The issue with Hitchens is that his youtube debates was 1/100 of his interactions with other people. He debated and knew Dinesh D'Souza for over 20 years and dinned and drank with him multiple times. Yet when you watch the debates, he chides him, derides his faith, and betrates him for bad ideas. Which are we supposed to believe? That he was mean and hostile and belligerent towards Dinesh who he drank and ate with for over 20 years? He was extremely friendly with multiple religious figures and carried on extended conversations with them. I'm trying to find it, but there was one Church of England priest with which he was intiminate friends with and took long road trips together while Christopher asked him various questions and enjoyed each other's company. What you see on stage is a sliver of the warmth and generosity that was Chistopher Hitchens. For sure, he didn't budge an inch when it came to relenting his ideas in the name of courteousy or being a courteous host, but should we really hold that against him?
That's true, thanks.
But STILL.. I mean, this Demba dude (and tbh I don't watch footsyballsy so I have no idea who he is) is so NICE. Reminds me of my old Islamic Studies teacher. She was a sweetheart. A saint, I swear.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/741d6/741d63e72cd0da1dd0bc954dcb986f7104d78e32" alt="yes"
But I guess neither of them are debating. I don't like watching religious debates
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9930e/9930ec693904aea642ae70068a6c9fd1ddb72c8f" alt="vomit"
so maybe that's why I don't like Hitchens and Dawkins and stuff.
Thank you Deusvult!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af732/af732476308b002994e78dd51df3ca3a550edb7c" alt="Smiley"