DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?

Previous page 1 2 3« Previous thread | Next thread »
- osmanthus
- Cave dwelling
- Pub Regular
- Fingerer of piglets
- offline
Re: DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?
Reply #60 - December 12, 2008, 01:38 PM

Umm, you have actually quoted Amhed, not BMZ.

Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West.
- a.ghazali
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Re: DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?
Reply #61 - December 12, 2008, 01:42 PM

Quote from: osmanthus on December 12, 2008, 01:38 PM
Umm, you have actually quoted Amhed, not BMZ.

Oops! There were so many sub quotes I must have left the wrong one. But I believe the issue was first raised by BMZ anyway.

Knowing Islam is the only true religion we do not allow propagation of any other religion. How can we allow building of churches and temples when their religion is wrong? Thus we will not allow such wrong things in our countries. - Zakir Naik
- osmanthus
- Cave dwelling
- Pub Regular
- Fingerer of piglets
- offline
Re: DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?
Reply #62 - December 12, 2008, 01:46 PM

It happens.

Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West.
- BerberElla
- Class A'sexual
- Creator Goddess
- offline
Re: DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?
Reply #63 - December 12, 2008, 02:22 PM

Quote from: AhmedBahgat on December 12, 2008, 01:04 AM

Hey

It looks like what Bunny is saying about you on FFI is true, look dear lady, i insist on what I said, he is a hadith freak who should be dismissed and not replied to by any Muslim, he is a clone of HM who also pissed ya off. Do what you want darling

cheers

Haha do you honestly think I give a shit what that deranged psychopath says about me?

We will do what we want though, don't worry about that.

Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
- BMZ
- Muslim
- offline
Re: DID QUR'AAN AND ISLAM SUPPORT SLAVERY?
Reply #64 - December 12, 2008, 04:20 PM

Quote from: a.ghazali on December 12, 2008, 01:42 PM
Quote from: osmanthus on December 12, 2008, 01:38 PM
Umm, you have actually quoted Amhed, not BMZ.

Oops! There were so many sub quotes I must have left the wrong one. But I believe the issue was first raised by BMZ anyway.

No offence. No worries. I understand.

The point is that many folks discuss the word using English translation and that is not necessarily correct.

Father Abraham had 'ma malakat aymanayhe' but he did not capture them after a battle.

The words do not mean slave. If one is the Man of the House, then all occupants within one's own household such as wife, children, slaves (males and females), parents and others, will be under him. This is a huge subject and I cannot do it all now as it is past midnight. Will do it later in short bites.

Good night
BMZ
Previous page 1 2 3« Previous thread | Next thread »