Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


What music are you listen...
by zeca
June 04, 2024, 03:00 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
June 03, 2024, 04:08 AM

New Britain
June 02, 2024, 05:11 PM

What's happened to the fo...
June 02, 2024, 02:12 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
June 01, 2024, 03:35 PM

General chat & discussion...
May 31, 2024, 08:51 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
May 26, 2024, 09:19 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
May 25, 2024, 05:42 AM

Is Iran/Persia going to b...
by zeca
May 20, 2024, 11:23 AM

Best Quran translation ev...
May 19, 2024, 02:20 PM

Gaza assault
May 18, 2024, 03:37 PM

Pro Israel or Pro Palesti...
May 07, 2024, 04:01 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?

 (Read 34236 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #60 - October 14, 2008, 12:00 PM

    *STRAW-MAN/IRRELEVANT NONSENSE*


    Oh really! How abut some charts and graphs which indicate those "spikes" and also the accompanying "spikes" of backlashes?


    As you are Canadian you can, perhaps, be forgiven for your ignorance of European history, and racism, but in 1918 britain could have become fascist, long before Germany did. There aren't graphs to prove that, and there may not be graphs to prove that afro-caribbean immigration produced a similar response. Yet it is evident to us as socialists what happened because we dealt with, and did our best to stop it, and we realise that is a similar thing happening now. The working-class in Europe knows better than to reproduce what has happened before, and knows better than to listen to fascists across the pond, as it were.

    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.


    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #61 - October 14, 2008, 05:52 PM

    Funnily enough the so-called working class doesn't seem to agree with your political opinions on the whole. It may be worth considering this before you set yourself up as their champion. Just sayin'.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #62 - October 14, 2008, 06:13 PM

    we have to realise our interests

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #63 - October 14, 2008, 06:46 PM

    we have to realise our interests



    How?

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #64 - October 14, 2008, 06:53 PM

    First of all by understanding what's around us and realising that its basis is in the exploitation of us by our masters -socialist education. Then we can set about replacing this type of society, only then the illusory communism of Islam we can seriously talk about about ending, but in the process of getting there have to challenge the religious outlook.

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #65 - October 14, 2008, 06:57 PM

    First of all by understanding what's around us and realising that its basis is in the exploitation of us by our masters -socialist education. Then we can set about replacing this type of society, only then the illusory communism of Islam we can seriously talk about about ending, but in the process of getting there have to challenge the religious outlook.

    Amusing take on the situation. You say "socialist education" must come first. Would you care to enlighten us as to why it is not possible to take a stance against Islamism without first engaging in socialist re-education education?

    I would have thought that one's private political opinions were not a significant factor when it comes to rational, humanist criticism of medieval ideologies.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #66 - October 14, 2008, 07:20 PM

    We don't have to, but I recommend it. We enhance our challenge to it by engaging in our critique of that society we live in itself. That only explains why a religion like Islam, which was progressive in its time but, at least, whose promulgation is now reactionary, is thriving.

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #67 - October 14, 2008, 07:31 PM

    You know I think a debate between you and IHS could be interesting. It'd certainly promote some serious discussion of various issues.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #68 - October 14, 2008, 07:31 PM

    uhhh... righteo

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #69 - October 14, 2008, 07:35 PM

    That's not a bad idea at all.  They both have strong views on socialism - one for, one against.  A one on one debate with no interjections or interruptions from other posters could be very educational for us all.

    Quote from: panoptic
    uhhh... righteo


    Good for you. Afro

    Now, I wonder will IHSoter be up for it?


    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #70 - October 14, 2008, 08:36 PM


    In a few years time the people who bought into this stupid bullshit will be wringing themselves of it, with embarrassment hopefully.



     IHS and Ansar aren't capable of embarrassment, but certainly their medication will have to be increased.


    There's nothing there that I should even be remotely embarrassed about.



    No, of course not. Now wipe that egg off your face, or whatever it is, and keep on manning the lookout, good lad, run along now.


    Well, it looks like you must have really thunked hard in getting a response like out. I can also see that you probably have no real idea what this thread is about and will just go into denial mode and then resort to diversionary tactics. So, for the record, what is your take on the Eurabia Controversy? If you have nothing outside of typing out a lot of Z's as you have in the past when it came the subject of parallels between Islam and Nazism  then why even type anything out at all? Ok, ok . . . . . . . . . I know you really harbor resentments against Baal and all that but what's stopping you from at least stating an articulated position?
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #71 - October 14, 2008, 09:57 PM

    *STRAW-MAN/IRRELEVANT NONSENSE*


    I never said that and you know it. If it is also your description of my response to you then perhaps you might be able to tell us what "straw man" I erected and how this same response is also "irrelevant". Can you do that?

    Oh really! How abut some charts and graphs which indicate those "spikes" and also the accompanying "spikes" of backlashes?


    As you are Canadian you can, perhaps, be forgiven for your ignorance of European history, and racism,


    Just what are you talking about?

    but in 1918 britain could have become fascist, long before Germany did. There aren't graphs to prove that,


    And there won't be but keep in mind that Britain's fascist movement was at it's zenith in the late 1930's and still had little public support since they were considered a bit too friendly with Germany so I really doubt that Britain would have become fascist earlier. It's from this later time frame that one is most likely to find records that can yield data.

    and there may not be graphs to prove that afro-caribbean immigration produced a similar response.

     

    I think any research into police records of post-WWII Britain might reveal enough data and anecdotal remarks to  back up a position of orchestrated violence from street gangs and post-war fascists. Hell, for that matter just look at back issues of Searchlight magazine and plenty of data is furnished to back up what is in their articles. I regarded them as a great source in compiling Nazi-Islamic collaboration in the UK.  dance

    Yet it is evident to us as socialists what happened because we dealt with, and did our best to stop it, and we realise that is a similar thing happening now.


    First of all you do not represent "socialists". You represent yourself and that was admitted to when the subject of your former moniker (third camp) came up a while back. In fact, I find this dramatically written bit of yours to be rife with a glaring inaccuracy. The role of Communists and socialists in pre-WWII Britain to fight fascism is tawdry and two-sided. There those on the Left of that time and place who were also very much for appeasement of Hitler and that includes Vanessa Redgrave's father who even campaigned for the Molotov-Rippentrop Pact. So please let's not let the rosy picture take us to such lofty heights without a parachute.

    The working-class in Europe knows better than to reproduce what has happened before,


    Uh-huh. . . Ok, let's hold it here. For starts, there is an active network of neo-Nazis and assorted rabbles of fascists in Europe and most of them are of decidedly "working class" background (of course, there are the token "rich kids" involved). In fact, they really embody the idea of a twisted lumpenproletariat and they do know how to work on an organizational level that (after all the research I have done into such groups) is highly reminiscent of leftist organizations that like to socialize around "affinity" groups.

    Decentralized yet uniformly indoctrinated (with variants) and yet having the ability to co-ordinate their actions under umbrella organizations. Which is exactly how Trots in the UK and other groups like the International Solidarity Movement work. The cross-pollination is such that it's known that the savvier jihadis have researched the tactics and strategies of both extreme rightwing and leftwing and strategies extensively for decades and it has paid off extremely well.

    This is one (of many) blindspots that leftists (most of whom can hardly be classified as "working class") didn't think about and it shows when Muslims in Europe (the majority of whom can easily be classed as "working class") take an old idea (Islam), mix it with leftist sophistry (plus some lethal organizational and operational insights), throw in a dash of anti-Semitic sentiments (appropriately applied), do meticulous research into the culture industry of the West and have an understanding of it's structural transformation far better than most leftists. So there you have it, it looks like the working-class in Europe has indeed reproduced what has happened before and then some . . .

    and knows better than to listen to fascists across the pond, as it were.


    I hope that is the case for most working class people in Europe and elsewheres but when groups like the BNP show more street aptitude than the SWP, Respect, etc. there is a huge problem that the Left cannot stop. The Left may have the upper hand in terms of making their views known in the media and distorting public perceptions but the extreme Right knows the lay of the land far better and they know how to use violence far more selectively and efficiently.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #72 - October 14, 2008, 10:12 PM

    Quote
    Face it finally boys & girls, the Gulag Archepelago is the collective monument to the atheist religion.


    So much nonsense in one sentence.  Communism does not equal atheism, and losing your religion does not mean you lose your belief in God.  Nor do most atheists feel the need to follow any particular ideology, or "church" as you call it. 

    sorry cheetah, but from where I stand I am not going to walk up to each atheist and cuddle him/her up and hold them as the unique creative individual they are. To me they are a group of people with common traits, academically you can use the new definition of 'race' to apply it on them if you are into that definition. I can call them a religion, a doctrine, an ideology, whatever group they fit in and they do fit in a groups and sub-groups. No matter how individual they like to be.

    Here is a common observation, the atheist that comes from a christian background often embraces the golden rule, the atheist that comes from islam often embraces the idea that the strongest wins.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #73 - October 14, 2008, 10:20 PM

    Quote
    Here is a common observation, the atheist that comes from a christian background often embraces the golden rule, the atheist that comes from islam often embraces the idea that the strongest wins.


    Is this your own observation ? Completely unbiased of course .  In fact Im sure its a scientifically proven fact. 

    Life is a sexually transmitted disease which is invariably fatal.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #74 - October 14, 2008, 10:51 PM

    Quote
    Here is a common observation, the atheist that comes from a christian background often embraces the golden rule, the atheist that comes from islam often embraces the idea that the strongest wins.


    Is this your own observation ? Completely unbiased of course .  In fact Im sure its a scientifically proven fact. 


    Own obbservation. Completely unbiased (Fvxk jeebus with a 10 foot pole). Not a scientific proven fact.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #75 - October 15, 2008, 12:01 AM

    I never said that and you know it. If it is also your description of my response to you then perhaps you might be able to tell us what "straw man" I erected and how this same response is also "irrelevant". Can you do that?


    That is pretty obvious to most readers.

    Just what are you talking about?


    Should be obvious too. You've already displayed your ignorance.

    I regarded them as a great source in compiling Nazi-Islamic collaboration in the UK.  dance


    Well, I think that's quite enough to disregard your views about that subject.

    Quote from: al-dickweed
    First of all you do not represent "socialists".


    It's up to the reader whether or not I do, but I am speaking from the british socialist tradition as well as i am from the (formerly) muslim one.

    Quote from: al-dickweed
    they really embody the idea of a twisted lumpenproletariat and they do know how to work on an organizational level that (after all the research I have done into such groups) is highly reminiscent of leftist organizations that like to socialize around "affinity" groups.


    You don't get the subject at all.

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #76 - October 15, 2008, 02:10 AM


    Well, it looks like you must have really thunked hard in getting a response like out. I can also see that you probably have no real idea what this thread is about and will just go into denial mode and then resort to diversionary tactics. So, for the record, what is your take on the Eurabia Controversy? If you have nothing outside of typing out a lot of Z's as you have in the past when it came the subject of parallels between Islam and Nazism  then why even type anything out at all? Ok, ok . . . . . . . . . I know you really harbor resentments against Baal and all that but what's stopping you from at least stating an articulated position?


    Patronising twat.

    I don't harbour resentment towards Baal, just think he's  an idiot and bores me to tears. Same as you.

    Seeing as we're full of good ideas for each other today, why not shut the fuck up about the Islam/Nazism crap - yawn again - oh and it wouldn't hurt of perhaps you lightened up a bit, maybe take the marrow out of your ass? Stop dressing like a woman, get out more, get a life, friends - these are but a few suggestions, plenty more if you have trouble with these, and I think you will.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #77 - October 15, 2008, 03:57 AM


    Well, it looks like you must have really thunked hard in getting a response like out. I can also see that you probably have no real idea what this thread is about and will just go into denial mode and then resort to diversionary tactics. So, for the record, what is your take on the Eurabia Controversy? If you have nothing outside of typing out a lot of Z's as you have in the past when it came the subject of parallels between Islam and Nazism  then why even type anything out at all? Ok, ok . . . . . . . . . I know you really harbor resentments against Baal and all that but what's stopping you from at least stating an articulated position?


    Patronising twat.

    I don't harbour resentment towards Baal, just think he's  an idiot and bores me to tears. Same as you.

    I did not know that little red fish with their particularly short short-term Five Seconds memory had a capacity to shed tears. A, they lack the glands for sheddingg, B they can not remember that far back to hold any emotion other then pain, hot, cold, nice, bad. I hope you are enjoying your little bowl as much as we are enjoying watching you in it Jackie Boy.

    PS: Yes, you are still in the ignore, it just that sometimes, I get this hunch, and yes again, my hunch is almost always wrong, your posts are almost always boring.


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #78 - October 15, 2008, 12:38 PM

    I hope you are enjoying your little bowl as much as we are enjoying watching you in it Jackie Boy.

    PS: Yes, you are still in the ignore, it just that sometimes, I get this hunch, and yes again, my hunch is almost always wrong, your posts are almost always boring.




    Please save me from the bowl oh brave ones Cheesy


    It's ignore or not ignore, typical of you not to put your money where your mouth is -  and I don't want to go there, sorry about that.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #79 - October 15, 2008, 05:01 PM

    Gentlemen, would all of you please use your ignore lists before the staff find it necessary to get all smitey?

    Kthnx. Smiley

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #80 - October 15, 2008, 08:55 PM

    I never said that and you know it. If it is also your description of my response to you then perhaps you might be able to tell us what "straw man" I erected and how this same response is also "irrelevant". Can you do that?


    That is pretty obvious to most readers.


    Really? I haven't read anything from "most readers" about that so perhaps you can tell me what's so "obvious".

    Just what are you talking about?


    Should be obvious too. You've already displayed your ignorance.


    So, in your mind being Canadian would show that I have no idea at all about European history (much less the UK)? Would that apply to Americans, Australians, New Zealanders,  Tahitians and residents of the Kamchatka peninsula as well? If such is the case perhaps you might have enough kindness in your heart to inform us where I have displayed what you term "ignorance".

    I regarded them as a great source in compiling Nazi-Islamic collaboration in the UK.  dance


    Well, I think that's quite enough to disregard your views about that subject.


    And how so? Is it because the staff at Searchlight magazine doesn't meet your requirements of what it takes to be deemed a socialist? Cheesy

    Quote from: Ansar al-Zindiqi
    First of all you do not represent "socialists".


    It's up to the reader whether or not I do,


    And if the "reader" follows the back and forth exchanges we've had on this forum they would be educating themselves of the fact that you do not represent "socialists".

    but I am speaking from the british socialist tradition as well as i am from the (formerly) muslim one.


    And both of those traditions have plenty of tawdry details that are best kept in the closet. That is unless you want to air them out publicly on this board. But nonetheless I thank you for bringing that up since it evokes Baal's earlier statement (make of it what you will) that:

    Quote
    Here is a common observation, the atheist that comes from a christian background often embraces the golden rule, the atheist that comes from islam often embraces the idea that the strongest wins.


    Quote from: Ansar al-Zindiqi
    they really embody the idea of a twisted lumpenproletariat and they do know how to work on an organizational level that (after all the research I have done into such groups) is highly reminiscent of leftist organizations that like to socialize around "affinity" groups.


    You don't get the subject at all.


    Oh yes I do. The upshot to what I've been typing about in my last posting to you is that one does not need to resort to the Eurabia thesis at all to discern a pattern of concerted behavior within the ummah that works towards ultimately dominating all non-Muslim societies (as well as Europe). One can read Muslims sources as well be at least somewhat familiar with Critical Theory (which is decidedly "leftist" and which you display no comprehension of), the history of early fascism as well as the nature of various insurgencies and cults.

    Your making the claim that the working class of Europe will prevent any sort of fascistic revival is blunted by the very existence of a global network of neo-Nazis and fascists (which is quite evident in Europe) as well as the fact that many a working class Muslim finds such ideas more than a little attractive and that ideas from both the extreme Left and extreme Right have been learned by jihadis and those lesson have been learned and put into action by them.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #81 - October 15, 2008, 09:26 PM

    Patronising twat.


    Good start. Please carry on. . . .

    I don't harbour resentment towards Baal, just think he's  an idiot and bores me to tears. Same as you.

     

    So you don't harbour resentment towards Baal and I but you just think that we're "idiots" and that we "bore" you "to tears"? Well, hot diggety! I think that's known as a contradictory statement. grin12

    Seeing as we're full of good ideas for each other today, why not shut the fuck up about the Islam/Nazism crap


    Well, I won't and as long as I live I'll see those parallels and talk and write about them as well as encourage others to understand that what we are facing nowadays with Islam may be horrible but it isn't totally unprecedented. Nobody is going to stop me and that includes you.

    - yawn again - oh and it wouldn't hurt of perhaps you lightened up a bit, maybe take the marrow out of your ass? Stop dressing like a woman, get out more, get a life, friends - these are but a few suggestions, plenty more if you have trouble with these, and I think you will.


    So that's you idea of "lightening up"? In fact, I'm feeling very tranquil as of late and so I have no need to do any of those things. In fact, yawning is known to be contagious but it has to be overcome and your efforts to shut down my right to speak my mind is something that everybody here should take note of.

    Look Jack.  . . . . . for what it's worth freedom of speech is a very profound and relevant concept and a right that nobody here is in the mood to give up on. Maybe you have decided to not exercise that right. After all, I did ask you to at least state an articulated position and you haven't so I'll ask you another question: Why are to trying to stop me (as well as others) from discussing Nazi-Islamic connections as well as the Eurabia controversy? Is it too much for you that others find it worthwhile to explore such subjects? If it is then I'd say your presence here is unneccessary but then again I'm not a moderator but I really can't see much in the way of positive contributions from you when you resort to such tactics to stifle debate and discussions on such matters.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #82 - October 15, 2008, 10:21 PM



    Well, if I don't represent socialists, then where that leaves you with your biggotry, racist immigration theories, baying for blood, fantasizing about another inquisition...? Well, it is pretty obvious where you're really coming from.

     whistling2

    "...every imperfection in man is a bond with heaven..." - Karl Marx
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #83 - October 15, 2008, 10:55 PM



    Well, if I don't represent socialists, then where that leaves you with your biggotry, racist immigration theories, baying for blood, fantasizing about another inquisition...? Well, it is pretty obvious where you're really coming from.

     whistling2

    dickweed..biggotry..racist..baying for blood..inquisition.. can you ease up on the personal attacks and address points instead? you are not a jack torrance (not even close), you actually have no fear of putting your ideas out in the open and face the music, I respect that so plz do not pick up bad habits from our resident contrarian (..basement troll).

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #84 - October 16, 2008, 01:59 AM

    blah blah blah Jack Torrance...blah blah blah Jack Torrance,  all pay homage to Torrance...blah...suck my cock, please, please, blah blah blah


    Someone's a trifle obsessed me thinks.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #85 - October 16, 2008, 09:15 AM

    These kind of replies from panoptic and Jack Torrance are incredibly ignorant and if it continues it puts the credibility of this site into question. Don't even worry about ownership of the domain name but worry about the credibility of this site going down the drain faster than a certain personality saying "Muslims are not human".
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #86 - October 16, 2008, 12:36 PM

    These kind of replies from panoptic and Jack Torrance are incredibly ignorant and if it continues it puts the credibility of this site into question. Don't even worry about ownership of the domain name but worry about the credibility of this site going down the drain faster than a certain personality saying "Muslims are not human".



    Yes, yes, it's terribly worrying whistling2

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #87 - October 16, 2008, 01:40 PM

    Quote
    The upshot to what I've been typing about in my last posting to you is that one does not need to resort to the Eurabia thesis at all to discern a pattern of concerted behavior within the ummah that works towards ultimately dominating all non-Muslim societies (as well as Europe). One can read Muslims sources as well be at least somewhat familiar with Critical Theory (which is decidedly "leftist" and which you display no comprehension of), the history of early fascism as well as the nature of various insurgencies and cults.

     

    Ansar al-Zindiqi,

    I agree with your statements, and I want to add my own observations. The right-wing groups in Turkey, either in Islamist or nationalist hues, express sympathy for the Nazis quite often. One would think they can get along pretty well with each other, fighting against the common enemy, i.e. Jews, homosexuals, decadent Western liberals, etc. In some contexts nationalist mythos supplants Islamic elements, but in other contexts, nationalism and religion augment each other.

    Muslim apologists, irrespective of their levels of education, are extremely hypocritical about Islamic imperialism. A certain nostalgia exists about "our glorious forefathers" who were "great conquerors, who seized all the lands they attacked." Any blasphemy against this mythological past is met with extreme distrust and xenophobia. For example, some Muslim apologists are so hypocritical that they can label the Armenian Genocide "an imperialist deception" in cold blood.

    PS: Nice to see you again.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #88 - October 16, 2008, 05:38 PM

    Quote
    The upshot to what I've been typing about in my last posting to you is that one does not need to resort to the Eurabia thesis at all to discern a pattern of concerted behavior within the ummah that works towards ultimately dominating all non-Muslim societies (as well as Europe). One can read Muslims sources as well be at least somewhat familiar with Critical Theory (which is decidedly "leftist" and which you display no comprehension of), the history of early fascism as well as the nature of various insurgencies and cults.

     

    Ansar al-Zindiqi,

    I agree with your statements, and I want to add my own observations. The right-wing groups in Turkey, either in Islamist or nationalist hues, express sympathy for the Nazis quite often. One would think they can get along pretty well with each other, fighting against the common enemy, i.e. Jews, homosexuals, decadent Western liberals, etc. In some contexts nationalist mythos supplants Islamic elements, but in other contexts, nationalism and religion augment each other.

    Muslim apologists, irrespective of their levels of education, are extremely hypocritical about Islamic imperialism. A certain nostalgia exists about "our glorious forefathers" who were "great conquerors, who seized all the lands they attacked." Any blasphemy against this mythological past is met with extreme distrust and xenophobia. For example, some Muslim apologists are so hypocritical that they can label the Armenian Genocide "an imperialist deception" in cold blood.

    PS: Nice to see you again.

    Interesting to observe you lot flexing your  (cerebral) muscles. However one must exercise caution when calling upon these sources. Please remember the Armenian holocaust for what it was , the military alliance betwixt Germany and Turkey in the War to End All Wars and the ensuing conflagration 20 years later. Pragmatism rules.

    Religion is ignorance giftwrapped in lyricism.
  • Re: "The 'Eurabia' myth"-debunked?
     Reply #89 - October 17, 2008, 02:20 AM

    Quote
    The upshot to what I've been typing about in my last posting to you is that one does not need to resort to the Eurabia thesis at all to discern a pattern of concerted behavior within the ummah that works towards ultimately dominating all non-Muslim societies (as well as Europe). One can read Muslims sources as well be at least somewhat familiar with Critical Theory (which is decidedly "leftist" and which you display no comprehension of), the history of early fascism as well as the nature of various insurgencies and cults.

     

    Ansar al-Zindiqi,

    I agree with your statements, and I want to add my own observations. The right-wing groups in Turkey, either in Islamist or nationalist hues, express sympathy for the Nazis quite often. One would think they can get along pretty well with each other, fighting against the common enemy, i.e. Jews, homosexuals, decadent Western liberals, etc. In some contexts nationalist mythos supplants Islamic elements, but in other contexts, nationalism and religion augment each other.

    Muslim apologists, irrespective of their levels of education, are extremely hypocritical about Islamic imperialism. A certain nostalgia exists about "our glorious forefathers" who were "great conquerors, who seized all the lands they attacked." Any blasphemy against this mythological past is met with extreme distrust and xenophobia. For example, some Muslim apologists are so hypocritical that they can label the Armenian Genocide "an imperialist deception" in cold blood.

    PS: Nice to see you again.

    Interesting to observe you lot flexing your  (cerebral) muscles. However one must exercise caution when calling upon these sources. Please remember the Armenian holocaust for what it was , the military alliance betwixt Germany and Turkey in the War to End All Wars and the ensuing conflagration 20 years later. Pragmatism rules.

    Pragmatism always rules of course. But. the question is when some some blood-thirsty pragmatist decided to genocide some people, why was the cost for him to pick the genocide option even available on the table? Why was the option made so cheap for him that to go ahead with murder was the best option?

    What mechanisms were available at the time that allowed the genocide to become a pragmatic choice?

    I mean let's be clear here. At what point is it the pragmatic option for me to kill you and take your wallet? Is it when your wallet has a certain sum? Is it when I know I can get away with it and end up with a profit? Why did the Turks have such an easy time genociding people? Why we allowed them to end up with a profit?


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »