Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Today at 01:35 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 01:34 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
Yesterday at 06:58 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 06, 2025, 09:50 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
December 27, 2024, 12:20 PM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Berlin car crasher
by zeca
December 21, 2024, 11:10 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?

 (Read 35311 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #30 - October 09, 2008, 02:04 PM

    Quote
    the rampant mindles atheist fundamentalism and stupidity


    Eh? Huh?  That's one of the least widespread problems facing the world today.  Admittedly not non-existent, but very, very trivial compared to the problems facing us courtesy of religious fundamentalism.

    Oh no Cheetah. There are humungous slavering hordes of nasty atheists ready to destroy civilisation as we know it. Only Dio and brave Christian soldiers like her stand between the hordes and the gates of Vienna. It's stirring stuff.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #31 - October 09, 2008, 02:05 PM

    Quote
    the rampant mindles atheist fundamentalism and stupidity


    Eh? Huh?  That's one of the least widespread problems facing the world today.  Admittedly not non-existent, but very, very trivial compared to the problems facing us courtesy of religious fundamentalism.

    Oh no Cheetah. There are humungous slavering hordes of nasty atheists ready to destroy civilisation as we know it. Only Dio and brave Christian soldiers like her stand between the hordes and the gates of Vienna. It's stirring stuff.


    True, and they already made great way in the destruction of civilisation - but most of them - like you - aren´t even aware of it. That´s the really really sad part. The falsification of our past that gets accepted as uncontested truth is a sign of it.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #32 - October 09, 2008, 02:10 PM

    Quote
    yeah, sure. If you say so.


    Yes, I do say so, and I'll change my mind when I see atheist fundamentalists crashing planes into buildings, blowing themselves up on tube trains, opposing life saving vaccinations for children, dragging school boards through courts to get their favourite fictional story taught as fact in the science class, or protesting against life saving medical research.

    Till then, I'll carry on saying so. thnkyu

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #33 - October 09, 2008, 02:10 PM

    Quote
    the rampant mindles atheist fundamentalism and stupidity


    Eh? Huh?  That's one of the least widespread problems facing the world today.  Admittedly not non-existent, but very, very trivial compared to the problems facing us courtesy of religious fundamentalism.

    Oh no Cheetah. There are humungous slavering hordes of nasty atheists ready to destroy civilisation as we know it. Only Dio and brave Christian soldiers like her stand between the hordes and the gates of Vienna. It's stirring stuff.


    True, and they already made great way in the destruction of civilisation - but most of them - like you - aren´t even aware of it. That´s the really really sad part.

     

    Cheesy Awesome. That one is worthy of FSTDT. You're gonna be famous. bunny

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #34 - October 09, 2008, 03:13 PM

    If I had to be honest I also think that the article is a bit misleading, so therefore as shyte as the right wing loony articles that you read.

    It dismisses the threat of demographics in a very non factual way, I personally think there is a demographic threat IF the current birth rate remains the same.

    IF on the other hand the generation westernisation of muslim families falls under the influence of western birth rate ideals then the threat is non existant.

    Both this article and the right wing "Eurabia by 2050" are based on a lot of IFS and not alot of real facts.


    Here's some relatively comprehensive study which gives some info on current demographic trends, and it indeed shows a steadily shrinking of difference in TFR between Muslim and non-Muslim women in Europe.


    Another poster who goes by the handle of "Rick Roskell" makes another good point in this comment, stating:

    Quote from: Rick Roskell
    There is NO way to reliably project what growth may occur in the future from that of a single generation today. The reality is that immigration patterns change. Total Fertility Rates change. A myriad range of influences effect what happens in this area. To predict what the situation will look like 50 years from now based on what happened in the last 15 years is utterly, completely, 110%, blue-sky speculation.

    Take immigration patterns as an example. Early in the last century there was a large influx of Chinese to Canada, mostly on the West coast. They were attracted by the lure of gold, jobs building railroads, etc. If you were to judge by the increase of Chinese people in Canada during that period, then today damn near everyone in Canada would be of Chinese decent! But that's not the case, obviously.

    To take a mere snapshot of recent growth patterns in a small segment of society- and project that same growth pattern 50 years into the future- isn't just intellectually invalid, it's bone-headed.

  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #35 - October 09, 2008, 03:15 PM

    Well - I hope he´s right about moslem demographics (the less of them in Europe, the better) - but if the rest of the article is as "intelligent", "unbiassed" and factually true as this crap
    Quote
    Europe once faced a genuine fundamentalist threat, in the face of a declining population. From 1345 to 1750, the continent's population barely grew, and the church, a murderous, terrorist, woman-hating force, seized considerable power. It was not Christian culture, but rather the opposition to this Christian threat, that made Europe great: The Enlightenment not only destroyed the church as a power, but also created the fertility boom.

     I doubt the article is more than wishful thinking and propaganda -drivel no better than right-wing shyt.

    So the church's Witch-Finders-General and the Inquisitors never existed then?

    Religion is ignorance giftwrapped in lyricism.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #36 - October 10, 2008, 12:35 AM

    Quote
    The funnier part? Mark Steyn opines that this will surely lead to a ban on Gay marriage, the end of feminism, de-secularization and an end to the European welfare state. His solution? Ban gay marriage, end feminism, de-secularization and an end to the European welfare state.


    Here, this very neatly pin points the reason I've always been suspicious of the demographic argument from the religious right.  Its always used to raise the scary spectre of society turning into....erm.......exactly the same thing they want to turn it into.   idiot2


    It's called "can't stand competition".

  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #37 - October 10, 2008, 12:53 AM

    Quote
    the rampant mindles atheist fundamentalism and stupidity


    Eh? Huh?  That's one of the least widespread problems facing the world today.  Admittedly not non-existent, but very, very trivial compared to the problems facing us courtesy of religious fundamentalism.

    Oh no Cheetah. There are humungous slavering hordes of nasty atheists ready to destroy civilisation as we know it. Only Dio and brave Christian soldiers like her stand between the hordes and the gates of Vienna. It's stirring stuff.


    True, and they already made great way in the destruction of civilisation - but most of them - like you - aren´t even aware of it. That´s the really really sad part.

     

    Cheesy Awesome. That one is worthy of FSTDT. You're gonna be famous. bunny


    Noted and submitted.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #38 - October 10, 2008, 07:30 AM

    Yes but you're talking about one small area in one country. I think the article makes a lot of sense, assuming the stats are correct ( which I haven't checked yet ). Of course the stats will piss off the "Gates of Vienna" crowd because they don't back up said crowd's preferred position.

    Toronto is not a small area. Greater Metropolitan Toronto is 5 Million and Quebec is another 5 Mills. The whole country is 30 Mills. In montreal I can not walk without hearing people on the street talking Arabic and Veils are much more frequent then they were in Cairo 15yrs ago.

    Personally I think Islam should be criticised on grounds other than any supposed demographic threat to Europe. I don't think the European demographic argument is the main concern.

    "Demographics and Ghettos" are a main concern. Lebanon was less then 20% muslims beginning of the last Century and the muslims were not as morally flared as they are now.

    Kosovo is another fresh One.

    Btw, I can not accept how the prick who wrote this article is only basing his conclusion on average birth rates. He missed the bit about migration. He missed talking about current and existing Age difference of the population (existing young vs existing old). I remember many other points as well. This prick only picked on only One point and chose to beat it in order to make his point. Does my Ad Hominem (prick) makes up for his burning strawman? I think not.



    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #39 - October 10, 2008, 07:43 AM

    [
    Btw, I can not accept how the prick who wrote this article is only basing his conclusion on average birth rates. He missed the bit about migration. He missed talking about current and existing Age difference of the population (existing young vs existing old). I remember many other points as well. This prick only picked on only One point and chose to beat it in order to make his point. Does my Ad Hominem (prick) makes up for his burning strawman? I think not.



    I've noticed that everyone that does not agree with you is a 'prick' or a 'cunt' or a 'cock-sucker' etc. It says an awful lot about you buddy and why you are a travelling salesman and not an orator.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #40 - October 10, 2008, 12:48 PM

    Toronto is not a small area. Greater Metropolitan Toronto is 5 Million and Quebec is another 5 Mills. The whole country is 30 Mills. In montreal I can not walk without hearing people on the street talking Arabic and Veils are much more frequent then they were in Cairo 15yrs ago.


    Anecdotal evidence cannot substitute specific statistics.


    Kosovo is another fresh One.


    Nope and nope.



    "Demographics and Ghettos" are a main concern. Lebanon was less then 20% muslims beginning of the last Century and the muslims were not as morally flared as they are now.


    Somehow, despite the spread of Islamic fundamentalism over the past 2 decades, birth and fertility rates in the Muslim world sharply went down... Hmmmm...  yes
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #41 - October 10, 2008, 04:57 PM

    Toronto is not a small area. Greater Metropolitan Toronto is 5 Million and Quebec is another 5 Mills. The whole country is 30 Mills. In montreal I can not walk without hearing people on the street talking Arabic and Veils are much more frequent then they were in Cairo 15yrs ago.


    And some more data...

    While it shows a significantly higher TFR among Muslims, it in no way suggest Canada becoming Muslim-majority by the 2nd half of this century, and considering how drastically it dropped over the past 15 year, I won't hold my breath for it to rise any time soon.

  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #42 - October 12, 2008, 01:20 PM

    Toronto is not a small area. Greater Metropolitan Toronto is 5 Million and Quebec is another 5 Mills. The whole country is 30 Mills. In montreal I can not walk without hearing people on the street talking Arabic and Veils are much more frequent then they were in Cairo 15yrs ago.


    Anecdotal evidence cannot substitute specific statistics.



    This is a quote from the article:
    Quote
    Three types of data permit the analysis of fertility differentials by religious affiliation; however, very often one has to rely on crude estimates. Furthermore, in each case the data are not as detailed as needed for a thorough analysis over time and by cohort and age of mother.


    If you are going to rely on crude estimates, then you can rely on my estimate. Here is a nice little estimate, the numbers I have seen from many sources already +/- 100K:

    Quote
    http://soundvision.com/info/muslims/muslimsincanada.asp

        * Muslims in Canada today number more than 750,000
        * According to the 2001 census the Canadian population consisted of 579, 600 Muslims, representing 2% of the Canadian population
        * If Muslim maintained the same growth rate as the last decade since the census, today Muslims in Canada number 753,480. (From 2001 to 2003, according to statistics from Citizenship and Immigration Canada, an estimated 132,600 Muslims immigrated to Canada. That’s a rise of 23 percent)
        * Ontario contains 61% of the entire Muslim population
        * 5% of all Toronto population is Muslims, making Toronto the highest concentration of Muslims in any city in the US or Canada
        * There are 21 Federal ridings with 7% to 14% Muslim population which can emerge as a major electoral force



    Summarize plz, Are these more strawman articles attacking a particular statistic and ignoring the rest of the picture as to what affect a population delta?

    "Demographics and Ghettos" are a main concern. Lebanon was less then 20% muslims beginning of the last Century and the muslims were not as morally flared as they are now.


    Somehow, despite the spread of Islamic fundamentalism over the past 2 decades, birth and fertility rates in the Muslim world sharply went down... Hmmmm...  yes

    Your still harping on fertility rates. I am talking about demography and population patterns and you are talking about fertility rates. Fertility rates generally went down world-wide, so the decline is relative. Muslims in their own muslim paradises are discouraged from giving birth by their governments and by the lack of social handouts available in the West where, alternatively the mullahs are highly encouraging high birth rates in dar-al-harb.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #43 - October 12, 2008, 10:24 PM

    Kosovo is another fresh One.


    Nope and nope.[/quote]

    Summarize plz, Are these more strawman articles attacking a particular statistic and ignoring the rest of the picture as to what affect a population delta?

    These two articles are by journalists who have visited Kosovo.
    Neither of them are PC-blinded cheerleaders - both are familiar with Islam as it is in the Middle East.
    What they find is a country where the local Islam traditions haven't been infiltrated by the Wahhabi preachers.
    In Kosovo, Islam is a religion like any other and the Muslims are as liberal as anyone else in Europe.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #44 - October 13, 2008, 01:25 AM

    I wish we had an icon for whistling through the graveyard. That is the typical pose of the lefty secularist. Strike  pose, spit out some empty rhetoric to magically make reality disappear for you, then villify those who are trying to save your suicidal selves from dragging the rest of us down w/ you.

    Weren't they called the Heaven's Gate cult? A few years back, some nutter talked some vulnerable dupes into to believing that some comet passing by would save them from this world. All they had to do to escape was to castrate themselves & commit suicide. then the aliens hiding in the comet would wisk them off to where ever & they would live happily ever after.

    I know what our atheist friends will say, "Well-yeah-but, that was religion, we don't practice a religion. Our belief isn't really a belief but an unbelief. Though, any belief necessarily implies unbelief in whatever contradicts your belief. Sure, unbelief in a universe that has any kind of ultimate purpose for personality or life amounts to a comprehensive cosmological vision. It might be true that religion is how people conduct themselves in response to their cosmological vision. Thus, atheism has as  much implication for how we live relative to the cosmos we imagine as any other cosmological vision. Thus any world view is intrinsically & inescapably religious in its implications. This doesn't matter, I don't like religion 'cuz I say I don't, therefore I am not religious."

    Face it finally boys & girls, the Gulag Archepelago is the collective monument to the atheist religion. I have no patience w/ your sectarian quibbling about your not being members of that particular atheist church. All the other atheist churchs have proven just as sanguinary. It is something intrinsic to human nature that makes people act out this way. Just like something in human nature makes us religious, there is something that makes us murderous. Learn to be honest w/ yourselves & face up to you natures w/ a complete inventory of all the evidence.

    Excising, or attempting to excise, or (more precisely) pretending to excise a basic part of our human nature will not in anyway alter our human nature. We basically can't help being religious, we need to come to terms w/ this, not play make pretend it isn't there.

    As for the Cathars, if you could do so, would you not be willing to go back & time & have the leaders of the Heaven's Gate group stopped by the police? If the authorities could have isolated the followers from their suicidal nut of a leader, many of them probably would have opted out. Even if only one or two could have been saved, it would have been worth it.

    The Cathars were much the same thing, they were a suicide cult. Not only were they resolved to eventually try to kill themselves (you can't really stop people from committing suicide if they wish to) they were committed to evangelizing others to exterminate themselves as well, & in a very gruesome manner (starvation) as well. You can quibble about excesses & methods if you wish. It is difficult to seperate fact from legend in the Cathar case.

    One can argue about methods & excesses in stopping the Nazis (Dresden) or their allies the Japanese (Kamikazes!), the ultimate moral necessity of stopping such groups is clear enough it seems to me.  One can wallow in the childish delusion that there is nothing in this world to "...kill or die for..." (Lennon), his spiritual father Chamberlain thought so. We learned in WWII what such self indulgence leads to.

    There are simply murderous causes in this world, they must be stopped. Sometimes it takes alot of fire to stop a fire. The Cathars made a fetish of death, every bit as much as did the Nazis & the Imperial Japanese. No one should apologise for wanting them stopped.

    If I am dealing w/ people who are too limited to grasp the distinction between the cause itself & methods, this really a hopeless discussion. 

    "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."  --Leon Trotsky
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #45 - October 13, 2008, 04:03 AM

    And for anyone who wants to know what the Cathars were actually like, as opposed to what IHS says they were like, I suggest reading the following as a starting point.

     parrot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars parrot

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #46 - October 13, 2008, 05:50 PM

    Quote
    Face it finally boys & girls, the Gulag Archepelago is the collective monument to the atheist religion.


    So much nonsense in one sentence.  Communism does not equal atheism, and losing your religion does not mean you lose your belief in God.  Nor do most atheists feel the need to follow any particular ideology, or "church" as you call it. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #47 - October 13, 2008, 10:24 PM

    Quote
    Face it finally boys & girls, the Gulag Archepelago is the collective monument to the atheist religion.


    So much nonsense in one sentence.  Communism does not equal atheism, and losing your religion does not mean you lose your belief in God.  Nor do most atheists feel the need to follow any particular ideology, or "church" as you call it. 


    Every time I read one of his posts, the phrase "Wahabbi Catholic" comes to mind.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #48 - October 13, 2008, 10:40 PM



    Summarize plz, Are these more strawman articles attacking a particular statistic and ignoring the rest of the picture as to what affect a population delta?

    These two articles are by journalists who have visited Kosovo. Neither of them are PC-blinded cheerleaders - both are familiar with Islam as it is in the Middle East. What they find is a country where the local Islam traditions haven't been infiltrated by the Wahhabi preachers. In Kosovo, Islam is a religion like any other and the Muslims are as liberal as anyone else in Europe.


    Uh-huh. So let's all calm down and go with those who know how to use statistics when talking about demographics to tell us that there is no Islamic threat in Albania too. And tell this to Lillymill also as Muslims and leftists do their best to slander her. Islam is a religion like no other and even in Kosovo one must realize that there are no pink bunny rabbits at the end of the rainbow.

  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #49 - October 14, 2008, 12:15 AM

    And for anyone who wants to know what the Cathars were actually like, as opposed to what IHS says they were like, I suggest reading the following as a starting point.

     parrot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars parrot

    I liked your link, especially the paragraph where the author says that the Cathars did in fact encourage their members to commit suicide by starving themselves to death. Though the author quibbles over whether or not starving yourself to death really constitutes suicide. I understand suicide to be choosing to deliberately kill oneself by ones own actions. Thus if I choose not to eat until I die, I am committing suicide by starvation. Maybe you think if someone stops eating for a few days & then dies at the end of that period, the not eating & the dying are unrelated.

    To the Smart Ass:
    Now it should be noted, that the Wahabis are the ones who defend the ritual suicided of the jihadist. Now you are also defending ritual suicide. I am like the Wahabbis because I oppose ritual suicide in all cases. You are unlike the Wahabbis because you also defend ritual suicide? Or is it Oz who is unlike the Wahabbis because he defends ritual suicide also? Your point is really quite muddled, but why should today be any different.

    &, no one thinks that all atheists are communist, but communism is intrinsically an atheistic philosophy. It is obviously a species of atheism.  You can see the consequence of discounting any kind of transcendent value to human life in the Trotsky quote I use ironically as my signature. If human life basically worthless, why not waste it? This is the intrinsic logic of an atheist outlook. LIfe is meaningless, you can't escape it. The Cathars only taught that the body is worthless, we needed to escape the body.

    Dearest Os, please read your own links in the future.

    "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."  --Leon Trotsky
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #50 - October 14, 2008, 01:57 AM

    Quote
    &, no one thinks that all atheists are communist, but communism is intrinsically an atheistic philosophy. It is obviously a species of atheism.  You can see the consequence of discounting any kind of transcendent value to human life in the Trotsky quote I use ironically as my signature. If human life basically worthless, why not waste it? This is the intrinsic logic of an atheist outlook. LIfe is meaningless, you can't escape it. The Cathars only taught that the body is worthless, we needed to escape the body.


    Oh, what a total load of bollocks.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #51 - October 14, 2008, 02:32 AM

    Well, if there is no God then there is nothing sacred. If nothing is sacred then life can not be sacred. Why should anyone value the absurd accident of a mere human life if there is no God? Atheism can not answer this question, thus it is useless for resisting humanities eternal tendency towards decending into a charnal house.

    All sorts of progressive secular atheist types were willing to make excuses & equivocate on the old Soviet Union. All sorts of people who demured from calling themselves communists still enthused over what was being built in the Soviet Union. Lenin called such people useful idiots. I can call up all manner of quotes from Bernard Shaw or any manner of other noteworthy persons.

    When those who would be societies leaders abandon any traditional notion of duty to God & tradition, things fly off the rails. There was never any more concerted effort to marginalise faith then in the 20th century. There was never bloodier time either.

    "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."  --Leon Trotsky
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #52 - October 14, 2008, 03:05 AM

    Quote
    Well, if there is no God then there is nothing sacred.


    What does sacred mean?

    Quote
    If nothing is sacred then life can not be sacred


    See above.

    Quote
    Why should anyone value the absurd accident of a mere human life if there is no God?



    Because we're human.

    Quote
    Atheism can not answer this question,

     

    This atheist has just answered your question.

    Quote
    thus it is useless for resisting humanities eternal tendency towards decending into a charnal house.




    Humanity has no eternal tendencies at all. Certainly not the nihilistic one you imagine, if we did we would have gone kaput within a few years of splitting the atom.

    Quote
    All sorts of progressive secular atheist types were willing to make excuses & equivocate on the old Soviet Union.


    Yes, they were back in the 1930s,  so what?

    Quote
    All sorts of people who demured from calling themselves communists still enthused over what was being built in the Soviet Union.


    Yes, and...?  So what?  All sorts of other people enthused over what was being built in fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.  Life has moved on from 70 years ago, so why are you still going on about it?

    Quote
    Lenin called such people useful idiots.


    Lenin called foreign communists "useful idiots" and he was right.  But Lenin is long dead, and so is the Soviet Union, and so are the Kim Philbys of this world. 


    So get over it.

    Quote
    I can call up all manner of quotes from Bernard Shaw or any manner of other noteworthy persons.


    Could you call up a relevant quote from someone who hasn't been dead for over 150 years?

    Quote
    When those who would be societies leaders abandon any traditional notion of duty to God & tradition, things fly off the rails


    What a pile of rubbish.  The communist examples you gave above did not abandon traditional notions of God and tradition, they just substituted them with communist dogma.  And that is why they were able to get away with the same shit that their religious forebears got away with, eg, pogroms against Jews. 

    Quote
    There was never any more concerted effort to marginalise faith then in the 20th century. There was never bloodier time either.


    False correlation.  The reason the 20th century was so bloody is that we had more effective weapons then than we ever had before.  Religion, or lack of it, made diddly squat difference.























    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #53 - October 14, 2008, 03:37 AM

    "Eurabia" is a load of racist bullshit. It's fascist and racist propaganda invented by the far-right, based on speculation of immigration trends - itself a transient phenomenon - and designed to promote hostility to other members of our _class_ - the working class - who migrate to areas of the world for economic reasons. That is: to be exploited in (possibly) better conditions. In other words this "Eurabia" bullshit is a method of divide and rule. By the way, most so-called 'muslim' immigration to Europe isn't from _Arab_ countries, so let's not talk about a "Eurabia" at all. And, even if Europe became 90% muslims (which it won't, anyway) it is crude to assume that means that results in Europe becoming Islamist. Anyway, the only dominant Islamist party in a European country is a Sufist reformist party.

    Every twenty years or so there's a spike of immigration into europe and it produces a racist anti-jewish/anti-black/anti-asian/[this time] anti-muslim/whatever backlash.

    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #54 - October 14, 2008, 04:42 AM

    "Eurabia" is a load of racist bullshit. It's fascist and racist propaganda invented by the far-right, based on speculation of immigration trends - itself a transient phenomenon - and designed to promote hostility to other members of our _class_ - the working class - who migrate to areas of the world for economic reasons. That is: to be exploited in (possibly) better conditions. In other words this "Eurabia" bullshit is a method of divide and rule. By the way, most so-called 'muslim' immigration to Europe isn't from _Arab_ countries, so let's not talk about a "Eurabia" at all. And, even if Europe became 90% muslims (which it won't, anyway) it is crude to assume that means that results in Europe becoming Islamist. Anyway, the only dominant Islamist party in a European country is a Sufist reformist party.


    When you quit ranting and start thinking you might see that it's not so far-fetched. By the way, when was Bat Y'eor ever a far-right, fascist and a racist to boot?  Huh? That's an idiotic comment on your part and I'm hardly surprised. And mentioning a Sufist reformist party as "the only dominant Islamist party in a European country" is hardly enough to explain the successes that Muslims have had in getting laws passed on their behalf and the fear they they have been able to instill in their once naive host countries.

    Every twenty years or so there's a spike of immigration into europe and it produces a racist anti-jewish/anti-black/anti-asian/[this time] anti-muslim/whatever backlash.


    Oh really! How abut some charts and graphs which indicate those "spikes" and also the accompanying "spikes" of backlashes? Otherwise it's just an opinion on your part and hardly worth mentioning.

    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.


    I doubt it. Muslims still arrive in Europe and and their numbers will keep rising at this current pace. Maybe the self-proclaimed leftists such as you who are doing their best to hijack and neutralize any criticism of Islam will see how dumb such apoplectic reactions such as you've posted will fare in the eyes of future generations.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #55 - October 14, 2008, 05:05 AM

    Quote from: Rick Roskell
    To take a mere snapshot of recent growth patterns in a small segment of society- and project that same growth pattern 50 years into the future- isn't just intellectually invalid, it's bone-headed.


    Then how the hell did random sampling get accepted as sufficient for use in statistics?


    Quote from: PoliticallyIncorrectLib
    Anecdotal evidence cannot substitute specific statistics.


    Sure it can. Especially if one notes that fertility rate speculation is about as haphazard as trading in derivatives and also fails to take heed to the fact that legal immigrations numbers, estimates of illegal immigration numbers as well as current and existing age difference in populations are extremely relevant and cannot be ommitted from any discussion about Muslim demographics in Europe and elsewheres. It's an impoverished critique that plays well with select audiences but I can hardly ever vouch for it. Meanwhile, the Eurabia theory still isn't that far fetched. The pattern of intent that I can discern by reviewing innumerable quotes and missives from Islamic spokesmen as well as observing the behavior of Muslims as they intimidate entire native European populations (as well as non-Muslim immigrants) is certainly anecdotal when presented but then again experiential knowledge rarely translates into convenient graphs and charts.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #56 - October 14, 2008, 06:42 AM

    And for anyone who wants to know what the Cathars were actually like, as opposed to what IHS says they were like, I suggest reading the following as a starting point.

     parrot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars parrot

    I liked your link, especially the paragraph where the author says that the Cathars did in fact encourage their members to commit suicide by starving themselves to death. Though the author quibbles over whether or not starving yourself to death really constitutes suicide. I understand suicide to be choosing to deliberately kill oneself by ones own actions. Thus if I choose not to eat until I die, I am committing suicide by starvation. Maybe you think if someone stops eating for a few days & then dies at the end of that period, the not eating & the dying are unrelated.

    Dearest Os, please read your own links in the future.

    Dearest IHS sweetey-pie snookums Kiss, I did read that link. Not only did I read the link but I read the text it links to. Astonishing, is it not? Whoever would have thought?

    Anyway the reason I linked to it, or one of the reasons to be precise, was that you were comparing the Cathars to the Heaven's Gate cult. This is, if not dishonest, at least a woefully poor comparison. Your implication was that the entire Cathar culture was based on self-destruction and that massacring the Cathars was a benefit to humanity and therefore justifiable. This from the person who loves to rant about the disgusting habits of atheists. Lovely. How about I take a few quotes from the article I linked to and see if you are capable of reading them? 

    Quote
    Upon reception of the consolamentum, the new Perfectus surrendered his or her worldly goods to the community, vested himself in a simple black or blue robe with cord belt, and undertook a life dedicated to following the example of Christ and his Apostles — an often peripatetic life devoted to purity, prayer, preaching and charitable work, or so it was claimed.

    How utterly horrible, IHS. No wonder you are appalled.


    Quote
    While the Perfecti vowed themselves to ascetic lives of simplicity, frugality and purity, Cathar credentes (believers) were not expected to adopt the same stringent lifestyle. They were however expected to refrain from eating meat and dairy products, from killing and from swearing oaths. Catharism was above all a populist religion and the numbers of those who considered themselves "believers" in the late twelfth century included a sizable portion of the population of Languedoc, counting among them many noble families and courts. These individuals often drank, ate meat, and led relatively normal lives within medieval society — in contrast to the Perfecti, whom they honored as exemplars. Though unable to embrace the life of chastity, the credentes looked toward an eventual time when this would be their calling and path.

    Well I must admit that really does sound like a suicide cult.


    Quote
    Many credentes would also eventually receive the consolamentum as death drew near — performing the ritual of liberation at a moment when the heavy obligations of purity required of Perfecti would be temporally short. Some of those who received the sacrament of the consolamentum upon their death-beds may thereafter have shunned further food or drink in order to speed death. This has been termed the endura. It was claimed by Catharism's opponents that by such self-imposed starvation, the Cathars were committing suicide in order to escape this world. Other than at such moments of extremis, no evidence exists to suggest this was a common Cathar practice.

    Umm, yeah. What was that again?

    So the Cathar "priesthood", for want of a better term, tried to live frugal lives that followed the example of Jesus. The vast majority of normal Cathars led perfectly normal lives, apart from refraining from meat and dairy products, and some Cathars who were already almost dead may have shunned food and drink for a short time.

    This is hardly analogous to Heaven's Gate or Jonestown, but then I've long since learned not to expect unfailing accuracy from fallible humans, especially some of them in particular.

    Now let's contrast the behaviour of that horrible suicide cult with the behaviour of your wonderful church.

    Quote
    In January 1208 the papal legate, Pierre de Castelnau was sent to meet the ruler of the area, Count Raymond VI of Toulouse. Known for excommunicating noblemen who protected the Cathars, Castelnau excommunicated Raymond as an abettor of heresy. Shortly thereafter, Castelnau was murdered as he returned to Rome via Saint Gilles Abbey by a knight in the service of Count Raymond. As soon as he heard of the murder, the Pope ordered the legates to preach a crusade against the Cathars. Having failed in his effort to peacefully demonstrate the errors of Catharism, the Pope then called a formal crusade, appointing a series of leaders to head the assault. There followed 20 years of war against the Cathars and their allies in the Languedoc: the Albigensian Crusade.


    Quote
    The Béziers army attempted a sortie but was quickly defeated, then pursued by the crusaders back through the gates and into the city. Arnaud, the Cistercian abbot-commander, is supposed to have been asked how to tell Cathars from Catholics. His alleged reply, recalled by a fellow Cistercian, was "Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius." — "Kill them all, the Lord will recognise His own." The doors of the church of St Mary Magdalene were broken down and the refugees dragged out and slaughtered. Reportedly, 7,000 people died there including many women and children. Elsewhere in the town many more thousands were mutilated and killed. Prisoners were blinded, dragged behind horses, and used for target practice. What remained of the city was razed by fire. Arnaud wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

    Now of course this could not possibly be seen as using violence to prevent people living as they wish. Good heavens, no. That sort of thing is the preserve of horrible, nasty Muslims. They're the only ones who kill people they see as apostates.

    About the only suicidal thing the Cathars did as a whole was to disagree with your pope's ideas on religion. That certainly proved to be suicidal. Yet here you are on a site for apostates, merrily slagging off people who wished to think for themselves and claiming their brutal extermination was a good thing. You're amazing. Truly amazing.

     

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #57 - October 14, 2008, 07:24 AM


    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.



     IHS and Ansar aren't capable of embarrassment, but certainly their medication will have to be increased.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #58 - October 14, 2008, 12:52 PM


    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.



     IHS and Ansar aren't capable of embarrassment, but certainly their medication will have to be increased.


    There's nothing there that I should even be remotely embarrassed about. You, however, have a track record of not addressing issues honestly such as not facing up to the parallels between Nazism and Islam and going into denial mode. And has been mentioned before every village has one and in this case you are it. Cheesy You are basically a troll without much purpose nor much to contribute on a forum. If you are the opposite and even give a damn about at all about what this forum is trying to promote maybe you would write something of substance for once instead of being a lifelong professional goof. 
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #59 - October 14, 2008, 03:35 PM


    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.



     IHS and Ansar aren't capable of embarrassment, but certainly their medication will have to be increased.


    There's nothing there that I should even be remotely embarrassed about.



    No, of course not. Now wipe that egg off your face, or whatever it is, and keep on manning the lookout, good lad, run along now.

    Ha Ha.
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »