Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 03:33 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 07:04 PM

News From Syria
December 15, 2024, 01:02 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
December 15, 2024, 12:13 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
December 11, 2024, 01:25 PM

New Britain
December 08, 2024, 10:30 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
December 06, 2024, 01:27 PM

Ashes to beads: South Kor...
December 03, 2024, 09:44 PM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Was Muhammad Needed

 (Read 8967 times)
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Was Muhammad Needed
     OP - December 21, 2010, 06:42 AM

    Hi,

    There have been a thought that, I could not come to a rational conclusion of. Although I went against Islam for a very basic reason, that is. I could not find a reason to believe in God and, No need for Religion any moreb but can find a logic why it was needed then. There is a point though, the three one man led monotheists beliefs as you know, first two individuals in historical order were,

    Moses: led his people through some oppressors ........................... thus needed as there was a situation
    Jesus:  Tried to lead his people from some oppressors .................. (as above)

    But the last one:

    Muhammad: Claimed to be prophet in front of an audience no foreign oppressor ......... Was he a need of that time?

    "Religion is the purposeful suspension of critical thinking" Bill Maher
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #1 - December 21, 2010, 08:29 AM

    Actually only in Moses's example people were getting oppressed, before Jesus's arrival no one was oppressed, and similarly no one was oppressed in Mohammed's case, in both cases when the two arrived that started the oppression and hence the need to go away. Had they not made up their stories their followers would've been fine living where they were.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #2 - December 21, 2010, 10:06 AM

    Actually only in Moses's example people were getting oppressed, before Jesus's arrival no one was oppressed, and similarly no one was oppressed in Mohammed's case, in both cases when the two arrived that started the oppression and hence the need to go away. Had they not made up their stories their followers would've been fine living where they were.


     cheers clap They made tribalism more dangerous!



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #3 - December 21, 2010, 11:09 AM

    Muhammad: Claimed to be prophet in front of an audience no foreign oppressor ......... Was he a need of that time?

    Arabs were butthurt because god sent prophets to jews and christians and they felt left out of divine plan. Therefore a prophet emerged and everybody lived happily ever after.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #4 - December 21, 2010, 11:19 AM

    Muhammad was needed because all of humanity was being oppressed by not worshipping him and Allah. The majority of humanity is still oppressed by not submitting to him and Allah.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #5 - December 21, 2010, 11:28 AM

    I actually have strong doubt that there was guy "Muhammad" as described in hadith and quran.., All that is cock and bull story written 100s of years after a character like "Muhammad" might have been there.

    Islam is a cruel Joke filled with silly stories and stupid rituals..  It is simple Arabian Paganism/tribalism  gone wild..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #6 - December 21, 2010, 12:44 PM

    shaitan is your alias oppressor in Islam

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #7 - December 21, 2010, 01:25 PM

    Muhammad was needed because all of humanity was being oppressed by not worshipping him and Allah. The majority of humanity is still oppressed by not submitting to him and Allah.



     Cheesy Cheesy great observation!

    I actually have strong doubt that there was guy "Muhammad" as described in hadith and quran.., All that is cock and bull story written 100s of years after a character like "Muhammad" might have been there.

    Islam is a cruel Joke filled with silly stories and stupid rituals..  It is simple Arabian Paganism/tribalism  gone wild..


    Lmao may I add   'gone super wild' and the amazing thing is so many people are still in denial!



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #8 - December 21, 2010, 02:56 PM

    Never mind Muhammad, its doubtful the book was even needed.

    If you know everything, then you know how everything will turn out.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #9 - December 21, 2010, 03:40 PM

    Muhammad was needed because all of humanity was being oppressed by not worshipping him and Allah. The majority of humanity is still oppressed by not submitting to him and Allah.



    What he said.

    Allah and Muhammad his mechanic are the solution to all things.

    What's that? You don't have no Allah's pixie dust? Okay we'll just sprinkle some... ah! there we go... its all dandy and smashingly good now.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #10 - December 21, 2010, 03:48 PM

    I actually have strong doubt that there was guy "Muhammad" as described in hadith and quran.., All that is cock and bull story written 100s of years after a character like "Muhammad" might have been there.


    I've thought about that. I believe a few academics have tentatively suggested this. Either way, Muhammad was in some imagined or reimagined. Whats important is how he was imagined and reimagined, howhe came to serve the need for an icon and an idol to be worshipped / feared with a death taboo and 'perfect man for eternity' to whom submitters must aspire to emulate and reference.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #11 - December 21, 2010, 04:31 PM

    His enormous popularity suggests that he was.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #12 - December 21, 2010, 04:41 PM

    Not necessarily;
    Jesus is even widely more popular, yet his existence is in even more question.

    Hercules was also popular, both today as a character and before as a god-man.
    Popularity gives no indication as to the legitimacy of something, its a logical fallacy.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #13 - December 21, 2010, 05:30 PM

    Not necessarily;
    Jesus is even widely more popular, yet his existence is in even more question.

    Hercules was also popular, both today as a character and before as a god-man.
    Popularity gives no indication as to the legitimacy of something, its a logical fallacy.


    His enormous popularity suggests that he was needed. I was answering the original question, not making a statement about whether he existed...though I have no reason to doubt that Muhammad existed.  In all of these cases, I think there were individuals that these fantastical legends were based on.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #14 - December 21, 2010, 05:47 PM

    His enormous popularity suggests that he was needed.

    He was indeed what dear Teetertotter? you mean he existed?? there are plenty of mythical Popular character around the globe in different cultures , it doesn't mean Popular character must be a true character.. 
    Quote
    I was answering the original question, not making a statement about whether he existed...though I have no reason to doubt that Muhammad existed.

    well I have a good reason to doubt that Muhammad like charcater that is described in hadith and Quran existed.

    please read this thread "Muhammad -Myth vs Reality." carefully at http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5518

    Quote
    In all of these cases, I think there were individuals that these fantastical legends were based on.

    Who?? give me few examples., do you mean to say fantastical ?  or a poor chap with FANATIC followers??

    with best regards
    yeezevee

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #15 - December 21, 2010, 09:45 PM

    Needed, like herpes is needed.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #16 - December 21, 2010, 09:51 PM

    I actually have strong doubt that there was guy "Muhammad" as described in hadith and quran.., All that is cock and bull story written 100s of years after a character like "Muhammad" might have been there.

    Islam is a cruel Joke filled with silly stories and stupid rituals..  It is simple Arabian Paganism/tribalism  gone wild..


    there actually might be quite a lot of truth to this

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #17 - December 22, 2010, 12:47 AM

    Actually only in Moses's example people were getting oppressed, before Jesus's arrival no one was oppressed, and similarly no one was oppressed in Mohammed's case, in both cases when the two arrived that started the oppression and hence the need to go away. Had they not made up their stories their followers would've been fine living where they were.

     

    alright I am a bit confused here, I have always been under the impression that when Jesus came around locals were being ruled by Romans may be they were living in peace and the term oppressor does not fit properly. Was it not  Huh?  Huh?

    I need a good lecture on this point so I can progress further

    "Religion is the purposeful suspension of critical thinking" Bill Maher
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #18 - December 22, 2010, 01:31 AM

    I actually have strong doubt that there was guy "Muhammad" as described in hadith and quran.., All that is cock and bull story written 100s of years after a character like "Muhammad" might have been there.

    Islam is a cruel Joke filled with silly stories and stupid rituals..  It is simple Arabian Paganism/tribalism  gone wild..


    I have no doubt about the existence of some warlord during that time, or at least a figure manufactured by warlords to secure the beginnings of an empire, or perhaps they were advised by some respected desert mystic. The first established caliphates, the fallout after this mans death, the conflict with his succession, must have had some basis in fact. Also, the history of the so called prophet, and all prophets as we know them now, would be saturated with myth and legend, mixed up with other heroes of the time, and copied or stolen from figures of long before.

    And I also have no doubt that the Qur’an is compiled writings, originally written and re-written piecemeal, a constitution for micro-managing a growing empire and future conquest, with plenty in it to secure the loyalty of fighting men, divide spoils of war, promising a paradise men’s club, and of course the taking of whores with divine blessing.

    But yeah, its all heavily embellished.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #19 - December 22, 2010, 04:40 AM

    He was indeed what dear Teetertotter? you mean he existed?? there are plenty of mythical Popular character around the globe in different cultures , it doesn't mean Popular character must be a true character..  well I have a good reason to doubt that Muhammad like charcater that is described in hadith and Quran existed.


    Perhaps I am missing the correlation between 'needed' and 'existence' - I simply don't see it.  The question was "was muhammad needed?" my response was "his enormous popularity would suggest that he was [needed]."  Meaning that whoever/whatever he was, he was able to fill a void in his initial (voluntary) followers enough to bring about a movement that spread like wildfire. Fantastical (fantasy), as in greatly embellished. I have no reason not to believe that there were individuals (Jesus, Muhammad, and even Hercules) that may have had humble beginnings and in successive years, their stories were greatly embellished.  

    Your link is appreciated.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #20 - December 22, 2010, 08:47 AM

    He was indeed what dear Teetertotter? you mean he existed?? there are plenty of mythical Popular character around the globe in different cultures , it doesn't mean Popular character must be a true character..  well I have a good reason to doubt that Muhammad like charcater that is described in hadith and Quran existed.

    please read this thread "Muhammad -Myth vs Reality." carefully at http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5518
    Who?? give me few examples., do you mean to say fantastical ?  or a poor chap with FANATIC followers??

    with best regards
    yeezevee


    I went through the forum, and have heard this theory before but there is much more subjective data available to deny the probability of a person with similar characteristics ever existed, I am more with Ishina on this topic
    I have no doubt about the existence of some warlord during that time, or at least a figure manufactured by warlords to secure the beginnings of an empire, or perhaps they were advised by some respected desert mystic. The first established caliphates, the fallout after this mans death, the conflict with his succession, must have had some basis in fact. Also, the history of the so called prophet, and all prophets as we know them now, would be saturated with myth and legend, mixed up with other heroes of the time, and copied or stolen from figures of long before.

    And I also have no doubt that the Qur’an is compiled writings, originally written and re-written piecemeal, a constitution for micro-managing a growing empire and future conquest, with plenty in it to secure the loyalty of fighting men, divide spoils of war, promising a paradise men’s club, and of course the taking of whores with divine blessing.

    But yeah, its all heavily embellished.


    You know my negation of religion was on purely logical and scientific basis, with a little dislike to the tactics that were used to promote this particular religion, but I had this notion that the leader had in his heart an ulterior motive and believed in it thus led his people by hook or crook, and you are also familiar with the ummah's obsession with sira' nabi. But since joining this forum I am now questioning the basic motive and morality of declaring prophecy and have a crazy theory(may be it have been addressed before) thus looking for input.

    "Religion is the purposeful suspension of critical thinking" Bill Maher
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #21 - December 22, 2010, 09:29 AM

    I have no doubt about the existence of some warlord during that time, or at least a figure manufactured by warlords to secure the beginnings of an empire, or perhaps they were advised by some respected desert mystic. The first established caliphates, the fallout after this mans death, the conflict with his succession, must have had some basis in fact. Also, the history of the so called prophet, and all prophets as we know them now, would be saturated with myth and legend, mixed up with other heroes of the time, and copied or stolen from figures of long before.

    And I also have no doubt that the Qur’an is compiled writings, originally written and re-written piecemeal, a constitution for micro-managing a growing empire and future conquest, with plenty in it to secure the loyalty of fighting men, divide spoils of war, promising a paradise men’s club, and of course the taking of whores with divine blessing.

    But yeah, its all heavily embellished.


    Excellent post there.

    Muslims will of course never accept such a reading. How Mo is imagined is what matters to them, and to those who want to debunk his inanity and cruelties. He 'exists' because he is the beyond reproach inssan al-kamil, greatest and most perfect man for eternity whose sunnah is the idealised centre of practise for followers of Islam. And how he is imagined crystallises exactly what Islam is, and how it is to be perceived, practised and asserted. Thats why he is Islam's biggest achilles heel, and why there is a death taboo surrounding any criticism or rejection of him.



    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #22 - December 22, 2010, 11:51 AM

    But since joining this forum I am now questioning the basic motive and morality of declaring prophecy and have a crazy theory(may be it have been addressed before) thus looking for input.


    Question everything.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #23 - December 22, 2010, 12:00 PM

    Excellent post there.

    Muslims will of course never accept such a reading. How Mo is imagined is what matters to them, and to those who want to debunk his inanity and cruelties. He 'exists' because he is the beyond reproach inssan al-kamil, greatest and most perfect man for eternity whose sunnah is the idealised centre of practise for followers of Islam. And how he is imagined crystallises exactly what Islam is, and how it is to be perceived, practised and asserted. Thats why he is Islam's biggest achilles heel, and why there is a death taboo surrounding any criticism or rejection of him.


    Faith is about maintaining the facade, playing the role, believing things despite the odds, ignoring or demonising the things you don’t like. You start doubting one thing and it starts a chain reaction. Its like a game of Jenga - you start removing blocks and eventually the little tower becomes so unstable that it collapses. Game over.

    Also, the most vocal proponents on the public stage have their very careers resting on this myth.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #24 - December 22, 2010, 01:30 PM


    alright I am a bit confused here, I have always been under the impression that when Jesus came around locals were being ruled by Romans may be they were living in peace and the term oppressor does not fit properly. Was it not  Huh?  Huh?

    I need a good lecture on this point so I can progress further

    This is an interesting point to look at the lives and works of  the time that Prophet's of Abrahmic religion  and compare with each other.,  Frankly speaking we know very little of Moses and Christ unlike Muhammad .. As far as I know & read this is what I get..



    Moses we don't have time line but stories from OT..
       
    Quote
    Timeline of Jesus Christ

    6-4 BC • Birth of Jesus Christ
    5-4 BC • Escape to Egypt. Slaughter of children.
    4 BC    • Herod the Great dies (spring).
    7-8 AD • Jesus visits Jerusalem as a child.
    12 AD • Augustus makes Tiberius co-regent.
    14 AD • Tiberius becomes Caesar (August 19th).
    25 AD • Pilate & Caiaphas appointed to office.
    29 AD • Ministry of John the Baptist begins.
    29 AD • Christ's ministry begins.
    31 AD • Tiberius executes Sejanus (Oct 18th).
    33 AD • Jesus dies (Friday, April 3rd, 3:00pm).
    36 AD • Pilate dethroned. Caiaphas deposed.
    37 AD • Tiberius Caesar dies.  

    Thatis what we ger for Christ from NT history..

    and here is the Time line of Prophet of Islam..

    Quote
    571: Birth of the Holy Prophet. Year of the Elephant. Invasion of Makkah by Abraha the Viceroy of Yemen, his retreat.
    577: The Holy Prophet visits Madina with his mother. Death of his mother.
    580: Death of Abdul Muttalib, the grandfather of the Holy Prophet.
    583: The Holy Prophet's journey to Syria in the company of his uncle Abu Talib. His meeting with the monk Bahira at Bisra who foretells of his prophethood.
    586: The Holy Prophet participates in the war of Fijar.
    591: The Holy Prophet becomes an active member of "Hilful Fudul", a league for the relief of the distressed.
    605: The Holy Prophet arbitrates in a dispute among the Quraish about the placing of the Black Stone in the Kaaba.
    610: The first revelation in the cave at Mt. Hira. The Holy Prophet is commissioned as the Messenger of God.
    613: Declaration at Mt. Sara inviting the general public to Islam.
    614: Invitation to the Hashimites to accept Islam.
    615: Persecution of the Muslims by the Quraish. A party of Muslims leaves for Abyssinia.
    616: Second Hijrah to Abysinnia.
    617: Social boycott of the Hashimites and the Holy Prophet by the Quraish. The Hashimites are shut up in a glen outside Makkah.
    619: Lifting of the boycott. Deaths of Abu Talib and Hadrat Khadija. Year of sorrow.
    594: The Holy Prophet becomes the Manager of the business of Lady Khadija, and leads her trade caravan to Syria and back.
    595: The Holy Prophet marries Hadrat Khadija. Seventh century
    620: Journey to Taif. Ascension to the heavens.
    621: First pledge at Aqaba.
    622: Second pledge at Aqaba. The Holy Prophet and the Muslims migrate to Yathrib.
    623: Nakhla expedition.
    624: Battle of Badr. Expulsion of the Bani Qainuqa Jews from Madina.
    625: Battle of Uhud. Massacre of 70 Muslims at Bir Mauna. Expulsion of Banu Nadir Jews from Madina. Second expedition of Badr.
    626: Expedition of Banu Mustaliq.
    627: Battle of the Trench. Expulsion of Banu Quraiza Jews.
    628: Truce of Hudaibiya. Expedition to Khyber. The Holy Prophet addresses letters to various heads of states.
    629: The Holy Prophet performs the pilgrimage at Makkah. Expedition to Muta (Romans).
    630: Conquest of Makkah. Battles of Hunsin, Auras, and Taif.
    631: Expedition to Tabuk. Year of Deputations.
    632: Farewell pilgrimage at Makkah.
    632: Death of the Holy Prophet. Election of Hadrat Abu Bakr as the Caliph. Usamah leads expedition to Syria. Battles of Zu Qissa and Abraq. Battles of Buzakha, Zafar and Naqra. Campaigns against Bani Tamim and Musailima, the Liar.

    So we get little better on Muhammad  and  what Muhammad's character would have been from the stories that come out of these years.. You can read more on Islam all the to 20th century at  http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15311

    with best
    yeezevee

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #25 - December 22, 2010, 02:12 PM

    This is an interesting discussion w.r.t. to hisotorical Muhammad/his life and his actions..  so let me put these three posts together..  
    Quote
    I have no doubt about the existence of some warlord during that time, or at least a figure manufactured by warlords to secure the beginnings of an empire, or perhaps they were advised by some respected desert mystic. The first established caliphates, the fallout after this mans death, the conflict with his succession, must have had some basis in fact. Also, the history of the so called prophet, and all prophets as we know them now, would be saturated with myth and legend, mixed up with other heroes of the time, and copied or stolen from figures of long before.

    And I also have no doubt that the Qur’an is compiled writings, originally written and re-written piecemeal, a constitution for micro-managing a growing empire and future conquest, with plenty in it to secure the loyalty of fighting men, divide spoils of war, promising a paradise men’s club, and of course the taking of whores with divine blessing.

    But yeah, its all heavily embellished.

    Perhaps I am missing the correlation between 'needed' and 'existence' - I simply don't see it.  The question was "was muhammad needed?" my response was "his enormous popularity would suggest that he was [needed]."  Meaning that whoever/whatever he was, he was able to fill a void in his initial (voluntary) followers enough to bring about a movement that spread like wildfire. Fantastical (fantasy), as in greatly embellished. I have no reason not to believe that there were individuals (Jesus, Muhammad, and even Hercules) that may have had humble beginnings and in successive years, their stories were greatly embellished.  

    Your link is appreciated.

     
    I went through the forum, and have heard this theory before but there is much more subjective data available to deny the probability of a person with similar characteristics ever existed, I am more with Ishina on this topic
    You know my negation of religion was on purely logical and scientific basis, with a little dislike to the tactics that were used to promote this particular religion, but I had this notion that the leader had in his heart an ulterior motive and believed in it thus led his people by hook or crook, and you are also familiar with the ummah's obsession with sira' nabi. But since joining this forum I am now questioning the basic motive and morality of declaring prophecy and have a crazy theory(may be it have been addressed before) thus looking for input.


    Ishina  does have a point in the sense that there must be an historical figure in Islam that is connected to Quran/ some hadith. The question How close was his life to what we know from Quran and Hadith?  But I have hard time to believe anything in Quran as well as in hadith that is there about Muhammad. One  of the theory people exploring is that there were Multiple characters of Muhammad that are put together in these books.,  I mean thing like these are horrible and  bullshit
     
    Quote
    http://www.yanabi.com/forum/Topic315265-107-1.aspx

    ya taiba (02.04.2009)

    BISMILLAH AL RAHMAN AL RAHIM


    YA RASOOL ALLAH

    ALLHUMMAJ AL SALAWAATIKA WA BARAKAATIKA ALA MUHAMMADININ NABI YI WA AZWAAJIHI UMMAHAATIL MU'MINEENA WAZURRIYATIHI WA AHLI BAYTIHI KAMA SALLAYTA ALA IBRAHIMA INNAKA HAMEEDUM MAJEED.


    2. Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti reports from Abu Ya’la, Hakim, Dar Qutni, Tabarani and Abu Nu’aym from Umm Ayman May Allah be pleased with her, who said, ‘the Prophet got up one night and urinated in a bowl. During that night, I rose in the state of thirst so I drank whatever was in the bowl. In the morning I told Him what I had done to which He smiled and said, ‘surely you will never have pain in your stomach’’. Abu Ya’ala’s wordings are as follows, ‘you will never feel stomach pain as of today’.

    http://www.sunniport.com/masabih/showthread.php?t=1530

    These are written way after death of Muhammad, My Point is Muhammad  may  not be as bad character as his followers make him to be. , More over the guy did nothing  as lon as  his first wife Khadija was alive...

     Clearly we need lot more information on this subject.. But let us discuss it  and let me put some links on that

    http://www.readislamicbooks.com/lecture-3-the-historic-aspect-of-prophet-muhammad%E2%80%99s-life.html
    http://www.kalamullah.com/muhammad-audio-book.html
    http://www.islamfortoday.com/companions.htm

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #26 - December 22, 2010, 03:43 PM

    There is plenty of evidence that Moses and Abraham don't exist and their stories were fabricated long after the supposed acts, we have information that there was a messianic teacher around the time of Jesus but no external proofs outside of Christianity that the actual personage of Jesus Christ existed.  Muhammad is an actual historical figure but given the rapid promotion of every variant of tom foolery and mythology in the hadith and the rejection of the vast majority as hopelessly false the actual character of Muhammad is at least questioned.

    If Moses and Abraham  fall everything else falls.

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #27 - December 22, 2010, 04:08 PM

    There is plenty of evidence that Moses and Abraham don't exist and their stories were fabricated long after the supposed acts, we have information that there was a messianic teacher around the time of Jesus but no external proofs outside of Christianity that the actual personage of Jesus Christ existed.

    adding some proof and links along with that statement would be very useful to the thread,,

    Quote
     Muhammad is an actual historical figure but given the rapid promotion of every variant of tom foolery and mythology in the hadith and the rejection of the vast majority as hopelessly false the actual character of Muhammad is at least questioned.

    If Moses and Abraham  fall everything else falls.

    According to early Islamic history., Muhammad's Islamic life is just 23 years.  he starts it when he was 40 year old guy and dies when he was 63.  Out of that 23 years, first 10 years is simply around the town of Mecca.. and the problem is existence of the town Mecca itself is in question.  IF we look at Quran that allegedly came out of Mecca is a soft Islam and much of it is stories and copy/paste from earlier Abarahamic stories in new wine bottle.

    So question about the historical Meccan Muhammad do bother me a bit..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #28 - December 22, 2010, 05:31 PM

    yeezevee:

    The first historian to mention Jesus was Tacitus (55-120 ce) somebody who had access to Roman historical records. He states about christians that their "originator, Christ, had been executed in Tiberius' reign by the governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate."

    - Tacitus, The annals of Imperial Rome, XV, 44, p. 365

    There are two things that make this seem like a genuine account. First of all, it's written by somebody outside of the Christian faith who has nothing to gain from mentioning Jesus and secondly, it is written in a very matter-of-fact way in which no doubt is entertained whatsoever.

    However, and of course this is the important point, there are no historical accounts of Jesus from his own lifetime. Most important is the lack of any mention from Philo of Alexandria, a famous Jewish philosopher who lived at the same time as Jesus in Egypt which meant either one of two things:- Jesus didn't exist or that the historical Jesus who proclaimed himself the messiah of the Jewish people was seen as largely irrelevant by the Jewish intellectuals of his time.

    taken from this thread: http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=11942.msg330208#msg330208

    At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
    Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
    Downward to darkness, on extended wings. - Stevens
  • Re: Was Muhammad Needed
     Reply #29 - December 22, 2010, 10:36 PM

    I've split the off-topic stuff out. Carry on. Afro


    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »