Salam saffyold and welcome,
I've watched the video and I want to make some short comments on what he says:
But the one thing that God does not allow is oppression. Oh my servant I have prohibited oppression upon myself. Out of his bounty, God can do whatever he pleases.
That's complete nonsense in my opinion. Just think about the fact that people of the book have to live as dhimmis under a Muslim state. They have to pay the jizyah so as to feel humiliated for rejecting Islam, a religion perfected by Allah. And if I get a certain verse in surah 9 right, then Polytheists have to either convert or be killed (one might argue that it was specific to Mhmd's aera.) Isn't Islam supposed to encompass all aspects of the human life? Islam in the government means, no secularity, it means crippled freedom of speech and crippled freedom of conscience and religion, because we know that blasphemy is punishable in Islam, and it is a very flexible term.
Of course, let's not forget about eternal Hell. Now, Muslims would say, it's just in the hereafter and you can't actually feel oppressed by it. That's not entirely true. Those who fully believe in the horrors of Hell, will behave and react very differently to certain situations. For example, when you tell your parents you're no longer a Muslim or you have doubts, they might pull out a broom stick and beat you up a bit (which actually happened to one of our members here), and they might wanna ship you to a country where good Islamic behaviour is taught.
Those Muslims. What's wrong with that religion? It teaches people to be violent. Even the Qur'an. Look at the Qur'an, it encourages domestic violence. And then they pull out the verse. First of all before you can even understand the Qur'an, you have to give 20 years of your life to study. 20 years of your life to study. I'm not making this up. You read the conditions of tafseer. There are twelve knowledges that you have to master before you can comment on the Qur'an. That's the first thing.
I think that pretty much kills the Qur'an's claim of being a clear, detailed and easy to understand book. Here are the references: 5:15,16; 44:58; 54:22,32,40; 6:114; 10:15; 2:2.
How one can call the Qur'an the "Kitab Mubin" (The Clear Book) is absolutely beyond me. Why wasn't God able to reveal a book that actually isn't ambiguous and confusing, doesn't leave out important details and doesn't require libraries of tafaseer and ahadith and years of studying them, before you can claim that you have understood God's vital message? What about the average believer? Does God only want an elite to hold the power and authority over deciding which exegesis is the correct one? Doesn't that create a lot of problems in Islamic countries?
And regarding 4:34, why didn't God just outright ban violence against women? Instead he chose to include a highly controversial verse that can be understood to allow chastisement as a last resort.
I mean, look at 98:6.
"Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures."
Allah can clearly and easily condemn whole groups to be lesser humans - for mere unbelief, but he couldn't say, for example:
98:6: Those who use any kind of violence, be it physical or psychological, against their wives and their children, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.
See? That would have convinced anybody that Islam abhorrs domestic violence.
The Prophet never struck a woman, a child or a servant ever. You have in the messenger of Allah the best example.
What about the hadith where Mhmd strikes Aisha in the chest. Let me see, which hadith it was. Oh, I remember that "Salafi Burnout" posted it once:
Sahih Muslim #2127.
Topic: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS TOTALLY REFUTED AND PROHIBITED IN ISLAM