To be honest, a lot of the exposing of Hirsi Ali as a "liar" have to do with over zealous nature of some people who like political smear campaign.
Just think about all the allegations. Is she the only immigrant doing that? All these convenient wordings to frame Ayaan to discredit her past is simply disingenuous. If right-wings are doing it to BLM/muslims the same allegations would fall flat because of "racism".
It reports that basically none of the claims she makes about her early life are true: she is not from Somalia, although her parents were from there she spent most of her childhood in Kenya,
As a 3rd generation immigrant myself, some immigrants community still consider themselves as part of their ancestor's heritage and might refuse to assimilate. It's not strange for a Somalian from Kenya to identify more as Somalian and not Kenyan.
which isn't a country that refugees are accepted from because of its relative stability
This is a totally irrelevant point; if you think of any "stable" 3rd world country that have people who migrate to the west (let's give an example, China) nobody on the left wing would think that it's a bad idea to lie and get in. "Stable" doesn't mean much, there are more economic migrants than there are war refugees. Those economic migrants might lie to get in so they can immigrate faster (or to not get deported). I don't think any left-wing would have any problem with that, after all why ban people from wanting a good life. If you can get paid 5x of your salary back home, why not lie?
But if it's Ayaan, blow it out of control. She's right-leaning, so smear her to the ground.
she wasn't married off in absentia against her will, she attended her wedding to a Canadian who said it was for citizenship, but that she decided she like the Dutch state's benefits better
A lot of speculation to make her look extra bad... for doing something many immigrants do. How many "refugees" stopped at first western nation they see? If everybody does that, nobody would even reach UK, Germany, or even Sweden. What's wrong with wanting better benefit? As far as I know, it was the left wing who actually support that rights. So what's wrong if she wants to use it for her benefit?
she wasn't scared of her family when she landed in the Netherlands, she was still in contact with them and her conversations with them seemed friendly, according to all her acquaintances at the time.
The problem with this is it's her words vs her family. I actually had someone linked to me an article in dutch about her brother backing up Hirsi Ali's story, but I don't want to search for the link now...
And "keeping in touch with family" is not really a good basis to judge "good relationship" or not. There are many families that hate each other but they still keep in contact... and she might not "hate" everyone in her family. And you might hate your parents, but you still miss your siblings... it's more complicated than that.
I've seen a lot of reports about Hirsi Ali being a liar, but all of that falls flat like a bad case of journalism/smear campaign.
If the right wing calls for ban against illegal immigration and demand to deport/revoke citizenship of all immigrants who lied about their name/age/birthplace, accusation of racism would fly everywhere. But this is Hirsi Ali, so she's fair game.
So Hirsi Ali is a liar not because she lied, but because she's allying herself with right-wing racists. If Hirsi Ali is a liar and deserved to get her Dutch citizenship revoked, many other immigrants are also liars and they all need to be deported. Not just her. But that would be inhuman. Revoking Hirsi Ali's citizenship is not inhuman, though.