Why dont you look at wiki on big bang for a start?
Why don't you help him out and answer the question instead of telling him to read an artical ?
okay.....i have been asked two questions about the creation of universe
1) What is the evidence of big bang Huh? and many scientists speak against it (names not mentioned by the questioner)...
2) How can you say that universe is not required to be created
for second question i said that all scientists agree that there is no evidence of universe to be created...as it was in some other state before big bang.............am i right Huh?? and kindly also give some links to material about it......
One of my friends asked some what of a similer question and made loads of stupid statement. I'll post a part of my rebuke that will be helpfull to you. And its scinetficly acurate. I have had reviewed by a perosn who has a PHD in astro-physics from Manchester university so its athuentic
.
The "Big bang"
Right lets talk about the big bang theory then. Every person who was arguing said that I believed that the earth came from a big bang and that tells you how much you guys were ignorant about the big bang theory.
Now what is the big bang theory. First of all there was nothing “big” and there was no “bang” the name was actually a sarcastic remark made by the British astronomer sir Fred Hoyal who rejected it at the time but it stuck. The big bang put in simple term is the expansion of the whole universe from a singularity.
Now that we have a basic understanding of what the big bang is we can talk about the evidence.
Evidence number 1. Hubble’s observation Now you asked me evidence for the big bang theory. Well let me provide you with 2 key points. First are the observations made by Edwin Hubble. He observed that distant galaxies were moving away from us (At the time, most astronomers thought that galaxies like Andromeda were within the Milky Way. He was the first to show that they lay outside of our galaxy.This was discovered whilst he was observing Cepheid Variables in the Andromeda Galaxy and noticed the light being emitted was Doppler Shifted. By examining Cepheid Varibles in a number of different galaxies he found that the majority of galxies were moving away from us, and that the further they were away, the faster they were receding. Leading to, Hubble's Law on the Redshift of Galaxies.) . Thus proving that the universe was expanding. Edwin Hubble did this by measuring the Doppler shift effect of distant galaxies. He found that the more distant the galaxies the more of there colour was shifted to red. This is known as red shift.
Evidence Number 2. Cosmic Microwave back ground Radiation. This is the CMBR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WMAP_2010.png . It is the most important picture taken by humans because it actually is the picture of the baby universe. It was taken by WMAP. Basically what it is the radiation from the big bang.
I think that should be enough. There other pieces of evidence such as the size of cosmos and the age of star among others. If you want more evidence then ask me and if you want me to go into more detail let me know.
Now for the next premises. What was there before the big bang ? Well tbh nothing. The reason being time and space are not separate entities’ but one. Space and time did came to existence at the instant of the big bang or cosmic inflation. So if time didn’t exist you can’t say what there “before” because there was no such thing as a before , present or after. Its like standing on the north pole and asking what’s the north of north pole. If you want me to go into more detail as always let me know J.
Moving to the 3rd premises. Who created the big bang ?
No one created the big bang. Why are you asking “who” created big bang. By doing you are committing a logical fallacy called “begging the question” in which you are already assuming something needs to exist and make something else exist with out proving the premises of your argument that such a trancendent being exists in the first place so lets play by the rules of logic
.
Topic: creation of universe