Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Welcome to the forum → The Lounge → Google

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Gaza assault
Yesterday at 10:04 AM
AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM
The origins of Judaism
by zeca
February 02, 2025, 04:29 PM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 01, 2025, 11:48 PM
New Britain
February 01, 2025, 11:27 PM
Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 01, 2025, 07:29 PM
اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 01, 2025, 11:55 AM
Do humans have needed kno...
January 30, 2025, 10:33 AM
News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM
Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM
What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Google

 (Read 2854 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Google
     OP - September 27, 2009, 09:10 AM
    Anyone notice that we have recently really been getting  recognised by Google?

    I have run lots of random searches in google regarding Islam when I have randomly happened to find a post from this forum come up on the first page of Google!

    Anyone else experiencing the same thing - Has it always been like this or is there a reason behind it?
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #1 - September 27, 2009, 09:15 AM
    Hey that's good. No it hasn't been like that as far as I'm aware. We must be finally building up some search ranking. How long have you noticed this happening?
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Google
     Reply #2 - September 27, 2009, 09:23 AM
    Hey I just checked us out on Alexa too:

    http://www.alexa.com/site/linksin/councilofexmuslims.com

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/councilofexmuslims.com

    22 sites linking in according to Alexa. Most of them good ones. That has to help.  dance
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Google
     Reply #3 - September 27, 2009, 09:28 AM
    Quote from: osmanthus on September 27, 2009, 09:15 AM
    Hey that's good. No it hasn't been like that as far as I'm aware. We must be finally building up some search ranking. How long have you noticed this happening?

    the past fortnight
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #4 - September 27, 2009, 09:34 AM
    Even the world famous 'Berbs blog' is now in there
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #5 - September 27, 2009, 09:36 AM
     Cheesy Well that  will certainly get us some traffic. We'll be the hard core capital of the internet soon.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Google
     Reply #6 - September 27, 2009, 12:10 PM
    How does that work is it based on visitors, number of links or being hyper linked elsewhere.
    Take the Pakman challenge and convince me there is a God and Mo was not a murdering, power hungry sex maniac.
  • Re: Google
     Reply #7 - September 27, 2009, 12:29 PM
    all 3, and more...
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #8 - September 27, 2009, 02:55 PM
    I just did a few searches with surprising results, only to realize I was logged into Google and it personalized the search order (possibly based on past visits). While signed out, the term "ex muslim" searches ex-muslim.org.uk which I guess is good.
    Hear ye -->> DONATE TO CEMB

    Relativism | Cognitive dissonance | Cognitive biases | Memeplex | Consequentialism
  • Re: Google
     Reply #9 - September 28, 2009, 12:25 AM
    Quote from: pakman on September 27, 2009, 12:10 PM
    How does that work is it based on visitors, number of links or being hyper linked elsewhere.

    Google wont tell anyone the exact details of what search rankings are based on because if they told anyone then people would start playing the system.
    Incoming links are good as long as they are legit. Link exchanges are pretty much useless if they are obviously contrived. Google is onto that trick. Meta keywords in the head of a page are virtually completely ignored these days as they are too easy to game. Frankly most of what is written about SEO is bollocks as far as I can tell.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Google
     Reply #10 - September 28, 2009, 08:34 AM
    Quote from: osmanthus on September 28, 2009, 12:25 AM
    Google wont tell anyone the exact details of what search rankings are based on because if they told anyone then people would start playing the system.
    Incoming links are good as long as they are legit.  Google is onto that trick. Meta keywords in the head of a page are virtually completely ignored these days as they are too easy to game. Frankly most of what is written about SEO is bollocks as far as I can tell.

    I dont think it can be kept a secret, particularly as some of the experts who worked with google probably are now working as consultants for SEO companies - the only thing that they can probably hold back on is the weighting of these individual factors in the algorithm.  A bit like the coca-cola recipe.
    Quote
    Link exchanges are pretty much useless if they are obviously contrived.

    Link exchanges were always pretty inflential until these link farms became abundant - now low page ranking sites have been rendered pretty much useless.  However ones from sites like the BBC make a difference.
    Quote
    SEO is bollocks as far as I can tell.

    Not sure how you came to this conclusion?
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #11 - September 28, 2009, 08:44 AM
    Yes I know links in from high-ranking sites are good. I didn't say otherwise. I was talking about "link farms" and other tricks when I said "obviously contrived" link exchanges are no good. For instance if you set up a site and have a bunch of friends set up sites on free hosting packages then all link to you it wont do you a bit of good. Google sometimes even craps on your ranking for stunts like that.

    I also didn't say SEO is bollocks. You clipped the sentence and quoted it out of context. I said most of what is written about SEO is bollocks. You still get people saying meta keywords are important. They aren't. I've read all sorts of daft ideas that are supposed to help your rankings (forgotten most of them).
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Google
     Reply #12 - September 28, 2009, 08:53 AM
    Yeah, google discovered these link farms were artificially increasing rankings so they started looking at the site rankings too. A lot of the SEO articles are bollocks, but thats true of pretty much anything when there is money to be made in a specialised business with low start up costs..
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Google
     Reply #13 - September 28, 2009, 08:54 AM
    Yup. Exactly. People just write all sorts of rubbish and some others fall for it, then it becomes a meme.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »