Never thought I'd say this but I think yeezevee makes more sense than Cheetah here.

As to the OP, my answer is "Other"
I do not oppose the idea that a life may be taken for another life on a moral basis, however I do not think, on a practical basis, that the state taking someone's life serves justice. Until such time as an error and bias-free system of conviction and sentencing is achieved (which I think is highly unlikely to ever occur), I do not agree with including capital punishment as a punishment for any crime.
As for the OP I voted 'other'.
I'm actually kind of surpised to find myself arguing the sometimes the death sentence is the right thing side of this.
I don't know alot about the high profile cases that make the news.
I do know the living conditions of 2,500 or so men who live at the facility where worked before my sick leave. I know many of these men on a daily conversaion level. There is but but two or three of them that are claiming innocent. That is not 100% innocent. That is innocent of the crime they ere convicted of. Two totally different things.
If you got to know how dangerous some of these men are maybe you would have different feeling about them. Some of them would rape and torture to death your 3 month old son or your 80 year old grandma and then say they willingly took part. They'd do the same to you, they do not want to stop. They rape other offenders if ever they would get the chance. They would hurt anyone.
At work I am considered offender friendly because I will always try to get programs to help them. I listen to what they would say even when it was hard to hear.
But there is reality to be faced. Some people are so damaged and so dangerous that the quality of their life will be so low that there would be mercy in death.