If you want, you can add me on Skype or some other program so we can actually chat one on one and avoid any potential mud slinging. Just an offer.
Hi EzraJT, I am not putting words in your mouth but cool down. You sound upset for no good reason . On that word of yours "Clinton killing more than million Iraqi people" (clearly large% of that must be children) I am reading more than the wiki links you are throwing in your posts. You know wiki is not a final word., one has to go deeper than that. Wiki gives you initial info and some links on a subject through which you can do further research.
Oh I'm calmed down and fine, I just don't like being misquoted. I said nearly a million people, not millions of children. There's a clear difference between the two statements. I wasn't offended, just a bit perplexed.
Yes, Wikipedia isn't the final word, but Wikipedia articles are just collections of sources. I can simply site the sources they give, which are largely UN and international aid agencies.
US Sponsored Genocide Against Iraq 1990-2012. Killed 3.3 Million, Including 750,000 Children
Squeezed to Death Half a million children have died in Iraq since UN sanctions were imposed -
As many as 576,000 Iraqi children may have died since the end of the Persian Gulf war _1995
Thanks for the links, but I wouldn't say we committed or tried to commit genocide, since I doubt anyone's goal was to kill every Iraqi on the planet.
So I would not be surprised if a million children died in Iraq during that time., But how and why economic sanctions by a western country kill children/people in one of the richest countries(IRAQ) in the world EzraJT?
Why does that happen? Didn't Iraq's had enough oil wealth to promote health care in that country? Why can not a countries like Iraq, Iran, Pakistan make politicians like Clinton so they can do sanctions on America and kill Americans who are in need of medicines? What is the basic reason?
Do you know what economic sanctions are? Do you even know what Iraq is rich in? Did you even read the articles you linked to?
is that sarcastic statement? again let us go back to your post
Yeah, it was sarcasm.
So Clinton waged war across the planet and killed nearly a million people in Iraq by his polices..
So, Is Mr. Clinton worst President of USA since 1942 or did US had presidents worse than Clinton.?
What's with your obsession with best or worst? I simply asked how he was the only president who cared about everyone, your words. Give me the reasons and criteria behind your statement.
Also, I don't view Clinton as any better or worse than Reagan or Bush or Obama. They're cut from the same cloth.
You've already proven my case more than I did by providing numerous sources for one of my statements (that he killed nearly a million in Iraq).