Funny poster.

Anyway, I was going to say: everyone has a different style and strategy of battle.

Christopher Hitchens has a pretty arrogant style of battle.
The skeptic movement are in a battle against pseudoscience and other kinds of baloney. I, personally, prefer to follow the humble style (like Michael Shermer and Ben Goldacre), but I wouldn't bash the arrogant types.

Their fearless, assertive, self-confident style is sometimes necessary.
Strangely enough, I find enjoyment in both types, I love Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, but I also enjoy Michael Shermer, so I guess it more depends on the topic and what kind of mood I'm on. They can both be effective though, so they both suit their purposes.