Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
November 22, 2024, 02:51 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 08:08 PM

Gaza assault
November 21, 2024, 07:56 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 05:07 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2024, 05:41 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 20, 2024, 09:02 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Awesome Radio 4 programmes

 (Read 4161 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     OP - February 22, 2013, 09:36 PM

    I'm going to use this thread to post great audio programmes on BBC Radio 4 starting with the following:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01mhwss

    Scientific Progress
    Series 4 Episode 5 of 5

    Quote
    Duration: 15 minutes
    First broadcast: Monday 10 September 2012

    Edward Stourton continues to revisit broadcast debates from the archives - exploring the ideas, the great minds behind them and echoes of the arguments today.

    By 1971, Austrian Sir Karl Popper was already established as perhaps the greatest philosopher of science when he appeared on Dutch television. He sat opposite Nobel-winning neuroscientist Sir John Eccles to discuss the scientific method and its flaws. How did we know if a fact or theory was unquestionably true or not?

    As a young man, the discoveries of Albert Einstein, which dislodged many of the basic "truths" of physics according to Newtonian laws, had impressed on him the fallibility of scientific experiments. The scientific community, he asserted, needed to look at problems from a very different perspective - using his theory of falsifiability. Eccles had, in fact, used this way of thinking to disprove his own theories.

    So how can we differentiate between pseudo-science and real science? What is the role of science and scientists in the progress of mankind? And on to today - do these arguments still hold sway?

    In the studio dissecting the debate is Colin Blakemore, Professor of Neuroscience at the University of Oxford; and Anthony O'Hear, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Buckingham.


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #1 - March 20, 2013, 11:36 PM

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01phhb9

    Ben Goldacre's Bad Evidence
    Duration: 38 minutes
    First broadcast: Tuesday 01 January 2013

    Quote
    Medic and author Ben Goldacre explores the idea of evidence-based policy and asks if it can ever become a reality in the UK.

    In medicine, how do we know if a particular treatment works? The simple answer is to subject it to a fair test against other treatments or a placebo. So far the best example of a fair test in medicine is a randomised controlled trial or RCT.

    Often to referred to as 'the gold standard' when it comes to determining what works, RCTs are now commonplace in business. But what about government? The idea of evidence-based policy is hardly new - it's what social scientists have been banging on about since the 1960s. But in practice, when evidence has been used to determine policy, it's often been anything but 'gold-standard'.

    In this programme, the medic and author of Bad Science, Ben Goldacre, sets out to explore the potential for putting RCTs at the heart of the policy-making process, arguing that not only can they reveal if our existing policies are effective but RCTs have the potential to transform the way we create and implement social policy across the country, from education to health, from welfare to crime.

    Of course not everyone agrees that all you need is hard data to make the best policy. Experience, values, ideology - these, say critics should never be abandoned in favour of cold statistics. And whilst the RCT may work well for pills and potions, it's too blunt an instrument to deal with the subtle and complex challenges of assessing how best to punish crime, treat drug users or teach children from impoverished background to read and write. Just look at the recent fiasco over badger-culling. over a ten-year period, randomised experiments and pilot studies have resulted in no clear policy on how to prevent the spread of bovine TB. And then there's the ethical question - how for example could you allow randomisation to determine something as morally (and politically) sensitive as sentencing criminals, let alone teaching kids?

    What is clear, is that bad policies cost us dear - both socially and economically. The challenges are many but the potential, argues Ben, could be truly transformational, both for society and for government.


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #2 - March 21, 2013, 12:30 AM

    Hey, did you listen to The Infinite Monkey Cage?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00snr0w

    Quote
    Award winning science/comedy chat with Brian Cox, Robin Ince and guests. Witty, irreverent look at the world according to science with physicist Brian Cox and comedian Robin Ince.


    There are 7 series so far, and you can find them all on YouTube.

    Here's Series 1, Episode 1:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCr2C5DYvbA

    It's great stuff.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #3 - March 21, 2013, 06:46 PM

    Hey, did you listen to The Infinite Monkey Cage?

    I caught a few episodes.  Yeah, they are entertaining as well as interesting.  I love how they try to extract humour out of science.  There was this girl who performed at The Pod Delusion birthday bash last year.  She's a comedian, presenter, songwriter and geek, all in one.

    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #4 - June 01, 2013, 11:05 PM

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sn9cf

    Unreliable Evidence: How Free Is Our Speech?
    Duration: 43 minutes
    First broadcast: Wednesday 29 May 2013

    Quote
    Are laws designed to protect individuals and minority groups from offence and harassment, inhibiting free speech?

    Clive Anderson and his guests discuss whether cases such as the conviction of a woman for telling David Cameron he had "blood on his hands" and the arrest of a man for calling a police horse "gay" are bringing the law into disrepute.

    Barristers Ivan Hare and Neil Addison call for the repeal of some public order laws and for reform of law relating to the incitement of hatred on the grounds or race, religion or sexual orientation.

    But Chief Constable Andrew Trotter argues that such laws are essential tools in the police armoury for maintaining public order. He says minority groups and individuals deserve protection from abusive language.

    Legal academic Gavin Phillipson suggests that hate speech laws should be restricted to preventing language which fundamentally questions other people's right to exist or that attempts to relegate them to lower class citizens.


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #5 - June 02, 2013, 11:50 PM

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/moreorless

    More or Less: Behind the Stats
    The maths of spies and terrorists
    Duration: 25 mins
    First Broadcast: Fri, 31 May 13


    Quote
    After the killing of a British soldier on the streets of Woolwich in London, it emerged that the suspects were known to the security services. But how feasible is it for the authorities to keep track of everyone on their watch list? Tim Harford crunches the numbers, with the help of the former head of MI5, Dame Stella Rimington. Plus: a listener requests a cost-benefit analysis of kidney donations; and Johnny Ball gives the Apprentices a maths lesson.


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #6 - June 10, 2013, 10:04 AM

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00hj0kd

    Islam and Science

    Quote
    Writer and journalist Ehsan Masood explores the status of science in the modern Islamic world, and asks whether measures taken to promote science are having an impact on the work of Muslim scientists

    Episode 3
    3/3 The Islamic world is witnessing a trend for seeking 'scientific miracles' in the Qur'an.

  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #7 - February 14, 2014, 06:15 PM

    Just discovered this series of radio programmes on Radio 4:
    A Brief History of Mathematics
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00srz5b/episodes/guide


    Worth checking out if mathematics is your thing. parrot

    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #8 - March 20, 2014, 01:04 AM

    Caught this absolute gem on the radio on my drive back home. Definitely worth listening to if you're interested in libertarianism/freedom/the state.

    Moral Maze: Victimless Crime
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03y15hy
    Duration: 43 mins

    Quote
    Is there such a thing as a victimless crime? This issue is at the heart of two campaigns that have been attracting a lot of coverage recently. At the moment the sale and purchase of sex is legal in Britain, but there's a growing demand to criminalise those who pay for sexual services. We are also seeing around the world calls to legalise the use of cannabis for personal use. The definition of a "victim" in both cases is complex and contested, but how should we use the law in these circumstances when there's a conflict between individual liberty and the policing of social norms and harms? Since 1960 laws criminalising homosexuality, suicide and blasphemy have all been consigned to history. Is that the way it should be In a liberal progressive society? Or should we and the state take a much more robust view of harm and listen more to the voices of victims, extending principles like "hate crimes" in the law?

    Combative, provocative and engaging debate chaired by Michael Buerk with Claire Fox, Michael Portillo, Giles Fraser, Anne McElvoy.

    Witnesses are Ian Driver, Sean Gabb, Kathy Gyngell and Finn Mackay


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #9 - March 20, 2014, 02:03 AM

    Radio 4 is a national treasure

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Awesome Radio 4 programmes
     Reply #10 - April 25, 2014, 11:52 PM

    More Radio 4 awesomeness:

    In Search of Ourselves: A History of Psychology and the Mind
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b041dlkx/episodes/player
    Lots of episodes.
    Quote
    Martin Sixsmith presents a history of psychology and seeks to understand what makes us think, feel and act the way we do.


    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »