Re: Killing male babies to end war
Reply #1 - December 03, 2008, 07:57 PM
Of course, the supernatural is behind the fighting, note.
I suppose it's easy for us to judge the extreme measures taken by these women. Sounds like an intra- tribal conflict to me, possibly with different clans involved.
The females of lots of mammalian species go in for infanticide when child-rearing conditions are adverse. It's usually a case of cutting your losses and trying reproduction again when resources are more readily available.
Some female mammals even reabsorb quite well advanced foetuses father than continue a pregnancy where the survival of newborns would be very uncertain.
Reading between the lines it sounds like recent child-rearing attempts have been consistently iffy, post 1985, and the women have decided they've got nothing to lose by making the ultimate statement. Probably the emotional strain of seeing newborns die of hunger is worse than giving them a quick death.
It pays to remember that as short a time ago as the 1950s the people there used to cannibalise dead relatives and it was only by tracking the course of Kuru Kuru that that was discovered.
Anyway, it makes a change from the killing off of female babies.
Religion is ignorance giftwrapped in lyricism.