I showed from the Bible the Mosaic Law was alway intended to be temporary.
I think you are missing the point. You are trying to prove to me that although people could not eat all of those animals in the past, now that Jesus has come we can because the old laws were always supposed to be temporary.
My point is that it is silly. What is the point of telling people that they cannot eat a camel if there is no harm in doing so? What is the point of telling people they cannot eat bacon for so long only to tell them later that they can? A pig is so "unclean" that if you touch the carcass of a dead pig you are unclean for the rest of the day and have to wash your clothes, Jesus dies, and now you can not only touch a dead pig but you can stuff an apple in its mouth and cook it on a spit roast for dinner.
Do you really not see the absurdity?
I explained how Jesus fufilled the Law so that Christiians no longer had the restrctions of the Mosaic Law.
Yeah, problem is that it seems to conflict with the verse where Jesus says he has not come to alter even a single dot of the law. I don't see why he would say that if he then went on to make 99% of it obsolete.
you act as if this one tiny aspect of the whole Law was the purpose of Jesus' death
I was very careful when wording my reply so as not to do that. My point is that Pigs are bad, and Jesus had to die in order to make them dinner.
Yes it would be rather stupid if the single purpose of Jesus' death was to change a dietary law.
No, it is rather stupid that eating camels has ANYTHING at all to do with a man being nailed to a cross and murdered.
So what does it matter that Jews don't work on Saturday. Is it not their own choice what they believe?
Oh I see. We can all read the bible and choose to believe it says whatever we want it to? I suppose that does match the reality of religion that I see around me. Such as Christians eating pigs, and Jews no longer stoning to death disobedient children.