Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Today at 01:38 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 08:40 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 12:02 PM

Excellence and uniqueness
by akay
December 24, 2025, 04:40 AM

ركن المتحدثين هايد بارك ل...
by akay
December 23, 2025, 03:44 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 06, 2025, 10:06 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 29, 2025, 12:39 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 05, 2025, 11:34 PM

Ex-Muslims on Mythvision ...
by zeca
November 02, 2025, 07:58 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 23, 2025, 01:36 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
October 07, 2025, 09:50 AM

What's happened to the fo...
October 06, 2025, 11:58 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: An early pioneer of Islamic excuse making

 (Read 1394 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • An early pioneer of Islamic excuse making
     OP - October 14, 2013, 07:09 PM

    Why the quran sucks in parts, and why it sounds just like an Arab guy talking

    Quote
    Whilst agreeing that the Qur'an expresses the highest forms of rhetoric they differ
    as to whether it is uniformly eloguent. Thus, would there exist verbal structures
    more suitable and symmetrical for the transmission of some given meaning?
    The Judge disagrees, and maintains that each of its words represents the apex
    of meaning, even though some may be more perceptive of this than others. Abu
    Nasr 'l-Qushairi prefers the view that it does indeed vary. He thus says: "We
    make no clairms that everything in the Qur'an is of the purest eloquence. Others
    have also said the Qur'an comprises of material that is both eloquent as well as
    most eloquent. The scholar "\tl 'l-Din b. 'Abd 'l-Salarm has inclined to his view,
    and posed this question: "Why is the Qur'an not most eloquent in its entirety?
    The master, Mauhub 'l-Jazari furnished a reply which in essence states that the
    Qur'an, structured in this way, would have contradicted the conventional speech
    patterns of the Arabs which combines both eloquent and most eloquent
    discourse. The challenge as such would have remained incomplete. Thus, it
    followed their speech patterns so that their inability to rmeet its challenge could be
    manifest. And this then precluded them from countering: "You produce that over
    which we essentially lack ability! This is tantamount to a seeing person saying to
    the blind: I have overcome you by way of my sight. The blind one will simply
    respond: "Your victory would be complete only if I too was able to see, and your
    sight was stronger than mine! But seeing that I am totally deprived of sight, how
    is it possible to take up the challenge! [/quote}

  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »