Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Life, The Universe & Everything → Philosophy → One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

What music are you listen...
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:56 PM
New Britain
June 06, 2025, 10:16 AM
Do humans have needed kno...
June 04, 2025, 11:58 PM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
June 03, 2025, 07:33 PM
Muslim grooming gangs sti...
June 02, 2025, 09:31 PM
ماذا يحدث هذه الايام؟؟؟.
by akay
June 02, 2025, 10:25 AM
What happens in these day...
June 02, 2025, 09:27 AM
What's happened to the fo...
June 01, 2025, 10:43 AM
Lights on the way
by akay
May 26, 2025, 10:25 AM
Gaza assault
May 24, 2025, 11:55 AM
الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
May 19, 2025, 12:00 PM
Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
May 17, 2025, 09:44 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument

 (Read 2054 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     OP - July 31, 2014, 07:51 AM
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     Reply #1 - August 03, 2014, 02:45 PM
    1. It is possible that a maximally great Thundercat exists
    2. If it is possible that a maximally great Thundercat exists, then a maximally great Thundercat exists in some possible world
    3. If a maximally great Thundercat exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world
    4. If a maximally great Thundercat exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world
    5. Therefore, a maximally great Thundercat exists
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     Reply #2 - August 03, 2014, 03:03 PM
    Lol. I'm not sure how the arguer gets to p3 from p2 anyways, it goes against axiomatic set theory.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »