However I do still find it very odd that you have such a stand on Muhammad, I can understand the whole "reform Islam" stuff and the "good parts of Islam", but to see the good in such a person is very difficult and in my view, it serves no purpose. If Muhammad was a prophet and had a few good characteristics and actions, what was he? A historical figure, there are thousands upon thousands of historical figures, so being an Islamophile without being a Muslim is also hard to comprehend.
+1
You are an apostate alright, I wrote it above.
Islam is not pure evil: no ideology can claim that title. Communism caused the deaths of tens of millions of people, but one cannot say it never had any positive effects. Pure evil cannot exist, because "evil" is defined and perceived as the anti-thesis of "good." There is no such thing as a pure disease, we can only talk about fatal diseases. Take a good look at the worst tyrants of the past: I am sure with enough digging, you can find good acts that each one did. Hitler allowed Germany to rebuild from the ashes of WWI, and get rid of the Treaty of Versailles, which was unjustly imposed upon the Weimar Republic. There wered moments when Mohammad was moved with compassion, pardoning people, giving alms etc. Is this what you want to hear?
There are a few good bits in Islam, Mohammad was occasionally a kind person. Actually, his initial career in Mecca was almost admirable, before the Hijrah. But this cannot change the fact that Mohammad devolved into a vile pedophile, a bloody marauder, and an intolerant monster in Madina. He became the worst tyrant he could create out of himself when circumstances allowed it.
You can admire Mohammad or Islamic culture, it is your choice. It is my choice to loathe them both.