Great stuff. Thanks for posting the link.
Nor that, on the whole, racism and [150] anti-semitism manifest themselves, not across
national boundaries, but within them. In other words, they justify not so much foreign wars as
domestic repression and domination.19
Where racism developed outside Europe in the nineteenth century, it was always associated
with European domination, for two converging reasons. First and most important was the rise
of official nationalism and colonial 'Russification'. As has been repeatedly emphasized
official nationalism was typically a response on the part of threatened dynastic and
aristocratic groups - upper classes - to popular vernacular nationalism. Colonial racism was a
major element in that conception of 'Empire' which attempted to weld dynastic legitimacy
and national community. It did so by generalizing a principle of innate, inherited superiority
on which its own domestic position was (however shakily) based to the vastness of the
overseas possessions, covertly (or not so covertly) conveying the idea that if, say, English
lords were naturally superior to other Englishmen, no matter: these other Englishmen were no
less superior to the subjected natives. Indeed one is tempted to argue that the existence of late
colonial empires even served to shore up domestic aristocratic bastions, since they appeared
to confirm on a global, modern stage antique conceptions of power and privilege.
Golden
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb1f0/cb1f0bebad095b69989190f224e314e926e8b003" alt="Afro"