Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Berlin car crasher
by zeca
Yesterday at 11:10 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 07:30 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
December 20, 2024, 12:15 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
December 19, 2024, 10:26 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 17, 2024, 07:04 PM

News From Syria
December 15, 2024, 01:02 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
December 11, 2024, 01:25 PM

New Britain
December 08, 2024, 10:30 AM

Ashes to beads: South Kor...
December 03, 2024, 09:44 PM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim

 (Read 15943 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     OP - April 30, 2013, 08:29 AM


    Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim


    On the road into the city of Madinah, approaching from the south, on the rocky slopes of Ayr mountain, there stands a giant billboard advertising a very telling hadith that is authentically attributed to the prophet: “Madinah is sacred between Mount Ayr and Mount Thawr. So whoever innovates an innovation therein, or gives protection to an innovator, then upon him is the curse of Allah, the angels, and all of mankind.”

    This is one of many ahadith that strictly advocate against reforming the religion of Islam with “newly invented innovations.”

    For over a thousand years, from pulpits across the globe, Muslims have heard the same admonition, Friday after Friday: “Verily, the best speech is the book of Allah. And the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. And the worst of all evil affairs are newly invented matters in religion. For verily, every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is a deviation, and every deviation is in the hellfire.”

    Muhammad said, “I have left you upon a clear path. Its night is just as bright as its day. None will deviate there from without meeting destruction.”

    When I looked at ahadith like these as a believer in the truth of the Islamic message, I found it nearly impossible to interpret Islam in any manner other than what was confirmed by the Qur’an and the authentic sunnah. For this reason, I was a salafi.

    Contrary to what you may think, “salafi” does not mean “Saudi nutcase” or “intolerant, anti-western misogynist.”

    To be a salafi simply meant that I accepted Islam, all of Islam, in the same way that the prophet and his companions accepted it, as it was transmitted in the earliest books of Islamic literature.

    This, I concluded, is what Allah commanded in the Qur’an. “Oh you who believe, enter into Islam completely, and do not follow the footsteps of Shaitan.” And, “Say, (Oh Muhammad) if you truly love Allah, then follow me, and Allah will love you.”

    I wondered then how Muslims could claim to believe in the truth and supremacy of Muhammad’s message while completely ignoring huge swaths of what the prophet himself taught.

    And I am not simply referring to big beards and short pants here, though there are many authentic ahadith that let us know that big beards and short pants are kind of a big deal to the all powerful and all wise creator of the universe.

    No, Islam presents in itself an entire world view and life system that Muslims give lip service to. Many Muslims, conservative and progressive alike, claim to believe that Islam is the solution. But they conveniently disregard what Islam actually teaches when it conflicts with their own aims and agendas.

    This troubled me. Didn’t these people know that Allah said “Whoever opposes the way of the messenger and follows a way other than that of the believers, we will turn him unto wherever he turns, then cast him into hell! What an evil abode!” Didn’t they believe that if they followed the messenger completely, they would achieve success? “And whoever obeys Allah and his messenger has indeed achieved the greatest success.”

    I honestly thought that through the application of the “original” teachings of Islam, I would uncover the solution to the many problems and ills that I saw in the world around me. Ask no questions, make no excuses, just say, “we hear and we obey,” and you will achieve salvation.

    But things did not quite work out that way. Over the years, and after much study and contemplation, I began to understand why Muslims—ones interested in progression at least—ignored huge swaths of Muhammad’s teachings.

    His teachings regarding Jihad, even in their most liberal interpretations, involve killing real people on the basis of the conclusions they reach about the world around them.

    His teachings about women have forever secured their inferior status and perpetuated their childlike dependency on the men in their lives.

    His teachings regarding the cosmos are invariably flawed when viewed in their entirety, relegating them at best to the realm of poor metaphor and poetic analogy—though I have no reason to believe he did not take himself literally.

    Similarly, his teachings on the origin of life and the creation of man are completely incompatible with anything that we’ve come to know through the overwhelming evidence for evolution by natural selection. To try to reinterpret his teachings in these areas as metaphorical is to render them completely useless and unintelligible. He might as well not even have said them.

    His teachings regarding finance would mean the utter collapse of the world economic system as we know it, with modern economic theories being replaced by his blanket prohibition on all interest and his rudimentary instructions for bartering dried dates.
     
    His political legacy has meant that the lands conquered by his armies are and forever will be in a perpetual state of war, not only against the non-believer, but against fellow believers who just did not get one point or another correct.

    I began to think that surely, the lord of the universe must have had a better plan than this.

    Surely, he must have thought things out a little more fully before deciding to send his final communication to mankind to a 7th century desert military leader, and thus forever stagnating his creatures in that mentality.

    Perhaps other Muslims were correct. Perhaps we were supposed to sift through the volumes of useless information, ethical atrocities, and scientific inaccuracies to find the gems of truth that we could still relate to our modern lives.

    Perhaps we really were meant to sweep everything that we did not agree with under the carpet, out of sight and out of mind, and focus only on the bits that gave us that warm and fuzzy feeling of being part of a global brotherhood of believers.

    But then, what is the point? If I am still going to use my own intellect and reason to decide which parts of my Islamic guidance to follow,  then what is the point of using it as a guide? How effective of a guide could it be if I still had to use an external, non-divine compass to make sense of it all?

    This troubled me as I tried to interpret Islam differently, and I nearly lost all faith then and there.

     But then, there were those things that just maybe--just maybe--could be true.

    What about the hadith about the goat herders building tall buildings? What about the hadith where the Prophet said, “Verily, Islam started as something strange and it shall return to being something strange, just as it started. So give glad tidings to the strangers.” It sure seemed strange in today’s world. How could Muhammad have known? What about the scientific miracles? Many of these things were seemingly true!

    Ah, but that is what religions do, don’t they? For every chapter filled with nonsense, there is one sentence that is just ambiguous enough that it just could be true--provided you tilt your head and squint your eyes just right. And upon that they assert all of their arguments.

    I had a Hindu once ask me how the writers of Hindu scripture could possibly have known that matter could be neither created nor destroyed, as is taught in the Hindu concept of Samsara. I had a Christian ask me how Jesus could have possibly known that the temple in Jerusalem would soon be reduced to rubble.

    How did they know? Maybe it was a lucky guess.  Maybe it was written after the fact. Maybe the “miraculous” meaning given today was never originally intended to start with. Maybe it was just a coincidence. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

    Then I came across this verse again in suratul-baqarah. I had heard and recited it countless times before, but in this context, this verse presented perhaps the biggest reason why I could no longer accept Islam. “Say, shall you believe in one part of the book and disbelieve in another part!? So what shall be the reward of whoever does that among you, except disgrace in this world? And on the day of judgment, they will be returned to the greater punishment! And Allah is not unaware of all that you do!”

    When I read this verse again, I knew that Islam was impossible. As human beings we do not have full control over what we believe. Either things make sense to us and we believe they are true, or things do not make sense to us and we do not believe they are true. And at that point in my life, many parts of Islam simply did not make sense to me and I simply did not believe they were true. It really was all or nothing, take it or leave it.

    It was a strange feeling.  If Islam was not true, then what was? What if no religion was true? Was it even possible to have a universe without a god?

    I began to research things without bias or fear.

    Most things I had already known deep inside, but for each new issue I cam across, I tried to ask myself:  “How would this look any different if there was no Allah and if Muhammad was not a messenger?”

    Question after question, and after being honest with myself, I simply couldn’t find any reason to conclude that Allah and Muhammad were necessary parts of any equation. Things worked just well without them. Sometimes even better.

    From the plains of Africa to the Islands of Polynesia, human history made so much more sense when not viewed through the faulty lens of religion.

    Now, being an atheist does not mean that I have all the answers. It does not mean that I am sure to be right about everything. But the thing is, I don’t have to be. No one is out to torture me for making mental mistakes. If I am wrong about one belief or another, then that is all there is to it. No one cares but me.

    I know that there are no rewards, no punishments, no fires, no gardens, no rivers, and no virgins.

    Best of all, there is an overwhelming sense of liberation that comes from being able to think my own thoughts and reach my own conclusions. They are, after all, truly my conclusions.

    I can now reach conclusions based on evidence and reason, not fear and superstition. And in the absence of evidence, I have the luxury of saying “I have no fucking idea, but let me try to find out.” I tend to say that a lot.


  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #1 - April 30, 2013, 11:24 AM

    Very nicely put, happymurtad. Bravo!
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #2 - April 30, 2013, 11:39 AM

    Quote
    “Verily, the best speech is the book of Allah. And the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. And the worst of all evil affairs are newly invented matters in religion. For verily, every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is a deviation, and every deviation is in the hellfire.”


    Did Islam invent the theatre of the absurd or is it older?  Is getting someone to believe six impossible things before breakfast the first principle of dictatorship?

    Quote
    The British playwright N. F. Simpson is not a raving lunatic, although that is the first impression his two plays give. On the contrary, Mr. Simpson is lucidly, frighteningly, overwhelmingly sane. His unblinking perception of the rationalized madness that we call human life misleads one at first into thinking his plays gibberish, but we soon perceive that they are not the products of a chimpanzee pecking away at a typewriter, beloved example of statisticians as the primate may be. A Resounding Tinkle and The Hole are the result of something as rare as chimps actually--rather than in imagination--at typewriters: they come from articulately humorous and serious intelligence.

    It is Simpson who has advanced the proposition (in his One-Way Pendulum, not yet produced in this country) that if one weighing machine can speak your weight, five hundred weighing machines can sing the Hallelujah Chorus


    http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1960/7/5/the-hole-pthe-british-playwright-n/

    Quote
    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.
    The White Queen
    "I'm just one hundred and one, five months and a day."
    "I can't believe that!" said Alice.
    "Can't you?" the Queen said in a pitying tone. "Try again: draw a long breath, and shut your eyes."
    Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things."
    "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."


    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Through_the_Looking-Glass

    (Read the rest of this - is wonderful!

    Quote
    Twas brillig and the slithy toves,
    Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
    All mimsy were the borogoves,
    And the mome raths outgrabe.


    Beat that quran!

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #3 - April 30, 2013, 06:08 PM

    A good read.
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #4 - April 30, 2013, 10:11 PM

    You need to write books like right now

    ***~Church is where bad people go to hide~***
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #5 - May 01, 2013, 06:41 AM

    But that is innovation!  Actually should any dawaa merchant say anything on the internet?  Innovation isn't it?

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #6 - May 01, 2013, 10:48 AM

    The internet is not a religious innovation.
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #7 - May 01, 2013, 10:58 AM

    Nope, not having that - Allah is the creator of everything, everything is religious - including bicycle riding in saudi Arabia.  Therefore any innovation is a religious innovation!

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #8 - May 01, 2013, 11:01 AM

    Doesn't this mean there should be nothing new near Medina?  Isn't there a geographical limit, therefore anything goes elsewhere?

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #9 - May 01, 2013, 01:46 PM

    I’m not sure if you are only being sarcastic, but I don’t find it useful to accuse Islam of things it does not actually say. The prohibition on innovation is understood to be strictly in a religious sense.

     In Islamic jurisprudence, there is a distinction between acts of worship and worldly acts. Worldly acts are all considered permissible until there is some proof to deem them impermissible. So, for example, all meats are permissible for Muslims except those that are deemed impermissible by the qur’an and the sunnah: pork, meat slaughtered to pagan gods, etc. Muslims are not restricted to only the meats that Muhammad ate at his time. If a Muslim were to consider sushi forbidden, for example, then this would actually be an innovation.

    In acts of worship, however, everything is forbidden except for that which has been sanctioned by proof. If Muslims decide, for example, that instead of performing the traditional salah prayer ritual, they were going to dance naked around a fire while playing the guitar to praise Allah, this would be an innovation.

    There are plenty of things that Muhammad clearly enjoined that Muslims now disregard. Similarly, there are many things that Muhammad forbid that Muslims now do. Changing the religion in this way is the sort of innovation I was referring to in the piece.
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #10 - May 01, 2013, 02:13 PM

    Yes being sarcastic, but what is religious?  Modesty and veils for example.  Religious police?  How do they decide?   What authority do they have?

    For example, the rules on witnesses and women or inheritance, they might be in the koran but why are they religious rules?  Why not innovation in these matters?

    And isn't there a geographical limit to the area where no innovation applies?


    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #11 - May 01, 2013, 02:52 PM

    Quote
    Yes being sarcastic, but what is religious?  Modesty and veils for example.  Religious police?  How do they decide?   What authority do they have?


    I really could write for quite a bit on this, but I’ll try to be succinct. There are ayat and ahadith that order “promoting good and forbidding evil.” There are also several ayat and ahadith that command “obedience to those in positions of authority.” Both of these are used for the justification and legitimization of the religious police. Again, we can go back and forth on how legitimate the regime that supports them really are, but at least in theory there is a religious sanction behind the concept.

    Quote
    For example, the rules on witnesses and women or inheritance, they might be in the koran but why are they religious rules?  Why not innovation in these matters?


    These matters are religious precisely because they are in the Qur’an. There is no separation of church and state in the qur’an. There are so many verses I can quote in this regard. “Nay, by your lord, they shall never believe until they make you (Muhammad) the judge in all matters that arise between them, then find no uneasiness in themselves with that you have decreed, but submit in total submission.” And another verse “It is not befitting for a believer, male or female, once Allah and his messenger have ruled on a matter, that they should have any inclination towards their own preference.” And another “And whoever does not rule by what Allah has revealed, then they are disbelievers.”

    Muhammad really dug Islam into a hole that they can not get out of. This is exactly why you see the results of the study that was recently done showing that Muslims tend to give lip service to shariah law. To do otherwise is blasphemous.  . They never seem to want it fully implemented in ways that affect them directly. That was also shown in the study. Kill apostates? Sure! Cut off our hands? No thanks. This is also what I alluded to in the piece above and something that really troubled me as a Muslim

    Quote
    And isn't there a geographical limit to the area where no innovation applies?


    No, there is no geographical limit. The hadith that I quoted in the beginning was more for emphasis on the sin of innovation. Kinda like fornicating in a church. It’s “wrong” everywhere else, but somehow even worse in a sacred place.
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #12 - May 01, 2013, 04:45 PM

    Even by your mighty standards Mr Murtard, that’s brilliant  Afro

    That’s a cracking, thought-provoking read. Like Crunchy Cd’s said, you should write a book? People will actually listen to you; how can they not, given your irrefutable insider-knowledge, along with your calm and reasoned way of presenting the facts? Do it bro?


    Hi
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #13 - May 01, 2013, 06:15 PM

    Quote
    These matters are religious precisely because they are in the Qur’an. There is no separation of church and state in the qur’an.


    This sounds like a 1400 year old catch22!

    I think it is reasonable to conclude everything in Islam is religious and therefore innovation is not allowed in anything!

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation: Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #14 - May 01, 2013, 06:25 PM

    Is the entirety of Islamic Jurisprudence attempts to make this set of beliefs mesh with the real world?  Are the sparks of suicide bombing, jihad, terribly poor governance, Islamic human rights, anti-semitism etc the completely predictable sound of wrecked gearboxes?

    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #15 - May 01, 2013, 08:20 PM

    This sounds like a 1400 year old catch22!

    I think it is reasonable to conclude everything in Islam is religious and therefore innovation is not allowed in anything!



    I don’t think it’s that difficult a concept to grasp.

    If Islamic sources are silent about a certain mater, as they are about, say, riding bicycles or eating pistachios or drinking apple juice, then those matters are NOT religious. Whatever you want to do regarding them is fair game.

    If Islamic sources give a specific ruling about an issue, as they do about many issues including prayer times, beards lengths, and arse washing, then those issues become religious issues. 
  • Islam and Innovation:?Observations of an Ex-Salafi Muslim
     Reply #16 - May 03, 2013, 01:19 AM

    Your posts on Islam and your experience with it are always a great pleasure to read.

     Afro

    In my opinion a life without curiosity is not a life worth living
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »