Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 22, 2024, 02:51 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 05:07 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2024, 05:41 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 20, 2024, 09:02 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens

 (Read 17093 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #60 - September 01, 2011, 06:38 PM

    So what questions does "atheism" ask, then?


    would you ask someone where is the proof for love, sure there are tokens of love that are exchanged (buying gifts) but that int-itself is not love. Just because two people live and are happy together does not mean they are necessarily in love. Asking for 'proof' of love is absurd riligoen works in the same way so if you want to challenge riligoen you will have to go to the deep obscure and frighting waters you cant just sunbathe out on the beneath with the new atheists and pretend to know wtf riligoen is all about. The new atheist may get rid of the practices and rituals and religious names but riligoen wont be gone it would manifest itself in other thing hence we are required to go ver deep (so this is not a job for scientist or the likes of dennet who are after $$)  we need to replow the old seeds, we might go starving for a while (nihlishm) but maybe next time we will have a healthy harvest

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #61 - September 01, 2011, 06:41 PM

    Why... are you spelling "religion" like that?

    Also, great job evading the question.

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #62 - September 01, 2011, 06:47 PM

    'New atheism' is the Dajjal.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #63 - September 01, 2011, 06:54 PM

    Why... are you spelling "religion" like that?

    I couldn’t stop Cheesy at that!
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #64 - September 01, 2011, 07:38 PM

    I don't think "where is the proof" is not a logical question. However I would agree with lucem's last post. You need a good philosopher who have good knowledge of theology and the arguments put forward by intellectual theists that will damage religion. Some philoscifical arguments are ilogical when u put them in the Context of science one would be the Kalamazoo which fails when you see it through the context of cosmology .

    How ever I think we need few Humes and Russelse if you want to make a big whole in religion. Tbh honest people like hitchens and Dawkins can't touch wlc's arugement. Just look at hitchens debate with him.







    Lost somewhere between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home. [carl sagan]
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #65 - September 01, 2011, 07:52 PM

    I disagree with that to an extent that the post modern approach to religion isn't a philosophical one, but one of religion as a narrative and a world view.

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #66 - September 01, 2011, 07:57 PM

    Philosophy is dead!


    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #67 - September 01, 2011, 08:04 PM

     Roll Eyes
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #68 - September 01, 2011, 08:19 PM

    Gladlfy it was nice knowing you man. Your abot to enter in a debate with some of the philosophical atheists here.

    Good luck =3




    Lost somewhere between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home. [carl sagan]
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #69 - September 01, 2011, 08:21 PM

     Cheesy

    You're about to be as dead as God!

  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #70 - September 01, 2011, 08:22 PM

    Lol dead thing dont scare me Wink


    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #71 - September 01, 2011, 08:25 PM

    Well I hope not, otherwise you'd be scaring yourself. Tongue
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #72 - September 01, 2011, 08:25 PM

    Philosophy is dead!


    That’s what they said about Punk…
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #73 - September 01, 2011, 08:28 PM

    Listen punk stay dead

    Right! Wink

    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #74 - September 01, 2011, 09:26 PM

    Asking for 'proof' of love is absurd riligoen works in the same way so if you want to challenge riligoen you will have to go to the deep obscure and frighting waters you cant just sunbathe out on the beneath with the new atheists and pretend to know wtf riligoen is all about.

    Do you need a PhD in philosophy to be allowed to argue against creationism or ridiculous so-called miracles in the Qur'an?

    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #75 - September 01, 2011, 09:27 PM

    So has anyone said anything worth saying yet?
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #76 - September 01, 2011, 09:48 PM

    Yes. And its Gladfly! Wink

    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #77 - September 01, 2011, 10:21 PM

    Do you need a PhD in philosophy to be allowed to argue against creationism or ridiculous so-called miracles in the Qur'an?


    if you want to bash creationism go ahead i will join you and i think many Christians might as well
    the funny thing is, with the rise of science in the public sphere riligoen in its attempts to incorporate science and remain relevant has led itself into trouble  
    but i don't think science will kill of riligoen it would just give it a new form a form far more dangerous because now riligoen will start making claims that impact the real world whereas before riligoen was content to remain a idea in peoples minds. Its like when riligoen was incorporated into real world politics with the monarchy that's when all the nasty stuff started to be justified as rational (such as witch hunts)  by those committing the heinous  act.

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #78 - September 01, 2011, 10:23 PM

    So has anyone said anything worth saying yet?


    We have a new spelling for 'religion'. That is not to be sniffed at.




    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #79 - September 01, 2011, 10:24 PM

    So has anyone said anything worth saying yet?


    Abood has said some good stuff regarding ethics

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #80 - September 01, 2011, 10:30 PM

    Philosophy is dead!




    well depends on what philosophy is
    each philosopher would give you a different answer as to what philosophy does or is

    Hegel in his dialectics said that history has come to its end (for Hegal the world existed only in his head  parrot )
    Heidegger said philosophy has come to its end


    for Wittgenstein philosophy was the study of language
    [Philosophical problems] are, of course, not empirical problems; but they are solved through an insight into the workings of our language, and that in such a way that these workings are recognized -- despite an urge to misunderstand them. The problems are solved, not through the contribution of new knowledge, rather through the arrangement of things long familiar. Philosophy is a struggle against the bewitchment (Verhexung) of our understanding by the resources of our language. [Ludwig Wittgenstein, "Philosophical Investigations," 1953]

    the etymology is the old Greek words "filo"+"sophia" which is "love of wisdom".

    i like to think of philosophy as  thinking made wonderful
    i like the Plato dialogues (Socratic debate) , so simple with no complicated system or jargon yet there is so much to be found in it
    but most philosophers are a pain in the ass, i cant stand reading philosophy its a headache  


    btw philosophy of science is stil on the rise

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #81 - September 01, 2011, 10:34 PM

    Reminds me, I was meant to pick up a copy of Wittgenstein's P.I. months ago...  lipsrsealed
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #82 - September 01, 2011, 10:34 PM

    Yes i have wasted years on this love of wisdom!

    Philosophy promised me so much and gave me so so little in return!

    What a waste of time it was!

    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #83 - September 01, 2011, 10:36 PM

    What did it promise you?
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #84 - September 01, 2011, 10:38 PM

    Gladfly what a capitalist mentality , philosophy fine tunes and amplifies your ability to reason that is what it gives us and it for this reason that some philosophers  bashed philosophy  saying that reason is the problem in the first place that - led us to this shitty world.

    Gladfly  you view knowledge as a commodity as a means, the great philosophers (Kant) said that knowledge was a thing-in itself that philosophizing itself was the great reward . Also you prove post-modernism as correct, you want knowledge to be exchanged for something in return.

    Wikipedia Leotards Meta-Narrative he was one of the firs post modernists

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #85 - September 01, 2011, 10:40 PM

    I'm going to ask my question again in the hope that you'll answer it this time:

    What questions do you think "atheism" should ask?

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #86 - September 01, 2011, 10:44 PM

    harakaat the question the (true) atheist (the question only applies to those who are true atheists, present day nihilist)  

    God is dead, man is a animal and his rationality is not to be prized, mortality , metaphysical systems all gone

    The great question is :

    what now?



    but first we have to complete the job and get rid of capitalism and again find our 'selves' and our 'language' our species being then we can all sit round the camp fire and decide what to do

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #87 - September 01, 2011, 10:46 PM

    So asking a religious dude "What now?" is going to deconvert him?

    Nice.

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #88 - September 01, 2011, 10:46 PM

    Also, has anyone linked this yet?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #89 - September 01, 2011, 10:47 PM

    Atheism =/= nihilism...

    Have you heard the good news? There is no God!
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »