Thank you chepea for being the thread's doorman, keep all the ruffians out, cheers
Oh, btw, for those of you who liked the JCTI there is also a CCAT test on there-
Cerebrals Cognitive Ability Tests (CCAT) 10:
http://www.cerebrals.org/wp/tests/cerebrals-cognitive-ability-tests-ccat/
The CCAT is a battery divided into three subtests: Verbal Analogies (VA), Mathematical Problems (MP) and General Knowledge (GK) of respectively 42, 38 and 56 items. Each part measures a distinct ability, and once taken as a whole, these tasks give a reasonably good estimate of general crystallized intelligence and scholastic ability.
As a psychometric tool, the CCAT shows both excellent reliability and criterion-related-validity. Reliability of the full CCAT as checked by Spearman-Brown corrected Split-Half coefficient proved to be very highly satisfactory (.97). This ensures an acceptable measurement error (2.77 for the full scale index) and a fair stability of measurement. Furthermore, the Verbal Ability scale resulting from the addition of VA and GK subtests demonstrated sufficient level of reliability for being interpreted as an individual measure (.96).
Unlike the JCTI, the CCAT covers three areas, verbal ability, mathematical ability and general knowledge, I didn't like it as much, but according to the research it's meant to be good, it is a bit long, and does feel like a traditional IQ test, but I would say it's more modern than most of those 1950s IQ tests you find on the net, it has around 90 questions, but it's not too bad.
My score (a few years ago) was 150 btw, raw score=82, which was classed as 'very superior', but I don't trust it that much. It's a bit of fun at least.