...
by zeca
November 02, 2025, 07:58 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 23, 2025, 01:36 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
October 07, 2025, 09:50 AM

What's happened to the fo...
October 06, 2025, 11:58 AM

Kashmir endgame
October 04, 2025, 10:05 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: William Lang Craig's Reasonable Faith

 (Read 1886 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • William Lang Craig's Reasonable Faith
     OP - June 04, 2011, 09:22 PM

    I'm posting a link to another forum where a poster went over William Lang Craig's book Reasonable Faith.  I'm willing to bet that you've heard this arguements before from other apologists as well who ape WLC's arguments. It's a long thread but to I would focus on Original Position's posts. 

     http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/137/religion-god-theology/william-lane-craigs-reasonable-faith-1023351/

    Quote
    There are typically two claims that contemporary defenders of Christianity want to make. Some defend the weaker claim that it is rational or justifiable to accept Christian beliefs. Others defend the stronger claim that it is irrational or unjustifiable to reject Christian beliefs. Among contemporary philosophers, William Lane Craig is one of the most well-known defenders of this stronger claim.

    I am not certain whether I think the weaker claim is correct, but I am confident that the stronger one is not. Since bunny recently sent me a copy of Craig’s book, Reasonable Faith, I thought it a good opportunity to examine one of the more thorough defenses of the claim that those such as myself who reject Christian beliefs are irrational and unjustified in do so. Since there are a couple of fans (and foes) of Craig on this forum, I thought I could post my thoughts here and get some useful pushback.

    Craig’s book has five sections , dealing with, in order: faith, humanity, god, creation, and Jesus. As I go through each section, I’ll post a brief summary of what I find most interesting or significant and some comments on where and why I disagree.


    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »