Mind going into more detail? I've never been a muslim so you probably have a different perspective than me.
I suppose you directed this question to me? As it was several hours ago I watched it, I have already forgotten most of what they discussed (I'm in a haze right now), so can't give you a lot of details.
They speak about freedom of religion and their right to wear the veil, but they fail miserably to tackle the question regarding being forced to wear the hijab and niqab. They do not take into consideration that the niqab is a huge obstacle in partaking in society. And I am saying this as an ex-niqabi myself, who tried to convice myself and others that "it is not an obstacle, the obstacle is other people and their prejudice". It's not. The face veil is a huge barrier to be a normal person. You yourself might not think about it or see it or be aware of it, I didn't, but others do!
They ask for special treatment, ie. they want to have the ability to express their faith that homosexuality is sinful or that women should be segregated from men (and also impose this on Muslims whether they like it or nor), while they condemn a person from wearing a T-shirt they deem to be "insulting". As non-Muslims, we have no obligation to comply to the Islamic rulings about portraying Muhammad or any other living being. The niqabi woman wouldn't even answer the question whether or not she supports freedom of expression, because she doesn't! She demands the right to express her hate against homosexuality, but does not accept people criticizing Islam or Muslims. This is "islamophobia" according to her.
The fact that they are practicing "taqiyyah", whether or not they recognize that they are doing so, is far more repusling. And I know this because these are two conservative ladies, albeit a bit "feminist" because they believe their "Islamic rights" give them freedom to do certain things that they in reality are
not allowed to do, but they take advantage of the Brittish society and its openess to live out these ideas. Had they lived in a real Islamic state, she would not be allowed even to debate and speak on national television! They talk about "no compulsion in religion" when they fully well know that this is not a
general principle that is not classified by other rulings. A wife must OBEY her husband in everything that is right, whether that means wearing the hijab and niqab or praying extra salawat or cooking and cleaning or doing things in a specific way. Traditional Islam gives no "freedom from compulsion" since obedience is a very important part of Islamic morality and values, whether it is about husband-wife, child-parent, slave-owner, employee-employer etc relations.
They abstain from speaking freely about certain Islamic rulings and values because they are "not relevant" to our situation, for example execution of apostates. It's hypocrisy! Either they are shamefully lying, decieting and turning the truth over and over again to make it sound "prettier", or they are completely IGNORANT of their own religion.
Then we have the hijabi ladies attempt to deny that women are asked to write her questions instead of being given the right to talk through a microphone. There are exceptions, but my guess would be that 90 percent, if not more, of the times women are limited from speaking up in "mixed settings". Once again, taqiyyah and hypocricy!
These are just some of the points I remember.
Topic: The Big Questions - Human Rights vs Religious Rights