bogart you seem to have tremendous knowledge about history of mankind and cultures .,, but in that post you are saying something that sounds imaginary and out of this real world. sounds like Quantum world, quantum conscious and humans beings driven by quantum consciousness, That is a
very difficult subject with many slippery slopes ., I wish and hope you dwell deeper to make the subject clear to the readers., Let me take couple of points from your post
Humans makes a conscious choice to follow a religion, accept various ideas, conduct, creeds, etc.
Q1:
what is conscious choice dear bogart?and even if you could define that, since the beginning of ((
religions ,)), Ooops i meant faiths, history of faith heads (I meant HEADS OF FAITH) So.,
Q2:
how many human beings did make the conscious choice about faith..for that matter on anything in their life ?Let us go to the real numbers here., here is the ~human population at a given time
World Population Growth
Year Population
1 200 million
1000 275 million
1500 450 million
1650 500 million
1750 700 million
1804 1 billion
1850 1.2 billion
1900 1.6 billion
1927 2 billion
1950 2.55 billion
1955 2.8 billion
1960 3 billion
1965 3.3 billion
1970 3.7 billion
1975 4 billion
1980 4.5 billion
1985 4.85 billion
1990 5.3 billion
1995 5.7 billion
1999 6 billion
2006 6.5 billion
2009 6.8 billion
2011 7 billion

'
Some of those human population numbers are interpolated but question is at any given time,
Q3:
how many people do you think have made conscious choice about their faith during their life time at any given time from the above list??All those three questions, we can also frame them w.r.t. well developed cultures/religions/faiths of ancient history ..for e.g
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history
tell me taking the individual cultures from above figure .,
How many people of that each culture/faith/religion followed their faith consciously At any point they can stop and consider anything with their religion contains.
Religions will conform or die.
I am not sure what all that means but this is strange statement from you
Dawkins is a biologist. His knowledge of deities is limited and opinion irrelevant. Go look up Mictlantecuhtli
What deities and what knowledge are you talking?? what knowledge do any one needs to understand deities and deitism ?? And how did you come to the conclusion that Mictlantecuhtli had more knowledge about deities and deitism than Richard Dawkins when this Mictlantecuhtli is not even a human being but a deity Aztecs?? http://www.ancient.eu/Mictlantecuhtli/with best regards
yeezevee