Thanks sloth.
From what i gather then, mohammed made up his own rules with grammar and people still understood what he meant but anyone can do this and it all just subjective if somone feels they have 'matched' it or not.
Hamza knows it is subjective. That is what he is trying to remedy.
He is trying his hardest to make it objective, by appealing to objective countable things like 'frequency of rhetorical devices', which is the particular aspect of his argument that this thread addresses.
Btw. I really like how you did not capiltalise the 'M' in Mohammed. The existin rules of grammar say that you are supposed to capitalise the first letter or names, but you chose instead to create a style of writing that breaks the rules. This was such a great linguistic feature of your sentence.
and then , the next word in your sentence "made". WOW. "
mohammed
made". Such great alliteration. How did you do it?
Are you sure you are not a prophet?