I've discovered a good article on the topic, so I thought that I would post it here for reference purposes. It's worth noting that the ED is designed to refute DCT and not any modified versions of it. For a response to modified DCT, you need a modified ED. See the following for a modified version of the dilemma:
In Jesseph's last rebuttal, it was obvious that he ran out of time.
He skipped this argument entirely, so I am forced to flow the argument to Craig. Also, Jesseph never responded to Craig's rebuttal to the Euthyphro dilemma, that "the good is the very nature of God and that the commands of God flow necessarily out of his moral nature." Craig thinks he's answering the objection, but actually he's only pushing the problem one step further back. Is God good because his nature fulfills a standard independent of His will, or is the fact that God approves of a certain kind of character itself the standard of goodness? Craig might reply that God is good because He is benevolent, merciful, and just. The question then arises: Are benevolence, mercy, and justice valid grounds for judging a being to be good, and if so, are they not standards by which we human beings are judging good?
Anyways, here is the article on ED:
http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/christian-ethics/divine-command-theory/the-euthyphro-dilemma/