What I meant to say is that most reforms to Turkish law have been instituted by Erdogan's neo-liberal (conservative) government.
The Gezi park protests are definitely positive, if not for the fact that they reaffirm the desire to return to a shared universal for the population of Turkey. Erdogan was being undiplomatic with his neo-ottoman revivalist speeches.
Sometimes Erdogan comes out as a moderate man compared to other people in AKP:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gWApki3dPADanish-Turks (of all kinds - we have a lot of Kurds here) are face palming over this video.
I think my healthy dose of scepticism is warranted. All we can conclusively say is that the protesters were against the encroachment of an arab-derived suni islam.
Might be. There are lot of reactionary people there and not just in AKP.
I think is about the general taking away of their freedoms - individually and collectively - using an unwanted religious context in a country where many are proud of the secularism and individual freedom to believe or not (compared to other Muslim majority countries). Also the media blackout (PENGUINS!), stories of corruption and nepotism of the Erdogan regime are making people angry.
And that park is the last open, green area to meet and hang out in in downtown Istanbul, as far as I understand. Which is why so many different groups joined efforts in the initial peaceful protests against an (illegal) demolition of the park. And when the hard reaction came, people found out they have common interests against an oppressive regime (albeit "democratically" elected).
I hope the spirit of Gezi Park protests will spread out in the country to influence voters and revive that spirit come election time. Fingers crossed.
That of course requires there are worthy politicians to vote into office...