Religion of peace and three of its peaceful killings
OP - August 26, 2015, 08:56 AM
Religion of peace and three of its peaceful killings
Some Muslim apologist try to derail the ongoing manslaughters of atheists, freethinkers and humanists by fanatic Islamists as a misrepresentation of the sacred message of the peaceful religion. But I strongly stand against such false claims. I think Islam needs to take some responsibility. For centuries they just evading their liability by imposing those hideous act of terrorisms over some divergent whose actually falsifying Islam as a religion of terror. Their next claim would be, terrorists are terrorists, and they got nothing to do with any religion. But my point is, what if those terrorists are spiritually motivated to carry out their terrorisms by the religion insidiously claimed to be the harbinger of peace? Will we still gonna call it the religion of peace? What if that religion itself stands with a number of heinous atrocities committed by its supreme founder against his critics? What if he blatantly instigated his followers to take down breastfeeding woman and venerable old man for simply opposing him with their poetries? Will you still gonna label it as the religion of harmony?
Islam barely cares of any of its critics. Neither has it ever cared of its eulogist. It’s neither about the pious Muslims nor about atheists. It’s all about Mohammed and his pagan God Hubal (currently known as Allah). All that matter is what Mohammed said & did (Hadith), and also what he accentuated on behalf of Hubal (currently known as Quran). So behold at few examples established by Mohammed regarding the criticisms of his dogma. Let’s take a look at the death tolls paid by the critics for criticizing self proclaimed apostle and the last savior of mankind.
For reference I’m using few of the most authentic books written by reverent Muslim historians like Sirat Rasul Allah written by Ibne Hisam and Ibne Ishaq, Sahih Bukhari, Sunane Abu Daud, Sahih Muslim and of course Quran revealed by Hubal, Spoken by Mohammed and written by his fellow verse writers.
First one to go was Asma bint Marwan, a mother of three kids at 624 AD . She ridiculed her fellow tribesman for following a stranger chief instead of their own kiths and keens. She also understood anti-Semitism of Islam & flagrant attitude of Mohammed and provoked insurgence against the autocracy he established in Madina. That was all it takes to issue a death warrant. This is what she wrote, (according to Sirat Rasul Allah, UMAYR B. ADIYY'S JOURNEY TO KILL ASMA D. MARWAN)
"I despise B. Malik and al-Nabit
and Auf and B. al-Khazraj.
You obey a stranger who is none of yours,
One not of Murad or Madhhij.
Do you expect good from him after the killing of your chiefs
Like a hungry man waiting for a cook's broth?
Is there no man of pride who would attack him by surprise
And cut off the hopes of those who expect aught from him?"
Hearing this poem Mohammed asked his fellow marauders, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” (In simple words, who will kill her for me?)
Umayr b. Adiya al-Khatmi took the chance to prove his allegiance and went on to assassinate that poor woman. The night he did his dirty work, Asma was breast feeding one of her kids. Next morning the assassin returned and told the apostle all about what he had done. And the apostle of peace replied, “You have helped God and his apostle, O Umayr!”
When Mohammed was asked if that action was sinful, he replied; “Two Goats won’t but bang their head about her death.” (In simple English, her life has no value)
Another one was a century old man named Abu Afak. He was a reverent of his own tribe. He was astonished by the atrocity of Islam, something he never seen before in his entire lifetime. This is what he wrote against it.
Long have I lived but never have I seen
An assembly or collection of people
More faithful to their undertaking
And their allies when called upon
Than the sons of Qayla when they assembled,
Men who overthrew mountains and never submitted,
A rider who came to them split them in two (saying)
"Permitted", "Forbidden", of all sorts of things.
Had you believed in glory or kingship
You would have followed Tubba.[1]
Listening to this Mohammed blared with anger, “Who will take care of this rascal for me?”And Salim bin Umyar went on to kill him.
After several failed attempt of assassination Umyar finally got the chance on a hot and humid night when Abu Afak was sleeping outdoor to cool down. Umyar then transpierced a sword at his midsection until it pierced through the bed he was laying on. The old sage man died in an instant.
Third one is Al Nadir ibn Al-Harith. A despicable example of war crime committed by Mohammed and his imaginary God Hubal. Al Nadir was a prisoner of war, captured in the battle of Badr. Unlike the rest of the POWs he wasn’t allowed to be freed upon ransom. Only because he criticized Islam with his poetry and stories. Mohammed formed a verse regarding his execution,
That is because they opposed Allah and His Messenger. And whoever opposes Allah and His Messenger - indeed, Allah is severe in penalty. Quran 8:31
The translation is collected from Sahih international. The most authentic translation of Quran. Please take a deeper look. Allah or Hubal is sever to them who oppose him (I’m confused either it would be him or her. Because Hubal was a pagan Goddess, and when Mohammed assimilated her with his imaginary Abrahamic faith he altered her sex into a common gender with abstract masculine stature and misogynist nature). Allah/Hubal can’t take simple opposition let alone criticism. Islam’s God himself is a terrorist by nature who tends to execute his opposition. Who’s prone to reply criticism with terrorism. And those Muslim extremist who gets involved in killing are actually the true Muslim in all sense. Furthermore the moderate Muslim, those believe in harmonious co-existence with atheist and other non-believers (who oppose Islam by simply not believing it) are the false Muslim and can be accused of misrepresenting Islam.
Here I got a tafsir (explanation) of Quran that explains the background of this verse and the reason of execution of Nadir ibn Al-Harith. It says,
An-Nadr visited Persia and learned the stories of some Persian kings, such as Rustum and Isphandiyar. When he went back to Makkah, He found that the Prophet was reciting the ayats of Qur'an sent from Allah to the people. Whenever the Prophet would leave an audience in which An-Nadr was sitting, An-Nadr began narrating to them the stories that he learned in Persia, proclaiming afterwards, Who, by Allah, has better tales to narrate, I or Muhammad. When Allah allowed the Muslims to capture An-Nadr in Badr, the Messenger of Allah commanded that his head be cut off before him, and that was done, all thanks are due to Allah.., [Tafsir Ibn Kathir, on Quran 8:31]
You will find this part of Tafsir Ibn Kathir on Wikipedia, if you search by the name “Nadr Ibn al-Harith. ”.
The killing in Charli Hebdo, killing and ineffable persecution of Bangladeshi humanistic bloggers and free thinkers, religious conflict and war in Arab world, civil war in some parts of Africa, the despicable 9/11 terrorist attack on America, and many other past events and many more to come in future, all are linked with one hideous religion; Islam. A religion that kills for opposing and criticizing its fallacies. Are you insane enough to call it a religion of peace? If you still are, then congratulation. You’ve become a true Muslim.
God didn't created us in his Image. We created God as our own reflection.
Topic: Religion of peace and three of its peaceful killings