I never said I'd kill murderers. I said I wouldn't mourn an executed murderer.
Sure. First you said "We could argue" for the killing of killers. Later you said you are undecided. You say you wouldn't mourn the death of a killer, what about a killer who had to kill to survive? What about a killer who killed the murderer of his baby? What about a killer who experienced decades of mental abuse at the hands of a partner? What about someone later proven to be innocent?
I never said anyone who disagrees with me is insane. I said I think proponents of execution for homosexuals and apostates are insane.
Yes, but your argument is only that YOU don't think it is right. I was pointing out that what is immoral to you is moral to someone else, and vice versa. If you argue that someone is insane just because their morals are different from yours then you must accept that you too are insane, because others disagree with your morals.
Can you understand the fundamental differences in these things?
Sure I do.
The USA kills people for what Americans think is immoral, and Iran do also - but they find different things immoral, my argument from the start has been that in my opinion the only moral stance is to not kill anyone at all (for various reasons), once you start excusing it by saying "I wouldn't mourn an executed murderer" you don't have any moral high ground and certainly no authority to draw a line on your imaginary scale and say "This is the line we cannot cross."