but what K_CHOR SAYS HERE is rubbish..
Proof is in the pudding .. and pudding is in the numbers .. Judaism with its Rabbinical Law Vs Islam with its Allah divine Law... which one has more numbers??
The problem with Klingschor's rhetoric in that particular post is that Muslims in their own books define Sharia as something that should be spread. Tons of Islamic material written by scholars even define "Sharia" as part of the "political system." They define it as the "governance that must be implemented." Non-muslims happen to define this as "politics." It's just a fact.
So with the logic that it's "anti-muslim bigotry" for Ayaan to "say such a thing" is incorrect. He'd have to go "correct" a million muslim scholars on how "Sharia" is defined. He's mixing concepts up and is thinking way too hard about "Imperialism."
I come across ex-muslims and atheists, and they think wayyy too hard about politics and "who's right-wing" and "who's on the left" that they make all of these sweeping generalizations on people. They forget the importance on what people actually have to say, and all of sudden define everyone unjustly by "Marxist" "Libertarian" "Right-wing conservative" etc etc.
I'm sorry but I rather make an impactful change in the world without resorting to thinking too hard about things and being incorrect about them.
I also rather have fun in my life than try too hard and fail just to be "politically correct."