Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Russia invades Ukraine
Today at 09:34 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
Today at 09:31 PM

Islam and Science Fiction
Yesterday at 11:57 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 09:32 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 08, 2025, 01:38 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 07, 2025, 01:11 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 05, 2025, 10:04 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
February 02, 2025, 04:29 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 01, 2025, 11:48 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:

 (Read 14247 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #30 - July 20, 2010, 10:54 PM

    And how do you ensure that?

    Ensure the girls are well informed of Forced Veiling Hotlines, or similar initiatives.  Ensure that the parents are well aware of these hotlines.  Ensure that the girls are taught their rights at school.  ..and other ideas people can come up with.


    Quote
    Secondly, parents who are so intent on their daughters only leaving the house with a burka are almost certainly likely to respond to the ban by simply not allowing their daughters to leave the house at all, which is likely to be even more damaging.

    I see your point.  Any proposed law would need to be thought through very carefully.  The potential benefits might outweigh the drawbacks or vice versa.


    Quote
    Thirdly, you refer to children not being allowed to leave the house without a burka "like the daughters of many religious/traditionalist families". I would contest that the actually proportion of families within the UK (or indeed Europe) that enforce such a lifestyle are vanishingly small, possibly countable on the fingers of a hand or two.

    Errr.  Are you having a laugh??  My teenage sister is one of them.  In fact, many towns in the UK (Leicester, Dewsbury, Blackburn, Bolton, Bradford etc) have religious Muslim communities where the teenage girls don't have much freedom to go out unveiled and play outside with friends.
    There are many Muslim girls' schools in this country which demand (as part of the school uniform) that the teenage girls wear the niqab during journeys to and from school.

    Quote
    I have issue with parents that implicitly sexualise their young daughters by covering them in the name of modesty (with either burka or hijaab), but I have equal issue with the parents who overtly sexualise their young daughters by dressing them up in skimpy clothes and having their faces caked with make-up. I do not however feel it is for the state to get involved in this issue beyond long term education strategies. Active enforcement of bans has so many negative repercussions.

    I agree with you about western teenage girls feeling the social pressure, but they still have the freedom to do what they want.  The problem with Muslims is that the girls haven't got much of a choice.  A few years go there was the murder of a 16 year old Muslim girl in Ontario, Canada - by her father because she refused to wear hijab.  That speaks volumes about the attitude of some of these men.

    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #31 - July 20, 2010, 11:01 PM

    I would contest that the actually proportion of families within the UK (or indeed Europe) that enforce such a lifestyle are vanishingly small, possibly countable on the fingers of a hand or two.


    You'd be suprised, I'm afraid.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #32 - July 20, 2010, 11:11 PM

    The problem with Muslims is that the girls haven't got much of a choice.  A few years go there was the murder of a 16 year old Muslim girl in Ontario, Canada - by her father because she refused to wear hijab.  That speaks volumes about the attitude of some of these men.


    You can be assured, MrSilly, in Western nations, Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to, not allowed to socialize when the want, wear the latest fashion they want to, question things how they want, shave their face (boys) or legs (girls), enjoy playtime, learn and instrument, visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship.

    (Source: personal experience)
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #33 - July 20, 2010, 11:21 PM

    BF Checklist:

    Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to: Dunno bout that but social pressure
    not allowed to socialize when the want: To an extent, annoys me
    wear the latest fashion they want to: would be allowed
    question things how they want: wouldn't dare, Izzat
    shave their face (boys) or legs (girls): He shaves
    enjoy playtime: He does do, cricket et al
    learn and instrument: never wanted to as I know
    visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever: Visits me so hah
    had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship: He had me and still does

    Not doing too badly am I?
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #34 - July 21, 2010, 05:17 AM

    You can be assured, MrSilly, in Western nations, Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to, not allowed to socialize when the want, wear the latest fashion they want to, question things how they want, shave their face (boys) or legs (girls), enjoy playtime, learn and instrument, visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship.

    (Source: personal experience)

    Wow. Thanks for sharing. TBH if I grew up in a household as religious as yours, I would probably have ended up much more pessimistic.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #35 - July 21, 2010, 05:56 AM

    I too am a little torn on the issue.  I know it would be illiberal to ban the niqab (or hijab!!), but deep down I feel maybe it is a very effective way to solve the problem. whistling2
    Or perhaps another effective way to solve the problem would be to ensure that young women (or older women even!) are NOT UNDER ANY SOCIAL PRESSURE to wear the niqab / hijab / burqa.  Because there's no doubt in my mind that there is a great deal of pressure.  I realise that many women are just brainwashed and wear it willingly to please their God, but they should not then put others under any pressure to wear it.  PERIOD!



    @MrSilly:

    You do speak a lot of sense with what you said, except that I would disagree slightly on the reversible damage bit:
    If a child/teenager is forced to wear the niqab and not allowed to step out of the house without it, etc, like the daughters of many religious/traditionalist families, this can have an almost permanent effect on the girls's skills in terms of being a well-rounded individual who fits well into mainstream society.  It's like leaving a cult for some, and people can struggle to adapt to mainstream society.
    The niqab/veil is a tool of segregation to keep Muslim girls pure and chaste, until they get married off to a similarly religious man, and the cult perpetuates.  :sigh:



    Experience is the best teacher possible, so a person like you is able to see it for what it is, unlike these new converts who extol it. This obsession with sex being the parameter of virtue is a medieval concept and anti woman.It is incredulous how women themselves supposedly make a free choice, to allow themselves to be shackled in the name of a sadistic GOD. I would like out point out to Khadija with the kind of freedoms that are available to her wherever she is in the west she can follow whatever life style she wants. She could be as puritanical as she wants to be without needing the medieval 'coffin bag'.  



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #36 - July 21, 2010, 06:34 AM

    Quote from: MrSilly
    I am against the ban as it sits. I believe if a burka clad woman needs to identify herself to a police offier, bank clerk, or post office worker, then she must be obliged to reveal her identity as and when required. But she should be allowed to be an anonymous thing as she pleases otherwise.


    Agreed.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #37 - July 21, 2010, 06:57 AM

    Ensure the girls are well informed of Forced Veiling Hotlines, or similar initiatives.  Ensure that the parents are well aware of these hotlines.  Ensure that the girls are taught their rights at school.  ..and other ideas people can come up with.

    I see your point.  Any proposed law would need to be thought through very carefully.  The potential benefits might outweigh the drawbacks or vice versa.

    Errr.  Are you having a laugh??  My teenage sister is one of them.  In fact, many towns in the UK (Leicester, Dewsbury, Blackburn, Bolton, Bradford etc) have religious Muslim communities where the teenage girls don't have much freedom to go out unveiled and play outside with friends.
    There are many Muslim girls' schools in this country which demand (as part of the school uniform) that the teenage girls wear the niqab during journeys to and from school.
    {X}I agree with you about western teenage girls feeling the social pressure, but they still have the freedom to do what they want.  The problem with Muslims is that the girls haven't got much of a choice.  A few years go there was the murder of a 16 year old Muslim girl in Ontario, Canada - by her father because she refused to wear hijab.  That speaks volumes about the attitude of some of these men.


    You can be assured, MrSilly, in Western nations, Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to, not allowed to socialize when the want, wear the latest fashion they want to, question things how they want, shave their face (boys) or legs (girls), enjoy playtime, learn and instrument, visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship.

    (Source:{Y} personal experience)


    {X} :Like convert to Islam for example. Imagine the plight of a Muslim girl who wants to convert to Christianity or what have you!  The much touted free choice becomes impotent almost always.Ideally, yes she could complain to the authorities,but my friends High Octane& ateapotist will bear me out, the situations are not always easy and clear cut, the confusing 'shades of grey of life' come into the picture to destroy all our neat 'black and white' concepts of  free choice.
    And helpless girls are doomed to be always in denial of their individuality, by its sheer impotency.I wish more and more people like H O and AT come forward to tell their stories so that the world knows the truth.

    {Y}: The best source my friend, the ultimate source! Many personal experiences told  to the world would give the authorities the correct picture or else views of people like khadija will prevail.Bear in mind,being deluded is like being on a  trip, you are not aware of all the real pains.She has just begun her " LSD  trip" so everything is so nice and pleasant.Only her daughter who makes a 'free choice',facilitated suitably by right islamic education, has any chance of painfully knowing the truth and rebelling.
    In the mean time crooked tyrants will be mocking everyone behind the veil of "FREE CHOICE". finmad



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #38 - July 21, 2010, 08:40 AM

    Having said what I said in the posts above, I should add that the libertarian inside me agrees with MrSilly that the state should not dictate to people what they can and can't wear in public.  Private premises can have rules of their own.  Smiley

    Also, I think a ban would make us look very authoritarian, and the British people are very tolerant of other cultures.  Smiley

    It is a complicated issue and I am not saying that banning the niqab would solve all problems.  This needs to be thought through very carefully.  There maybe many other better ways to solve the problem of women's oppression.  For example:
    -  Putting pressure on religious leaders (and Muslim schools) to promote a more progressive interpretation of Islam.
    -  Educating young women on their rights.
    -  Promoting integration of Muslims into mainstream society in a variety of ways.
    -  Promoting the mixing of different cultures and religions.
    -  Side-lining religion and promoting secular humanism.
    -  Ensuring Muslim teenage girls have access to the internet. Smiley
    -  And last but not least, ridiculing the niqab greatly, so here's a picture to that effect:  Smiley



    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #39 - July 21, 2010, 10:26 AM

    BF Checklist:

    Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to: Dunno bout that but social pressure
    not allowed to socialize when the want: To an extent, annoys me
    wear the latest fashion they want to: would be allowed
    question things how they want: wouldn't dare, Izzat
    shave their face (boys) or legs (girls): He shaves
    enjoy playtime: He does do, cricket et al
    learn and instrument: never wanted to as I know
    visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever: Visits me so hah
    had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship: He had me and still does

    Not doing too badly am I?


    Your BF is doing VERY WELL indeed compared to the many thousands of Muslim children in the Western world (by my guestimate).

    Wow. Thanks for sharing. TBH if I grew up in a household as religious as yours, I would probably have ended up much more pessimistic.


    Quick point: my household isn't this bad, but I know many of my stricter relatives who are that bad. I've had to very rebellious to earn a lot of freedoms in my household though.

    views of people like khadija will prevail.Bear in mind,being deluded is like being on a  trip, you are not aware of all the real pains.She has just begun her " LSD  trip" so everything is so nice and pleasant.Only her daughter who makes a 'free choice',facilitated suitably by right islamic education, has any chance of painfully knowing the truth and rebelling.
    In the mean time crooked tyrants will be mocking everyone behind the veil of "FREE CHOICE". finmad


    +1

    Having said what I said in the posts above, I should add that the libertarian inside me agrees with MrSilly that the state should not dictate to people what they can and can't wear in public.  Private premises can have rules of their own.  Smiley


    I disagree, I think the state should set boundaries for which citizens should play nicely. It is the middle ground between being 100% authoritarian and 100% chaotic (via 100% freedom). All things in moderation.

    Also, I think a ban would make us look very authoritarian, and the British people are very tolerant of other cultures.  Smiley


    I think it would show British people have a spine to know what is best for people and stick to values that have taken blood, sweat and tears to earn. It would show British people are open to other cultures, but not soo open minded & accepting they become deluded to PC and moral relativism with regards to a less developed culture.

    It is a complicated issue and I am not saying that banning the niqab would solve all problems.  This needs to be thought through very carefully.  There maybe many other better ways to solve the problem of women's oppression.  For example:
    -  Putting pressure on religious leaders (and Muslim schools) to promote a more progressive interpretation of Islam.
    -  Educating young women on their rights.
    -  Promoting integration of Muslims into mainstream society in a variety of ways.
    -  Promoting the mixing of different cultures and religions.
    -  Side-lining religion and promoting secular humanism.
    -  Ensuring Muslim teenage girls have access to the internet. Smiley
    -  And last but not least, ridiculing the niqab greatly, so here's a picture to that effect:  Smiley


    I absolutely agree with these recommendations.  Smiley

    I one thing is: why must the state have to work so hard in trying to influence a religion? The British government is funding this in various ways, but at the end of the day it is dawaganda marketing Vs a dynamically evolving memeplex which given the boundaries to exist (e.g. wearing a veil), will do. I've yet to ponder more over this matter however, not my final take on it. Smiley



     Cheesy
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #40 - July 21, 2010, 10:57 AM

    I disagree, I think the state should set boundaries for which citizens should play nicely. It is the middle ground between being 100% authoritarian and 100% chaotic (via 100% freedom). All things in moderation.

    Could you elaborate?
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #41 - July 21, 2010, 12:10 PM

    Ensure the girls are well informed of Forced Veiling Hotlines, or similar initiatives.  Ensure that the parents are well aware of these hotlines.  Ensure that the girls are taught their rights at school.  ..and other ideas people can come up with.


    These sorts of initiatives have already been tried with regard to physical and sexual child abuse, forced marriages. Yes, they may reduce the incidence, but they do not "ensure that young women (or older women even!) are NOT UNDER ANY SOCIAL PRESSURE to wear the niqab / hijab / burqa".

    Quote from: ateapotist
    Errr.  Are you having a laugh??  My teenage sister is one of them.  In fact, many towns in the UK (Leicester, Dewsbury, Blackburn, Bolton, Bradford etc) have religious Muslim communities where the teenage girls don't have much freedom to go out unveiled and play outside with friends.
    There are many Muslim girls' schools in this country which demand (as part of the school uniform) that the teenage girls wear the niqab during journeys to and from school.


    Are there any statistics on the number of children wearing burka/niqab in the UK? Or even the of the number of burka wearers as a whole in the UK?

    My skepticism about all the noise about this issue is that 2 countries that have made a big fuss about this, France and Belgium, actually have such tiny numbers of women wearing them nationally, <400 and <30 respectively. True, there are different sociocultural issues relating to the UK, and I would guess that the total number of women wearing burka in the UK is a lot more, i.e in the thousands, but the number of children being being forced to wear niqab/burka is going to be very very small, irrespective of your anecdotal evidence.

    Which schools enforce a policy of burka/niqab for its pupils to and from school?

    Quote from: ateapotist
    I agree with you about western teenage girls feeling the social pressure, but they still have the freedom to do what they want.


    The question of how much choice children do have with regard to not wearing designer clothes is a moot point. There is a lot of social and psychological coersion, even though they have the physical freedom not to. Just as Muslim women are often coerced into wearing burka, even though they say that its their choice and that it liberates them.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #42 - July 21, 2010, 12:12 PM

    You can be assured, MrSilly, in Western nations, Muslim girls and boys are also forced to fast when the don't want to, not allowed to socialize when the want, wear the latest fashion they want to, question things how they want, shave their face (boys) or legs (girls), enjoy playtime, learn and instrument, visit the house of a non-Muslim friends let alone ever had a childhood boyfriend/girlfriend relationship.

    (Source: personal experience)


    I never disputed that.

    What I am disputing is this claim that there are "many" Muslim children being forced to wear burka/niqab to go outside. I don't believe there are many at all, just a tiny tiny number.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #43 - July 21, 2010, 12:21 PM

    I think it would show British people have a spine to know what is best for people 1 and stick to values that have taken blood, sweat and tears to earn 2. It would show British people are open to other cultures, but not soo open minded & accepting they become deluded to PC and moral relativism with regards to a less developed culture 3.


    1 I don't like any state that takes this sort of stance on dictating what people do in their private lives because it thinks it allegedly knows better. Let's ban tatoos, motobikes, rugby, alcohol and anal sex because we know what is best for people.

    2 Yes values of liberalism, that allow people to do what they want as long as it doesnt harm other people.

    3 Not banning something doesn't mean that we have become deluded by political correctness and relativism, it just means we are liberal.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #44 - July 21, 2010, 02:06 PM


    I disagree, I think the state should set boundaries for which citizens should play nicely. It is the middle ground between being 100% authoritarian and 100% chaotic (via 100% freedom). All things in moderation.


    Could you elaborate?


    Sure, here is the theory:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Miwb92eZaJg
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #45 - July 21, 2010, 02:22 PM

    1 I don't like any state that takes this sort of stance on dictating what people do in their private lives because it thinks it allegedly knows better. Let's ban tatoos, motobikes, rugby, alcohol and anal sex because we know what is best for people.


    The state tells me I can't drink and drive. Here it knows better than the thousands of people who felt the ban wasn't necessary. Depending on the underlying justifications and done correctly, the state (like the UK) will try to do what is best for the public. The examples you've provided don't have underlying justifications as to why they should be banned.

    2 Yes values of liberalism, that allow people to do what they want as long as it doesnt harm other people.


    The veil does harm other people. For a start, it harms the young girls growing up.

    3 Not banning something doesn't mean that we have become deluded by political correctness and relativism, it just means we are liberal.


    I think it does in this case and the justification of such open ended liberalism makes it evident to me.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #46 - July 21, 2010, 02:24 PM

    Quote from: HighOctane


    Giving people the freedom to wear burka is not in line with the evolution of a chaotic system. The analogy here, giving the 11 year old boys lots of drugs and alcohol and the liberty to smash up people's private property is not comparable to a liberal society which gives people the liberty to do as they want so long as it does not violate the liberty or harm others.  
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #47 - July 21, 2010, 02:27 PM


    OK I understand the theory. But my question is do you think state intervention should be based on principle or on consequences?
    What do you mean by boundaries and by playing nicely? should the state determine what is nice?
    And the more pertinent question, should the state determine what is nice or what is wrong? should laws be based on nice and unpleasant or on right and wrong? does nice=right and unpleasant=wrong?

    Eating 5 Big Macs a week or smoking are not "nice" but are they wrong? should the state intervene? how is that different from wearing a burqa and walking down the street?
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #48 - July 21, 2010, 02:28 PM



    rofl

    Iblis has mad debaterin' skillz. Best not step up unless you're prepared to recieve da pain.

  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #49 - July 21, 2010, 02:32 PM

    The state tells me I can't drink and drive. Here it knows better than the thousands of people who felt the ban wasn't necessary. Depending on the underlying justifications and done correctly, the state (like the UK) will try to do what is best for the public.


    Yes, and drinking and driving causes objective physical harm to others. An adult woman wearing the burka does not.

    Quote from: HighOctane
    The examples you've provided don't have underlying justifications as to why they should be banned.


    Neither does banning the burka. They may all cause harm to the consenting individual, but that is another matter.

    Quote from: HighOctane
    The veil does harm other people. For a start, it harms the young girls growing up.


    I've already conceded that children wearing the burka is an exception, and postulated that the number of children wearing a burka in the UK is vanishingly small.

    How exactly does an adult wearing the burka harm others?

    Quote from: HighOctane
    I think it does in this case and the justification of such open ended liberalism makes it evident to me.


    A matter of difference of opinion.

    Allowing people to smoke is not being politcally correct or morally relativistic, it is giving them the liberty to make lifestyle decisions, even if they are lifestyle decision that harm themselves.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #50 - July 21, 2010, 02:37 PM

    MrSilly / IA: The essence of the video was that an complex systems is the best way to control a group of random participants. You don't know how they will behave, but you set the law and order that best serves themselves and each other.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #51 - July 21, 2010, 02:41 PM

    Who decides what is best for themselves? What is the criteria?
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #52 - July 21, 2010, 02:42 PM

    How exactly does an adult wearing the burka harm others?


    Some points on another thread. Maryam gave enough points also.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #53 - July 21, 2010, 02:44 PM

    MrSilly/IA, that's 10 questions between you both ... All due respect, I think this would be a lot more of a productive debate if you gave critical, concrete, points rather than taking the strategy that the recipient debator must answer all the questions you ask otherwise you are right by default.

    Apologies if I am wrong in reading your intensions. Smiley
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #54 - July 21, 2010, 03:25 PM

    MrSilly/IA, that's 10 questions between you both ... All due respect, I think this would be a lot more of a productive debate if you gave critical, concrete, points rather than taking the strategy that the recipient debator must answer all the questions you ask otherwise you are right by default.

    Apologies if I am wrong in reading your intensions. Smiley

    I'm not here to prove I'm right and win debates.

    You said "I think the state should set boundaries for which citizens should play nicely."

    I'm only trying to understand what you mean by that. The video doesn't explain your statement.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #55 - July 21, 2010, 08:11 PM

    I'm not here to prove I'm right and win debates.

    You said "I think the state should set boundaries for which citizens should play nicely."

    I'm only trying to understand what you mean by that. The video doesn't explain your statement.


    Okay cool.  cool2

    Sorry I thought the video was clear enough. What I meant was that the state sets laws (i.e. the boundaries) to ensure order. Laws are put in place for various reasons, one of which to protect members from harm, another to ensure equality. If people are going over those boundaries (i.e. laws) then they are not playing nicely (e.g. not hiring a person due to their sex or sexual orientation). There are several good reasons for banning the veil, and ban would ensure that certain members of society (i.e. Muslims) not only have a healthier relationship each other better (improving  equality) but also have a more positive impact to the rest of society (integration). Then there is the security issue too.

    Today, a random ~45 year old Far East-Asian woman sat next to me on the London Underground and asked me about my netbook and if I recommended it or not. I gladly told her about it and my recommendations. What is the chance a Muslim woman with a veil would do such a thing? Such a woman would firstly lack confidence in talking to non-Muslims she doesn't know, then not want to approach a non-Muslim man she doesn't know, and in all seriousness an English person would feel uncomfortable talking to someone with a veil. These are not sweeping generalizations, these are valid and legitimate concerns for the welfare of Muslim women.

    In summary, wearing a veil doesn't allow certain members to play nicely. So by putting in place such a law (boundary), it is better for the group as a whole, imo.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #56 - July 21, 2010, 08:26 PM

    I think that's plausible but I cannot let the state dictate what we wear. We can ban the Burqa in government buildings and public transport. We can also let private businesses do as they please. So a restaurant or a supermarket may refuse to serve a Niqabi if they wanted to. Or not. It should be decided by them.

    What we can't have is the government telling us what we can't wear while walking down the street. I just can't accept it. We can't base all our laws on consequences. There are some personal freedoms that can't be infringed on.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #57 - July 21, 2010, 08:42 PM

    IA, you strike me as someone who believes in civil liberties but is trying to find loopholes in his own beliefs. A right is a right is a right, wherever you are--at least as far as the government goes, if you want to go the route of "private businesses have a right to do whatever they want". I'm not trying to attack you, but your position seems quite insincere. Even if security was an issue, don't you think banning the niqab/burqa would unjustly affect innocent women? Why should a woman who wears the veil have to uncover her face or not go to a certain building just because some douchebag thought it'd be a good idea to disguise him/herself with a veil to commit a crime? It seems more like an excuse to ban the veil than a real reason. And it's yet another example of wanting to give up some liberty for a little extra security. If you believe in religious freedom, banning the veil would infringe on that, unless you also believe in collective punishment.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #58 - July 21, 2010, 08:54 PM

    Not really Abood.

    I've even said B&B owners should be able to refuse to serve gays. I believe in private property. Although admittedly I do have qualms about my stance such as the issue of blacks in the 60s. But that's the exception not the rule. But the rule is private establishments should be able to run their businesses as they wish.

    As for government institutions, I said some should ban the Niqab. By some I mean places where:
    -IDing citizens is necessary such as for preventing cheating in schools or IDing examinees in driving licence exams or when receiving welfare payments...etc 
    -Security is a big issue such as in airports and public transport
    -If the Niqabi is in a sector where wearing the Niqab would negatively and directly affect their job performance such as working as a teacher or a nurse.
  • Re: Maryam Namazie interview: Ireland:
     Reply #59 - July 21, 2010, 08:59 PM

    What we can't have is the government telling us what we can't wear while walking down the street. I just can't accept it. We can't base all our laws on consequences. There are some personal freedoms that can't be infringed on.


    IA, I say this in a nice way  Smiley : honestly I don't see any concrete justification apart from personal acceptance .... which can extend to just having faith in an idea. While I think people have certain characteristics written in their blood (I think liberalism is part of your character, and that's not a bad thing at all), I do not think personal ideals should justify the livelihoods and welfares of thousands of people.

    As for government institutions, I said some should ban the Niqab. By some I mean places where:
    -IDing citizens is necessary such as for preventing cheating in schools or IDing examinees in driving licence exams or when receiving welfare payments...etc 
    -Security is a big issue such as in airports and public transport
    -If the Niqabi is in a sector where wearing the Niqab would negatively and directly affect their job performance such as working as a teacher or a nurse.


    See, here you are using reason to justify the ban in specific areas.  Afro

    I believe in private property.


    And here it is a personal belief. :-(

    Anyhow, best wishes, goodnight, catch this thread tomorrow.  Smiley
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »