Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Today at 05:30 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
Today at 12:35 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 12:31 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
December 28, 2024, 01:33 PM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
December 27, 2024, 12:20 PM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Berlin car crasher
by zeca
December 21, 2024, 11:10 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Alan Hart on Zionism

 (Read 11139 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #30 - January 27, 2009, 01:05 AM

    Quote
    I agree that a two-state solution should be found.  I've always believed that pre-1967 Israel should be for the Israelis and Gaza & the West Bank should be for the Palestinians.  Too bad religion got dragged into the conflict tho'.


    So then you yourself are a Zionist, Nour.  Zionism = the belief that the Jews should have a homeland of their own. 


    Yes I'm a Zionist as well but if you listened to the Left, the Nazis, the Islamists and people like Turquoise you would think that Zionism was some kind of deeply sinister cult, the enemy of all mankind.

    Zionism is actually a quite reasonable position. So there are some fanatics involved but for Islamists, the far Left and the far Right to condemn Zionism because of the fanatics is like Mr Kipling condemning Cadbury's for making sweet things.

    Turquoise, yes there is a Jewish Lobby, yes they have some influence but just look at the influence the Islamic nations have at the UN. There is nothing sinister about the Jewish Lobby. They lobby to get support for Israel and they are pushing at an open door because most American politicians whether secular or religious happen to see Israel as a liberal democracy surrounded by fanatics and tyrants not a pariah state that likes to kill innocent civilians and drink their blood.

    Yes if you buy into the Elders of Zion type conspiracy theory and see Israel as a child murdering genocidal apartheid state then the Jewish Lobby will look decidedly like the evil puppet masters of the world but you would have to be a nasty little racist to get that far down that primrose road of delusion without snapping back to reality.

    Why does the idea of Jews lobbying for support for Israel bother you so much. Is it sinister that Jews are doing the lobbying? Perhaps you are one of these people who thinks that Israel should be left friendless and without aid? Maybe you would like to see Israels F16's confiscated and them given muskets to defend Israel with!!

    You act as if you are just a concerned humanitarian looking objectively at just one more conflict and coming to your own conclusion but it is quite obvious that you are in the camp of Israel haters who condemns Israel for it's military action more than you would dream of condemning Mugabe or the regime in Sudan.

    You are either an undercover Islamist, an antisemite or an anti imperialist Leftist who has the simplistic Star Wars view of the world. Empire against Rebels. The noble third world against the malign American, Israeli, Western European reich.

    By the way you accuse me of working myself into a rage when I'm posting speeded up versions of anti Israel demonstrations with the Benny Hill theme tune and busting my chops with laughter at the idea that Jews own the banks and the media.

    No mate your antisemitic theorising concerns me but you do not have the power to enrage me.

     parrot 

  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #31 - January 27, 2009, 08:28 AM

    I agree with a lot of what you've posted above.  However, Israel is there to stay, whether you, Alan Hart and the ultra Orthodox Jewish fundies like it or not.  Fantasizing about eradicating Israel is just pie in the sky, the most realistic solution is the two state solution with Israel within its 1967 borders.



    Yep. But even that, the Israelis will not ever allow.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #32 - January 27, 2009, 08:30 AM



    Yes I'm a Zionist as well but if you listened to the Left, the Nazis, the Islamists and people like Turquoise you would think that Zionism was some kind of deeply sinister cult, the enemy of all mankind.




    How ridiculous 'mate'.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #33 - January 27, 2009, 08:39 AM

    I agree with a lot of what you've posted above.  However, Israel is there to stay, whether you, Alan Hart and the ultra Orthodox Jewish fundies like it or not.  Fantasizing about eradicating Israel is just pie in the sky, the most realistic solution is the two state solution with Israel within its 1967 borders.



    Yep. But even that, the Israelis will not ever allow.

    I think they'll have to sooner or later. Mind you it will require Hamas et al giving up the rockets and shit as well.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #34 - January 27, 2009, 08:59 AM

    I agree with a lot of what you've posted above.  However, Israel is there to stay, whether you, Alan Hart and the ultra Orthodox Jewish fundies like it or not.  Fantasizing about eradicating Israel is just pie in the sky, the most realistic solution is the two state solution with Israel within its 1967 borders.



    Yep. But even that, the Israelis will not ever allow.

    I think they'll have to sooner or later. Mind you it will require Hamas et al giving up the rockets and shit as well.



    I'm afraid Os, this is one of those wounds that will never heal. Possibly the biggest mistake of the 20th century that will go on haunting the world until the bitter end. People can't even discuss it on forums without issuing death threats, accusing people of racism and all sorts - and we're cyber space - what hope?. Cry

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #35 - January 27, 2009, 09:01 AM

    Well the Irish got sick of the bullshit eventually and they're supposed to be dumber than everyone.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #36 - January 27, 2009, 09:35 AM

    Quote
    I agree that a two-state solution should be found.  I've always believed that pre-1967 Israel should be for the Israelis and Gaza & the West Bank should be for the Palestinians.  Too bad religion got dragged into the conflict tho'.


    So then you yourself are a Zionist, Nour.  Zionism = the belief that the Jews should have a homeland of their own. 


    Yes I'm a Zionist as well but if you listened to the Left, the Nazis, the Islamists and people like Turquoise you would think that Zionism was some kind of deeply sinister cult, the enemy of all mankind.

    Zionism is actually a quite reasonable position. So there are some fanatics involved but for Islamists, the far Left and the far Right to condemn Zionism because of the fanatics is like Mr Kipling condemning Cadbury's for making sweet things.

    Turquoise, yes there is a Jewish Lobby, yes they have some influence but just look at the influence the Islamic nations have at the UN. There is nothing sinister about the Jewish Lobby. They lobby to get support for Israel and they are pushing at an open door because most American politicians whether secular or religious happen to see Israel as a liberal democracy surrounded by fanatics and tyrants not a pariah state that likes to kill innocent civilians and drink their blood.

    Yes if you buy into the Elders of Zion type conspiracy theory and see Israel as a child murdering genocidal apartheid state then the Jewish Lobby will look decidedly like the evil puppet masters of the world but you would have to be a nasty little racist to get that far down that primrose road of delusion without snapping back to reality.

    Why does the idea of Jews lobbying for support for Israel bother you so much. Is it sinister that Jews are doing the lobbying? Perhaps you are one of these people who thinks that Israel should be left friendless and without aid? Maybe you would like to see Israels F16's confiscated and them given muskets to defend Israel with!!

    You act as if you are just a concerned humanitarian looking objectively at just one more conflict and coming to your own conclusion but it is quite obvious that you are in the camp of Israel haters who condemns Israel for it's military action more than you would dream of condemning Mugabe or the regime in Sudan.

    You are either an undercover Islamist, an antisemite or an anti imperialist Leftist who has the simplistic Star Wars view of the world. Empire against Rebels. The noble third world against the malign American, Israeli, Western European reich.

    By the way you accuse me of working myself into a rage when I'm posting speeded up versions of anti Israel demonstrations with the Benny Hill theme tune and busting my chops with laughter at the idea that Jews own the banks and the media.

    No mate your antisemitic theorising concerns me but you do not have the power to enrage me.

     parrot 




    I don't have to explain myself to you.  But for the benefit of the other people of the forum, here is my position on the subject:

    In theory, I am not against Jews having a piece of land, I have defended that stance for years. The problem is their attitude towards it. For them that land is holy, in fact we could say for them that land is God. Yes, for many zionists, the transcendent God of the Torah is gone and they want something concrete. The problem with this is that this type of ideology is invariably dangerous, just like the Islamic ideology is dangerous. It's yet another 'the end justifies the means' doctrine.

    What is more holy, a human life or a piece of land? As long as the answer for them(both) is the latter, there will be no peace. I can give you my humble prediction of what will happen: things won't get any better in that region, if fact, they may get worse due to their refusal to compromise. The Muslim world might get united (Sunnies and Shias) in order to hit Israel. America will probably attack Iran and the other countries in the region. It could very well be of Armageddon proportions.

    What I see is two dangerous ideologies living side by side and it saddens me to see that innocent people of both sides are dying to suit the agendas of their religions and leaders.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #37 - January 27, 2009, 09:58 AM

    I agree with a lot of what you've posted above.  However, Israel is there to stay, whether you, Alan Hart and the ultra Orthodox Jewish fundies like it or not.  Fantasizing about eradicating Israel is just pie in the sky, the most realistic solution is the two state solution with Israel within its 1967 borders.



    Yep. But even that, the Israelis will not ever allow.

    I think they'll have to sooner or later. Mind you it will require Hamas et al giving up the rockets and shit as well.



    I'm afraid Os, this is one of those wounds that will never heal. Possibly the biggest mistake of the 20th century that will go on haunting the world until the bitter end. People can't even discuss it on forums without issuing death threats, accusing people of racism and all sorts - and we're cyber space - what hope?. Cry


    Hello Jack, I totally agree  Smiley
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #38 - January 27, 2009, 10:30 AM

    Quote
    I agree that a two-state solution should be found.  I've always believed that pre-1967 Israel should be for the Israelis and Gaza & the West Bank should be for the Palestinians.  Too bad religion got dragged into the conflict tho'.


    So then you yourself are a Zionist, Nour.  Zionism = the belief that the Jews should have a homeland of their own. 


    No, I am not.  Read my post again Cheetah.  I said that Israel should have a right to exist within it's pre-1967 borders.  This means that whilst I do believe that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland, so do the Palestinians.  The Zionists don't believe that Palestine should even exist.  Ergo, I am NOT a Zionist.

    Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

    The sleeper has awakened -  Dune

    Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish!
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #39 - January 27, 2009, 01:16 PM

    Quote
    I agree that a two-state solution should be found.  I've always believed that pre-1967 Israel should be for the Israelis and Gaza & the West Bank should be for the Palestinians.  Too bad religion got dragged into the conflict tho'.


    So then you yourself are a Zionist, Nour.  Zionism = the belief that the Jews should have a homeland of their own. 


    No, I am not.  Read my post again Cheetah.  I said that Israel should have a right to exist within it's pre-1967 borders.  This means that whilst I do believe that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland, so do the Palestinians.  The Zionists don't believe that Palestine should even exist.  Ergo, I am NOT a Zionist.


    The traditional definition of Zionism is a person who believes in the right of the Jews to a homeland of their own, regardless of location or borders.  Zionist seems to have changed into a smear word in some quarters by becoming associated with people who have more sinister ambitions than just a country where the Jews can do their own thing in peace.

    Maybe now Bush has gone the US administration will put pressure on for a negotiated settlement.  We can always hope anyway.....


    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #40 - January 27, 2009, 01:18 PM



    No, I am not.  Read my post again Cheetah.  I said that Israel should have a right to exist within it's pre-1967 borders.  This means that whilst I do believe that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland, so do the Palestinians.  The Zionists don't believe that Palestine should even exist.  Ergo, I am NOT a Zionist.


    The traditional definition of Zionism is a person who believes in the right of the Jews to a homeland of their own, regardless of location or borders.  Zionist seems to have changed into a smear word in some quarters by becoming associated with people who have more sinister ambitions than just a country where the Jews can do their own thing in peace.

    Maybe now Bush has gone the US administration will put pressure on for a negotiated settlement.  We can always hope anyway.....




    I'm with cheetah, it does make you a zionist by the proper difinition, not the smear campaign attached to the name.

    I guess that makes me one too, since I agree with pre 1967 borders.


    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #41 - January 27, 2009, 07:19 PM

    We can rename this place the Council Of Zionists.  bunny

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #42 - January 27, 2009, 07:35 PM

    I really stay away from the word "Zionist" and anything derived from it. It's not a very precise term, and it mostly just arouses emotions rather than understanding.

    "Poor human nature, what horrible crimes have been committed in thy name!"
    - Emma Goldman
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #43 - January 27, 2009, 08:11 PM

    Okay then, I am a Zionist who also believes in a homeland for the Palestinians.

     thnkyu

    Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

    The sleeper has awakened -  Dune

    Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish!
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #44 - January 27, 2009, 08:16 PM

    Okay then, I am a Zionist who also believes in a homeland for the Palestinians.

     thnkyu


    Me too.  I think most people are, its just interesting the way Zionist has been twisted into a new smear word. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #45 - January 27, 2009, 08:30 PM

    Something for all you wild-eyed conspiracy theorists out there!, did you know Atheism is a Jewish plot



     Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

    I was not blessed with the ability to have blind faith. I cant beleive something just because someone says its true.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #46 - January 28, 2009, 07:49 AM

    Okay then, I am a Zionist who also believes in a homeland for the Palestinians.

     thnkyu


    Me too.  I think most people are, its just interesting the way Zionist has been twisted into a new smear word. 


    blame the Israelis, they'll give a bad name to whatever you like.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #47 - January 29, 2009, 12:55 AM

    We can all agree that Israel has done some very bad things in their history but they are nothing when compared to the imperialism of the Ottoman Empire or the murderous suppression of the Palestinians by Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Kuwait.

    No righteous Left wing activists or Muslim protesters talks about Black September (Google it), no "peace" protesters stormed the Kuwaiti embassy after the Gulf War.

    Arafat even said that the Kuwaitis killed more Palestinians in the wake of the first Gulf war than Israel ever did but it's Israel that upsets everyone.

    Arab armies can gun down Palestinian women and children in cold blood and there are no middle class Lefties and Islamist thugs rioting in the streets.

    This is proof positive that it's not a humanitarian desire to help the poor Palestinians which provokes such a response it's a bigoted hate of Israel, America and the West which gets the mob frothing at the mouth.

    The only explanation is for this is that they are either antisemitic conspiracy theorists/islamists or they are deluded and simplistic anti imperialist wing nuts. The scary thing is this is a bloody big constituency and so many sensible people are quite happy to follow the rabble.

    It's funny how people are super sensitive about not demonising Muslims as people and we are always reminded not to say the Palestinians are genocidal right wing racist theocrats but that Hamas is.

    But no one has corrected this statement "blame the Israelis, they'll give a bad name to whatever you like"

    If you are not being a bigot shouldn't that read "Blame Likud, they'll give a bad name to whatever you like"

    Or "Blame the messianic settlers, they'll give a bad name to whatever you like"

    But to blame a whole nation screams bigotry and the fact that that statement has just stood unchallenged for days just goes to show how screwed up our discourse is.

    If I was to say that "Palestinians are racist genocidal bigots" I would be rightfully reprimanded and condemned quickly by most posters on this forum but if I was to say that "Americans are fat, stupid and arrogant" or "Israelis are racist bigoted oppressors" I'm far less likely to be challenged.

    It seems racism and bigotry is much more acceptable as long as it's aimed at the right targets.

    Well I suppose it's understandable, this is the eternal battle between good and evil after all. Darth Vader and the Death Star against Luke Skywalker and the plucky Rebels.

    When the world looks like that I spose a little bit of bigotry directed at Darth and his evil war machine is cool.
     
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #48 - January 29, 2009, 05:53 AM

    Aye. There is an element of that involved for sure.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #49 - January 29, 2009, 02:25 PM


    It seems racism and bigotry is much more acceptable as long as it's aimed at the right targets.




    It seems so, and so is hatred and vengeance, when directed at the right targets (name your own favourite serial killer/Paedo) - it's a human trait Mr Pig.

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #50 - January 29, 2009, 02:37 PM


    It seems racism and bigotry is much more acceptable as long as it's aimed at the right targets.




    It seems so, and so is hatred and vengeance, when directed at the right targets (name your own favourite serial killer/Paedo) - it's a human trait Mr Pig.



    Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now you have lost the plot. Oh dear
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #51 - January 29, 2009, 09:15 PM

    It might have been better to request elucidation.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #52 - January 30, 2009, 08:46 AM

    It might have been better to request elucidation.




    He's already taken it, that's why he's gone all funny Smiley

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #53 - January 30, 2009, 08:52 AM

    Haven't tried that one. Is it legal?

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #54 - January 30, 2009, 08:54 AM

    Haven't tried that one. Is it legal?



    As long as the user is under 18, and this surely must be the case with Miss Piggy Smiley

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #55 - January 30, 2009, 08:56 AM

    Damn. That rules me out then. I haven't been 18 for ages.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #56 - February 01, 2009, 04:48 AM

    I just found out that Alan Hart has a TV show on Iran's Press TV.


    He recently interviewed Reverend Stephen Sizer who cites American evangelical Dale Crowley after about four minutes.

    Dale Crowley's anti-Israel radio talk show (Crowley's Spotlight on Israel, with a nod and a wink to the fascist magazine Spotlight) was recently taken off the air, as it was considered hateful. Crowley is well-respected in the Christian Identity movement, a racist and antisemitic Christian cult popular in the USA.

    Dale Crowley participated in the Barnes Review conference, at which participants denied that Holocaust took place.

    The Leftist anti Israel buffoons like George Galloway and Alan Hart who seem to be in the pay of the right wing theocratic tyranny in Tehran always end up linking with the ideas of the holocaust denying right wing nutters in Europe and America at some point.

    These people are totally deranged, degenerate and shouldn't be taken seriously as impartial commentators. They are fully paid up anti western lunatics of the third degree and Turquoise is citing Alan Hart as someone we should take seriously. Please.   
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #57 - February 01, 2009, 08:52 AM

    Dale Crowley participated in the Barnes Review conference, at which participants denied that Holocaust took place.




    You go along with this forbidden questioning of history do you? I tell you what, just like nut-case jew haters will hang on to the coat tails of those that that question the holocaust academically, you are one of those who hang onto the guy in front who go's around smearing peoples names with anti-semitic comments. You're no worse than the worst of the racsists/nazis - and all those other names you so love to label others by. The simple question is, do you value free speech or not?

    Ha Ha.
  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #58 - February 01, 2009, 02:50 PM

    Yes I value free speech, Alan Hart, George Galloway and their cronies are free to glorify Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah and Hamas and condemn Israel as a demonic state and I'm free to call them deluded, degenerate, anti Western nutters who make common cause with rightwingers of the most egregious kind.

    That is free speech in action.

    Once again Jack you seem to be making accusations you can't back up. When did I call for an end to free speech?

  • Re: Alan Hart on Zionism
     Reply #59 - February 02, 2009, 08:48 AM

    When did I call for an end to free speech?





    When you make it clear there are idiots out there like you who will twist peoples words and smear them to such an extent that they don't speak up, that's when. Now run along and play in the shit, good boy.

    Ha Ha.
  • Previous page 1 23 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »