Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


What music are you listen...
by zeca
Today at 08:55 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
Today at 02:46 PM

افضل الايام
by akay
Yesterday at 05:31 PM

News From Syria
Yesterday at 02:13 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 01:30 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 11:56 AM

Ramadan
by akay
March 14, 2025, 01:22 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
March 06, 2025, 10:16 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
March 04, 2025, 09:03 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
March 04, 2025, 06:42 PM

Gaza assault
February 26, 2025, 09:25 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The siren song of the neocons in David Cameron's cabinet

 (Read 1903 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The siren song of the neocons in David Cameron's cabinet
     OP - March 06, 2011, 10:07 PM

    How very Guardian ...

    -----------------------------------

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/03/david-cameron-neoconservative-cabinet

    Neoconservatives such as Gove and Osborne sing a seductive hawkish tune – but the PM risks alienating his Liberal allies

    David Cameron's recent offer to intervene in Libya, arming insurgents and enforcing a no-fly zone, was withdrawn almost as quickly as it was articulated. Objections from the US and France sank the idea. But it seems that the idea had enjoyed support from the cabinet, most of all from the hawkish faction around the education secretary Michael Gove – who is a signatory to the neoconservative Henry Jackson Society's statement of principles. Cameron, though no neocon, is a traditional Atlanticist, and has energetically promoted a small fraternity of foreign policy hawks since gaining the Tory leadership in 2005.

    They first emerged in defence of Tony Blair and his unpopular foreign policies. Cameron himself, though he only reluctantly voted for the Iraq war, greatly admired Blair's stance in the debacle. Even he, though, could hardly match Gove's gushing praise for Blair in the runup to the Iraq war, in a column for the Times entitled "I can't fight my feelings any more: I love Tony". This passion for Blair was not restricted to his stance on foreign policy – it included Blair's position on the firefighters' strike, asylum seekers and tuition fees – but it was on Iraq that Gove maintained Blair was "behaving like a true Thatcherite". Indeed, for many Tories , Blair is neocon rex.

    Gove is the author of a number of neoconservative tracts. These include Celsius 7/7, which argues that Islamists are waging "total war" against the west, not because of imperialism but because of their root-and-branch rejection of "western values". A more pointed intervention, though, was the essay "The Very British Roots of Neoconservatism and Its Lessons for British Conservatives". In it, Gove was trying to persuade Tory allies sceptical of the adventurism of Rumsfeld and Bush that their policies were ones that the great patriarchs of conservatism would approve of. He argued that neoconservatism had strongly British roots that could be traced back to the statecraft of the Anglo-Irish Tory leader George Canning, whose pre-emptive battles with Bonapartism helped "advance the cause of freedom". Palmerston and Churchill were also given their due as precursors to modern neoconservatism. Significantly, Gove's trinity was entirely composed of Tories with some connections to Liberalism – if a neoconservative is a liberal who has been "mugged by reality", many Tory luminaries from Burke onward have been instinctive Whigs turned counter-revolutionary.

    Alongside Gove in the neoconservative faction are Ed Vaizey, the under-secretary of state who is, like Gove, has also signed up to the Henry Jackson Society's principles. Similarly, George Osborne, the chancellor, is a "signed up, card-carrying Bush fan", persuaded of the "excellent neoconservative case" for war with Iraq. His PPS, Greg Hands MP, is also a signatory to the Henry Jackson Society. Neoconservative ideas are also propagated in a number of thinktanks such as Policy Exchange whose director, Nicholas Boles MP, is another Henry Jackson Society signatory. The magazine Standpoint provides monthly ballast to this tendency.

    Despite often crucial tactical differences, such as those which have emerged over Libya, there is a shared vocabulary between neoconservatives and those, like William Hague, who articulate a "liberal conservative" foreign policy. Hague has vocally supported "humanitarian intervention", and was reluctant to criticise even the more controversial stances of Blair, such as his support for the 2006 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. This gave the Tories few opportunities to land any damaging blows against New Labour. Indeed, the "liberal interventionist" stance devised by Hague and Cameron amounts to reheated Blairism.

    The neoconservative agenda is not restricted to foreign policy, but includes a securitarian drive to contain Islamism and propagate "British values". Cameron's recent speech announcing the failure of multiculturalism can be seen as a tilt toward the neoconservatives in his cabinet. Yet the neoconservative temptation is a dangerous one for Cameron to succumb to. It offers moral and intellectual definition to an aggressive but vacillating government lacking legitimacy. If Cameron is a poorly defined leader, neoconservative belligerence can provide a far more robust political direction than the "big society". But Cameron still needs his Liberal allies, and the electoral base for neoconservatism is smaller even than for the aggressive Thatcherism he jettisoned in opposition. If Cameron were to openly embrace the neoconservative agenda, it would be a retreat from the electoral coalition-building that has temporarily saved the Tories from irrelevance.
  • Re: The siren song of the neocons in David Cameron's cabinet
     Reply #1 - March 07, 2011, 12:46 PM

    Didn't read the whole article, just flickered through, but...

    Quote
    The neoconservative agenda is not restricted to foreign policy, but includes a securitarian drive to contain Islamism and propagate "British values".


    I agree with this.

    Don't agree with invading other countries necessarily, however I do believe that asserting liberal Western values ("asserting muscular liberalism", as Cameron put it) within liberal Western societies is something that should ideally be done. I don't see an issue with asserting Western values in Western societies, values of individual liberties, secularism, democracy and free speech, after all, it is with great pride that we should celebrate the fruits of a free society, and assert those values as important in maintaining that society.

    I would not object to classes teaching highschool children the idea of secularism, the importance of democracy and human rights, the concept of freedom and / or free speech. I know it might seem like "flexing" our values onto wider society, but those values are important.

    I do think a lack of "shared values" such as "British values" may have something to do with migrant communities becoming insular and sourcing their values from their religion or family roots.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »