Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 03:56 PM

ركن المتحدثين هايد بارك ل...
by akay
January 18, 2026, 02:48 PM

Is Iran/Persia going to b...
by zeca
January 18, 2026, 08:49 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
January 13, 2026, 09:54 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
January 12, 2026, 09:15 AM

What's happened to the fo...
January 09, 2026, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
January 06, 2026, 01:26 PM

Excellence and uniqueness
by akay
January 05, 2026, 10:14 AM

New Britain
December 31, 2025, 01:38 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 05, 2025, 11:34 PM

Ex-Muslims on Mythvision ...
by zeca
November 02, 2025, 07:58 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 23, 2025, 01:36 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Equality ???

 (Read 27155 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 3 45 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #90 - September 10, 2011, 12:38 AM

    Also, bitchy? When a woman gets bitchy she's blamed and when a man gets dissatisfied she's blamed for not satisfying him? If women get bitchy it's often because they're not happy with the guy, takes two to tango.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #91 - September 10, 2011, 12:44 AM

    Yeah, okay, I made it through 1/2 of the first and 3/4 of the second. I find talk radio boring, which is why I asked for transcript excepts, so I wouldn't have to sit through all of it.

    From what little I did hear, though, it's my opinion the guy is bitter against women and misogynistic. The "American women" he describes are simply a caricature (the women on "Two and a Half Men" come to mind)-- I've met women like that to be sure but met plenty more who aren't.

    I got a solution for this guy and all the other ones who whine about what bitches women are-- stop dating/marrying fucking bitches. Simple. That's what I do. Got fooled/reeled in by a woman who was a bitch at heart but played you so you'd marry her and give her kids? Man the fuck up and file for divorce-- you shouldn't have been such a dope in the first place. I've had this happen to more than one friend-- I feel very little sympathy for them despite generally being sympathetic to my friends when they're in a bad spot. One friend recently had this happen (and I could tell what this girl was about after a few minutes, why he couldn't is beyond me) and one day called me and started complaining "I married a bitch". I told him I didn't want to fuckin hear about it, go bitch to one of your other friends. It was a stupid move on his part, and there are a lot of women out there who aren't like that. Can't stand your wife? Divorce her, but don't come bitching to me.

    My friends say I'm too picky when it comes to women, well, that may mean I don't get laid as often as they do but it also means I don't end up with a fuckin banshee for a wife/girlfriend, and the girls I do end up with have no motive other than spending time with me cause we like each other, and having lots of dirty, dirty sex-- works for me. If men don't want bitches then they need to stop acting like dirty dogs.


    Well good for you Q-Man, I admire you for that.  Afro

    I've always said those kinda bitches and the arsehole men who go for that type, and vice-versa deserve each other 100%.  yes  

    I've also always maintained that any woman who puts up with abuse from men should get the hell out and likewise so should the men from abusive women and that includes verbal/mental abuse too not just physical and I don't care what the circumstances are, just GTFO.  

    With regards to social inequality, I dunno....was hypocrucifier referring to that or emasculation of men?



    "The greatest general is not the one who can take the most cities or spill the most blood. The greatest general is the one who can take Heaven and Earth without waging the battle." ~ Sun Tzu

  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #92 - September 10, 2011, 01:02 AM

    Shouldn't have got the hispanic dildo.


     Cheesy

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #93 - September 10, 2011, 01:25 AM

    I feel oppressed by Islam, but not by the west for the most part. There is some way to go to remove some restrictions, but it's clear that this can only work hand in hand with the liberation of men from their gender defined oppression. When men are not laughed at for being 'like a woman'- how can a woman, for example, remove the glass ceiling when society forces the opinion that men must be the providers and laugha at a man who is a stay at home father?

    You're really not getting it. Yes, I absolutely agree with you that men are forced into gender roles, but that's not what this is about at all. Do you think some big, hunky douche gives a crap about men oppressed because they don't fit into the very role he plays in society? Again, I am a queer/bisexual guy, I experience gender role oppression first-hand and actively struggle with it. But this is a product of patriarchal society, and is one of the things feminists have been fighting and continue to fight against. It goes hand-in-hand with the oppression of women: women are expected and demanded to be weak, emotional, nurturing, while men are demanded to be the exact opposite. They're two sides of the same coin and the struggle against one has to be the struggle against another.

    What this "men's right" bullshit is doing is getting on the defensive and saying that it's not women who are oppressed and abused, but actually men. These people are actively anti-feminist, and if you go to their channel, you will see that very clearly and explicitly. These people have no desire to seek gender emancipation; in fact, that's the exact opposite of what they do. They believe women have never been oppressed and have always been cared for and nourished so they should stop bitching and enjoy their lives as housewives.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #94 - September 10, 2011, 09:31 AM

    IF YOUR COMPLAINING ABOUT FEMALE RIGHTS, IT MEANS YOU AINT IN THE KITCHEN COOKING ME SHIT, SO STFU!

    "The words that oscillate between nonsense and supreme meaning are the oldest and truest." - C.G. Jung
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #95 - September 10, 2011, 11:16 PM

    Abood - I've said nothing, but quietly watched, and your posts in this thread have been great.  You have cut right through the bullshit on both sides and told it like it is.   Afro

    I can't be bothered with the rest of the thread.  The men's rights brigade have always been a bunch of pathetic little bigots, and the women that cling onto them are pathetic and stupid too. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #96 - September 10, 2011, 11:47 PM

    Thanks.

    I can't stand anti-feminists, especially self-hating women. They're their own worst enemy.

    I actually just started a course on feminist philosophy. dance
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #97 - September 11, 2011, 12:03 AM

    I can't stand self-hating women either but I can't stand manginas either.

    "The greatest general is not the one who can take the most cities or spill the most blood. The greatest general is the one who can take Heaven and Earth without waging the battle." ~ Sun Tzu

  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #98 - September 11, 2011, 12:22 AM

    Manhood is a stupid and sexist concept.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #99 - September 11, 2011, 01:10 AM

     Cheesy

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #100 - September 11, 2011, 04:00 AM

    When you grow up with people closest to you telling you you're "gay" and to "man up" and stop being "feminine", then you can laugh, okay? To me being told to be a "man" is like a black person being told to be white. If I ever tried to be a man, it's out of a feeling of inferiority and a desire to fit in. Fuck manhood. And fuck anyone who feels the desire or obligation to perpetuate any such gender role on anyone else.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #101 - September 11, 2011, 04:33 AM

    Abood i get what you're saying but as I mentioned previously, I failed to point out that I was talking in general terms and not in reference to the video which I didn't watch (the woman was too annoying!)

    My point isn't that men are MORE 'oppressed' or that women aren't and/or have never been. My point was/is that both men and women face role defined oppression- meaning they have both been subjected to roles that demand they behave/feel/etc a certain way. My agenda/desire is only that ALL people are free to just be what they feel they are best at, or what makes them happy. Furthermore, my point was/is also that when people ignore or laugh at how men are role defined this is illogical as doing the same to women

    I believe in equality for all people to be the way they feel is their nature- not the way they are told should be their nature
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #102 - September 11, 2011, 04:41 AM

    When you grow up with people closest to you telling you you're "gay" and to "man up" and stop being "feminine", then you can laugh, okay? To me being told to be a "man" is like a black person being told to be white. If I ever tried to be a man, it's out of a feeling of inferiority and a desire to fit in. Fuck manhood. And fuck anyone who feels the desire or obligation to perpetuate any such gender role on anyone else.


    Ok, look, I'm sorry about laughing.

    The concept of "being a man" is unfair and demanding. And is more of a impediment on many men's quality of life than anything a feminist could ever dream up. I agree with that. But I don't think it's sexist. I like the conventional concepts of manhood, I like that I'm muscular and 'tough', and my partner is soft and feminine. Not like a stereotype, but in general if my girl can lift more than me I feel weird. I'd like my son to be tough and manly too. But would I hate him for being feminine or even gay? No. I just think I'm allowed to have preferences. I have never had a problem with having effiminate or 'different' male friends.. even while other brown friends of mine shunned them. I think we all come in different gradients in shape and behavior and there is no 'standard' behaviour or 'look' for any gender.

    To me "manhood" is a preference or inclination, just as being gay or effiminate is a type of inclination. Hopefully we can move to a future where such things like 'manhood' are reduced to a mere choice among many, versus being a prevailing prejudice we are all pigeon-holed in. And besides, my concept of 'manhood' might be very different from another guys.

    Have I said anything wrong? Please do rip me apart if I have. I'm just a simple man. Tongue

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #103 - September 11, 2011, 04:51 AM

    I have no problem with manly men, just as I have no problem with heterosexual men. What I have a problem with is the monopolization of those two concepts and marginalization and forced assimilation of people who would otherwise not fit in.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #104 - September 11, 2011, 04:59 AM

    In that case I agree with you. I'm not that manly myself and have always felt I needed to 'man up' too. Especially since I was a massive nerd and geek in high school. A simple 'manhood' thing that I completely despise is watching sports. I hate watching sports. I have never ever gained an ounce of enjoyment watching a hockey, football, soccer or basketball game. I like playing it, occasionally, but even then I find the types of men that play sports to be immensely obnoxious and irritating. But in this country everyone loves hockey, and in a blue-collar redneck province like Alberta, association with manhood and loving sports is very raw and demanding. You can lose friends here and women for not liking Hockey.

    In fact I regularly follow the NHL just to keep my info up to date in case someone asks. And I HATE it. I hate that most women will think you're unmanly for not liking sports, and most men won't think you're 'one of the guys' for not backing The Oilers. It drives me batshit crazy. I used to be very insecure about this, and used to think myself less of a man for not liking to watch sports. I know better now. Most sports watchers are mindless sheep, no different than a roman audience at a gladiatorial arena. Only difference being that a gladiator match would be a LOT more entertaining than a Football game.

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #105 - September 11, 2011, 05:02 AM

    Some (many?) women love being feminine women, they want to 'take care of their man', have babies, stay at home, cook, clean, they pride themselves on doing a good job at this.

    The problem was that women were oppressed into this role so all women were expected to not only do this but to love it too. The liberation of women from the feminist movement means women now have the option to do other things that makes them happy. The problem now though is that this liberation has lead to the oppression, in a sense, of women who are traditional and like to be. Before, women were considered inferior to men because their role was to cook, clean, have babies, raise the kids, etc while a man had all the stress of making money to feed the family and keep a roof over their head. Many women who fought/strive for equality in fact want to be domestic still but they want to have their views/ideas regarded, have equal say as the man on decisions etc.

    The liberation of women assumes all women want to shed the shackles of the domestic life and run out to get a degree/job. Women who choose to be traditional are regarded as inferior and lacking in intelligence. The liberation of women has instead created a burden on women so now a woman isn't good enough unless she does all the domestic things, has kids, and has a good job.

    This is the same with men I suppose. Men are expected to now go to work and contribute to the domestics, child rearing, etc.

    People should just be free to be what they want to be. I shouldn't feel ashamed cos I like to take care of my home, and my bf shouldn't feel ashamed that he takes care of finances. Also, if the situation was reversed there's no shame in that either.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #106 - September 11, 2011, 05:04 AM

    Right on, Saffire.  Afro

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #107 - September 11, 2011, 05:05 AM

    I hate that most women will think you're unmanly for not liking sports


     Cheesy

    When I first started dating my bf he never watched football. I specifically remember him telling me he's not even into it much. Now, 1.5 years on he watches sport all the f***ing time! What a cheat! Grrrrrr. I hate it. Sport is so boring! I don't see the point of it, who cares in manchester united wins or not? How the heck will that affect anything!?
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #108 - September 11, 2011, 05:09 AM

    Cheesy

    When I first started dating my bf he never watched football. I specifically remember him telling me he's not even into it much. Now, 1.5 years on he watches sport all the f***ing time! What a cheat! Grrrrrr. I hate it. Sport is so boring! I don't see the point of it, who cares in manchester united wins or not? How the heck will that affect anything!?


    Well here's the thing. I believe in entertainment. I love playing video games, and care deeply about the next season of Boardwalk Empire or Spartacus. Sure none of these things are important or really have any consequence but I do enjoy them. I'm not knocking anyone for enjoying sports.. I just don't, and I hate it when men (and women!) demand that I as a man must like this sports shit or there is something wrong with me. I don't! Never have. Never will. I find a sports game to be the most immensely boring thing you could put me through. I'd rather pull my pubes out of my crotch with a tweezer before I'd enjoy sitting through a Baseball game.  Cheesy finmad

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #109 - September 11, 2011, 05:11 AM

    I'm also a fairly fit guy, i go to the gym regularly and love other physical activities. I love hiking, rock climbing, running, weight lifting, dirt bikes, off-roading, and many other things. So a lot of people automatically presume I must love sports. Annoying.

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #110 - September 11, 2011, 05:16 AM

    NO! Computer games teach you stuff, like how to defeat the bad guys and get to the next level! There's a point to it in a way. I found that especially when I was depressed and a total failure I got so addicted to games cos they gave me that feeling of accomplishment that I was lacking from real life

    And movies teach you stuff, you get to consider alternative possibilities. You get to see things, think about how you'd feel if such and such were true, make you recognise other people's ideas, like literature. They are useful tools. I've died of starvation, been forced to work as a ten dollar whore for crack, murdered, victimised, ruled, etc through movies. They allow me to reflect on myself. I particularly like movies that show you how 'everyone is capable of everything' where they show the life of a bad character, like a paedophile who one would automatically hate and want to torture til he dies, but they show his childhood, upbringing, how he was also molested, etc and by the end of the movie you don't accept his fault and think it's ok, but you understand, feel sorry for him even- you still want him dead for his own good and for the good of children, but you understand. Ergo movies are useful too.

    What use is sport? Even if it was between races (blacks against whites for example) it would be a useful tool to gauge which race is better, or women against men, or something. I don't see how sports today have any useful purpose.
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #111 - September 11, 2011, 05:23 AM

    NO! Computer games teach you stuff, like how to defeat the bad guys and get to the next level! There's a point to it in a way. I found that especially when I was depressed and a total failure I got so addicted to games cos they gave me that feeling of accomplishment that I was lacking from real life

    And movies teach you stuff, you get to consider alternative possibilities. You get to see things, think about how you'd feel if such and such were true, make you recognise other people's ideas, like literature. They are useful tools. I've died of starvation, been forced to work as a ten dollar whore for crack, murdered, victimised, ruled, etc through movies. They allow me to reflect on myself. I particularly like movies that show you how 'everyone is capable of everything' where they show the life of a bad character, like a paedophile who one would automatically hate and want to torture til he dies, but they show his childhood, upbringing, how he was also molested, etc and by the end of the movie you don't accept his fault and think it's ok, but you understand, feel sorry for him even- you still want him dead for his own good and for the good of children, but you understand. Ergo movies are useful too.

    What use is sport? Even if it was between races (blacks against whites for example) it would be a useful tool to gauge which race is better, or women against men, or something. I don't see how sports today have any useful purpose.


    You know, as a lover of movies and games and a passionate HATER of all things sports... I want to agree with you totally. But watching sports does have a point. It teaches our youth to be idiotic tribalistic neanderthals that backs a team mindlessly even though there is no moral or personality difference between one team or another. I've always viewed sports as a sort of opiate of the masses, after all if men can mindlessly back a team that is simply an amalgam of overpaid, overgrown men who wack plastic around for a living... then you can also get them to go to war as soldiers and throw themselves off a cliff for the fuhrer.

    LOL sorry about the rant, I hate sports.
     
    But yeah, watching sports has nearly zero value. It is as close to a completely useless activity as you can get.

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #112 - September 11, 2011, 05:37 AM

    Sports is just another TV serial lasting over the season.  Oh oh Tony Romo is sleeping with Jessica Simpson, its affecting his performance let's boo him.  Rachael loves Ross but is married to a British chick I hate that British chick! Grrr argh.  Its the same bull wrapped up in a package that makes men think that they aren't preforming the same bs as women do during the day time soaps.  There is a purist sports as a true art form crowd and I respect those guys who like the game 'for the game' for the most part it is soap operas with athletic guys

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #113 - September 25, 2011, 10:58 PM

    Why I, as an ardent anti-feminist, feel sorry for women

    By Erin Pizzey

    I feel sorry for women of my generation who were tricked into believing that the so-called women's movement had anything to offer women except tears.

    Professor Ruth Wisse from Harvard, has this to say about the women's movement......... 'By defining relationships between men and women in terms of power and competition instead of reciprocity and cooperation, the movement tore apart the most basic and fragile contract in human society, the unit from which all other social institutions draw their strength.'


    I believe that the women's movement internationally has been the most extreme and the most influential cause of the destruction of family life in this century.  The history of this movement goes back to the early sixties in America when the women's liberation movement was born out of the rage and frustration of American women working along side men in the left wing movements that were sweeping across the western world.  Like many women of my age, I was transfixed by the writings of feminist gurus.  I passionately believed in the message that was being touted through the pages of newspapers.  The seductive message was that women were going to cease to fight and to compete with each other.  We were going to come together to improve our role in society and to take advantage of choices that would enable us to compete in the work place, if we so wished.  We would be given control over our bodies and be able to make our own decisions over abortion.

    To this end we were invited to attend conferences where 'a new future for women' would be revealed.

    What was all too quickly revealed was an agenda that made my blood run cold.   Hundreds of women, all white, mostly middle class and largely from academia, assured us that they had the solutions to all our problems.  My problem as I saw it, was that I had recently moved into Hammersmith and was suffering from a great deal of isolation.  I supposed that the women's movement was geared towards helping women, like myself, at home with small children, to learn to reach out to others in our communities.

    I was very wrong. It soon became obvious that the women's movement was bent on infiltrating and destroying family life.   The enemy I needed to identify was behind my own front door.  Useless to protest that my husband paid our mortgage and enabled me to stay at home full time to be with my two small children.  I was howled down and ridiculed. Within a matter of months after that first conference the subject of women's liberation had become so fashionable that very few women would dare even suggest that they were happy to be at home and even less likely to admit that they were happily married.

    Some newspapers, through their women's pages, and virtually all magazines carried their new 'deal' for women.  Marriage and family life were little more than gulags where women languished, forced to service the bestial needs of men.  Women, in this brave new world, were now fueled with the information that women's sexual needs, denied them for so many generations by selfish and controlling men, were now paramount.  Overnight the roles changed and men no longer were the pursuer but became the pursued.  The pill took care of any consequences and old fashioned morality was thrown on the scrap heap.  Chivalry towards women by men was met with sullen rudeness and men began to feel the chill wind of universal female dislike.  Maleness became radically unfashionable.  Little boys were to be brainwashed into abandoning their traditional games and toys and encouraged to adopt 'femaleness.'  Men were to be redesigned and repackaged into 'new men.'

    Many men, at first, responded with cries of delight.   Blinded by lust and the lure of relationships without any responsibility, many men fully concurred with the women's movement.   Slowly, as women moved into positions of power, men began to feel the iron fist of the women's movement on their backs.

    Today, millions of men look back at the devastation this movement created in their lives.  Publicly derided as useless, feckless idle wasters, men have retreated into their holes to lick their wounds.   A generation of young men in their early twenties is now adrift in a sea of misandry.  They are regularly exposed as less able than their sisters and pilloried as academic failures by the press.  No wonder they turn to mental illness, suicide and drugs.  Their feminist mothers, in many cases with multiple sexual partners, have abandoned their role as care givers.  Children come home to empty rooms, empty fridges and no warmth.  These are the children of the 'nobody home' generation.  The feminist movement decreed that all women must enter the work force and hand their young children over to the care of the  'mother' state.  As the divorce rates soar, men refuse to make any commitment that ties them to women who, when they are bored with the relationship, will  boot the men out and keep the money and the children.

    The gross injustice to men deserves our concern but save your tears for  innocent women.  Our daughters did not deserve the inheritance of malice and spite that my generation of women heaped upon the shoulders of men.  The feminisation of the schools where all male efforts were seen as malignant.  The natural attraction between boys and girls described as 'sexual harassment,' and the terrible loss of tenderness and romance that has been leached out of the lives of women.

    What we have left, thanks to this evil movement, is a vast number of lone women trying to keep what is left of family life going. They never asked to be foot soldiers in what has become a feminazi army.  They were not blessed with skills and college degrees that gave them economic power to make decisions when they were abandoned by their men.  They believed that the feminist movement was going to offer them choices.  What they did not understand was that there were never any choices.  Men, realizing that they had been cast in the role of sexual monsters, retaliated.  Those that didn't pitch into the war of the sexes with relish, simply faded away.  Women facing the new millennium have few choices.  One of them must be to take back our homes and our families from the clutch of the feminist movement.

    Fight back against the ridicule heaped upon men.  Those men are our sons and hopefully, our future son-in-laws.  Where are the men and women who want to preserve family life in this country?  Are they willing to stand up and be counted?

                            CLICK



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #114 - September 25, 2011, 10:59 PM

    So the feminist movement hurts men's egos. Aww, poor men...

    ...

    ...

    ...

     Roll Eyes
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #115 - September 25, 2011, 11:20 PM

    Depends on how you look at it! Tongue Being gender blind enables me to have a broader view of things.
    FYI it's a woman who has written this article.
    The truth doesn't care for egos!



    The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
                                   Thomas Paine

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored !- Aldous Huxley
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #116 - September 25, 2011, 11:44 PM

    hypo, do you think women can not be misogynistic? Have you heard of Ann Coulter or Phyllis Schlafly?

    You are not "gender blind" - you are presuming that your perspective is the "neutral" "unbiased" perspective, which is a bias itself.

    Hundreds of women, all white, mostly middle class and largely from academia, assured us that they had the solutions to all our problems.  My problem as I saw it, was that I had recently moved into Hammersmith and was suffering from a great deal of isolation.  I supposed that the women's movement was geared towards helping women, like myself, at home with small children, to learn to reach out to others in our communities.


    Secularism has a history of being white, middle class and academically based. Does that make it a bad idea? Why don't you rail against secularism?

    Feminism is the radical notion that women are people, that is all, on its fundamental level. That means they get to make choices, and mistakes, and accomplishments just like men do. Why this notion is so threatening to some people is baffling.

    Useless to protest that my husband paid our mortgage and enabled me to stay at home full time to be with my two small children.  I was howled down and ridiculed. Within a matter of months after that first conference the subject of women's liberation had become so fashionable that very few women would dare even suggest that they were happy to be at home and even less likely to admit that they were happily married.


    Oh yes and this old fogey's personal anecdotal experience invalidates all that feminists have achieved for women, men and children. Roll Eyes

    Some newspapers, through their women's pages, and virtually all magazines carried their new 'deal' for women.  Marriage and family life were little more than gulags where women languished, forced to service the bestial needs of men.  Women, in this brave new world, were now fueled with the information that women's sexual needs, denied them for so many generations by selfish and controlling men, were now paramount.


    Guess what, they were gulags for many women. Just because some women were happy with sugar daddies or were lucky to end up with decent men, does not mean all were (or are in modern states with little or no gender equality).

     
    Overnight the roles changed and men no longer were the pursuer but became the pursued.


    Oh how awful for these laziest women to not be treated as property that can be bought, sold, exchanged. Cry me a river.

     
    The pill took care of any consequences and old fashioned morality was thrown on the scrap heap.


    As is too often the case with ex-muzzie men Roll Eyes, if this is the attitude you continue to have after you've apostated, you may as well have remained muslim.

     Chivalry towards women by men was met with sullen rudeness and men began to feel the chill wind of universal female dislike.


    Aww boo hoo grandma. How about chivalry that goes both ways? What happens if a woman holds a door for a man? Does the fucking universe collapse on itself? Roll Eyes

     Maleness became radically unfashionable.  Little boys were to be brainwashed into abandoning their traditional games and toys and encouraged to adopt 'femaleness.'  Men were to be redesigned and repackaged into 'new men.'


    Yes how awful that gender roles were questioned at all. Tsk tsk tsk. Grin

     Many men, at first, responded with cries of delight.


    Oh FFS. No they did not. Read some actual history.

    Blinded by lust and the lure of relationships without any responsibility, many men fully concurred with the women's movement.   Slowly, as women moved into positions of power, men began to feel the iron fist of the women's movement on their backs.


    Yes it was so much better when only men could fist women and men. How dare women want any respect, autonomy, power-sharing or equality in any domain whatsoever??!
     finmad

     Publicly derided as useless, feckless idle wasters, men have retreated into their holes to lick their wounds.


    No that's only happening to the men who want a license to be assholes with no repercussions.

    A generation of young men in their early twenties is now adrift in a sea of misandry.  They are regularly exposed as less able than their sisters and pilloried as academic failures by the press.


    Right... that's why the proportion of male students in the highest paying fields of science and engineering keeps increasing or has stayed the same. More bullshit... this granny's supersizin' it.

    No wonder they turn to mental illness, suicide and drugs.  Their feminist mothers, in many cases with multiple sexual partners, have abandoned their role as care givers.


    LOL. Yes it's perfectly okay for their daddies to be screwin' their secretaries. It's only mommy's sex that should remain pure. How Freudian Cheesy

    Children come home to empty rooms, empty fridges and no warmth.  These are the children of the 'nobody home' generation.


    Yeah that's called a capitalist world economy where everyone needs to work just to be able to survive, you privileged bitch.

    The feminist movement decreed that all women must enter the work force and hand their young children over to the care of the  'mother' state.


    It was sooo much better when "women's work" was unpaid and subsidized capitalist industrialization so that men could bring home the bacon while women got shit for all they did. Now these broads want equal pay, equal rights, WTF? They oughta know their place, right, hypo?

    As the divorce rates soar, men refuse to make any commitment that ties them to women who, when they are bored with the relationship, will  boot the men out and keep the money and the children.


    Aww poor victimized men. Boo hoo. Cause yeah women on men violence, and exploitation is soooooo much more than male-perpetuated violence and exploitation of women.
     handjob

    Can't be bothered with the rest. You have a tendency for hyperbole and polemicism, hypo, but this article was really beneath what I think is your level of intelligence.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #117 - September 25, 2011, 11:50 PM

    I'm also a fairly fit guy, i go to the gym regularly and love other physical activities. I love hiking, rock climbing, running, weight lifting, dirt bikes, off-roading, and many other things. So a lot of people automatically presume I must love sports. Annoying.


    Actually as a guy who's really into physical fitness but not sports, I'd automatically presume you're gay. Just sayin.

    fuck you
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #118 - September 26, 2011, 12:08 AM

    Actually as a guy who's really into physical fitness but not sports, I'd automatically presume you're gay. Just sayin.


    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

    07:54 <harakaat>: you must be jema
    07:54 <harakaat>: considering how annoying you are
  • Re: Equality ???
     Reply #119 - September 26, 2011, 01:29 AM

    Yeah, okay, I made it through 1/2 of the first and 3/4 of the second. I find talk radio boring, which is why I asked for transcript excepts, so I wouldn't have to sit through all of it.

    From what little I did hear, though, it's my opinion the guy is bitter against women and misogynistic. The "American women" he describes are simply a caricature (the women on "Two and a Half Men" come to mind)-- I've met women like that to be sure but met plenty more who aren't.

    I got a solution for this guy and all the other ones who whine about what bitches women are-- stop dating/marrying fucking bitches. Simple. That's what I do. Got fooled/reeled in by a woman who was a bitch at heart but played you so you'd marry her and give her kids? Man the fuck up and file for divorce-- you shouldn't have been such a dope in the first place. I've had this happen to more than one friend-- I feel very little sympathy for them despite generally being sympathetic to my friends when they're in a bad spot. One friend recently had this happen (and I could tell what this girl was about after a few minutes, why he couldn't is beyond me) and one day called me and started complaining "I married a bitch". I told him I didn't want to fuckin hear about it, go bitch to one of your other friends. It was a stupid move on his part, and there are a lot of women out there who aren't like that. Can't stand your wife? Divorce her, but don't come bitching to me.

    My friends say I'm too picky when it comes to women, well, that may mean I don't get laid as often as they do but it also means I don't end up with a fuckin banshee for a wife/girlfriend, and the girls I do end up with have no motive other than spending time with me cause we like each other, and having lots of dirty, dirty sex-- works for me. If men don't want bitches then they need to stop acting like dirty dogs.


    Right On, Rev Afro

    "I'm standing here like an asshole holding my Charles Dickens"

    "No theory,No ready made system,no book that has ever been written to save the world. i cleave to no system.."-Bakunin
  • Previous page 1 2 3 45 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »