btw it's interesting to note that al Razi who was at the forefront of Islamic philosophy, science and medicine - and was well aware of all the works of the other Muslims scholars as well as the Greek scholars of the past - and of course well aware of the claims of the Qur'an - clearly regarded Ptolemy's work in the book
Almagest (arabicised as it was translated and used by the Arabs) as being very sound - which it was for the time.
But it of course put forward a geocentric view of the universe. The Earth in the middle - and everything rotating about the earth.
Of course I already know modern claims to scientific miracles are nonsense - and always did even when I was a Muslim - but for those Muslims who claim this, then here is a question for them.
If Al Razi and all the other Muslim scientists and astronomers had absolutely no problem with the Geocentric view of the universe - despite intimate knowledge of the Qur'an.
Then how can one claim the Qur'an rejects the geocentric model?
If these guys couldn't see what so many modern idiots who can barely string two Arabic words together can so "
plainly" see - then there is something wrong - no?
lol
I was thinking that yesterday. Following the Quran, we have proof the Muslim world believed in the geocentric model & the earth was flat.
Also as these were both the popular scientific understanding before the Quran (funny that isnt it), as Rationlizer pointed out, you would have thought that the Quran would have been at pains to point out & highlight the differences if it indeed was proposing something different.
Instead it proposes something dubiously similar. Hmmmm..