Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 01:32 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 09:01 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 08:53 AM

New Britain
Yesterday at 08:17 AM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali

 (Read 7011 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     OP - December 17, 2014, 04:35 PM



    BYU Radio interview with Kecia Ali about her book 'The Lives of Muhammad'. The interview starts at about 78 minutes.
    http://www.byuradio.org/episode/89868aec-bbae-4665-b80b-5594b3e647bd/the-morning-show-nutcracker-hackers-mrsa-muhammad?playhead=59&autoplay=true

    NPR interview
    http://www.npr.org/2014/10/19/356423265/many-views-of-muhammad-as-a-man-and-as-a-prophet

    Quote
    Recent outbursts sparked by a viral video and controversial cartoons powerfully illustrate the passions and sensitivities that continue to surround the depiction of the seventh-century founder of Islam. The Lives of Muhammad delves into the many ways the Prophet’s life story has been told from the earliest days of Islam to the present, by both Muslims and non-Muslims. Emphasizing the major transformations since the nineteenth century, Kecia Ali shows that far from being mutually opposed, these various perspectives have become increasingly interdependent.

    Since the nineteenth century, two separate streams of writing, one hagiographic and the other polemical, have merged into a single, contentious story about the life of Muhammad. Protestant missionaries, European Orientalists, Indian and Egyptian modernists, and American voices across the spectrum, including preachers, scholars, Islamophobes, journalists, academics, and new-age gurus, debated Muhammad’s character and the facts of his life. In the process, texts written symbolically came to be read literally. Muhammad’s accomplishments as a religious and political leader, his military encounters with Meccans and Medinan Jews, and—a subject of perennial interest—his relationships with women, including his young wife Aisha, are among the key subjects writers engaged, repurposing early materials for new circumstances.

    Many of the ideas about Muhammad that Muslims embrace today—Muhammad the social reformer, Muhammad the consummate leader, Muhammad the ideal husband—arose in tandem and in tension with Western depictions. These were in turn shaped by new ideas about religion, sexuality, and human accomplishments.

    http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674050600

    Q&A with Kecia Ali from IslamiCommentary
    http://islamicommentary.org/2014/10/kecia-ali-on-the-lives-of-muhammad-book-q-a/

    Kecia Ali on Twitter
    https://mobile.twitter.com/kecia_ali
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #1 - December 17, 2014, 04:53 PM

    her books on Islam, marriage and slavery are BRILLIANT --- absolutely excellent work she's done.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #2 - December 17, 2014, 05:19 PM

    http://www.popmatters.com/review/187484-the-lives-of-muhammad-by-kecia-ali/
    Quote
    The Lives of Muhammad by Dr. Kecia Ali, an associate professor at Boston University, begins with a touching dedication to her children, including her late daughter Shaira. Ali writes, “The standard biographies of Muhammad recount that seven of his eight children died during his lifetime. None of the miracles traditional sources ascribe to him impresses me more than his having survived such loss.”

    This dedication also serves as a fitting introduction to this book because it’s much more than just another take on Prophet Muhammad. The scope of this volume is vast: the nature of miracles, revelation and prophethood in Islam; challenges to the “accepted” path of Muhammad’s life; an extensive analysis of all his marriages with particular attention paid to Khadija and Aisha; and an attempt to weave together competing and contrasting narratives of Muhammad’s life from many sources, some inimical and some sycophantic.

    “In the twenty-first century, it makes no sense to speak of Muslim views of Muhammad in opposition to Western or Christian views,” writes Ali, “Instead, the images of Muhammad that contemporary Muslims hold fervently and defend passionately arose in tandem and in tension with western European and North American intellectuals’ accounts of his life. At the same time, Muslim sensibilities and beliefs have affected the way many non-Muslim authors write his life.”

    The Lives of Muhammad, then, is not merely a biography, but a biography of biographies. It’s a book devoted to unraveling the story of the Muslim prophet over the last 1,500 years and a serious contribution to the debate over what is real, what is apocryphal and what is myth.

    While some may claim that The Lives of Muhammad is a biased and subjective account by a famed Muslim scholar and expert, those decriers would be wrong. Ali does take the time to mention historical works that have attacked Muhammad – from Guillaume Postel’s 1583 work comparing Catholicism and Islam (“The spiritual sons of Luther are the little bastards of Mahom”) to William Bedwell’s 1615 work, Mohammedis imposturae; that is, A discovered of the manifold forgeries, falsehoods, and horrible impieties of the blasphemous seducer Mohammed, to Robert Spencer’s The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion (2006) – but does so only in the historical context. Ali is, after all, an academic; her focus from the beginning is to bring together several centuries of scholarship to show how writers across the world were interpreting, reading and responding to each other’s work.

    In fact, Ali’s greatest critics are likely to be those who might attack her scientific and scholarly approach as not being “religious enough”. Ali even suggests the same, arguing that failure to agree on a consensus perspective on Prophet Muhammad is one of the “litmus tests that raise the question of who is to be considered an insider and what is to count as tradition.” Ali probes current Muslim thoughts on Muhammad from the opening salvo of the book. “What can we really know about Muhammad, and how can we know it? Did Muhammad exist?” She certainly seems to think so, and yet, she also questions how Muslims have retold his story to the point where inaccuracies start to develop.

    For example, she questions whether Muhammad’s name was really the one he was born with because it “sounds more like a title than a personal name”, and whether the names commonly accepted to be his parents’, “Abdullah” and “Amina”, have not been doctored over time. “One hypothesis, which requires only minor adjustments to the standard account, is that biographers whitewashed Muhammad’s life to remove any pagan stain,” she writes. She also wonders about early descriptions of Muhammad, including one from a Sufi perspective that he “suffused the cosmos with light.” According to Ali, “Early Muslims used biblical categories, proof texts, and miracle stories to affirm Muhammad’s prophethood and the superiority of Islam, just as Christian opponents of the growing Muslim tradition used the same texts to affirm the opposite.”

    Towards the last third of the book, Ali pivots and refocuses her attention not merely on the companions and family of Prophet Muhammad, but in particular, his wife Khadija. With a deft legerdemain, The Lives of Muhammad becomes less on the namesake, and more of a discussion on history’s treatment of Muhammad, the Family Man. The discussion is totally fascinating, because it shows the length that Muslim apologists have gone to whitewash the biography of their prophet in reaction to pejorative and slanderous remarks about his personal life.

    For example, Ali references “pre-modern polemicists” who frequently tell the tale that Khadija, 15 years elder to Muhammad, still had to obtain her father’s permission to marry Muhammad. In some narrations, she had to get him drunk to get his approval; in other versions, her father was dead so her uncle assumed this responsibility. According to Ali, “Modern Muslim authors often skim over the father’s or uncle’s involvement in the marriage because it sits ill with the images of Khadija as a self-assured and independent woman.”

    Ali is a famed religious scholar in the United States and has written or edited six books in the last eight years alone. While that kind of output for a university professor is impressive, what is far more important is just how high the quality of scholarship has been. In work after work, Ali has tackled everything from Sunni thought (Imam Shafi’i: Scholar and Saint, 2011) to Muslim ethics (Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence, 2006) to the religion’s history of marriage (Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam, 2010). Yet, The Lives of Muhammad has set the bar high and it is her best work to date. It is exhaustive, well-researched and an amazing contribution to the humanities.

  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #3 - August 30, 2015, 11:31 PM

    New Books in Islamic Studies interview with Kecia Ali: http://newbooksinislamicstudies.com/2015/08/25/kecia-ali-the-lives-of-muhammad-harvard-up-2014/
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #4 - August 31, 2015, 05:54 AM

    I have to pay £15 to get a used copy, as it's not on Kindle. Seriously considering it. Is it worth it Zecs?

    Hi
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #5 - August 31, 2015, 09:21 AM

    I have to pay £15 to get a used copy, as it's not on Kindle. Seriously considering it. Is it worth it Zecs?

    musivore.. dear musivore.. STOP PAYING MONEY FOR SILLY BOOKS FROM SILLY AUTHORS .. go have a beer in  bar ,, or give to some   needy person on the road..

    So where did  our Kecia Ali  Ph.D., Religion, Duke University  got her story of Muhammad from?? Is it not also  ANOTHER STORY ON  LIFE OF MUHAMMAD   FROM ANOTHER AUTHOR??

    Silly people write nonsense stories in 21st century on a created cartoon character  for the sake loot booty and power by the early ruling clan of Islam.. And they are trying to brainwash some more Muslim kids with their own story of Prophet of Islam in 21st century

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #6 - August 31, 2015, 10:00 AM

    Many Views Of Muhammad, As A Man And As A Prophet  Interview with  Kecia Ali
    OCTOBER 19, 2014 



    Quote
    Many Views Of Muhammad, As A Man And As A Prophet

    The Prophet Muhammad, the founder of Islam, was one of the most influential men in human history — but there's little we can say about his life with historical certainty. The details of his life have been debated and manipulated ever since he walked the earth in the seventh century.

    Boston University professor Kecia Ali's new book, The Lives of Muhammad, examines those divergent narratives. In it, she explores the different ways the prophet's life story has been told and retold, by both Muslims and non-Muslims, from the earliest days of Islam to the present.

    As Ali tells NPR's Arun Rath, "There are a lot of ways in which Muhammad's life has been understood and experienced and celebrated in the past 1,400 years" — including, but not limited to, a wealth of different versions of his life story.

    Ali tells Rath how changing political and theological concerns have shaped how European Christians described Muhammad's biography, and why the realities of life before the printing press led Muslims to use Muhammad's life story as a lens through which to approach the Quran.


    Quote
    Interview Highlights

    On the Western biographical depictions of Muhammad

    Non-Muslims have been writing about Muhammad almost as long as Muslims have. And the things that they had to say about him were very much shaped by what knowledge they did have — much of it inaccurate — but also by current theological, political, social worries. So that when paganism was a concern, Muhammad was a pagan idol or a god. When heresy was a concern, Muhammad was akin to a Christian heretic. When fraud and impostors were a concern, Muhammad was a fraud. He was the arch-impostor.

    Over the centuries, European Christian accounts of Muhammad, in particular, went through a variety of stages and depictions. What begins to happen in the modern era is that European researchers begin to look at Muslim historical chronicles and sources and to merge their scholarly interests with their interest in Christian evangelism. And those depictions, which claim to be historically accurate and based on early Muslim sources, then engender a reaction from Muslim biographers.

    On the ongoing debate in the Muslim world: Was Muhammad divine, divinely inspired or a man like any other man?

    I certainly think that the view that has prevailed among Muslims has always been that Muhammad is a man. But the Muslim response to the traditional saying that Muhammad is a man is, "Yes, .but like a ruby among stones." Which is to say Muhammad is a man, but he's a very unusual sort of man. He's not divine, but he has the divine in him, in the sense that he is divinely inspired. His character is luminous. His ability to intercede on behalf of Muslims has historically been a very important part of his persona. He is the beloved of God.

    The way in which he surpasses humanity has historically been very, very important. I would say it's been downplayed somewhat in some modern Muslim biographies. But that tension has always been present.

     On the biographical interpretation of Muhammad's life by extremist groups, like the terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State

    They're making interpretive choices too. They are saying, "We're going to focus on a particular" — and not a particularly well-supported — "version of a political program of establishing God's rule. We're going to focus on particular norms that we want to see implemented."

    But it's actually been very striking to me how little direct appeal there is to the kind of interpretive tradition that looks at translating Muhammad's life and Muhammad's example and Muhammad's precedent into rules for Muslims of later generations to follow. Because, of course, that has been a major concern of Muslim jurists for well over a thousand years.

    On the significance of the Quran, as compared to a biography, when considering Muhammad

    That's a hugely complicated question. "Isn't the Quran supposed to be the thing?" And the reality is that of course the Quran is the thing. But the idea that it can be separated out from the life of Muhammad makes no sense for the vast majority of Muslims.

    I have a colleague who likes to say, "Muhammad wasn't just a UPS delivery guy. He didn't just bring this book and say, 'Here you go, good luck.' " And for the vast majority of Muslim history, people have really interpreted one by means of the other.

    And the other thing, of course, is that most Muslims didn't have access to printed copies of the Quran or online copies that they could keyword search. You had to get this from somewhere. Just like most Christians didn't have copies of the Bible until relatively recently. And so that process of looking at the text has almost always taken place through the lens of looking at the life of the prophet.

    Now, was it the historical events of the life of the prophet or was it something about his luminous character that was revealed in the things that we know about his life but also things passed down through, in some cases, a charismatic lineage of mystical teachers? There are a lot of ways in which Muhammad's life has been understood and experienced and celebrated in the past 1,400 years, and not all of them are captured by biography, to be sure.


    well let me carefully read that again


    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #7 - August 31, 2015, 10:18 AM

    I have to pay £15 to get a used copy, as it's not on Kindle. Seriously considering it. Is it worth it Zecs?

    I'm not sure to be honest. I read a bit of it sitting in Waterstones a while ago, wondered about buying it and didn't in the end. I think that was partly because it's more about later interpretations of Muhammad than the actual history of early Islam. It seemed interesting enough though, always bearing in mind that Kecia Ali is a practicing Muslim, though a very liberal one and a serious academic.
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #8 - August 31, 2015, 10:28 AM

    So where did  our Kecia Ali  Ph.D., Religion, Duke University  got her story of Muhammad from?? Is it not also  ANOTHER STORY ON  LIFE OF MUHAMMAD   FROM ANOTHER AUTHOR??

    I don't think it is that really. It seems to be more of an analysis of other people's versions of the life of Muhammad.
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #9 - August 31, 2015, 02:57 PM

    I don't think it is that really. It seems to be more of an analysis of other people's versions of the life of Muhammad.

    "I don't think it is really That ........... says zeca..

    Off course it is NOT that zeca.,   Dr. Kecia Ali   reading/coping rehashing the story of Muhammad in her own words is not going to make much difference about Prophet of Islam.,   Such authors are NOT new in Islam  Many converts of Islam have done that and she is no exception to that rule zeca..
      
    Anyways 40 year old Dr. Kecia Ali Ali,  terrific qualifications as Islamic Scholar.,   born in 1971  raised in the United States and converted to Islam in her college years for?Huh?.

     
    Quote
    The Scholar holds a Ph.D. in Islamic studies.. who focuses on Islamic jurisprudence and women in early and modern Islam. After completing her undergraduate studies at Stanford University, she earned a PhD in religion from Duke University, where she was a James B. Duke fellow.

    From 2001 to 2003, she was a research analyst for Brandeis’s Feminist Sexual Ethics Project, an initiative aimed at exploring the sexual ethics of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. Her work with the project developed into a book entitled: Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith and Jurisprudence, that was published in 2006. After stints at Harvard Divinity School and Brandeis University as a research associate and a postdoctoral fellow, she joined Boston University as an assistant professor of religion.

    With Oliver Leaman, Kecia coauthored Islam: The Key Concepts in 2007. The book is a concise guide to Islam that addresses issues from the role of women in Islam to jihad to the Quran and theology. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam, Kecia’s systemic analysis of how different schools of Islamic jurisprudence conceptualized marriage, appeared in 2010.

    Forthcoming is a biography of the 9th century jurist al-Shafi’i that focuses on his role as an influential early legal thinker in Islam. Another current project is The Lives of Muhammad, in which Kecia examines biographies by both Muslim and non-Muslim authors across history in order to show the interdependence between discourses in Islam and the West about Prophet Muhammad’s life.


    So what did we/the world learned about Prophet of Islam from her work??

    I don't know.. for me Quran .. Hadith  is enough to understand who the Prophet of Islam was and how he was/is projected by so-called Islamic scholars

    I don't need to read.. I don't need to pay to buy books of some professor of Islam to understand what Islam was.. what Islam is... and where Islam going...

    with best wishes
    yeezevee

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #10 - September 07, 2015, 01:07 AM

    I'm not sure to be honest. I read a bit of it sitting in Waterstones a while ago, wondered about buying it and didn't in the end. I think that was partly because it's more about later interpretations of Muhammad than the actual history of early Islam. It seemed interesting enough though, always bearing in mind that Kecia Ali is a practicing Muslim, though a very liberal one and a serious academic.

    Yes; and by later this is, mainly, 1800s-era later.

    The progression of pre-Ibn-Ishaq interpretations of Muhammad is an interesting topic in of itself - one I haven't yet got a handle on. There is much work to be done on what (for a start) 'Urwa bin Zubayr and the Byzantines might have said, pro and con. We don't get that here.

    Dr Ali might be useful as a corrective to 1800s-era "Orientalist" biases (most weren't nearly as biased as Edward Said claimed, which I think Dr Ali concedes); it might also be helpful as a sober guide to what modern Muslims have been saying about Muhammad's life.
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #11 - November 22, 2015, 10:20 AM

    Kecia Ali

    http://www.onbeing.org/program/progressive-islam-in-america/transcript/7000

    http://feminismandreligion.com/2013/11/26/men-men-everywhere-by-kecia-ali/

    http://news21.com/story/2007/08/22/even_as_islam_booms_its

    http://feminismandreligion.com/2014/05/27/whose-sharia-is-it-by-kecia-ali/

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-the-lives-of-muhammad-by-kecia-ali-1420841587

    https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/media/0207/Mir-Hosseini%2520Muslim%2520Women%2527s%2520Quest.pdf

    Quote
    Muslim women: converts for marriage or life by by Monsura Sirajee


    "Did you convert because of your husband?" the Postal worker quietly asked Elizabeth [name changed] as her Pakistani-American husband was standing nearby. Momentarily reflecting on the many late nights she spent rigorously studying Islam and the nearly crippling emotional turmoil she went through after revealing her decision to convert to her staunchly Irish, Roman Catholic family (all before she even met her husband), Elizabeth said simply: "Trust me. There are much easier ways to get married than converting to Islam."

    This was not the first time Elizabeth's faith would be questioned and concern for her well being expressed because of her marriage to a Pakistani-American. In a series of strange circumstances, just prior to giving a lecture at a university, Elizabeth was punched in the face and robbed while exiting the London Underground. Despite explaining why her face was bruised, concerned colleagues quietly asked if everything 'was all right at home'. The underlying suspicion was that someone 'at home' - namely, the brown husband who had presumably 'forced' her to convert - was probably abusing her.

    Based on some of the reactions Elizabeth has faced since converting to Islam, I am not surprised with the intense scrutiny of Katherine Russell, the wife of suspected Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Since news emerged that Russell converted to Islam and even dons the Muslim headscarf, much ink has been spilt analysing Russell’s motivations in converting. Many believe she was brainwashed and bullied. The Daily Mail reports one school friend saying: "She was this all-American girl who was ­brainwashed by her husband. Nobody understands what happened to her."

    Perhaps this narrative of brainwashing is true. Details of their life together have not been fully fleshed out. Yet, rather than seeing this as an exceptionally tragic case, many commentators have suggested that this abuse and brainwashing is simply a part of the Muslim female experience. When a woman takes up Islam, she gives up her freedoms.

    Quote
    Tamara Rodney, a Muslim convert who has worked extensively with female converts in the United States stated in an email: "Islam is misconstrued as a religion that denigrates women and strips them of their rights and freedoms. People often wonder why I would choose a faith that limits me as a woman." Yet, paradoxically, it is exactly the Islamic vision of a woman's place that attracts many to the faith. Professor Kecia Ali, a convert and Professor at Boston University stated in an interview with American Public Media: "I found the core of Islam to be so convincingly egalitarian that the rest seemed to be in some sense just details."


    Yet, many maintain Muslim female conversion is invariably tied to brainwashing done by the Muslim male. This comes as no surprise as this is yet another example of the way Muslim female agency has been erased from the picture. Rigorous, intellectual study of the faith is simply not the way Muslim women convert. As American journalist Omar Sacirbey recently observed in a piece published in the Washington Post: "The perception from others [is] that they are incapable of making their own choice in a decision that involved substantial spiritual wrestling."

    In addition to assumptions about Muslim female agency, another unexplored aspect of this fascination with Katherine Russell is her whiteness. While converts come from all races and backgrounds, the media seems to find something particularly fascinating about white, female conversion, as opposed to black/brown, female conversion. What could explain this difference?

    History, perhaps.

    In 1864, two white supremacists in the US wrote a pamphlet entitled: "Miscegenation: The Theory of the Blending of the Races", in which they predicted that emancipation of slaves would result in the widespread rape of white women by innately savage black men. These caricatures of the 'black brute' were meant to perpetuate fear and outrage. Whites would have to protect their women from the black man. This was not exceptionally controversial pamphlet. Rather, it expressed a general sentiment within the South regarding the danger of free black males when they came in contact with passive white femininity.

    Based on some of the comments made regarding Katherine Russell, I cannot help but see the parallels between caricatures of the 'black brute' and the 'vulnerable, white woman' in the post-Reconstruction era and caricatures of dark Muslim men and their white Muslim wives. Interestingly, although Tamerlan is the very definition of Caucasian, media reports have described him as 'dark-skinned' and have emphasised his Chechen ethnicity, while a US magazine even went so far as to darken their skin tone in cartoons on their front cover. There appears to be an underlying need, to use a variation of the famous literary theorist Gayatri Spivak's infamous phrase, to save white woman from the brown/black man. Of course, in their concern for the life of Katherine Russell and other female converts, once again, Muslim women have not been allowed to speak for themselves. As one commentator in the Huffington Post succinctly explained a woman’s place in Islam: "Under Islam, women are not to question men's actions. In fact it is as if women only exist to have babies.


    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #12 - September 05, 2016, 10:05 AM

    Another interview with Kecia Ali: http://www.bu.edu/today/2015/kecia-ali/
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #13 - September 05, 2016, 11:03 AM

    Quote
    I found the core of Islam to be so convincingly egalitarian that the rest seemed to be in some sense just details.


    It's really amazing, isn't it. The lives of people who were killed and discriminated as a direct result of Islam.... they are all "details". It is so convincingly egalitarian to kill and discriminate against non-muslims.

    I have no tolerance for people like this. People who whitewash (and erase) the existence of people suffering from religious violence just to save their religion's name.

    I bet you the same people will be frothing from the mouth had it been white people doing what muslims do.
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #14 - September 05, 2016, 01:10 PM

    It's really amazing, isn't it. The lives of people who were killed and discriminated as a direct result of Islam.... they are all "details". It is so convincingly egalitarian to kill and discriminate against non-muslims.
     ....

    Helaine   That is nothing to do with Quran.. The Islam's faith book.,    It is all to do with faith heads grabbing power(political, economical, social, religious,   controls  + LOOT AND BOOTY)  in the name of some faith..

    on the way let me add an article link of DOCTOR KE_CIA  on SEX, ISLAM & SEXY ISLAMIC PROPHET

    well I changed her heading., but it is a pdf file   read it  fascinating understanding of Islam from a Professor..   

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • The Lives of Muhammad - Kecia Ali
     Reply #15 - September 05, 2016, 01:27 PM

    Ke-cia Ali: In Search of the Real Muhammad

    Quote
    Quote
    Depending on whom you ask, Muhammad may be either the last prophet or merely an ambitious man. Now, in The Lives of Muhammad (Harvard, Sept.; Reviews, p. 20), Kecia Ali, associate professor of religion at Boston University, tries to fill in the missing pieces and shape a complete portrait of the founder of Islam.


    The book has two target audiences, Ali says—colleagues who study religion and Islam, and laypeople, Muslim and otherwise. Muslims and non-Muslims often view each other as “decadent” or “repressive,” but they really are speaking the same language, says Ali. They just don’t know it, because so many of today’s ideas about Muhammad have been influenced over the past two centuries by Western thought.

    “Supporters and critics both assume they know the story of his life,” says Ali, adding that her purpose isn’t to prove anyone wrong, but to show the diverse aspects of Muhammad’s life and how the story has changed over time.

    For early Muslim authors, for example, Muhammad’s first marriage to the prosperous widow Khadija served as a key point on his journey to becoming a prophet, while non-Muslim authors cited it as evidence of his calculating ambition, says Ali, noting that today the marriage is seen instead, by both Muslim and non-Muslim authors, as a portrait of Muhammad as a man and husband.

    Quote
    Ali, who converted to Islam in college, is president of the Society for the Study of Muslim Ethics, and previously published Sexual Ethics and Islam (2006); Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam (2010); and Imam Shafi‘i: Scholar and Saint (2011).


    Though scholars debate whether drawing an accurate picture of the historical Muhammad is possible, a standard narrative, drawing on a handful of early Muslim sources, has come to dominate nearly all accounts of his life, she says. Previously, Muslim thinkers wrote about Muhammad in a variety of genres with attention to his cosmic role and glory. Christian writers did not attempt to retell his life in full, but tried to refute his doctrines by denigrating his reputation.

    From medieval speculation about whether Muhammad was demon possessed to early modern questions about whether he actually received divine revelation, views of Muhammad changed dramatically over the centuries. The Enlightenment led to a new perspective on religious figures, she says, and from about the mid-19th century on, accounts of his life, both pro and con, are virtually indistinguishable.

    Today’s Muhammad, she writes, is a “shared creation illustrating not a clash of civilizations but a common, if contested, modernity.” —Lauren Yarger

    Lynn Davidman: Refugees from Orthodoxy

    Imagine entering a world you have glimpsed but barely understand, a culture you have been instructed to reject, among people you might have been taught to think of as morally inferior. Imagine no longer belonging in the company of those who claim to embody the will of God by their words and actions. This is the experience of those who find themselves no longer able to obey the dictates of their Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) communities and must “come out,” leaving behind everything and everyone they have known.


    [s]In her new book, Becoming Un-Orthodox: Stories of Ex-Hasidic Jews (Oxford, Nov.), Lynn Davidman, the Robert M. Beren Distinguished Professor of Modern Jewish Studies and professor of sociology at the University of Kansas, reports a series of conversations with “defectors” from Hasidic and other ultra-Orthodox communities. What causes the dissonance between their personal worldview and the idealized worldview of their community? What makes them abandon their obedience to sacred communal rules and compels them to leave their communities?

    In Becoming Un-Orthodox, Davidman concludes that the things that define us religiously—which can shift and fail—are not just beliefs but habitual practices that symbolize the values of the community, such as ritual bathing, particular modes of dress, and rules of comportment. She observes that those who leave ultra-Orthodoxy go through similar stages of divesting themselves of such observances. Those practices no longer make sense, and they begin to adjust their behavior to the rules of the wider culture.

    Davidman’s interest in the topic is deeply personal: she is herself ex-Orthodox, although she was raised Modern Orthodox in the 1950s and ’60s, in a denomination that was then more liberal than any form of Orthodoxy is today. When her mother died when Davidman was very young, she began to question her faith and over time became vocal about the moral hypocrisy she saw in the community. Finally, during her undergraduate years at Barnard, Davidman decided to live in the dormitories, as many other college students did. She says, “I wanted a life of my own, but to my father this choice amounted to leaving my family, and he believed I was already too heavily influenced by general culture.” Her decision finalized the break in Davidman’s own commitment to Orthodoxy. She was disowned and disinherited, left to navigate life on her own.

    Her courage must have been considerable, but as wrenching as her situation was, says Davidman: “I had not grown up isolated from the general culture like Haredi Jews were. I knew how to comport myself and could negotiate a way to finish my education.” By contrast, Davidman writes of one young Haredi woman who told her, “It wasn’t clear to me how you left. I mean how you physically did it. Where you went. How you got money. How you even had the right clothes to go.... I didn’t know a soul outside of my community.” Davidman’s own struggles inform this moving collection of stories of those who, in leaving their ultra-Orthodox life behind, needed courage of an even higher order. —Chana Thompson Shor

    Terryl Givens: Unlikely Messenger of Mormonism

    If anyone had told Terryl Givens 30 years ago that he would one day be a renowned scholar of Mormon thought, he might have laughed. But while his articles on Byron and Romanticism seem like distant memories, Givens’s early work in comparative literature laid the groundwork for a flourishing career as an intellectual historian of Mormonism. His new book, Wrestling the Angel: The Foundation of Mormon Thought: Cosmos, God, Humanity (Oxford, Nov.; Reviews, p. 20), is the culmination of that groundbreaking work.

    In his first book, The Viper on the Hearth, published in 1997, Givens, professor of religion and literature and James A. Bostwick Chair of English at the University of Richmond, plumbed how depictions of Mormonism in popular fiction shaped cultural understandings of the faith and its vexed relationship to American society. “That book altered the trajectory of my career,” Givens says, “for I realized I could use the tools of literary analysis to begin to look at religious texts, especially the Book of Mormon, and their impact on culture.”

    In the years since, Givens has approached the history of the Mormon faith not through the lens of theological analysis but with close readings of the scriptures of Mormonism, producing such books as By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture That Launched a New World Religion (2003) and The Book of Mormon: A Very Short Introduction (2009).

    In contrast to his earlier books, which focused on the history and development of the Book of Mormon itself, Wrestling the Angel Givens unearths in that scripture key elements of Mormon theology—a cosmology that locates human identity in a premortal world; a view of human life as an enlightening ascent rather than a catastrophic fall

    Theology has never found a comfortable place in Mormon thought, Givens points out—the religion is focused more on prophets and revelation than on dogma. But through his close readings of the Book of Mormon, Givens says it became apparent it contained any number of theological topics. “Mormonism doesn’t have a magisterium or an official catechism,” he says. “I had to sift out doctrines, dogmas, and practices.”

    Wrestling the Angel is Givens’s examination of Mormon religious history and theological development through the Book of Mormon. “[It] is the most widely distributed book in American history,” he notes, “and by looking at its reception and its impact on culture we can have a better informed study of Mormon thought.” Wrestling the Angel is an intellectual history, Givens says, an attempt to situate the development of that thought in the wider history of ideas of the 19th century.

    Givens says his training in comparative literature equips him to ask broad questions about the relationship of scriptural stories to cultural ideas, and his work in literary analysis of texts enables him to probe specific themes and meanings embedded in the stories. “I’m really happy that my training as an intellectual and literary historian allows me to be at the intersection of such an exciting and growing interest in the Mormon faith.”—Henry L. Carrigan Jr.

    Jennifer Harvey: Letters to White Christians

    Jennifer Harvey knows it’s complicated being a white scholar working on the fraught subject of race. Her third book on the topic is Dear White Christians: For Those Still Longing for Racial Reconciliation (Eerdmans, Nov.). “Anyone who is white and working within a set of visibly anti-racist commitments worries about getting it wrong,” says Harvey, who is an associate professor of religion at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, and an ordained minister in the American Baptist Church. “My job is to show as much authenticity as I can. If I’m wrong, someone will tell me, and I’ll respond.”

    Harvey’s title, Dear White Christians, is intended to be a direct challenge. In the book, she says, “I’m urging people to stop asking the same questions we’ve been asking for 40 years, like, ‘How can white communities become more diverse?’ If we knew our history we’d know that the African-American community answered this back in the ’60s.” Instead, Harvey encourages church communities to engage in what she calls “concrete repair of racial harm,” which “might mean that white churches in Ferguson, Mo., give their time and energy to holding the police department accountable.”

    Harvey’s interest in issues surrounding race began while she was an undergraduate in the late ’80s and early ’90s. “I became very serious about what it meant to follow Jesus,” she says. “To me, following Jesus meant thinking about homelessness, and racial and gender justice. By the time I graduated, racial justice was something that kept me awake at night, and I’ve never stopped thinking about it.”

    During college Harvey encountered liberation theology and fell in love with the work of James Cone, the Charles A. Briggs distinguished professor of systematic theology at Union Theological Seminary in New York City. That prompted her to attend Union, where she began to contend with her whiteness. “I had teachers and student peers who said, ‘That’s great you love liberation theology and want to talk about the Black Christ. But you’re white. What does that mean to you? You can’t talk about it the same way we do.’ ”

    Harvey does worry about the excessive attention given to white people who write about race; it is misplaced, in her opinion. “White scholars willing to talk about race get attention for saying the same things that scholars of color have been saying for a long time,” she notes.

    Writing about race and whiteness has often pulled Harvey into controversy, because of the events in Ferguson most recently, but also because some of her Huffington Post blog posts have gone viral, particularly the August 2013 post, “For Whites (Like Me) on White Kids,” which got 10s of thousands of likes and hundreds of comments. Addressing “Dear Parents of White Children,” Harvey argued that white parents must stop using the “sugary” language of color blindness with their kids. Children can see that people are not all the same, and parents should stop pretending they are, she wrote.

    Harvey has decided to expand those thoughts: “My next project is underway and it’s a book for the parents of white children.” Asked whether she’ll ever tire of the subject, Harvey says, “I suspect I’ll be writing about race and whiteness for the rest of my life.” —Donna Freitas

    Peter Kreeft: Philosophical Persuasion

    A philosophy professor meets a Christian woman at a religious conference. During their brief conversation, she says she is worried about her brother, a young man who is smart, kind, inquisitive—and an atheist. Would the professor please write to her brother and try to persuade him of the existence of God?

    So begins the imagined conversation, known in academic lingo as a “supposal,” between Peter Kreeft and the young man he calls “Michael” in his new book, Letters to an Atheist: Wrestling with Faith (Rowman & Littlefield, Oct.). The young man is real, as was the encounter between Kreeft and Michael’s sister. Although he never contacted Michael personally, and the letters that compose the book never got posted, emailed, received, or answered, Kreeft offers them to readers, who he invites to “become Michael,” to read and consider for themselves.

    Kreeft is a professor of philosophy at Boston College, where he has taught since 1965. He is also the author of more than 70 books, about half of which are for a general audience (the other half are for scholars).

    Raised an evangelical Christian in the Dutch Reformed branch of Protestantism, Kreeft converted to Catholicism at age 21. Though he has “questioned God, both intellectually and personally,” he says he has never stopped being a theist, or one who believes in God. “There was no rebellion or disillusionment” at the root of his conversion, Kreeft notes. In fact, “I am more, not less, evangelical as a Catholic than I ever was as a Protestant.”

    But despite his consistent belief, “there were many times when I questioned God, both intellectually and personally,” he says. “The two are not mutually exclusive—doubts are the ants in the pants that keep faith alive and moving.”

    Kreeft’s comfort with doubt led him, in Letters to an Atheist, to dive into some of the most difficult-to-resolve reasons many people don’t believe in God, such as the existence of evil in the world and violence committed in the name of religion. He also delves into reasons to believe, such as miracles, love, and what he sees as a highly compatible relationship between religion and science.

    The tone of the book is conversational, warm, and intended to read as an exchange “between friends,” something Kreeft says distinguishes his book from the work of the popular but controversial “new atheists,” whose writing he calls “purely polemical” and “shallow and unmoving compared with the classic atheists Hume, Voltaire, Nietzsche, and Sartre.”

    Kreeft’s book is, he says, simply the result of a request he received at a conference—a request he took very seriously because he believed he could be of help to this young man and others on the idea of God, which he says is the most important in human history.

    “We don’t know the stakes” of the theist-atheist debate, he says. “That’s why they are infinitely high: because they may be—we just don’t know—the difference between heaven and hell.” —Holly Lebowitz Rossi

    Lerone A. Martin: Pulpits of Wax

    In the early half of the 20th century, many black preachers discovered a new tool—the phonograph. Sermons recorded on vinyl (or, at first, wax) enabled them to reach beyond their local churches and market their sermons to other eager listeners. The records often outstripped the sales of those by popular blues singers like Bessie Smith and Ma Rainey, and while many preachers went to places like Chicago to get record deals, record company executives began traveling from church to church in the rural South in search of the next celebrity preacher. In Preaching on Wax: The Phonograph and the Shaping of Modern African American Religion (NYU, Nov.; Reviews, p. 20), Lerone A. Martin illuminates this little-known chapter in American cultural history.

    Martin, a postdoctoral research fellow at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis, understands this desire for the spoken word. “I grew up in a home where we watched preachers on TV, and my mom would always be ordering tapes of the sermons to listen to over and over again,” says Martin. When he got to graduate school, Martin was so intrigued by the pioneering use of media by black preachers that he focused his dissertation on Rev. James Gates and the phonograph records that made him a celebrity beyond his home church in Atlanta in the ’20s and ’30s.

    In Preaching on Wax, Martin widens his view from one preacher to analyze the culture-shifting technology of vinyl recordings: “I tried to make the phonograph the main character,” he says. In the years before WWII, especially in the rural South, a number of forces drove black preachers to records rather than the radio to reach listeners, Martin says. Most people could afford a phonograph, and it did not need electricity to run. Radios were expensive—they might cost around $50—and many people did not yet have electricity. In addition, most radio stations worried they would lose revenue if advertisers found their products associated with black preachers.

    The phonograph and the preachers’ records helped shaped modern African-American religion in significant ways, Martin argues. Examining this phenomenon “helps us to see that our own contemporary experience of religion, media, and commodification is not new,” he says. A preacher like T.D. Jakes, for example, uses television, film, books, and audio not only to reach a lot of consumers, but also to ground his authority as the pastor of a larger flock beyond his own church. Looking at the advent and development of preaching on phonograph records, Martin says, “helps us to think about celebrity and the way it bestows authority upon these religious leaders.” —Henry L. Carrigan Jr.[/b][/s]


    A version of this article appeared in the 10/06/2014 issue of Publishers Weekly under the headline: Religion Update Fall 2014:  

    and all that crossed out outside and inside that box  is rubbish and nothing to do with Muhammad PBUH)..      

    http://www.juancole.com/2014/10/understanding-kecia-muhammad.html

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »